Thursday, May 24, 2012

Reply to: Review, Revisit, Recap, (Part Two)

Reply to: Review, Revisit, Recap, (Part Two)

The following additional replies were made to this said as titled blog page. He is not concerned with nor avoiding an actual debate, and having my collected science up against his lack of any real nor unbiased so called science, now is he? really? Lets see what he does with that? Its bound to be a Wizard of Ozz style bunch of twisted "hoo.. eeh" again, if anything. You can almost see him alias Costner, pulling the levers and creating a bunch of smoke, stink, and noise already. Get started, alias no identity Costner! That was his reply posting character name from the Argus Leader, newspaper online, where he used to oppose me over 2 years ago. Same crap there, complete denial of all. Don't even be thinking of creating another blog page Costner, until you have answered to this page and you replies. You were challenged with this before, and you just keep lying about it and ignoring it. Get to producing that vaccine safety and effectiveness science you always claim to have. Hows that go? Antibodies equal efficacy and immunity, the diseases are not any longer present, (except for outbreaks in vaccinated children), and Paul Offit has all the science; or was that Gorski? Hum? Neither one seem to have any, when I looked? I bet it was the CDC? Nope, looked there too; nothing. I think your screwed. Still no response on that blog page; watch him just go create another, without responding to what is necessary and is in front of him and on the blog here.


Lets compare the information and so called science you have, to what I have? You aren't even in the ballpark, ("Mr. No Identity"), much more actually playing.

Vaccine Caused Ischemia/Hypoxia

Facts About Vaccine Aluminum Adjuvants

First reply: (Sent)

Your stupidity, and as well twisted and false perception of reality and fact in that reply, is near to and borderline to either mentally deranged and very ill, or extremely evil, which is it? Answer: Likely both! You as well do a good job of contradicting yourself. You have not published replies for the most part, because they were to much truth, and you couldn't accept the challenges to your false information; which you know is false. Get read for some actual unbiased science and your chance to actually debate it. Better as well get to digging for your aluminum adjuvant safety studies that I asked you for previously. Also I would like to see and have you provide all the documented data that you can, regarding the proof that the CDC has as to safety of injected aluminum adjuvants, or any other adjuvant. Note: I already have it outlined on my site, what they have; and their is literally nothing; and they admit it. Have a nice day, Costner!


Second reply:

All of that being said, would you like to focus on the topic at hand for a change? Perhaps you would like to discuss vaccines? More specifically, perhaps you would like to discuss why even years after your initial claims you have been unable to find one single peer-reviewed study published in any reputable medical journal worldwide which has been able to link any vaccine or combination of vaccines to autism.

Not a single one. Worldwide. Ever.

Is it time to move the goalposts again Mr. Hubbs, or do you think one of these days you might just be ready to admit there is no evidence to support your unscientific opinion on the matter?

Thought so.

Reply: Those are the words of repeatedly and in denial, insanity; alias Costner! Just because you do not accept the journals that those studies come from just because it doesn't agree with your safe and effective agenda, does not mean the studies are invalid. That statement is lying by decepetion and the use of blatant intellectual dishonesty, Costner. You put forth studies yourself that you say do not prove the subject content of that study provides proof of the link to ASD, and you have yet to put forth any study that provides proof of any other source of causation for ASD. Yet, what I have for studies are far more damning as to casuation than yours; yet you claim there is absolutely no study that shows and proves the connection; nor to vaccines. What would that take, in your mind? The CDC's admission, correct? Nothing short of that, correct? Admit it, no study in the world no matter how many, would be conclusive enough for you to accept the vaccines/ASD link. Why? Because something you are connected to has to much to lose, as to that final conclusion, right? Of course.  

No one moved the goal posts Costner, but you; the issue has been the same as it ever was. What? Just because I addressed your personal attack on me, that is moving the goal posts? You clearly and obviously aren't right, in the head; nor were you ever, Costner!


Third reply:

Here you go alias Costner, lets see what you can do with this! This going to be in several parts, as not all of it will go into one reply post. You claim to that there are no scientific studies that prove that vaccines cause autism; not one. You also claim to that all the studies show that there is not connection between vaccines and autism. Whats did those CDC funded epidemiological studies focus on? The answer is only one vaccine, the MMR; and one ingredient, thimerosal. How in your mind, is that looking at everything??? In order to do this right, we have to look at and combine the bigger picture, and leave no information off the table.


Ann Neurol. 2005 Jan;57(1):67-81.Neuroglial activation and neuroinflammation in the brain of patients with autism.

Vargas DL, Nascimbene C, Krishnan C, Zimmerman AW, Pardo CA.

Source: Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.

Now, you did not see them mention vaccines as the cause of that said neuroinflamation in the brain. They in this study do not even suggest a cause, and as if they are clueless as to the cause. They have proven that this situation exists; so what are they not suggesting at least suggesting causation?

However, many other studies we can find do show that this said repeat and chronic activation of the brains microgilia, is caused by aluminum adjuvants and thus the vaccines!  That includes the published papers of Dr. Russell Blaylock, and studies a swell from several other sources. Sources that indeed are accepted and peer reviewed from real and substantial health care journals, but just not from a pharma connected journal.

Dr. Russel Blaylock, (published studies)

When you look at studies, you also need to consider as well other information that puts the whole picture into its proper focus. No information should be left off limits.

International Review of Psychiatry, December 2005; 17(6): 485–495

Immunity, neuroglia and neuroinflammation in autism

Brain Inflammation Found in Autism - Study findings may reinforce immune system link.

What the researchers wanted to know: Do the brains of patients with autism show signs of inflammation?What they did: Researchers at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and other institutions looked at the brain tissue of 11 autistic patients, ages 5 to 44, who died of accidents and injuries. They were searching for certain proteins called cytokines and chemokines that are involved in the immune system. They also looked at the spinal fluid of six living autistic children to search for the same proteins.What they found: Both the brain tissue samples and the spinal fluid featured patterns of cytokines and chemokines that indicate inflammation—the swelling and reddening that accompanies an immune response. Researchers found inflammation in different parts of the brains, most notably the cerebellum, produced by two kinds of brain cells, astroglia and microglia. Unlike other studies, the findings also showed that the inflammation originated in the brain and wasn't caused by an immune response to something elsewhere in the body.

