Tuesday, August 14, 2012

Reply to: Germ Theory Denialism

Tuesday, July 31, 2012
Germ Theory Denialism 


  Antoine Bechamp. Real physiological   -vs-   PASTEUR: PLAGIARIST, IMPOSTER!
  understanding of human health and
  microbiology .

This below is the reply he refused to publish, and then lied about what was there, (as always).

You as author of his blog claim to be such a medically and science educated, blogging smart guy; but yet you couldn’t even use the correct terminology to describe the observed concepts of Bechamps work, in human microbiology. Those terms by the way are enzymology,  microzymas, and pleomorphic model of cell biology; and as well, Pleomorphism. The third element of blood.

To describe Bechamps work by claiming only with a single one liner sentence, that it involves a concept being of which that the disease caused the microbe; is a majorly vague and intentionally misleading statement. But of course you were hoping that for anyone reading your blogging trash; if you could make it sound intentionally ridiculous enough, that they would be mislead by it to a point that they would never actually take the time to research Antoine Bechamps work. Isn’t that right? And you can Costner, can do justice to and describe all of Bechamps work, and his observed and put forth concepts; in one redundant sentence? Wow. How brilliant, are you?

If there is anyone here with in no small part has some major ignorance going on as to the subject of human microbiology; it most obviously would be you, alias Costner!

The fact that you spent that much time to argue terms as to the real definition of the word, theory. For you to claim as well that there is a major difference between basic theory and that of scientific theory-claiming all scientific theory is fact; that level of arrogance in itself should be seen as about mind boggling, to even the average and knowledgeable self thinking person; and to the point of nausea. Why cant they cure anything then, Costner? Why is it all getting worse?

The only people lacking the proper scientific tools at any time in the history of medical care, for late the 1800’s to the current date; has been the main stream medical field. If you study the real historical information; it was people like Bechamp and others since that time that understood the proper magnification of live cell blood, verses the use of an electron microscope to literally study dead and dying blood and cell matter; which is near to worthless. What is the life force of a human being, Costner? It is human blood, as it flows! What should they be studying if they actually wanted to find the cause of health conditions? Tell me, exactly way was it that the FDA banned darkfield live blood cell microscopy? The multi million dollar question. 

No one stated that antibiotics do not work, and that issue in itself is irrelevant to the Bechamps information on microzymes. What is not irrelevant is the fact that antibiotics often do more harm than good, especially when overused and due to as well the lowering of resitence regarding the terrain, the human body. The soil and the seed. What will grow in deleted and toxic soil? Answer, often nothing but stunted and sickly plants ovetaken by weeds. What grows in clean, fertile and nutriant rich soil, just the opposite; healthy plants. It is no differant in regard to the health care of humans. When proper detoxification and cellular nutritian exist, the disease and disorder process often resolves itself. The miraculous self healing body. To simple? Not at all. But man obviously believes he is the only way to chemicalized drug and vaccine intervention; and that to this point in the bigger picture, has clearly been a literal disaster.

You admit Costner, that science is and does evolve to learn added information that may change former observations and resulting beliefs; but yet you claim that all of the basic science you stand on is so solid that in no way can nor will it be changed in ay way, significantly. Is that not what you stated; yes or no? How completely delusional is that?

You have even gone so far as to even claim that evolution is all supported by so many observations and confirming experiments that scientists are confident it will never be overturned by new evidence. In your world, alias no identity, Costner; that probably will be true for you; because NOTHING, and no alternative science and no data nor information and evidence, is ever enough. It never will be. Why? Because someone, has to much to lose.
One day your mind, (brain) should be donated to an unbiased branch of neuro-science, to see what is and actually has been wrong with you; and people like you. Is there something missing, mis-wired, or what?

As to your posted video; all of that is irrelevant to the actual subject matter involved.

I have an expose coming on not only Antoine Bechamps work, but a few others in history. Stay tuned; you should be very interested. That, if you actually gave a crap about real health care science, and microbiology. The truth was always to much for you to handle, Costner; so I would doubt in this case as well, that you will ever make any attempt to actually educate yourself on the real science, nor as to the truth and the facts.

End of reply:



Here below is the depth of actual unbiased information you need to review, and to understand; to know that Antoine Bechamps work and what he put forth, was actually right, and as well to understand what so called modern medicine has been and had missing from their microbiology and physiological understanding of the human body, and as well thus, real health care 

Louis Pasteur vs. Antoine Bechamp: Know the True Causes of Disease
Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/030384_Louis_Pasteur_disease.html

Germ Theory of Disease Causation

Antoine Bechamp
French biologist
1816 - 1908

What is Pleomorphism?


Pasteur was not a scientific genious, but a fraud. Pasteur had no training or credentials in either medicine or physiology; he was a chemist.Pasteur very likely created the disease known as "hydrophobia," rather than found a cure for it.

Lie No. 1 : Pasteur is a Benefactor of Humanity
- from ‘The Ten Biggest Lies about Vaccines’ by Sylvie Simon

Rabies Past Present in Scientific Review
Millicent Morden (Physician & Surgeon)

Pasteur began the practice of vivisection and horrific animal experiments, which has never been proven to have any value. Why not? In the natural state, animals simply have different diseases from humans. This one error has led us down a costly and finally fruitless path. How can we hope to cure human disease by giving animals diseases they would never have gotten in nature, then pretending that such diseases are the same ones we get, and then seeing which drugs cover up the animal's symptoms? Then we illogically conclude that those same drugs will have the same effect in humans! Idiotic as that sounds, this may be a pretty fair description of how many prescription drugs have found their way to market during the past century.

