Vaccine Ingredients: What You Should Know
Your agenda is exactly this, editor no identity Costner!
The shearing of the vaccines are good for me - brainwashed sheeple. Lets take a look at some more of the mind-boggling misinformation they have been fed.
And this "Costner" fool continues to create blog page after blog page, personally attacking me with endless lying misrepresentations of what I represent and have shown him repeatedly. All of it remaining from a status of him having no identity and with me having full identity. How honorable and credible is all that! Biased to the corrupt core. After such attacks he then refuses to publish the replies from me, wow. He instead twists and lies about what was in them.
He starts out again making this comment: Most vaccination conspiracy theorists have a habit of tossing out random statements to try and paint vaccines as harmful, even when it is blatantly obvious they have no idea what they are talking about....
As for your your repeated references to vaccine truth promoters as being only, "Vaccine conspiracy theorists". Hey, editor Costner... here's a clue... its NOT all just a theory; and never was - it is all directly provable.
I could only laugh at how increasingly desperate and ridiculous he is and remains. Well, lets actually go see here who it is that blatantly and obviously has no idea what they are talking about!
My reply posted to his blog!
You have really out done yourself this time as to your stupidity, denial, and refusal to accept the facts and that of toxicology science, Costner. How many related studies have I shown you and linked you to alias Costner; they are many. Nothing would be enough. Your blog page makes me want to gag, it is again so completely full of misinformation. You know better, yet keep on lying; just like your recent very pathetic showing on the Argus.
And YOU as well see no difference whatsoever between the effect of ingesting a substance and it being handled by the natural and primary and then secondary defense mechanisms of the body; verses injecting that same substance and bypassing the primary defenses of the human body. It simply does not get any more ignorant than that.
Where is the actual peer reviewed science in your 2 articles. All those are for the most part again, are just conflict of interest filled claims being made, with nothing to back it up for proof.
Here is one of the significant problems. Childrens Hospitals, Paul Offit obviously does not have even a basic and proper understand of the immune system; nor the Th1 and Th2 immune system defense mechanisms. He does not understand toxicology, nor care: otherwise he wouldn't have claimed that children can safely tolerate 10,000 vaccines. If that were true then he should be able to start out with 100 vaccines and prove his claim. If he gets to sick to show up for work, we know he lied. And the parents will want pictures as proof that he is still healthy and functioning. A complete physical and a common full panel blood work up will also be proper proof of his post vaccinated health; done by an independent medical facility.
Let me know when you have contacted Paul Offit about putting his own body to that vaccine test. I await his response and your notification of what that was!. If he refuses to respond, then I will expect you Costner to prove Mr. Offits claims; which you easily could do if you chose to volunteer. It just may become world wide news as to the outcome. I will make sure the CDC is contacted about it. Otherwise if you refuse, everything Offit claims to remains clearly disputed and discredited; standing as well on an insane comment and claim like that.
End of that reply.
You want the truth, it's is there and easily found! Step outside the (that) box and learn. Think for yourself.
Vaccine Ingredients, far better information than Offit has ever had!
So how does a mother feel when her baby is dead from vaccines and all she hears from doctors, the government and media is that vaccines are safe and effective?
Doctors denying Vaccine Risks An American Tragedy, April 25, 2011
So, lets look at one of the two sources of claimed vaccine ingredients safety information linked to in Costner's said blog page. http://www.chop.edu/service/vaccine-education-center/home.html
And here: How much actual proof of his claims science do you see in those links? That is a pretty poor showing if you ask me. How much science do you see here of the opposite effect as to those issues and the toxicity of vaccines?
Here again is one of the false hero's!
Paul For Profit Offit, the CDC spokesman of Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Dr. Paul Offit of the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia earned millions of dollars as part of a $182-million sale by the hospital of its worldwide royalty interest in the Merck Rotateq vaccine. The amount of income distributed to Offit could be as high as $46 million. Offit has refused to say how much he made from the vaccine.
The high price placed on the patents raises concerns over Offit’s use of his former position on the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) to help create the market for rotavirus vaccine -- effectively, to vote himself rich.
Offit’s claim to a share of the profits from Rotateq revenues is based on his role as a listed inventor on the cluster of patents that protect Merck’s vaccine. Paul Offit had a great personal interest in Rotateq’s commercial success, and more than any other individual in the world he found himself in a position to directly influence that success.
Unlike most other patented products, the market for mandated childhood vaccines is created by the recommendation of an appointed body, ACIP. From 1998 to 2003, Offit served as a member of ACIP.
How Independent Are Vaccine Defenders? More information on on Mr. Paul Offit.