Dr. Russel Blaylock, (published studies)


Self-Organized Criticality Theory of Autoimmunity

Conclusions: SignificanceSystemic autoimmunity appears to be the inevitable consequence of over-stimulating the host's immune ‘system’ by repeated immunization with antigen, to the levels that surpass system's self-organized criticality.

Michael Wagnitz: Scientists find correlation between autism and aluminum in vaccines

Do aluminum vaccine adjuvants contribute to the rising prevalence of autism?

Lucija Tomljenovic, Christopher A. Shaw

Mechanisms of aluminum adjuvant toxicity and autoimmunity in pediatric populations

The spectrum of ASIA: ‘Autoimmune (Auto-inflammatory) Syndrome induced by Adjuvants’

The Immune System’s Role in the Biology of Autism

Paula Goines and Judy Van de Water


In summary, there is exciting research regarding the role of the immune system in autism spectrum disorders that may have profound implications for diagnosis and treatment of this devastating disease.

Adverse Effects of Vaccines: Evidence and Causality (2012)

Vaccines show sinister side

If two dozen once-jittery mice at UBC are telling the truth postmortem, the world's governments may soon be facing one hell of a lawsuit. New, so-far-unpublished research led by Vancouver neuroscientist Chris Shaw shows a link between the aluminum hydroxide used in vaccines, and symptoms associated with Parkinson's, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS, or Lou Gehrig's disease), and Alzheimer's.

Shaw is most surprised that the research for his paper hadn't been done before. For 80 years, doctors have injected patients with aluminum hydroxide, he said, an adjuvant that stimulates immune response.

"This is suspicious," he told the Georgia Straight in a phone interview from his lab near Heather Street and West 12th Avenue. "Either this [link] is known by industry and it was never made public, or industry was never made to do these studies by Health Canada. I'm not sure which is scarier."

Similar adjuvants are used in the following vaccines, according to Shaw's paper: hepatitis A and B, and the Pentacel cocktail, which vaccinates against diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus, polio, and a type of meningitis.

Read more:

Shaw's study completed peer review, it was published in in 2207 in Neuromolecular Medicine:

Aluminum adjuvant linked to gulf war illness induces motor neuron death in mice.
Neuromolecular Med. 2007;9(1):83-100.
Petrik MS, Wong MC, Tabata RC, Garry RF, Shaw CA.
Department of Ophthalmology and Program in Neuroscience, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Gulf War illness (GWI) affects a significant percentage of veterans of the 1991 conflict, but its origin remains unknown. Associated with some cases of GWI are increased incidences of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and other neurological disorders. Whereas many environmental factors have been linked to GWI, the role of the anthrax vaccine has come under increasing scrutiny. Among the vaccine's potentially toxic components are the adjuvants aluminum hydroxide and squalene. To examine whether these compounds might contribute to neuronal deficits associated with GWI, an animal model for examining the potential neurological impact of aluminum hydroxide, squalene, or aluminum hydroxide combined with squalene was developed. Young, male colony CD-1 mice were injected with the adjuvants at doses equivalent to those given to US military service personnel. All mice were subjected to a battery of motor and cognitive-behavioral tests over a 6-mo period postinjections. Following sacrifice, central nervous system tissues were examined using immunohistochemistry for evidence of inflammation and cell death. Behavioral testing showed motor deficits in the aluminum treatment group that expressed as a progressive decrease in strength measured by the wire-mesh hang test (final deficit at 24 wk; about 50%). Significant cognitive deficits in water-maze learning were observed in the combined aluminum and squalene group (4.3 errors per trial) compared with the controls (0.2 errors per trial) after 20 wk. Apoptotic neurons were identified in aluminum-injected animals that showed significantly increased activated caspase-3 labeling in lumbar spinal cord (255%) and primary motor cortex (192%) compared with the controls. Aluminum-treated groups also showed significant motor neuron loss (35%) and increased numbers of astrocytes (350%) in the lumbar spinal cord. The findings suggest a possible role for the aluminum adjuvant in some neurological features associated with GWI and possibly an additional role for the combination of adjuvants.

100 Compiled Studies on Vaccine Dangers

Vaccines and Scientific Studies

Brain Behav Immun. 1993 Mar;7(1):97-103.

Antibodies to myelin basic protein in children with autistic behavior.

Singh VK, Warren RP, Odell JD, Warren WL, Cole P.

Source;Biomedical Division, Center for Persons with Disabilities, Logan, Utah.

Taming brain inflammation

A common factor in many brain disorders, including brain fog, ADHD, ADD, anxiety, depression, memory loss, is brain inflammation.

Safety of Aluminum Added to Vaccines as a Vaccine Adjuvant

Pharmacol Toxicol. 1992 Apr;70(4):278-80.
Aluminium-adjuvanted vaccines transiently increase aluminium levels in murine brain tissue.


Aluminium is widely used as an adjuvant in human vaccines, and children can often receive up to 3.75 mg of parenteral aluminium during the first six months of life. We show that intraperitoneal injection of aluminium adsorbed vaccines into mice causes a transient rise in brain tissue aluminium levels peaking around the second and third day after injection. This rise is not seen in the saline control group of animals or with vaccine not containing aluminium. It is likely that aluminium is transported to the brain by the iron-binding protein transferrin and enters the brain via specific transferrin receptors.


Follow The Existing Science

For decades, we’ve been told by our federal health agencies that autism is a mystery. They don’t know what causes it, they don’t know how to treat it. They don’t even know if the increase in diagnoses is real. REALLY, CDC? (Think Seth and Amy from SNL.) REALLY?

A new study published by Dr. Dan Rossignol and Dr. Richard Frye in the journal Molecular Psychiatry* reviewed the world’s scientific literature to identify studies implicating biochemical abnormalities in ASD.

Here’s what they found:

437 publications examined immune dysregulation or inflammation in ASD; 416 (95%) found an association

115 publications examined oxidative stress in ASD; all 115 found an association

153 publications examined mitochondrial dysfunction in ASD; 145 (95%) reported an association

190 publications examined environmental toxicant exposures in ASD; 170 (89%) found an association

62% of the publications in these 4 areas were published in the last 5 years (2006-2010)

Genetic studies were the most common type of study in the medical literature concerning ASD; these studies accounted for more studies (1,576) than these 4 areas combined

Read more:

Mol Psychiatry. 2012 Apr;17(4):389-401. doi: 10.1038/mp.2011.165. Epub 2011 Dec 6.