In a hook entitled, "Bechamp or Pasteur," by E. D. Hume, there may be found much proof pertinent to our discussion. A notable failure of the Pasteur treatment was that of a young postman, named Pierre Roscol, who, with another man, was attacked by a dog supposed to be mad, but was not bitten, for the dog’s teeth did not penetrate his clothing; but his companion received severe bites. The latter refused to go to the Pasteur Institute and remained in perfect health; but the unfortunate Roscal was forced by the postal authorities to undergo the treatment, beginning March 9th. On the following April 12th severe symptoms set in with pain at the point of inoculation, not at the place of the bite, for he had never been bitten. On April 14th he died of paralytic "hydrophobia" the new disease brought into the world by Pasteur.

There are over 3,000 deaths on record in reports from the Pasteur Institute, of persons bitten by dogs. All died after treatments. On the other hand, the record of the London Hospital, a few years ago, showed 2,668 persons bitten by angry dogs: not one of them developed hydrophobia and not one had been treated by the Pasteur method.


In a hook entitled, "Bechamp or Pasteur," by E. D. Hume, there may be found much proof pertinent to our discussion. A notable failure of the Pasteur treatment was that of a young postman, named Pierre Roscol, who, with another man, was attacked by a dog supposed to be mad, but was not bitten, for the dog’s teeth did not penetrate his clothing; but his companion received severe bites. The latter refused to go to the Pasteur Institute and remained in perfect health; but the unfortunate Roscal was forced by the postal authorities to undergo the treatment, beginning March 9th. On the following April 12th severe symptoms set in with pain at the point of inoculation, not at the place of the bite, for he had never been bitten. On April 14th he died of paralytic "hydrophobia" the new disease brought into the world by Pasteur.

In addition, before his peers at the Academy, Prof. Peter accused Pasteur not only of having increased the incidence of rabies but of having “provoked cases of paralytic and even convulsive rabies”, rather than having made it disappear completely, as he had pompously announced. “The method of Mr Pasteur could not be less considered from the viewpoint of anaylsing the cases of death, the clinical analysis indicating that a certain number of these fatal cases are due to the Pasteurian inoculations, which explains the rise in deaths from rabies in humans.” Prof. Peter concluded: “Mister Pasteur does not cure rabies, he spreads it!”

Read much more of the details:
http://www.whale.to/vaccine/simon1.html#PASTEURS_RABIES_ __

Man, if you want to read a horrendous expose on the callamity and harm of vaccination in the day of Pasteur; get to read this one. This whole article is full of the accounts of an endless trail death of both humans and animals, as to his experiments; and remember Pasteur had no medical training other being a supposed chemist.


Between 1869 and 1872, Pasteur expounded three erroneous basic postulates that are still used today as the foundation of vaccination. The first put forward that asepsis reigns amongst our cells: the cell is clean, all microbes are exogenous (they come from outside) and attack it, and these germs have an existence that is independent from living organisms. The second is that each illness corresponds to a specific agent, microbial or viral, against which one can protect oneself, thanks to vaccines; the illness has one cause alone, therefore one remedy alone. Finally, immunity is aquired by the production of antibodies in response to the introduction of antigens via the vaccine and these antibodies give protection.

It has been well known for some time that these postulates are false, the latest discoveries in immunology contradict them totally. However, the vaccinators feign ignorance of these studies. If each germ provoked an illness, life on Earth would be long gone. Pasteur was wrong, but in this case he is forgiven, it was a simple case of human error.

What was less forgivable was his animosity towards Béchamp, the founder of enzymology, who was able to identify minute corpuscles smaller than cells, microzymas. These microzymas are the elements that are truly responsible for life, whether human, animal or vegetable. Microzymas can span centuries but are also able to evolve throughout time. In humans, their form varies according to the general state of the terrain they inhabit and from which they feed. They are as constructive as they are destructive, capable as they are of transforming, mutating and evolving. Had this theory of polymorphism been recognised it would have shaken to its foundation our perception of health and disease. When an imbalance disrupts the normal functioning of microzymas – malnutrition, poisoning, physical or emotional stress – the microzyma transforms into a pathogenic germ, in other words a microbe, and illness follows. From this perspective, all that is necessary is to reinforce the health of the person in order for the internal pathogenic germs to regain their original form and their protective function.

Read more:
http://www.whale.to/vaccine/simon1.html#THE_VACCINE_AGAINST_ANTHRAX_ __



Zymotic disease

Why we don't cure
By Dr Patrick Quanten MD

In the second half of the nineteenth century a French scientist, Antoine Béchamps, had given a rational, scientific explanation of the origin, growth and life activities of germs and of the normal living cells of vegetable, animal and human bodies. He became a Professor and taught at the University of Montpellier and the famous Sorbonne in Paris, where he was able to demonstrate, as early as 1864, that cells and germs are not the smallest individual living organisms, as taught by Pasteur and his followers. He called these organisms "microzymes". All cells and germs - bacteria, viruses, parasites, moulds as well as cells from complex structures - are associations of these microzymes. The physical characteristics and vital activities of cells and germs depend upon the soil in which their microzymes feed, grow and multiply. The higher the quality of the "soil" the higher developed the cell will be. Microzymes that grow in fertile procreative soil will form highly complex cells. The same microzymes feeding on morbid material, living and multiplying in poisonous conditions will develop into organisms of the lower order - bacteria, viruses, parasites.