They're some of the most trusted voices in the defense of vaccine safety: the American Academy of Pediatrics, Every Child By Two, and pediatrician Dr. Paul Offit.
But CBS News has found these three have something more in common - strong financial ties to the industry whose products they promote and defend.
The vaccine industry gives millions to the Academy of Pediatrics for conferences, grants, medical education classes and even helped build their headquarters. The totals are kept secret, but public documents reveal bits and pieces.
A $342,000 payment from Wyeth, maker of the pneumococcal vaccine - which makes $2 billion a year in sales.
A $433,000 contribution from Merck, the same year the academy endorsed Merck's HPV vaccine - which made $1.5 billion a year in sales.
Another top donor: Sanofi Aventis, maker of 17 vaccines and a new five-in-one combo shot just added to the childhood vaccine schedule last month.
Every Child By Two, a group that promotes early immunization for all children, admits the group takes money from the vaccine industry, too - but wouldn't tell us how much.
A spokesman told CBS News: "There are simply no conflicts to be unearthed." But guess who's listed as the group's treasurers? Officials from Wyeth and a paid advisor to big pharmaceutical clients.
Then there's Paul Offit, perhaps the most widely-quoted defender of vaccine safety.
He's gone so far as to say babies can tolerate "10,000 vaccines at once."
This is how Offit described himself in a previous interview: "I'm the chief of infectious disease at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and a professor of pediatrics at Penn's medical school," he said.
Offit was not willing to be interviewed on this subject but like others in this CBS News investigation, he has strong industry ties. In fact, he's a vaccine industry insider.
Offit holds in a $1.5 million dollar research chair at Children's Hospital, funded by Merck.
How Independent Are Vaccine Defenders?
Did you hear that? (55 vaccines given by age 6). Insanity!
Paul Offit – “Doctor of Vaccine Profit” Caught Lying – Again –
Paul A. Offit, MD
Chief, Division of Infectious Diseases
Director, Vaccine Education Center
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Here you can see how lying and selectively ignorant Costner again became on the Argus Leader, Sioux Falls SD. This is how he operates, total denial of all, in any way that can be made; no matter how actually uneducated and selectively in denial he is. His game is to try and keep people believing all the common and false propaganda filled misinformation. To much to lose. He attempted in his reply to post a link to his said blog on me with my name in the url. As it only amounted to a personal attack, The Argus deleted it; so he put it back in a reply with short link and that reply post was again removed. How desperate is all that, and all of it in a repeatedly failed attempt to shut down the truth and attack anyone that puts it forth.
Tiny shot in the arm poised to tame three strains of flu
Blogging editor, alias Costner's 3rd grade picture!
Do your next blog page on this below information, editor Costner! Or START revising the one you have.
Maybe you should have researched your information from some other source than Paul (to much to lose and LYING) Offit??? Pig DNA/virus found in Rotarix and again the FDA did nothing; did you review that information? No, not likely, your buddies Paul Offit and David (ilk) Gorski, didn't think it was important.
Aluminum in Vaccines: Where Are the Safety Studies?
Since the 1930s vaccine makers have been using aluminum as an adjuvant in vaccines. However, from what I’ve been able to gather over years of researching vaccines and vaccinations, there doesn’t seem to be studies determining aluminum safety issues. If such studies exist, I hereby request the U.S. CDC and FDA please publish them and supply me with a copy, as I’d love to ‘digest’ and dissect them.
As a matter of fact, when Congressman Dan Burton held his vaccine-autism link hearings from 1999-2004, the question that FDA was asked repeatedly was, Where are your [safety] studies? The FDA’s reply was that they would be very expensive to do.
One of the more compelling facts about aluminum is that it is a blood brain barrier neurotoxin as reported by W. Zheng in 2001 and Bioport Corp. in 2002. Additionally, there are many studies confirming its ability to activate brain microglia and increase inflammatory cytokines thereby contributing to brain excitotoxicity as reported by C. Garrel, et al., in 1994; M. Tsunoda in 1999; C. Struys-Ponsar, et al., in 2000; A. Campbell, in 2004; M.S. Petrik, et al., in 2007; Blaylock and Strunecka in 2009; C.A. Shaw, et al., in 2009; and X. Li, et al., in 2009.
Regarding the role of aluminum in vaccines and brain inflammation, I just co-authored a paper with Dr. Harold E. Buttram, MD, titled “Vaccines and Brain Inflammation,” which has been accepted for publication by an online journal. Dr. Buttram and I are hopeful our paper will bring more issues to the forefront regarding vaccines, brain inflammation, and the probable etiology that adjuvants, excipients, and neurotoxins have with regard to brain inflammation and encephalopathy.