Rossignol DA, Frye RE.

Source: International Child Development Resource Center, Melbourne, FL, USA.

A review of research trends in physiological abnormalities in autism spectrum disorders: immune dysregulation, inflammation, oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction and environmental toxicant exposures.

Now, in view of this information, do you actually think and believe that vaccines have been exonerated from causation in ASD? Do you think as well that-that would be a rational and honest conclusion, or would it be an intellectually dishonest conclusion.

Now let’s look at the issues of the MMR vaccine and as in and as to the claim that Dr. Andrew Wakefield  conducted fraudulent research-regarding his 1999 published study in the Lancet.

Rather than list each study, as they are numerous, I will list the source where they are already listed. Wakefields study has been stated to have been replicated elsewhere now five times, and the same findings were published from the study. Many more studies have supported those same  1998 published findings. Go through those studies and look for yourself. Can a person actually with any intellectual honest, actually disregard all that? Not unless they have chosen the mode of denial!

Peer Reviewed Papers Support Findings

The following peer-reviewed papers duplicate Dr. Wakefield’s original findings in five additional countries, including the US, Italy, Venezuela, Canada and Poland:

The following peer-reviewed papers support the findings of the original work by Wakefield and colleagues at the Royal Free Hospital in the UK:

Brian Deer Outside The GMC, (and they actually trusted this guy?? Foolish)

Listen to him attempt to claim its NOT bowel disease, in front of the parents; what an idiot!

Dr. Wakefield speaking at the 68th Annual Meeting of AAPS.

(2011-0413) - Dr. Andrew Wakefield's Lecture at Brandeis University

Italy – Court Holds MMR Vaccine Causes Autism – III: English Translation Of Court Decision

We present here a professional medical translation of the full text of the decision of the Italian Court of Rimini holding that the MMR vaccine causes autism in children.

More supporting study references, are at the bottom of this next article page..

Application of Novel PCR-Based Methods for Detection, Quantitation, and Phylogenetic Characterization of Sutterella Species in Intestinal Biopsy Samples from Children with Autism and Gastrointestinal Disturbances
Brent L. Williams, Mady Hornig, Tanmay Parekh, and W. Ian Lipkin

Autism Epidemic, Is Foreign DNA in MMR II Vaccine Responsible? CBCD Suggests CDC Study Microcompetition Theory

The Center for the Biology of Chronic Disease (CBCD) believes that the cause of the epidemic is the foreign DNA in the MMR II vaccine.

The Amish Don’t Get Autism? And They Don’t Get Vaccinations – Possible Link?

Foreign DNA Fragments Cause Major Diseases

More information:


In conclusion: If it is or were not the vaccines, then how would it be possible to reverse these cases of ASD with the biomedical means they are using? All of which directly implicates vaccines. Detoxing heavy metals, dietary changes and adding the right  supplements as a means to healing the MMR damaged gut; treating yeast overgrowth, protocols removing or reducing viral overload, etc etc. All of this points to as well immune system dysregulation that could likely only come from a load of vaccines. You do not ever find this in the unvaccinated.

Advances in Research - in Biomedical Treatment of Autism
The following index links to citations describing emerging findings in autism research:

Recovering Caroline

How many good outcome stories like that would it take? There are now so many. And what does the mainstream medical side proclaim as to this? They discourage any use of these protocols, claiming that they are unproven and dangerous. What do you think their evidence is for that? Little to nothing do the have, nor have they put forth, to make or support any knowledgeable and honest claim one way or the other. They of course for obvious reasons, must make deny the success; all of it. They do that while offering no hope themselves but a lifetime on more of their prescription drugs, masking the symptom and actually making the situation only worse; and never getting to the real cause. All in all it is not a very supportive picture for vaccines.

Again; how many vaccines has the CDC said they looked at with their funded epidemiological studies? The answer is one, the MMR. How many vaccine ingredients has the CDC claimed to have looked at with their funded epidemiological studies? The answer is one, thimerosal. So, with that they claim all the studies have been looked at and no studies show any link to vaccines. And they call that real science. Wow; and without any actual nor real human physiological studies?

End of replies to this said blog page. Needs to respond to everything above! Lets SEE your supporting science, Costner! You have nothing that I haven't shot down before, if not here, then somewhere else. As a fact. I'm just a little more polished, than you are; yaa think!

Facts About Vaccine Aluminum Adjuvants

Then of course we have the vaccine contamination issue: 

Warning! Are Vaccine-Resistant Pathogens Putting Your Child At Risk?


"Designer" Cells as Substrates for the Manufacture of Viral Vaccines, (what they know is that there is no way to effectively prevent vaccine contamination, and they clearly know it causes chronic disease). 

Vaccines Contaminated with Mycoplasma's - by Garth Nicolson microbiologist

The Peanut Allergy Epidemic is a MAN-MADE EPIDEMIC caused by vaccinations! Just like the latex contaminant - allergies.

Are Vaccines Safe? Listen to again the aluminum adjuvant amounts.

Can We Continue To Justify Injecting Aluminum Into Children?

Aluminum Used in Vaccines: Dr. Mercola Interviews Dr. David Ayoub Part 1 of 5

Dr. Mercola's interview with a radiologist and physician - Dr. David Ayoub regarding the new warning about everyday poison that are linked to Alzheimer's, ADHD and Autism.

Mercury, Autism & The Global Vaccine Agenda : Dr David Ayoub M.D. ( A lengthy video but worth the time). Amazing

Neurosurgeon issues public challenge to vaccine zealots: Inject yourselves with all shots you say children should get! 

Dr. Russell Blaylock interview on mandatory vaccine trials, fraudulent vaccine science, and vaccine ethics - March 2012 

"Designer" Cells as Substrates for the Manufacture of Viral Vaccines, (what they know is that there is no way to effectively prevent vaccine contamination, and they clearly know it causes chronic disease).