Read more:

Inflammatory response.
Allopathic perspective – Louis Pasteur vs - Pathogenic perspective – Antoine Bechamp:

1. Through his experiments re: fermentation he discovered ‘little bodies’, later renamed microzymes.

2. He deduced microzymes to be the smallest independent living organisms.
3. He demonstrated that microzymes naturally change into bacteria when given the right environment (when in a medium of alcohol, the waste product of cellular respiration), even after the death of an organic life-form.
4. Concluded that bacteria can only come alive if the pre-existing organic material had died.
5.Bechamps main conclusion was that bacteria is the result of disease, not the cause, thus directly opposing Pasteurs’ Germ Theory.

According to the pathogenic perspective leukocytes (white blood cells) are in fact particles of pathogenic matter which have been condensed into globular bodies which resemble cells. This happens in the lymph nodes of the lymph glands and the trabeculae of the spleen (this explains why when we are ill our glands often become swollen).

The pathogenic perspective of the inflammatory response is as follows:
1. Lowered vitality and resistance or some kind of invasion or obstruction by foreign matter causes the accumulation of pathogen in the circulation which makes blood more thick and causes congestion of blood in the affected area.

2. Because of the obstruction caused by the build-up of pathogenic material in the blood vessel it prevents the blood from flowing freely, causing it to surge back and gradually distend the blood vessels from the capillaries onwards.(redness and heat)

3. This distension of blood vessels causes the leukocytes (pathogenic matter) to be ‘pushed’ through into the interstitial spaces (not migration and chemotaxis as in the allopathic perspective ). ( swelling and pain)
4. Here the leukocytes engage in ‘battle’ with the bacteria and under the proteolytic action of the bacteria they disintegrate into pus.

5. These decomposed leukocytes form the food for the development of microzymes into bacteria which in turn destruct the leukocytes and so forth.

Health Care Truth

What Is a Microzyma?

Professor Antoine Bechamp (1816-1908)

On April 15, 1908, Antoine Bechamp, one of the greatest scientists who ever lived died, aged 91. You may well be asking "who cares?" or "why is this important?", as well as "who is this guy?"

It is important because Antoine Bechamp was the foremost pioneer of science, medicine, nutrition and genetics of his generation, and his discoveries could have saved humanity immense misery and suffering.
He was one of France's most prominent and active researchers and biologists; he had degrees in biology, chemistry, physics, pharmacy, and medicine, and practised, researched and taught in all those fields. He first worked in Strasbourg as a Professor of Physics and Toxicology at the Higher School of Pharmacy, later as Professor of Medical Chemistry at the University of Montpellier and, later still, as Professor of Biochemistry and Dean of the Faculty of Medicine at the University of Lille, all in France.

After his death, it took eight pages of the French Moniteur Scientifique (the equivalent publication to that of the National Academy of Sciences) just to list the titles of his professionally published studies. The Moniteur Scientifique said of Antoine Béchamp: "Those of his acquaintance who cared for him and were about him know that he never doubted that one day justice would be rendered him."

For many years, Bechamp was forgotten by all but a few diehards and researchers on the fringes of science and medicine. It is only now, with the rise of the internet, that his work and theories are getting the exposure that they deserve. At the time of writing, googling "Antoine Bechamp" gets 10,200 hits -- a long way from Louis Pasteur's 2,310,00, but it is still much more exposure and discussion than his work has had for many years.
The English science journal Nature wrote in its obituary that Dr. Béchamp was ensured "an honorable place among the founders of biological chemistry."

His would be a household name today if it wasn't for the activities of Louis Pasteur, who history has treated very kindly indeed, considering his fake science, his theft of ideas (mainly from Bechamp), his falsification of experimental data, and in general the many claims that he made which had no basis in fact. But Pasteur, charlatan that he was, doesn't deserve any more mention on this page than is absolutely necessary to document the history of Antoine Bechamp. There will soon be a squidoo lens up for Pasteur, the fraud and fake, and when it appears, the link will be here.

A short biography of Antoine Bechamp


Bechamp or Pasteur?

The Blood and its Third Element [Paperback]

Antoine Bechamp (Author)

The last work by Antoine Béchamp, a man who should, by rights, be regarded today as one of the founders of modern medicine and biology.

During his long career as an academic and researcher in nineteenth century France, Béchamp was widely known and respected as both a teacher and a researcher. As a leading academic, his work was well documented in scientific circles.

Few made as much use of this fact as Louis Pasteur, who based much of his career on plagiarising and distorting Béchamp’s research; in doing so, Pasteur secured for himself an undeserved place in the history of medical science.

The Blood and its Third Element is Béchamp’s explanation of his position, and his defense of it against Pasteur’s mischief. This final major work of Béchamp’s embodies the culmination of his life’s research. This book contains, in detail, the elements of the microzymian theory of the organization of living organisms and organic materials. It has immediate and far reaching relevance to the fields of immunology, bacteriology, and cellular biology; and it shows that more than 100 years ago, the germ, or microbian, theory of disease was demonstrated by Béchamp to be without foundation.

There is no single cause of disease. The ancients thought this, and Béchamp proved it and was written out of history for his trouble. The relevance of his work to the dilemmas that plague modern medical science remains as yet unrealized.