Recently a post-doctoral fellow, L. Tomljenovic, and a professor, C.A. Shaw, both associated with the University of British Columbia, Canada, published the paper, “Aluminum Vaccine Adjuvants: Are they Safe?” that needs to be taken seriously by Big Pharma, vaccinologists, and the U.S. HHS, CDC, and FDA for the documentation of research regarding aluminum in vaccines and health-related problems associated with it.
According to Tomljenovic and Shaw, In spite of these above data [regarding parenteral exposure], infants and children up to 6 months of age in the U.S. and other developed countries receive 14.7 to 49 times more than the FDA safety limits for aluminum from parenteral sources from vaccines through mandatory immunization programs.
Table 2, which accompanies that statement, indicates that in the United States the “Estimated total aluminum body burden (pg/kg bw/day) per vaccination” is as follows:
At birth 73.5 pg/kg bw/day [14.7 times FDA safety limit]
1 month -0-
2 month 245 [49 times FDA safety limit]
3 month -0-
4 month 171.1 [34.22 times FDA safety limit]
5 month -0-
6 month 161.2 [32.24 times FDA safety limit]
FDA Safety limit for aluminum from parenteral sources is 5 pg/kg bw/day. [Emphasis added]
The question everyone ought to be asking is this: What is the cumulative or total amount of aluminum storing as a toxic body burden in tiny infants’ bodies? From my math calculations, there is a total of 650.8 picograms/kilograms body weight injected over the first six months of infants’ lives. What kind of toxic burden does that body load place on a six-month-old infant whose immune system is developing? How does the liver detoxify such a heavy-duty load of aluminum? What does that amount of aluminum do to the kidneys? What effect is there on brain cells? After all, these infants aren’t fully-grown and don’t possess healthy adult body detoxifying capabilities.
Source: read more:
Do you think any parents, given the large number of vaccines on the CDC schedule, would want and need to know that information, editor Costner? Do you think their pediatrician is telling them all they need to know? Of course and quite obviously they are not. Do they deserve to know? Of course they do. Start asking and you are likely to get a known and often non-helpful and hostile response.
Lets look a bit more at the actual science.
Formaldehyde MSDS Sheet
Potential Chronic Health Effects: Formaldehyde.
Hazardous in case of skin contact (sensitizer). CARCINOGENIC EFFECTS: Classified A2 (Suspected for human.) by ACGIH, 2A (Probable for human.) by IARC [Formaldehyde]. MUTAGENIC EFFECTS: Mutagenic for mammalian somatic cells.
[Formaldehyde]. Mutagenic for bacteria and/or yeast. [Formaldehyde]. Mutagenic for mammalian somatic cells. [Methylp. 2 alcohol]. Mutagenic for bacteria and/or yeast. [Methyl alcohol]. TERATOGENIC EFFECTS: Classified POSSIBLE for human [Methyl alcohol]. DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICITY: Not available The substance may be toxic to kidneys, liver, skin, central nervous system (CNS). Repeated or prolonged exposure to the substance can produce target organs damage. Repeated exposure. Repeated exposure to a highly toxic material may produce general deterioration of health by an accumulation in one or many human organs
Exposures can also occur from various consumer products, including an estimated exposure of 0.1 mg from applying hand creams or suntan lotion. The amount of formaldehyde found in blood in humans from natural metabolic processes is about 2 to 3 μg/g, which would work out to about 150 to 200 mg in an average sized adult.
So, they assume they did not need to study it, and that that injecting a little more could never throw anything off balance or be harmful, correct? Yup, that's correct. Just like they never studied L. histidine a never before used vaccine ingredient in Gardasil. Looks like they should have first studied that issue!
Polysorbate 80 and Histidine, a marriage of disaster.
INTERNATIONAL PROGRAMME ON CHEMICAL SAFETY
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CRITERIA 89
Excerpt: Formaldehyde reacts with macromolecules, including DNA. The genotoxic effects of formaldehyde have been reported in a wide range of mutagenicity tests in vitro in the absence of a metabolizing system.
Formaldehyde mutagenesis and formation of DNA-protein crosslinks in human lymphoblasts in vitro
And how would they know what the minimum toxic formaldehyde dose is in a vaccine; when there are no actual studies on it in regard to vaccines?
Here in this next study they attempted to explain the potential DNA damage away by claiming that the body eliminates formaldehyde so quickly that it would and could not have the said any considerable nor concerning affect. They are absolutely sure as well that all people eliminate formaldehyde at the same rate? Junk science!