Adventitious Agents and Vaccines
Philip R. Krause
Food and Drug Administration, Bethesda, Maryland, USA

Vaccines Contaminated with Mycoplasma's - by Garth Nicolson microbiologist

Autism Epidemic, Is Foreign DNA in MMR II Vaccine Responsible? CBCD Suggests CDC Study Microcompetition Theory

The Center for the Biology of Chronic Disease (CBCD) believes that the cause of the epidemic is the foreign DNA in the MMR II vaccine.

SANE Vax Inc. Discovers Potential Biohazard Contaminant in Merck's Gardasil™ HPV 4 Vaccine

SANE Vax Inc. Discovers Potential Bio-hazard Contaminant in Merck’s Gardasil™ HPV 4 Vaccine

SANE Vax to FDA: Recombinant HPV DNA found in multiple samples of Gardasil

Contaminated Gardasil Vaccine May Be Infectious – Potentially Causing Millions More to Become Sick via Blood Transference – Merck Doctor Admits Contaminant Does Not Belong in the Vaccine

With 21 scientific references as to tha harm of a vaccine such as Gardasil:

Foreign DNA Fragments Cause Major Diseases

"No Evidence of Any Link"/More Studies

Warning! Are Vaccine-Resistant Pathogens Putting Your Child At Risk?

Baby receives cocktail of seven vaccines, loses ability to speak, recovers with homeopathic shock remedies

Psst... Costner! You lose, and you KNOW it! You always KNEW it..and you always KNEW you were lying. Hows that feel! Keep needlessly damaging the children... you sick and demented FREAK with to much to lose!!!

We have been fed a complete line of lies and misinformation. Majorly changed and manipulated figures were used.

The Present Status of Polio Vaccines

Presentation before the Section on Preventative Medicine and Public Health, at the 120th annual meeting of the ISMS in Chicago, May 26, 1960

The polio vaccine: a critical assessment of its arcane history, efficacy, and long-term health-related consequences

Smoke and Mirrors Disappearance of Polio

Small Pox

History Repeats Itself: Lessons Vaccinators Refuse to Learn, by Jennifer Craig, PhD

Collectivism: Family or State? An Essay On Mandatory Vaccination by Neurosurgeon, Russell Blaylock, MD

Obstetrician, Dr Nancy Banks on infant sacrifice a.k.a. vaccination.

Facts About Vaccine Aluminum Adjuvants

Thursday, May 17, 2012

Reply to: Review, Revisit, Recap

Review, Revisit, Recap

And do you have any proof of all that??? or as to anything in your most recent pages. Answer: No. It's absolutely nothing but mindless denial and stupidity, all of it; anyone can see that for what it is. In comparison, what exists here amounts to no more than you have on the proof of vaccine safety and effectiveness. It's worthless.

On the other hand, I have all the proof and specific information and the science to show they are not safe nor effective. So, what do you have? Answer: Nothing, and you never have. You can not debate me on a one on one, and you never could, and never will be able to. What I have is to much fact and truth, and you now that. You are simply a a very angry person who can not tolerate nor accept the facts.

Everything in your life is a smoke screen and a lie, Costner; how does that feel? Do you not think nor realize that you have done your agenda more harm than good? As well, anyone that is looking for the real truth, will be even more determined to find out the facts. Why? Because they can clearly see that someone with that big of an agenda to destroy one person and their credibility, clearly has a great deal to hide, as to the truth. What you believe you have done, is exactly the opposite of what you have in reality actually done. The sheeple will always be sheeple, no matter what; nothing much can change them, they are simply to dumb and brainwashed. Those with to much to lose will always be complete denialists. So, who in the mix actually matters??? Answer: Those who are actively searching for the vaccine and as well the so called modern medicine truth. Those are the only people that matter, those who we and I can put the truth forth in front of, and that they will realize that truth, and further educate themselves to the same. Do YOU actually think you can hold those people back by the bullshit personal attack on credibility you have going on here? And additionally you are going to do that from a position of no identity? It is not happening, I guarantee it. You are clearly and entirely insane, alias Costner! You only a product representation of the sickness that 100 years of lies within allopathic medicine circles has produced. It is that simple.

I can shut you down on any level you try at, given the chance; and you clearly know THAT. Want to dispute that; then put your words to the actual test? You can't and you know it. How's that feel? That is why you do the personal attack you do, while having the opportunity to control all the information you can. How sick is that? When you look in the mirror, do you EVER see what you really are? Do you ever realize even for a minute, how sick you really are?

What you have done is in what now some what, 80 titled pages of personal attack on on individual; only shows clearly just how very sick you are, and in fact how sick the whole allopathic medical system in reality is. How you liking, that fact?

You know of all the studies that exist on the harm of vaccines, and especially aluminum adjuvants, that the CDC refuses to acknowledge??? Yup, and you have clearly seen those.


Now. DID YOU SEE THIS above REPLY, "alias no identity, COSTNER" - That I sent to your blog. YOU ARE ACTUALLY SUPPOSED TO POST REPLIES - WHEN YOU ARE A BLOGGER!!! How sick is that when you allow nothing for information, to or that counters any claims you have made? Then you just repeat the same lies and twisted misinformation, over and over. You have done that here repeatedly.


Well now, how about another expose on the aluminum adjuvant issue, straight from the documents of the CDC itself? They and YOU, have all the vaccine safety and effectiveness science right? Really?

Take a look!

If you think an aluminum adjuvant is entirely safe to use in a vaccine, check out the references at the bottom of this article.

For Review Only
Public Health Goal for ALUMINUM In Drinking Water

Prepared by
Pesticide and Environmental Toxicology Section
Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment
California Environmental Protection Agency

Here is a list of the same research:

If you think all the safety studies have been done on aluminum, read through some of this information!!!


Prepared by:
Syracuse Research Corporation
Under Contract No.  200-2004-09793

Public Health Services Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry

In welding/aluminum

So if they have NOt filled these data needs on aluminum; WHAT have they filled??? Clearly have have not filled the data needs for human consumption, much more infant consumption, as far as in foods? Yet paul offits claims that aluminum adjuvants are entirely safe, simply because he claims that injected aluminum is detoxed the same way as ingested aluminum in foods. Thye have not proven any amount  of aluminum to be safe in foods, oh they are concerned about larger amounts, but where is the safety data on even small amounts consumed, in foods. It doesn't exist.