Also read the life story of Wilhelm Reich, if you do not believe that the work of real medical pioneers is sytematically destroyed. http://www.squidoo.com/bechamp

Royal Rife

The electron microscope which is commonly used today, while capable of attaining magnifications surpassing 500,000X at excellent resolution, is incapable of examining living things. Basic Histology, Junqueira & Carneiro, 1980, outlines the limitations of using electron microscopes:

"These conditions preclude the use of living material ... the electron beam on an object can damage it and produce unwanted changes in tissue structures. They take a living, changing scene (the blood), and disorganize it, by staining the blood sample. They then take a snapshot of this disorganized situation and interpret it as the entire story. During the study and interpretation of stained tissue sections in microscope preparations, the observed product is the end result of a series of processes that considerably distort the image observable in the living tissue, mainly through shrinking and retraction. It has been suggested in the past that the electron-microscopic specks identified as viruses could, more than likely, be nothing more than particles of lifeless, degraded protein--disintegrated peptides from cellular death--catabolic residues of cytoplasm, or repair proteins produced by the cells in response to the imbalanced biological terrain."

Royal Rife was arguably one of the greatest scientific minds of the twentieth century. His instrument (pictured below), which he designed and manufactured himself, was able to view living matter at unheard of magnifications of up to 60,000X, also at excellent resolution. With this extraordinary device, Rife identified microbes in the blood of sick people which seemingly miraculously transformed, under various conditions, one into the other, in classic pleomorphist fashion. He saw sixteen stages in all -- the same number in Gaston Naessens' somatid cycle.
Rife was able to observe and prove the reality of pleomorphism. He was able to do this partly because of his advancements with optics, but also because he used light frequencies to highlight his samples, rather than chemical dyes. Using dyes kills the specimen, so tissues cannot be viewed in the natural living state; and studying dead samples to understand living processes is as useless as studying cadavers.
How was it that the electron microscope, able to see only inert, inanimate matter has been universally adopted in the world's laboratories, while Rife's machine, able to view animate organisms as they live and move, went into universal limbo? What agenda is at work here? And what is it about the "politics of science" that has led innovators, scientists such as Bechamp, Enderlein, Naessens and Rife, to be brought to trial, and condemned to ridicule and obscurity?

Gaston Naessens

The Life and Trials of Gaston Naessens: The Galileo of the Microscope

Conclusion excerpt:

The implications of Béchamp's ideas, and the case his discoveries make for lifestyle changes such as wholesome nutrition and environmental, hygienic cleanliness have been ignored, in favor of the brain-dead easiness of the germ theory -- a convenience that profits industry and requires "heroic" and expensive medical interventions. The problem with the pleomorphic model of cell biology and medicine is that is can't support a huge drug and disease industry. Its promise? The same.

Synthesis of the Work of Enderlein, Bechamps and other Pleomorphic Researchers - by Dr. Karl Horst Poehlman, Australia

What is Pleomorphism?

Pioneers of Pleomorphism

Antoine Bechamp
Günther Enderlein
Gastons Naessens


Louis Pasteur (1822 – 1895), Plagiarist, Impostor!

Is Modern Medicine Founded on Error?



The Dream & Lie of Louis Pasteur
by R. B. Pearson (originally Pasteur, Plagiarist, Imposter 1942)

Bechamp or Pasteur?            

Bechamp or Pasteur: A Lost Chapter in the History of Biology 

The Lost History of Medicine

Pleomorphism, Its Discovery and Suppression

Royal Raymond Rife and Antoine Béchamp found Pleomorphism, the body's terrain/pH, not germ-theory to be a leading cause of cancer/fungus, viruses and other disease. To get better, eat alkalizing foods, take vinegar, baking soda. Check out The pH Miracle, http://www.phmiracleliving.com/

Bions, Protocells, Biogenesis, 
Pleomorphism, Living Blood and Genetics

Antoine Bechamp
Pleomorphism    Disease Theory

by Walene James
You can simply look at this uch of it ad see exactly WHY modern medicine has continued fail in the physiological understanding of disease and disorders. You can see as well in this why mainstream simply ca not get vaccine out of their head as the best and only way to prevent virla and bacterial illness.They falsely believe as well that once a virus is on the earth nothing can stop it but a vaccine and will propagate and exist forever. So,thus they simply can beleive anything but their vaccines changed anything. Even though millions remain existing with no vaccine derived immunity, if they ever had any), and have not been vaccinated in decades. Do they think that herd immuity is aqcuired by onky vaccinaing the young, and thus protects all of the rest of society of all ages? See, how mislead -ignorant their mind set, actually is?

Louis Pasteur & The Pasteurian germ theory
Disease Theory
[A fraudster and plagiarist of Bechamp, a maker of toxic and useless vaccines, and the claimed inventor of the truly disastrous (Pasteurian monomorphic) germ theory, no wonder he looks a miserable sod!]

The Dream & Lie of Louis Pasteur
by R. B. Pearson (originally Pasteur, Plagiarist, Imposter 1942)

The Post-Antibiotic Age: Germ Theory
by Tim O'Shea

Also here:


A little research uncovers the following amazing possibilities about Pasteur, which the reader is encouraged to further investigate:

Pasteur had no training or credentials in either medicine or physiology; he was a chemist.
Pasteur very likely created the disease known as "hydrophobia," rather than found a cure for it.
Pasteur initiated the practice of vivisection with horrific animal experiments. Hundreds of thousands of laboratory animals have been needlessly killed by atrocious experiments in the name of "science," not only at Pasteurian Institutes, but pervasively throughout the entire empire of medical research laboratories worldwide, even to the present time.
Rather than protect the human race from disease, Pasteur was directly responsible for the deaths of hundreds of people who were inoculated with unproven vaccines and injections, and indirectly for thousands more in whom disease was introduced by the administration of unproven Pasteurian procedures.
Pasteur may be seen more as a merchant than a scientist, with his frequent reporting of false test findings and data, which had two designs: self-promotion and profiteering from the sale of drugs and vaccines that were often made mandatory by legislators.
Pasteurian treatment for a disease he did not even have actually killed Alexander, the King of Greece.
Pasteur did not work on naturally diseased subjects, but instead introduced the idea of inducing sickness by giving morbid (diseased) injections into healthy subjects.
As far as his Germ Theory goes, there was much opposition to it among many researchers of his own time. In a lecture given in London on 25 May 1911, M.L. Leverson, MD stated:
"The entire fabric of the germ theory of disease rests upon assumptions which not only have not been proved, but which are incapable of proof, and many of them can be proved to be the reverse of truth. The basic one of these unproven assumptions, wholly due to Pasteur, is the hypothesis that all the so-called infectious and contagious disorders are caused by germs."

Also from the top medical journal Lancet, 29 Mar 1909, we find: "Koch's Postulates are rarely, if ever, complied with." Read more:

Professor Koch & Koch Postulates (One of Pasteurs competators, but doing the same kind and nature of work; hence as well, more vaccine maddness, in its early stages). Disease Theory   Medical/ tests  Diphtheria/vaccines

More excepts, from: The Post-Antibiotic Age: Germ Theory

Another Theory

Antoine Bechamp, from whose research Pasteur plagiarized whatever he thought was useful, came up with an interesting point of view that has never been refuted. Bechamp discovered tiny organisms he called "microzymas" which are present in all things - animal, vegetable, and mineral, whether living or dead. Depending upon the condition of the host, these microzymas could assume various forms. Bad bacteria and viruses were simply the forms assumed by the microzymas when there was a condition of disease. In a diseased body, the microzymas became pathological bacteria and viruses. In a healthy body, microzymas formed healthy cells. When a plant or animal died, the microzymas lived on. To this day, the whole theory of microzymas has never been disproved.
Later researchers like Naessens and Enderlein followed the same line of reasoning and developed their own systems of how these microzymas operate. Although their ideas were never proven false by opposing research, they were generally persecuted by mainstream medicine, which makes sense. Because without an enemy that can be identified and killed, what good is it to develop weapons? And developing weapons, that is, drugs, has been the agenda of the industry set up by Carnegie and Rockefeller even down to the present day, as we shall see. New drugs mean new research funding and government money and the need for prescriptions and for an entire profession to write those prescriptions.

Pasteur Won

How did Pasteur's ideas become the foundation of organized medicine? Politics. Pharmaceutical economics.
More excerpted highights:

Politics never changes. The same type of thinking that imprisoned Galileo long ago for discovering that the earth went around the sun, the rulers' eternal attempt to control the minds of their subjects, these are the forces that cast Pasteur, an ambitious opportunist, into a position he may not have deserved - the supposed Trailblazer in the science of modern biomedicine.

Funny how things often don't really get "discovered" until the commercial aspects of that discovery have been worked out.

Howard Hencke, in his 1995 book The Germ Theory: A Deliberate Aberration, notes that it was critical for the new medical industry.

"... to indoctrinate the public in the Western world with the belief that the salvation from all, especially physical ailments, lay outside the individual's system and responsibility, because it was caused by external factors...and that chemical remedies (drugs) will keep him free from disease, independent of his own vigilant responsibility."
We're talking about marketing here, yes?

The author of the long-suppressed work Pasteur or Bechamp? states:
"Had it not been for the mass selling of vaccines, Pasteur's germ theory of disease would have collapsed into obscurity." - E. Douglas Hume

Some 17 years before Pasteur, the most famous nurse in history, Florence Nightengale, put it like this:
"Diseases are not individuals arranged in classes like cats and dogs, but conditions growing out of one another. The specific disease is the grand refuge of the weak, uncultured, unstable minds, such as now rule in the medical profession. There are no specific diseases; there are specific disease conditions."
F.N. 1860

Sound familiar?

Read more:

More excepts, from: The Post-Antibiotic Age: Germ Theory

In 1915, another medical doctor wrote an article for the top British medical journal Lancet. Dr. Montais studied 21 cases of tetanus, each of whom had received Pasteurian inoculation. The conclusion of the article, which appeared in the 23 Oct 1915 issue, was that in every case, the tetanus had been caused by the inoculation. Dr. Montais said that "Pasteur had created a new form of disease."

We should understand that it was Pasteur who began the fashion of studying artificial disease conditions: "inducing sickness by morbid injections in human and animal subjects, instead of studying naturally diseased subjects."

Pasteur began the practice of vivisection and horrific animal experiments, which has never been proven to have any value. Why not? In the natural state, animals simply have different diseases from humans. This one error has led us down a costly and finally fruitless path. How can we hope to cure human disease by giving animals diseases they would never have gotten in nature, then pretending that such diseases are the same ones we get, and then seeing which drugs cover up the animal's symptoms? The we illogically conclude that those same drugs will have the same effect in humans! Idiotic as that sounds, this may be a pretty fair description of how many prescription drugs have found their way to market during the past century.

Without going on for pages and pages with data that substantiate the above ideas, suffice it to say that Pasteurian methods may not have been quite the success we have always been taught that they were. The reader is referred to the chapter on Vaccinations, and to Hans Ruesch's Naked Empress.