Formaldehyde-induced sister chromatid exchanges in vitro and the influence of the exogenous metabolizing systems S9 mix and primary rat hepatocytes
Excerpt from the abstract:
It could be demonstrated that the reduction was not due to an unspecific binding of formaldehyde to macromolecules of the added S9 mix. The decrease in genotoxic effects, due to rapid metabolisation of formaldehyde in vitro and in vivo, explains the differences between results obtained in the in vitro experiments — performed without metabolizing systems — and in vivo results.
Formaldehyde in Vaccines: Toxic Substance Poses Threat
WARNING: Toxic Chemical Unsafe for Human Consumption at Any Level
Considering that babies typically have weak lungs and no immune system, it really does not sound like a prudent action to inject a young baby with a HIB, DPT or DTaP vaccine that is stabilized in formaldehyde. A baby that may be genetically sensitive to begin with does not have the body or the immune system developed to handle such an assault, and as a result common sense should tell us a baby just might suffer any number of serious reactions or conditions.
Formadehyde has been indicated by some in connection with chemically induced asthma and Chronic exposure leads to many adverse side effects, including ADD and ADHD.
The Government Agency for Toxic Substances says children are more susceptible to formaldehyde than adults. Babies immune systems continue to develop well after birth, so a babies body is not ready to fight of such an assault on the system.
Classification of formaldehyde as a human carcinogen
Aluminum MSDS Sheet
Chronic ingestion of aluminum may cause Aluminum Related Bone Disease or aluminum-induced Osteomalacia with fracturing Osteodystrophy, microcytic anemia, weakness, fatigue, visual and auditory hallucinations, memory loss, speech and language impairment (dysarthria, stuttering, stammering, anomia, hypofluency, aphasia and eventually, mutism), epileptic seizures(focal or grand mal), motor disturbance(tremors, myoclonic jerks, ataxia, convulsions, asterixis, motor apraxia, muscle fatigue), and dementia (personality changes, altered mood, depression, diminished alertness, lethargy, 'clouding of the sensorium', intellectual deterioration, obtundation, coma), and altered EEG
So that ONLY happens with ingestion of excessive amounts of aluminum? We are sure of that?
No MSDS toxicology studies appear to exist here as to actually injecting aluminum in humans! So, where are those safety studies? I will claim and conclude in my study of the science right here and now, that obviously those studies do not exist. There are only simple comparisons that have no basis in actual human study nor toxicology. Just like there are as well no listed studies, nor long term studies for resultant potential chronic health problems
Potential Chronic Health Effects: Aluminum.
CARCINOGENIC EFFECTS: Not available. MUTAGENIC EFFECTS: Not available. TERATOGENIC EFFECTS: Not available. DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICITY: Not available. The substance is toxic to lungs. Repeated or prolonged exposure to the substance can produce target organs damage. Repeated exposure to a highly toxic material may produce general deterioration of health by an accumulation in one or many human organs.
Doesn't look all that safe to me!!! And these are only two of the total vaccine ingredients in the various and numerous vaccines! Only...TWO!
Then we have not even begun to address fluoride in the water, a byproduct of aluminum manufacture; see yet the careless insanity in and of all this? Its all assumed as ...good? Proven safe? Money, power, and control of information has no effect? Assumed responsible, but is actually a false directing and controlling authority? Do you think you need to actually educate yourself yet, if you want the real and unbiased facts?
Chemical Profile for ALUMINUM (CAS Number: 7429-90-5)
Health Hazard Reference(s)
Cardiovascular or Blood Toxicant
HEALTH EFFECTS Lists of various toxicants including aluminum |Main Page
Real science! The typical attacking, delusional and outright lying comment: "oh, they don't understand the science and scientific method". Oh ...really???
Aluminum and autoimmunity
Journal of Autoimmunity 36 (2011) 4e Review
Autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants
Yehuda Shoenfeld a,b,*, Nancy Agmon-Levin a
The Zabludowicz Center for Autoimmune Diseases, Department of Medicine B’ Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
Lupus. 2009 Nov;18(13):1217-25.
Adjuvants and autoimmunity.
Israeli E, Agmon-Levin N, Blank M, Shoenfeld Y.
Source: Center for Autoimmune Diseases, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel.
J Autoimmun. 2000 Feb;14(1):1-10.
Vaccination and autoimmunity-'vaccinosis': a dangerous liaison?
Shoenfeld Y, Aron-Maor A.
Source:Department of Internal Medicine B, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.