ATSDR’s Substance-Specific Priority Data Needs - Unfilled


Dose-response data for acute-duration
via oral exposure
Exposure via environmental media for humans living near
hazardous waste sites
Exposure via environmental media for children living near
hazardous waste sites
Exposure via environmental media for adults and c

Take another look; this information, comes RIGHT from the CDC itself!!! Notice what is in the url! One could only ask as well, where is their document on mercury?

[Federal Register: October 27, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 206)]


Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry


Announcement of Final Priority Data Needs for Six Priority
Hazardous Substances

Notice: one of the listed substances!!!! No mention of mercury, though, nope?

Announcement of Final Priority Data Needs for Six Priority Hazardous Substances, 55240-55242 [E9-25776]

See there with the same data, they have added exposure levels in children! Reallyl what kinds of exposure does that include????

Aluminum ..................... Exposure levels in humans living near hazardous waste
..................Exposure levels in children.
.............Exposure levels for adults and children who do not live near hazardous waste sites (as controls).
........Dose-response data for acute-duration 1
oral exposure.

So here they are ONLy concerned about hazardous waste sites? How disingenuos is that?

HHS: More Data Needed for Six Hazardous Substances

Substance-Specific Priority Data Needs for Six Priority Hazardous Substances

--Exposure levels in humans living near hazardous waste sites.
--Exposure levels in children.
--Exposure levels for adults and children who do not live near hazardous waste sites (as controls).
--Dose-response data for acute-duration \1\oral exposure.

Aluminum, again, straight from the CDC.

Toxicological Profile for Aluminum  Immunological and Lymphoreticular Effects
No studies were located regarding immunological/lymphoreticular effects in humans after intermediateor chronic-duration dermal exposure to various forms of aluminum.  Neurological Effects
No studies were located regarding neurological effects in humans after acute- or intermediate-duration
dermal exposure to various forms of aluminum.  Reproductive Effects  Developmental Effects  Cancer
3.3  GENOTOXICITY [Find ANYTHING reassuring in that information??? I sure don't!]  Other Routes of Exposure
Flarend et al. (1997) estimated aluminum absorption in rabbits following intramuscular injection of
26  Other Routes of Exposure

Flarend et al. (1997) estimated aluminum absorption in rabbits following intramuscular injection of
26 Al labelled aluminum hydroxide or aluminum phosphate adjuvants used for vaccines.  Aluminum from both
solutions was absorbed, appearing in the blood as early as 1 hour after injection.  Three times as much
aluminum from the aluminum phosphate adjuvant was absorbed during the first 28 days after exposure;
since the terminal phase of the blood concentration curve was not reached by that time, this difference
may be due to differences in the rate of absorption.

3.4.2  Distribution

Aluminum occurs normally in all body tissues of humans (Ganrot 1986).  The total body burden of
aluminum in healthy human subjects is approximately 30–50 mg (Alfrey 1981, 1984; Alfrey et al. 1980;
Cournot-Witmer et al. 1981; Ganrot 1986; Hamilton et al. 1973; Tipton and Cook 1963).  Normal levels
of aluminum in serum are approximately 1–3 μg/L (House 1992; Liao et al. 2004).  Of the total body
burden of aluminum, about one-half is in the skeleton, and about one-fourth is in the lungs (Ganrot 1986). 
The normal level of aluminum in adult human lungs is about 20 mg/kg wet weight (w/w) and increases
with age due to an accumulation of insoluble aluminum compounds that have entered the body via thephagocytosis and transported to pulmonary lymph nodes for insoluble compounds.  Pulmonary
concentration of aluminum increases with age.  Oral Exposure


Once into the blood, aluminum is believed to be present almost exclusively in the plasma where it is
bound mainly to transferrin (Ganrot 1986; Harris and Messori 2002; Martin 1986); recent data suggest
that over 90% of the aluminum in serum is bound to transferrin (Harris and Messori 2002). There is in
vitro evidence indicating that aluminum can bind to the iron-binding sites of transferrin (Moshtaghie and
Skillen 1986), and that Al+3 may compete with similar ions in binding to transferrin (Ganrot 1986).  As reviewed by Priest (2004), approximately 10% of the aluminum in blood is found in the erythrocytes;
peak levels occur 1 day after peak serum aluminum levels were reached. The half-life of aluminum in the
erythrocytes appears to longer than the half-life in plasma.  In addition to binding with transferrin, Al
+3 is also known to bind to a considerable extent to bone tissue, primarily in the metabolically active areas of
the bone (Ganrot 1986).

In addition to distribution of aluminum to the brain (hippocampus), bone, muscle, and kidneys of orally
exposed animals, there is evidence in animals that aluminum crosses the placenta and accumulates in the
fetus and distributes to some extent to the milk of lactating mothers (Cranmer et al. 1986; Golub et al.
1996; Yokel 1985; Yokel and McNamara 1985).  Aluminum levels were increased in both fetuses and
placentas of mice treated throughout gestation with aluminum chloride (Cranmer et al. 1986)

Then we can add the synergistic effect of fluoride and at times mercury to this, and what would you have?

And THis is the data that the CDc and Paul offit use to claim that aluminum adjuvants in vaccines, are SAFE? Really?  Other Routes of Exposure

In rabbits given a single intravenous dose of aluminum lactate, aluminum concentrations did not increase
above controls in the cerebellum, white brain tissue, hippocampus, spinal cord, adrenal glands, bone,
heart, testes, or thyroid (Yokel and McNamara 1989).  Treated animals did have significant increases of
aluminum in the liver, serum, bile, kidneys, lungs, and spleen.  Throughout the 128 day study, the liver of
exposed rabbits had over 80% of the total body burden of aluminum.  Persistence of aluminum in the
various tissues, organs, and fluids varied.  Estimated half-times of aluminum were 113, 74, 44, and
42 days in the spleen, liver, lungs, and serum, respectively.  The kidneys of treated rabbits demonstrated two half-times with an initial time of 4.2 and 2.3 days for the renal cortex and renal medulla, respectively,
and a second half-time of >100 days for kidney in general; the relative amounts subject to each half-time
were not addressed.  The half-life of aluminum in the brain of rats receiving an intravenous dose of
aluminum citrate was approximately 150 days (Yokel et al. 2001b).