So with most of the major researchers eventually coming around to the same conclusion, how is it that on the threshold of the 21st century, organized medicine in this country still acts as though the Germ Theory is carved in stone and all policy proceeds from this premise? And most people still believe it?

The answer to that is out there too, and can be gotten to with just a little more patience.

Roll forward now to the 1880s and 1890s. The Industrial Revolution, the age of coal, of oil, of electricity, of machines, of railroads and automobiles. Two figures towered over this era, wielding more power over science, industry, finance, and politics than possibly anyone else in history. Of course we're now speaking of Andrew Carnegie and J.D. Rockefeller.

The control of Carnegie and Rockefeller over most aspects of American life is something to marvel at and appreciate, even extending to the present day. Change was taking place faster than the politicians could control it, and for once in our history, control was in the private sector. Without going into a long political harangue, I just want to touch on one aspect of the way that power was expressed - the rise of organized medicine.

Read more:

Among many other things, Carnegie and Rockefeller controlled the oil and coal industries. By 1900, they became aware that these industries were producing mountains of waste year by year. An original idea was presented: what if these chemical waste materials could somehow be turned to profit? Capital idea, but how? Medicines, that's how. But medicines like the world has never seen. Medicines made from chemicals. Pharmaceuticals.

The Creation of Credibility

Brilliant idea. But how could the people be made to accept such a strange notion? That was the problem. They just took natural cures and occasionally consulted the country or local doctor for something "serious." The way to gain general acceptance of the new medicines soon became obvious: standardize the education, training, and credentialing of medical doctors and raise their economic status to a level where they would follow policy. And the policy would come from above.

About 1904 Andrew Carnegie noticed that the workers in his factories actually made more money than most medical doctors. Consulting with the president of MIT, Henry Pritchett, they set up the Carnegie Foundation with $10 million. Its original purpose was to provide a pension fund for retiring professors. But soon a new application emerged: control of education. The name was changed to the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, and Pritchett expanded its original purpose, now calling it

" a great agency devoted to strengthening American education through scientific inquiry and policy studies."
Any time billionaires tell you they're going to devote themselves to something for you, that's usually the time to check your wallet. Ever notice that?

The Foundation became immensely successful. Control of educational standards came about in this way: in order to qualify for the new pension system, a participating institution had to meet standards set by the Foundation. In the first year, only 52 of the 421 colleges who applied were accepted. The Foundation soon took on a life of its own.

Abraham Flexner

A nonphysician teacher, was hired by the Carnegie Foundation to travel throughout the country and "observe" medical education. His landmark study, known as the Flexner Report, was published in 1910. Upon his recommendations, the Foundation branched out from being merely a pension plan for professors to an entirely new area: research funding. Schools which met Flexner's, i.e., the Foundation's, standards were awarded research funds and endowments. Those who did not got nothing. In this way the giants of industry came to dictate the type of medical care that would flourish in America. Traditional, natural methods of healing were passed over, in favor of the more "scientific" approach, which coincidentally meant those schools with the likelihood of disseminating the products of the newborn pharmaceutical industry. The big universities in the medical hierarchy that rule today were aligned with the Carnegie Foundation at that time:

Not to be outdone by the Carnegie Foundation, The Rockefeller Foundation also came into ascendancy at this time. Again employing the direction of Abraham Flexner, the Rockefeller Foundation developed national standards for medical schools that were seeking "philanthropic" support. Good word. In 1904 there were 5747 medical doctors. Only 15 years later, after the Flexner Report, by 1919, there were only 2658. In that same 15 year period, the number of medical schools went from 162 to 81. (Lisa p 26) The cut had been made - Rockefeller was screening who was going to play ball from who wasn't.

Schools had to be connected to a large university. Universities had to be linked with clinical departments with laboratories and a university hospital. Using Rockefeller Funds, Flexner was able to develop a small group of elite medical schools that were clinically oriented. They already had the raw materials for the new drugs. What was lacking was an academic power-base to legitimize their development and general use.

The infrastructure for education, funding, research and the organization of medicine that persists today was created in a few short years. Ever wonder how simple folk medicine which had been around for centuries was chucked out the window so fast? Set up under the guidance and specifications of two of the biggest economic forces in history, Carnegie and Rockefeller, organized medicine became an industry, with its focus on market growth. An industry concerned with disease is not about to abolish itself by curing the diseased, now is it? This is why all these years, effective inexpensive non-pharmaceutical remedies have been systematically suppressed. It's just good business.

Against this backdrop, the flailing Germ Theory was revived and trotted back out for a SECOND RUN
The fact that it had been repudiated by its founder and most of his contemporaries was no longer mentioned in circles who expected next year's funding. The Germ Theory fit well with the new market-oriented paradigm of medicine: if bad bugs are out there causing diseases, we better find drugs to kill them. It was a natural, a marriage of expediency, like Bill and Hillary.

Up into the 1920s, the burgeoning medical industry was gaining strength. It was aided by the declining incidence of infectious diseases due to improved sanitation, for which medicine took credit. That is an entire story in itself, and a good starting point would be The Sanctity of Human Blood.

The politics of medicine was becoming stronger year by year, as new institutions were built and funding was doled out for those research projects that had the best potential for future market value. The worldwide flu epidemic of 1918 that killed millions proved that the new "scientific" approach had a lot to learn about disease prevention. There was simply no cure, as the virus tore through the world's population.