Excerpt: The findings could also represent a polyclonal activation (adjuvant reaction). The mechanism (or mechanisms) of autoimmune reactions following immunization has not yet been elucidated. One of the possibilities is molecular mimicry; when a structural similarity exists between some viral antigen (or other component of the vaccine) and a self-antigen. This similarity may be the trigger to the autoimmune reaction. Other possible mechanisms are discussed.
Safe, and effective????
Aluminum hydroxide injections lead to motor deficits and motor neuron degeneration.
HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT FOR ALUMINIUM, ALUMINIUM OXIDE, AND ALUMINIUM HYDROXIDE
Scientific Data Gaps
The following data gaps represent areas of scientific interest to further understanding on the human health implications of aluminium exposure:
At present, there is no long-term animal bioassay focusing on the neurotoxic effects of aluminium. Although this represents a major scientific data gap, the Panel questioned whether the availability of such a study would greatly improve our ability to establish human exposure guidelines for aluminium, given the availability of direct epidemiological evidence in this regard. If such a study were to be conducted for the purpose of informing human health risk assessment, careful consideration should be given to the neurological endpoints that would be of most relevance to humans, the most appropriate animal species and route of exposure, and the detailed experimental design, including the number of animals tested, and number and selection of doses.
They actually don't have a clue! If aluminum is used in water treatment plants to get the unwanted junk to settle to the bottom, how is injecting it into the human body a healthy thing? Aluminum as well is used as a blog coagulant. Sounds like something is indeed wrong with using it in multiple vaccines, ya THINK???
Current Medicinal Chemistry, 2011, 18, 2630-2637
Aluminum Vaccine Adjuvants: Are they Safe?
© 2011 Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
Aluminum is an experimentally demonstrated neurotoxin and the most commonly used vaccine adjuvant. Despite almost 90 years of widespread use of aluminum adjuvants, medical science's understanding about their mechanisms of action is still remarkably poor. There is also a concerning scarcity of data on toxicology and pharmacokinetics of these compounds. In spite of this, the notion that aluminum in vaccines is safe appears to be widely accepted. Experimental research, however, clearly shows that aluminum adjuvants have a potential to induce serious immunological disorders in humans. In particular, aluminum in adjuvant form carries a risk for autoimmunity, long-term brain inflammation and associated neurological complications and may thus have profound and widespread adverse health consequences. In our opinion, the possibility that vaccine benefits may have been overrated and the risk of potential adverse effects underestimated, has not been rigorously evaluated in the medical and scientific community. We hope that the present paper will provide a framework for a much needed and long overdue assessment of this highly contentious medical issue.
Curr Med Chem. 2011;18(17):2630-7. University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC,
Aluminum Vaccine Adjuvants: Are they Safe?
Aluminum in various forms can be toxic to the nervous system. The widespread presence in the human environment may underlie a number of CNS disorders. The continued use of aluminum adjuvants in various vaccines for children as well as the general public may be of significant concern. In particular, aluminum presented in this form carries a risk for autoimmunity, long-term brain inflammation and associated neurological complications and may thus have profound and widespread adverse health consequences. The widely accepted notion of aluminum adjuvant safety does not appear to be firmly established in the scientific literature and, as such, this absence may have lead to an erroneous conclusions regarding the significance of these compounds in the etiologies of many common neurological disorders. Furthermore, the continued use of aluminum-containing placebos in vaccine clinical trials may have lead to an underestimation of the true rate of adverse outcomes associated with aluminum-adjuvanted vaccines. In our opinion, a comprehensive evaluation of the overall impact of aluminum on human health is overdue. Such an evaluation should include studies designed to determine the short and long-term impacts of dietary aluminum as well as the potential impacts in different age groups of exposure to adjuvant aluminum alone and in combination with other potentially toxic vaccine constituents (e.g., formaldehyde, formalin, mercury, phenoxyethanol, phenol, sodium borate, polysorbate 80, glutaraldehyde). For the latter, until vaccine safety can be comprehensively demonstrated by controlled independent longterm studies that examine the impact on the nervous system in detail, many of those already vaccinated as well as those currently receiving injections may be at risk for health complications that exceed the potential benefits that vaccine prophylaxis may provide. The issue of aluminum adjuvanted vaccine safety is especially pertinent in light of the legislation which might mandate vaccination regimes for civilian populations (e.g., the Biodefense and Pandemic Vaccine and Drug Development Act of 2005). Whether the risk of protection from a dreaded disease outweighs the risk of toxicity from its presumed prophylactic agent is a question that demands far more rigorous scrutiny than has been provided to date.
Self-Organized Criticality Theory of Autoimmunity
Systemic autoimmunity appears to be the inevitable consequence of over-stimulating the host's immune ‘system’ by repeated immunization with antigen, to the levels that surpass system's self-organized criticality.