Subcutaneous injection of rabbits with aluminum chloride daily for 28 days was associated with
significant accumulation of aluminum (measured at the end of the exposure period) in bone, followed in
order by significantly increased aluminum concentrations in renal cortex, renal medulla, liver, testes,
skeletal muscle, heart, brain white matter, hippocampus, and plasma (Du Val et al. 1986).  Because the
brain tissue of treated rabbits had the lowest aluminum concentrations of the tissues evaluated, the authors
suggested that there was a partial blood-brain barrier to entry of aluminum.

Differences in brain aluminum levels following administration of different aluminum compounds may also be due to the presence of carrier systems that can transport aluminum into or out of the brain; this has been demonstrated for aluminum citrate (Allen et al. 1995).

Following intramuscular administration of aluminum hydroxide or aluminum phosphate vaccine
adjuvants in rabbits, increased levels of 26 Al were found in the kidney, spleen, liver, heart, lymph nodes,
and brain (in decreasing order of aluminum concentration) (Flarend et al. 1997).

There is also evidence from animal studies indicating that aluminum administered parenterally
accumulates to a small extent in the milk of lactating mothers, and that aluminum crosses the placenta and accumulates in fetal tissue (Cranmer et al. 1986; Yokel and McNamara 1985; Yumoto et al. 2000).
Intraperitoneal exposure of pregnant mice to aluminum chloride on gestation days 7–16 has been
associated with significantly increased concentrations of aluminum in both placental and fetal tissues
(Cranmer et al. 1986).

3.4.3  Metabolism


As an element, aluminum is always found attached to other chemicals, and these affinities can change
within the body.  In living organisms, aluminum is believed to exist in four different forms:  as free ions,
as low-molecular-weight complexes, as physically bound macromolecular complexes, and as covalently
bound macromolecular complexes (Ganrot 1986). 

Because aluminum has a very high affinity for proteins, polynucleotides, and
glycosaminoglycans, much of the aluminum in the body may exist as physically bound macromolecular
complexes with these substances.  Metabolically, these macromolecular complexes would be expected to
be much less active than the smaller, low-molecular-weight complexes.  Aluminum may also form
complexes with macromolecules that are so stable that they are essentially irreversible.  For example,
evidence suggests that the nucleus and chromatin are often sites of aluminum binding in cells

The mechanism of action for aluminum toxicity is not known, but the element is known to compete in
biological systems with cations, especially magnesium (Macdonald and Martin 1988) despite an oxidation
state difference, and to bind to transferrin and citrate in the blood stream (Ganrot 1986).  It may also
affect second messenger systems and calcium availability (Birchall and Chappell 1988), and irreversibly
bind to cell nucleus components (Crapper McLachlan 1989; Dyrssen et al. 1987).  Aluminum has also
been shown to inhibit neuronal microtubule formation.  However, much more work is needed before a
mechanism can be proposed.

3.5.1  Pharmacokinetic Mechanisms


The mechanism by which aluminum is absorbed and the chemical forms of aluminum able to pass
through the intestinal wall are not completely understood (DeVoto and Yokel 1994; Exley et al. 1996;
Lione 1985a; Priest 1993; Reiber et al. 1995; van der Voet 1992; Wilhelm et al. 1990).

3.5.2  Mechanisms of Toxicity

In the cases in which human aluminum toxicity has occurred, the target organs appear to be the lung,
bone, and the central nervous system.  No specific molecular mechanisms have been elucidated for
human toxicity to aluminum.  In animal models, aluminum can also produce lung, bone, and
neurotoxicity, as well as developmental effects in offspring.


Various neurotoxic effects of aluminum have been induced in animals, ranging from neurobehavioral and neurodevelopmental alterations following repeated oral exposures in mice and rats to neurodegenerative pathological changes in the brain caused by acute parenteral administration in  nonrodent species.  Numerous mechanistic studies of aluminum neurotoxicity have been performed, but no single unifying mechanism has been identified (Erasmus et al. 1993; Jope and Johnson 1992; Strong et al. 1996); it is likely that more than one mechanism is involved.  The main sites of action of aluminum are difficult to discern because the studies have been performed using a variety of exposure methods (including a number of different in vivo injections and in vitro systems) and animal species, and a number of typical effects are not common to all species and exposure circumstances (i.e., are only expressed using certain models of neurotoxicity).  Although insufficient data are available to fully understand the mechanism(s) of aluminum toxicity, some general processes that are involved have been identified.

The species (rodents) in which aluminum-induced neurobehavioral effects (e.g., changes in locomotor
activity, learning and memory) have been observed fail to develop significant cytoskeletal pathology, but
exhibit a number of neurochemical alterations following in vivo or in vitro exposure (Erasmus et al. 1993;
Strong et al. 1996).  Studies in these animals indicate that exposure to aluminum can affect permeability
of the blood-brain barrier (Yokel et al. 2002; Zheng 2001), cholinergic activity (Kaizer et al. 2005; Kohila
et al. 2004; Zatta et al. 2002), signal transduction pathways (Montoliu and Felipo 2001), lipid
peroxidation (Deloncle et al. 1999; El-Demerdash 2004; Fraga et al. 1990; Khanna and Nehru 2007; Nehru and Anand 2005), and impair neuronal glutamate nitric oxide-cyclic GMP pathway (Cucarella et al. 1998; Hermenegildo et al. 1999; Llansola et al. 1999; Rodella et al. 2004), as well as interfere with metabolism of essential trace elements (e.g., iron) because of similar coordination chemistries and consequent competitive interactions.