The still-unproven Germ Theory came to be accepted as policy largely because any opposition to it had little chance of getting published. A small group of scientists, however, aware that the work of Bechamp was a much more reasonable view of physical reality, continued to develop research in a direction other than germs as the cause of disease. "Science" was off and running, the thoroughbred of the new drug market, but the scientific method had been left in the dust. The Germ Theory was enshrined as the underlying dogma of the new Religion. J.H. Tilden, MD, among others, was not going to church services, apparently:

"...doctors fight the imaginary foe without ceasing. The people are so saturated with the idea that disease must be fought to a finish that they are not satisfied with conservative treatment. Something must be done, even if they pay for it with their lives, as tens of thousands do every year. This willingness to die on the altar of medical superstition is one very great reason why no real improvement is made in fundamental medical science."

- Toxemia Explained 1926
1926? Sounds like 2012. More deja vu.
Read more: http://www.whale.to/vaccine/shea1.html

More excerpted - highlights

In 1928, however, the Germ Theory got a power boost that has lasted almost to the present day. Dr. Alexander Fleming, a British scientist, accidentally discovered that his cultures were being destroyed by a certain mould. For the next 14 years, scientists in England and America were successful in isolating and testing penicillin, in secret. However, in 1942 a fire at The Cocoanut Grove, Boston's oldest nightclub, killed and injured hundreds of people. Penicillin was rushed to Boston in time to prevent infection from burns in hundreds of patients. The news exploded, and the race to mass-produce penicillin, the Wonder Drug, was on. By 1944, all American military requirements for penicillin could be met. Merck to the rescue.

This one event, the discovery of penicillin, did more to bring credibility to organized medicine than probably anything else in its history. To be able to prevent infection was certainly a miraculous and wonderful power. Thousands and thousands of people had died from infection down through the ages. Finally here was proof positive of the correctness of the Germ Theory: these patients had died from bad bacteria, and now if only the bacteria were killed with penicillin, the patients would live.

Once again, nature was to show that she does not deal in black and white. In fact,

Mother Nature Always Bats Last

In his early research to formulate penicillin, Sir Alexander Fleming knew very well about the way living things could change or adapt when stressful substances were added. He knew, perhaps better than anyone, the dangers of resistance from overuse of penicillin, and warned against that overuse from the very beginning, as expressed in an interview Fleming gave to the New York Times in 1945:

" The greatest possibility of evil in self-medication is the use of too-small doses, so that instead of clearing up infection the microbes are educated to resist penicillin..."

Think of it this way: the oldest living things on earth are bacteria and viruses. They have been around for billions of years. They have persisted through myriads of changeful environments - hot, cold, wet, dry, with oxygen, without oxygen, earthquakes, volcanoes, glaciers - you name it. They're still around. Thousands of species of plants and animals have come and gone because they couldn't adapt. So it's pretty safe to say that on this planet, the masters of adapting are bacteria and viruses.

Now suddenly in the 1940s, we introduce a new substance into the human population: penicillin, a substance which kills all bacteria. Do you think bacteria might have run into some other stresses in the past 10 billion years? Probably have. How did they survive? They changed - doctors say 'mutated.' The ones that mutated survived; the rest died.

Even from the very beginning of the Antibiotic Age in the 1940s, doctors noticed the signs of MUTATION
Exposed to antibiotics, if bacteria can change and survive, they are said to be drug-resistant. Superbugs.
Since the 1940s, many antibiotics have been developed until today there are about 160 types. The problem is that most are just slightly different versions of a few main types. And resistance to those main types has increased year by year.

Drug resistance is today one of the leading causes of deaths in the U.S.: More than 70 thousand patients die each year from it, according to the National Institutes of Health.(Garrett) These patients acquired the infection while they were in a hospital being treated for something else, according to the May 1997 documentary The Coming Plague. No known antibiotics can help these patients, and they die.

Increased mortality from infectious disease is on everyone's mind. A 1992 study by the CDC's Institute of Medicine showed that mortality from infectious disease has risen 22% worldwide from 1980-1992. (Slavkin, p108)
Here's a good example of drug resistance:

in 1946, about 88% of Staphylococcus infections could be cured by penicillin.
By 1950, only 61% of staph infections could be killed by penicillin
In 1982, fewer than 10% of staph cases could be cured by penicillin.
Today it is less than 5%.

The Plague Makers

In the 1960s, doctors switched the resistant staph patients to another antibiotic called methecillin. That worked for awhile, but not for long. By 1992, at least 40% of these staphylococcus infections were resistant to methecillin, according to the New England Journal of Medicine, 28 Apr 94.

By 1993, only one sure fire Staphylococcus killer remained: Vancomycin was the big gun. However today that is no longer true. Today there are many strains of staphylococcus that are resistant to vancomycin. That means also resistant to penicillin and to methecillin. What's left? Nothing. Out of drugs.

Let's talk strep. Many of the resistant Streptococcus infections have made headlines in the past few years if the patients die a particularly gruesome death. Examples of this are stories of the "flesh-eating disease" which appear from time to time in the news. This is a strain of Group A streptococcus that is resistant to all antibiotics and can attack flesh, muscles, and organs. Now we all know that newspapers are generally not reliable sources of information because they tend to twist facts and over dramatize things and create crises in order to sell more papers. So things have not yet reached the state of affairs that we saw in the movie "Outbreak" with Dustin Hoffman. But many credible medical authorities have been quoted as saying that it's no longer a question of if a scenario like the Ebola epidemic portrayed in that movie could happen. Rather it's a question of when.
Today 30% of Strep pneumoniae are resistant to penicillin, once the drug of choice with almost 100% results.
Today 30% of gonorrhea cases are resistant to both penicillin and tetracycline, which ten years ago was almost 100% effective. The CDC no longer recommends these two drugs for gonorrhea.