Vaccines and Autoimmune Diseases of the Adult
Dr Russel Blaylock, retired board certified neurosurgeon
Published papers: (Immunoexcitotoxicity).
Brief Assessment of Aluminum Exposure and Endocrine Disruption, (With 41 scientific references).
Aluminum phosphate:AlPO4 an Adjuvant, [more studies].
EDF Suspected - cardiovascular or blood toxicant, neurotoxicant, respiratory toxicant, respiratory toxicant. Implicated as a cause of brain damage; suspected factor in Alzheimer's Disease, dementia, convulsions and comas. More hazardous than most chemicals in 2 out of 6 ranking systems. On at least 2 federal regulatory lists. EDF Suspected - cardiovascular or blood toxicant neurotoxicant, respiratory toxicant. More hazardous than most chemicals in 3 out of 11 ranking systems. On at least 3 federal regulatory lists.
Chronic RELs and toxicity summaries using the previous version of the Hot Spots Risk Assessment guidelines (OEHHA 2000)
The binding of formaldehyde to endogenous proteins creates haptens that can elicit an immune response. Chronic exposure to formaldehyde has been associated with immunological hypersensitivity as measured by elevated circulating IgG and IgE autoantibodies to human serum albumin (Thrasher et al., 1987). In addition, a decrease in the proportion of T-cells was observed, indicating altered immunity. Thrasher et al. (1990) later found that long-term exposure to formaldehyde was associated with autoantibodies, immune activation, and formaldehyde-albumin adducts in patients occupationally exposed, or residents of mobile homes or of homes containing particleboard sub-flooring. The authors suggest that the hypersensitivity induced by formaldehyde may account for a mechanism for asthma and other health complaints associated with formaldehyde exposure.
Oh, but the dose in vaccines is to small to matter? There is a total of over 600 mcg in the combined total for all 3 Gardasil shots, and they wonder why girls developed blood clots and died; the FDA falsely blamed it of course on risk factors like birth control pills and smoking. Then it should have been contraindicated to get the shots at all. To much to lose ...now in taking any responsibility.
Wow, and aluminum adjuvants have been in vaccines a very long time. Just say, "hell ...NO, I am on my way to by some 1000 IU capsules of vitamin D3" and some C!
Think the new non-aluminum adjuvants they are trying are any better? From the looks of what has since resulted after the approval of Cervarix with its APo4 adjuvant; the outcome is just as bad or worse. I would not be expecting nor waiting for the FDA and the CDC to inform you or your doctor of that.
100 Compiled Studies on Vaccine Dangers
Vaccines and Immunization References and Research Citations
Aluminum A Neurological Gamble
Vaccine Immune Supression
Evidence-based vaccinations: A scientific look at the missing science behind flu season vaccines
Editor, alias no identity, "Costner"... you go..."Fool"!
These are America's and the worlds children, we are talking about!
"The WHO said, the CDC said, Paul Offit and Gorski said"
Holy ...buckets of bullshit!
Like I said blogging editor Costner, take just 100 of the 10,000 vaccines Paul Offit said children could safely get; then later write a blog page about your outcome?
Harold E Buttram, MD and Catherine J Frompovich
June 21, 2011
Basics of the Human Immune System Prior to Introduction of Vaccines: Are Vaccines Turning Our Children’s Immune Systems Inside Out?
Basics of the Human Immune System Prior to Introduction of Vaccines: Are Vaccines Turning Our Children’s Immune Systems Inside Out? Part 2
Vaccination: The Hidden Truth, Watch the full documentary now
Herd Immunity - [The real truth].
Polysorbate 80 (Tween 80) is present in Gardasil. It is a surfactant (lowers surface tension); it makes the blood-brain barrier more porous ("opens it up"). This facilitates the passage of aluminium and other substances through the barrier and into the brain tissue.
Polysorbate 80 bypassing the blood brain barrier, and the harm it does. Polysorbate 80 is in many vaccines and also causes sterility in rats. An Elsevier/ Science Direct Study
Food Chem Toxicol. 1993 Mar;31(3):183-90.
Delayed effects of neonatal exposure to Tween 80 on female reproductive organs in rats
No vaccine would ever be ineffective enough nor harmful enough for Costner, "no proof, no proof". What is this guys real problem? When you show him the proof he ignores it. He himself demands peer reviewed science from me, and when asked for his, he produces only a pitiful level of non-scientific low level of proof junk - that any reputable and honest scientist would and could blow a hole in a mile wide.