3.5.3  Animal-to-Human Extrapolations

The appropriateness of extrapolating health effects of aluminum in animals to humans cannot be
conclusively determined due to limitations of the human database.  Information on toxicity of aluminum
in humans is not extensive because the preponderance of studies are in patients with reduced renal
function who accumulated aluminum as a result of long-term intravenous hemodialysis therapy with
aluminum-containing dialysis fluid and, in many cases, concurrent administration of high oral doses of
aluminum to regulate phosphate levels.  No clinical studies on health effects of aluminum medicinals in
people with normal renal function have been performed, largely due to the fact that exposures typically
consist of over-the-counter products such as antacids and buffered aspirins that have been assumed to be
safe in healthy individuals at recommended doses based on historical use. The assumed safety of
aluminum is also partly due to the FDA-approved GRAS status of aluminum-containing food additives. 
Other human data largely consist of studies of aluminum-exposed workers that are limited by the lack of
quantitative exposure data and/or co-exposure to other chemicals.  Subtle neurological effects have been
observed in workers chronically exposed to aluminum dust or aluminum fumes, but these studies only
provide suggestive evidence that there may be a relationship between chronic aluminum exposure and
neurotoxic effects in humans.  Aluminum is generally considered to be neurotoxic in animals, and there is
an adequate basis to conclude that neurotoxicity/neurodevelopmental toxicity is the critical effect of oral
exposure in animals.  Whether the subtle neurotoxic effects seen in adult and developing animals exposed
to relatively low doses of aluminum would definitely manifest in humans under similar exposure
conditions remains to be determined. 



No studies were located regarding endocrine disruption in humans and/or animals after exposure to
aluminum.  No in vitro studies were located regarding endocrine disruption of aluminum.


There is a limited amount of information available on the toxicity of aluminum in children.  As with
adults, neurological and skeletal (osteomalacia) effects have been observed in children with impaired
renal function (Andreoli et al. 1984; Griswold et al. 1983)

[Well, of course; so then the CDC states that it is ONLY in those children with impaired renal capacity and with impairment that there needs to be any concern over aluminum or aluminum adjuvants in vaccines, correct? While what they do NOT tell you is that there are absolutely no studies and no adequate data on children with normal renal capacity!!!]

Most of the available data come from animal studies that examined the distribution, neurotoxicity, and
skeletal toxicity of aluminum at several ages (e.g., gestationally exposed, neonatal, young, adult, and
older animals). 

[Yet they admit that they do not know what if any correlations there are between these animal studies, when applied to humans. And yet they mae a damning statement like this below!!!]

Fetal exposure may result in a higher distribution of aluminum to the brain, as compared to adults.  In the fetuses of rats receiving a single subcutaneous injection of aluminum on gestation day 5, the amount of the radiolabelled aluminum in the brain was 30% higher than in the liver; in the dams, brain aluminum levels were only 1% of the levels found in the liver (Yumoto et al. 2000).

3.11.3  Interfering with the Mechanism of Action for Toxic Effects

The mechanism of action for aluminum toxicity is not fully understood; thus, there are no known ways of
interfering with its mechanism of action.  Some pathways of aluminum chloride toxicity include induced
lipid peroxidation, altered enzyme activity, overexpression of hippocampal Aβ immunoreactivity, and
biochemical parameters.  These toxic effects were shown to be improved in rats or mice when administered vitamin E, vitamin C, selenium, beer (due to its silicon content), centrophenoxine (an antiaging drug), and the herbal medicines Dipsacus asper Wall extract and Bacopa moniera - - . 2007; Jyoti and Sharma 2006; Nedzvetsky et al. 2006; Nehru and Bhalla 2006; Nehru et al. 2007; Saba-El Rigal 2004; Zhang et al. 2003).

[And what has been stated repeatedly about SIDS, it can be prevented with vitamin C]

Genotoxicity.  Several in vitro studies have found significant increases in the occurrence of
micronuclei formation (Banasik et al. 2005; Migliore et al. 1999; Roy et al. 1990) and chromosome
aberrations (Roy et al. 1990) in human lymphocytes; no human in vivo studies were identified.

Reproductive Toxicity.  No studies were located regarding reproductive effects of various forms of
aluminum following inhalation, oral, or dermal exposure in humans.

[They go on to mention a rat/guinea pig aitborn aluminum study, and as well that a number of oral-exposure
studies examining reproductive end points in several animal species were identified.  In general, the
results of these studies suggest that aluminum is not associated with alterations in fertility. And then they make the blanket statement that: Wow, how conclusively scientific, is that?]

Further studies in this area do not appear to be necessary at this time.

Developmental Toxicity.

No studies human studies examining the potential of aluminum to induce
developmental effects in humans exposed to aluminum via inhalation, ingestion, or dermal contact were

[But in this section the animal studies appear to be fairly to significantly - damaging]



A few reports indicate hypersensitivity in children and adults who have received aluminum-containing vaccines (Bergfors et al. 2005; Böhler-Sommeregger and Lindemayr 1986; Castelain et al. 1988; Veien et al. 1986).  A human oral exposure study (Gräske et al. 2000) did not find alterations in the concentrations of immunoglobulin, interleukin, natural killer cells, or B- or T-lymphocyte populations in humans ingesting an antacid suspension for 6 weeks.  No other human
exposure studies examining immunological end points were located. 

[Then they go on to focus on only dermal sensitivity; are you kidding me?]



There are suggestive data that the nervous system may be a sensitive target in humans. Subtle neurological effects, such as impaired performance on neurobehavioral tests and increases in objective symptoms, have been observed in workers exposed to aluminum dust and fumes, McIntyre powder, or welding fumes (Bast-Pettersen et al. 1994; Buchta et al. 2003, 2005; Dick et al. 1997;

[Are YOU kidding me? Where are the actual human studies involving an injected aluminum adjuvant???]


Oral exposure studies are also needed to evaluate the potential neurotoxicity of aluminum following acute-duration exposure and to confirm or refute the potential for aluminum to induce cognitive effects.  Additionally, neurotoxicology studies measuring blood aluminum levels would be useful in determining the relevance of the animal data to humans.  Research issues related to neurodevelopmental effects of aluminum are discussed in the Data Needs section on Developmental Toxicity. 

[They do not have a damn clue, and they know it. Aluminum adjuvants have been said to have been used for 90 years, and just like silver mercury amlagm tooth fillings they thought that because they had been used, they had to be safe; but on BOTH counts they were CLEARLY wrong! And neither the CDc nor the ADA will admit to the damage it all caused. They can't; the outcome and the liability would be literally staggering, for them.

And what about all the existing aluminum adjuvant harm studies that currently exist? You know, the studies that the CDC refuses to acknowledge as to their existence. You got it, you have been lied to and fed the vaccines are safe and effective and effective mantra; and that endlessly, no proof exists. YOU, were flat out mislead and lied to, period.]

[Go ahead and read the entire document, if you have the stomach for it! You will find it in the below links.]

Risks of aluminium exposure during pregnancy
Josep L. Domingo*, Mercedes Gómez and M. Teresa Colomina
Laboratori de Toxicologia i Salut Mediambiental, Facultat de Medicina, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Reus (Tarragona)

Vaccinations, in other words, are not immunizations. The term is falsely used to promote vaccines based on quack science that simply doesn't pan out in the real world.

Read more:

Science? Where is YOUR proof science you always say you have? They told you it was there, but actually it was never there!!! Imagine that; they lied, just like they have lied to us for the last 100 years and more! get over it, that is the reality of it all.


Here is some more on Gardasil; you know being you are such an expert, you should be able to refute all of this; but actually when have you ever done that on any issue. What kind a mental disorder would allow you to be that entirely delusional, alias no identity Costner?  You do not have a prayer against me and you never have; because I deal in the truth, facts and actual unbiased science; while you deal in misinformation and lies. It is as simple as that, and always was.

If you would like to read the actual 2006 Gardasil FDA pre-approval document that has been made reference to here, luckily Natural News in approximately 2008 had saved a copy of it to their files, just in case the FDA removed it, and sure enough it appears the FDA did. Take a look.

From my site page:

Excerpting from the article titled, The Great HPV Vaccine Hoax Exposed

Do HPV Vaccines Increase the Risk of Precancerous Lesions?

The reclassification petition cited above also reveals that Gardasil vaccines may increase the risk of developing precancerous lesions by 44.6 percent in some groups of women. This is found in a quote referencing a document mentioned in the petition, which states:

"PCR-based HPV detection device with provision for accurate HPV genotyping is more urgently needed now because vaccination with Gardasil of the women who are already sero-positive and PCR-positive for vaccine-relevant genotypes of HPV has been found to increase the risk of developing high-grade precancerous lesions by 44.6%, according to an FDA VRBPAC Background Document : Gardasil HPV Quadrivalent Vaccine. May 18, 2006 VRBPAC Meeting.

NaturalNews tracked down the correct URL of the document referenced above and found it in the FDA docket archives. We have placed a safe backup copy at:

Sure enough, that FDA document has now been removed from their site.

Further excerpts.

Sure enough, this document reveals startling information about the extreme dangers apparently posed by Gardasil vaccinations. On page 13, this document states:

"Concerns Regarding Primary Endpoint Analyses among Subgroups

There were two important concerns that were identified during the course of the efficacy review of this BLA. One was the potential for Gardasil to enhance disease among a subgroup of subjects who had evidence of persistent infection with vaccine-relevant HPV types at baseline. The other concern was the observations of CIN 2/3 or worse cases due to HPV types not contained in the vaccine. These cases of disease due to other HPV types have the potential to counter the efficacy results of Gardasil for the HPV types contained in the vaccine.

1. Evaluation of the potential of Gardasil™ to enhance cervical disease in subjects who had evidence of persistent infection with vaccine-relevant HPV types prior to vaccination. The results of exploratory subgroup analyses for study 013 suggested a concern that subjects who were seropositive and PCR-positive for the vaccine-relevant HPV types had a greater number of CIN 2/3 or worse cases as demonstrated in the following table:
Observed Efficacy
- 44.6%

Again here is the url for the now missing FDA VRBPAC 2006 Preapproval Meeting Document

And again, here is the back up copy of that 2006 document VRBPAC pre-approval document, here:

NOW, would the FDA like to explain WHY they removed that document from their site??? What do they have to hide? That is legal justification for criminal charges, because it proves that they knew, and they know, and with the power they hacve they thought they could get away with it, and no one would take it seriously, and the harm would never be connected; nor to their reckless approval.

This references the contents of that said FDA VRBPAC document, but is not the actual said document: it is only the approval letter.

Nor is this the actual document: just want to make that distinction.

SANE Vax Inc. Discovers Potential Biohazard Contaminant in Merck's Gardasil™ HPV 4 Vaccine, (this is an amazing video that clearly outlines the found contamination of Gardasil, that of course the FDA has since again, white washed. No proof of the harm, ever).

SANE Vax Inc. Discovers Potential Bio-hazard Contaminant in Merck’s Gardasil™ HPV 4 Vaccine

SANE Vax to FDA: Recombinant HPV DNA found in multiple samples of Gardasil

Vaccine ingredients: (Look healthy?)

Gardasil HPV Vaccine Hoax Exposed, Mike Adams, (also a very informative video)

The Great HPV Vaccine Hoax Exposed, (Page 1)
(a significant amount of written information and documents)

Dr. Sin Hang Lee: A case study in ethics don’t pay

In the fall of 2010, without Dr. Lee’s knowledge or having an opportunity to defend himself, the newly appointed Chairperson of the Pathology Department at Milford Hospital informed the hospital’s credentialing committee that she was not recommending for approval or supporting Dr. Lee’s application for renewal of his medical staff privileges. For those who do not know, medical staff privileges at a hospital are a major asset to a medical doctor and they establish the relationship that permits among other things, the doctor to practice at a particular hospital.  When medical staff privileges at a hospital are revoked or not renewed, the doctor no longer has permission to practice at the hospital or use its facilities.  The non-renewal of the medical staff privileges, may also adversely affect the doctor’s license to practice medicine. In Dr. Lee’s case, the non-renewal of his medical staff privileges at Milford Hospital is under appeal.

Although Dr. Lee still maintains his medical staff privileges during the appeal, his position as director of the laboratory was summarily terminated along with his employment relationship at Milford Hospital on December 13, 2010 and he has been prevented from using the hospital’s laboratory to continue  his testing and research there ever since that time.  A lawsuit addressing the wrongful termination claim has been brought against the Milford Hospital.

Still think vaccines and Gardasil, are all safe and effective, like you have been told? Welcome to the real truth.

09 Andrew Moulden En 06 de 11
09 Andrew Moulden En 07 de 11
09 Andrew Moulden En 08 de 11
09 Andrew Moulden En 09 de 11
09 Andrew Moulden En 10 de 11