This guy Costner is as fake and bogus as anything can get, and always was. Fear mongering without proof, should be a criminal offense; that when we are talking needlessly injecting children as if they are a toxic waste dump. Huge, no liability profits have nothing to do with it of course?!
Ask him, to list all the toxicologists on the FDA and CDC approval and decisions boards! There are none. It doesn't matter??? Really?
You know what Costner? You should just give it up! You lose, again.
Our current healthcare system has failed to protect us; worse, it’s our leading cause of death! Take back the responsibility for your own health from a system that—through adverse reactions to prescription drugs, infections, medical errors, needless surgical procedures and more—claims nearly 800,000 lives a year, closely followed by heart disease (700,000) and cancer (approximately 600,000).
America's Healthcare System is the Third Leading Cause of Death
Barbara Starfield, M.D. (2000) [The AMA knew this then, and was published in THEIR journal, and nothing much has been done but to just let it get worse, and as well they simply removed that study from their abstracts].
Excerpt: Even more significantly, the medical system has played a large role in undermining the health of Americans. According to several research studies in the last decade, a total of 225,000 Americans per year have died as a result of their medical treatments:
12,000 deaths per year due to unnecessary surgery
7000 deaths per year due to medication errors in hospitals
20,000 deaths per year due to other errors in hospitals
80,000 deaths per year due to infections in hospitals
106,000 deaths per year due to negative effects of drugs
Thus, America's healthcare-system-induced deaths are the third leading cause of the death in the U.S., after heart disease and cancer.
If you do not believe that real cures are suppressed, I suggest this information below! Not much can say it all better than that.
Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski
Burzynski, the Movie is the story of a medical doctor and Ph.D biochemist named Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski who won the largest, and possibly the most convoluted and intriguing legal battle against the Food & Drug Administration in American history.
His victorious battles with the United States government were centered around Dr. Burzynski's gene-targeted cancer medicines he discovered in the 1970's called Antineoplastons, which have currently completed Phase II FDA-supervised clinical trials in 2009 and could begin the final phase of FDA testing in 2011–barring the ability to raise the required $300 million to fund the final phase of FDA clinical trials.
When Antineoplastons are approved, it will mark the first time in history a single scientist, not a pharmaceutical company, will hold the exclusive patent and distribution rights on a paradigm-shifting medical breakthrough.
It’s time for a change!
Health Care Reform
Costner, watching TV
"Ok, that works - for me"!
"Just as long as I don't have to hear any more vaccine, and pharma..."conspiracy theories"
FDA censorship of nutritional science threatens health of all Americans
Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/029698_censorship_FDA.html
Ignorance Is Power - exposes FDA censorship of nutritional science, video.
FDA unleashes end game scheme to outlaw virtually all dietary supplements formulated after 1994
Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/032912_FDA_dietary_supplements.html
FDA's scheme to outlaw nearly all nutritional supplements created after 1994 would destroy millions of jobs and devastate economy
Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/032924_dietary_supplements_FDA_approval.html
And do they tell YOU about vitamin D3 at YOUR doctors clinic, or do they just push vaccines? Yup, they just push toxic vaccines, that's it. They can't even get the recommended dosage right, if they ever did tell you; 400 IU is nothing - for a deficient person. Many Americans are deficient. 400 IU is not near enough. A minimum of 5000 IU per day is what is needed.
Next time they attempt to push vaccines on you at your clinic, ask for the ingredient lists and the MSDS sheets on the ingredients, and as well as the safety studies. If they only hand you a copy of the CDC sites safety and effectiveness of multiple vaccines, paltry for any information and/or science assurances page; you might as well conclude there and then that they have not a clue; and they don't.
Vitamin D Council
Vitamin d better than flu vaccine, Dr. Eisenstein
Pro D (Vitamin D3 with Probiotics)
How Much Vitamin D Should You Take? Dr. Eisenstein
Dr. Eisenstein Discusses Vitamin D as an Immune Modulator of T cells
Vitamin D is better than ANY vaccine and increases the immune system by 3-5 times
Vitamin D not flu shots, Dr Mercola
Proc Nutr Soc. 2011 Aug 18:1-12.
Vitamin D and immune function: an overview.
Pediatr Res. 2009 May;65(5 Pt 2):106R-113R.
The vitamin D connection to pediatric infections and immune function.
Mol Nutr Food Res. 2011 Jan;55(1):96-108. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201000174. Epub 2010 Sep 7.
A review of the critical role of vitamin D in the functioning of the immune system and the clinical implications of vitamin D deficiency.
Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2010 Dec;235(12):1395-6; discussion 1397.
Ample evidence exists from human studies that vitamin D reduces the risk of selected bacterial and viral infections.
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2010 Oct;29(10):987.
Vitamin D supplementation could reduce the risk of type A influenza infection and subsequent pneumonia.
Arch Intern Med. 2009 Feb 23;169(4):384-90.
Association between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level and upper respiratory tract infection in the Third National National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.
Epidemiol Infect. 2006 Dec;134(6):1129-40. Epub 2006 Sep 7.
Epidemic influenza and vitamin D.
Pediatr Res. 2009 May;65(5 Pt 2):106R-113R.
The vitamin D connection to pediatric infections and immune function.
J Am Board Fam Med. 2009 Nov-Dec;22(6):698-706.
Vitamin D: an evidence-based review.
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2009 Jan;9(1):81-7.
Vitamin D, respiratory infections, and asthma.
J Clin Virol. 2011 Mar;50(3):194-200. Epub 2011 Jan 15.
Vitamin D and the anti-viral state.
Nutr Rev. 2006 May;64(5 Pt 1):226-33.
A potential role for vitamin D on HIV infection?
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2009 Apr;63(4):473-7. Epub 2007 Nov 21.
Association of subclinical vitamin D deficiency in newborns with acute lower respiratory infection and their mothers.
Mayo Clinic Study Finds Vitamin D Associated with Survival in Lymphoma Patients
Anti-Viral vitamin C
Editor Costner, you need to give it up while you can still save some face at all, as if that would even possible? You lose, again. Any honest person can see that. You can stay in your world of denial, but you have no right to repeatedly attempt to take anyone and everyone with you. You have a mind, heart, and a soul that is all to clearly pure ilk~! You could actually care less about humanity, it is all about denial and to much to lose for someone! Why do you think I do what I do? What you are made of is not what I am made of. You are like a toxic - cancer that invades our lives and attempts to prevent the real answers from being found. This exists world wide; but you do not see actual doctors here nor anywhere debating this full on with those that know the truth, nor with me on anything; they wouldn't be that stupid. Why do you think that is? They can't CONTROL the information in those situations. The only way you can attempt to control that is to lie and as well refuse to publish what is actually sent to you on that blog. How sick is that? How twisted and sick as well does a mans soul need to be, to do that?
Alias Costner, creating a new blog page! "Lets see, 1. Pharma's vaccines saved the world. 2. The only way to true health and regaining health is at your doctors office and the pharmacy. 3. I have run out of misinformation and lies that I have not already told them 300 times, and has been refuted? 4. I better go see and read the latest garbage Gorski has written?
"Praise the allopathic gods for science based medicine, and pharma Gorski"! Between him and Paul Offit, without it I wouldn't have anything to write at all.
Here's your favorite guy again Costner! You denied all that too! Again, only claiming to that he has no peer reviewed studies. You deny 5000 picture images of the same thing; vaccine damage! You deny as well grounded in actual science physiological explanation of how that happened and happens. That's funny, no neurologist nor brain science expert ever did, nor could. How's your credibility doing?
09 Andrew Moulden En 07 de 11, (at 8 minutes running time, Evan McCarthy, and as well Gardasil. Look what vaccines are doing! There it is, it can not be denied.
Listen to the information in this below video, amazing. And this is what they deny! And 5000 images of the same thing, and the knowledge and tools to understand it..
Tolerance Lost - Dr. Andrew Moulden
Vaccine Health Truth Tolerance Lost by Dr. Andrew Moulden Part 1 of 3
Vaccine Health Truth Tolerance Lost by Dr. Andrew Moulden Part 2 of 3
Vaccine Health Truth Tolerance Lost by Dr. Andrew Moulden Part 3 of 3
This man I believe in what I know of this, was silenced as to what he knew. His website was taken control of as well, it is no longer his. To think that this mans information has now been silenced, is just fuel to the fire for me! Period. They had to silence him, they had no choice - in the liability and loss of all, they were facing. Stand up and get information to anyone that will listen, one at a time, need be.
Index for other videos by Dr. Andrew Moulden
Not if you do not actually know what the risks are, or deny the risks!!!
Some might want to believe I have some personal vendetta against the pharmaceutical industry and modern so called medicine, and a mission to destroy that. Why would I do that? Why would anyone. All I do is put it forth, just exactly like it is. It was obviously not my choices that did nor resulted in what the medical system has done; nor as to its outcome.
In America, endless wars have been fought for freedom; and that does and should include as well, freedom from medical dictatorship and tyranny. You can agree or disagree with any given war and our being there at all, but the point made here I believe, is clear. And that is the way I see it; all of it.