Fred Tenover, PhD of the Centers for Disease Control in Atlanta has said: "We even have some strains [of streptococcus] now, although not all, that are resistant essentially to all of our clinically useful antibiotics."
Read more: http://www.whale.to/vaccine/shea1.html

More highlights: excerpted

The Superbugs

How serious is this problem of resistant bacteria? I guess death is a fairly serious outcome: 70,000 Americans are dying annually from bacterial infections they caught in the hospital, which no antibiotics could cure. According to the New England Journal of Medicine, Apr 94, of the 40 million patients hospitalized every year,2 million acquire infections after they get to the hospital. That's a one in 20 chance. As many as 60% of those 2 million infections involve antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

In some ICUs, there can be as high as a 70% chance of nosocomial infection! Nosocomial means acquired IN the hospital.


Let's look at TB for a moment. At the turn of the century, tuberculosis was the leading cause of death in the U.S. Then drugs were found that controlled TB for several decades. Recently however, there is no more control, because of the increase in the amount of what doctors call MDR TB. That stands for multiple drug-resistant TB. When the immune system becomes suppressed, by junk food, prescription drugs, bad lifestyle, etc., mutant strains of TB are encouraged. That means resistant to one or more of the 5 drugs used to treat TB. The two main TB drugs are isoniazid and rifampin. In New York City by 1991, 42% of new TB patients were resistant to one drug, and 60% of relapses were resistant to them both. (Garrett, p521)

Many strains of TB are resistant to all 5 drugs and that percentage is growing steadily. Such cases are generally fatal, according to the World Health Organization. The WHO is predicting that in the next decade, world deaths from TB will increase from 3 million to 30 million! (Slavkin, p 111)

Doctors have actually gone on record saying that they personally would not venture into certain inner city areas of New York City for any amount of money because of the danger of TB infection. (Lindsay Williams)

TB is a mycobacterium . Mycobacteria can survive in tissues for years, in a latent state, waiting for an opportunity such as a depressed immune system to become active and multiply.

So what are most doctors doing about this situation of antibiotic resistance? They are in a very tough position, that is certain. Because of the control of information, most of the population today is unaware of the extent of drug resistance in this country. Even if they encounter a doctor who is cautious enough to tell them that perhaps they or their child do not need an antibiotic at the first sniffle, patients will often go to another doctor to get the antibiotic. So usually the physician will just come across: some recent studies have shown 10 out of 10 doctors will simply prescribe an antibiotic for minor colds, with no culture. It is astounding to learn that the average child of nine in this country has already had 17 runs of antibiotics in his lifetime! Why is that a problem?
The word is attenuation. Attenuation means that the bacteria weren't killed; only half-killed. There are two reasons why this may have happened:

1. Most people stop taking the antibiotic as soon as they feel better. Isn't that true? They think they're fine, but what they just did was allow some bacteria to survive in a mutated form which is now resistant to the antibiotic they just took. Which means that next time the drug won't work.

2. The bacteria mutated and survived the full course of antibiotics.

Just In Case

Here's another interesting word: prophylactic. We're not talking about birth control here. This is another sense of the word: if you have a cold, it's usually virus. So why do they give you antibiotics, which only kill bacteria? The word is "prophylactic"; we're gonna give you a prophylactic dose of antibiotics. That means just in case you develop a "secondary" bacterial infection as a "complication" of the viral infection. Is that likely? Not very. The problem is, antibiotics are not M&Ms. They are powerful drugs which kill all your body's bacteria every time you take them. This is what is known as a Side Effect.

Leave Those Kids Alone

It starts almost at birth - you know, the ear infection thing. Otitis media, they call it. At the slightest redness around the ear, or the slightest little sniffle, any good mother will drag her baby into any good doctor for a checkup, right? Prescription? Antibiotics. Yes ma'am, we'll kill those bad bugs before they ever get a chance to get started.

Antibiotics are for what? That's right - bacteria. But according to the NEJM, 28 Jan 99, at least 41% of otitis media is caused by virus. But they get antibiotics anyway, as often as not because the parents insist on getting them. And that's for the cases which actually are otitis media, not even counting all the rashes, allergies, or little traumas which are misdiagnosed as otitis media. Drug of choice: amoxicillin, even though doctors have known since 1991 that kids who take amoxicillin for simple otitis media have a 2-6 times greater chance of recurring infection than kids who don't. (JAMA, 18 Dec 1991)

The whole scene is way out of control, and the real losers are the kids. Childhood is their one chance to prepare their own natural defenses for the environment they will live in their whole lives. Every time a child takes antibiotics unnecessarily, at least three things happen:

- he gets better
- his immune system gets weaker - recurrent infections likely
- those same antibiotics won't work next time, because only the bugs that survived will stick around

Almost 100% of the time, the child would have recovered anyway, without drugs, just like they did for all those centuries before 1940. Kids are supposed to be sick sometimes, just like trees are supposed to be in storms. That's how they build strength. The overdrugged, overprotected, artificially raised American kids are among the sickest, most allergic, most asthmatic, and most overweight children in the civilized world.

Healthy kids don't get sick. And it starts with the infant's immune system being unnecessarily weakened by inappropriate antibiotics from oversolicitous parents and from doctors rightfully fearful of litigation and from drug companies hungry for a profit. Yes, yes, we know all about the dangers of spinal meningitis. But let's look at the natural incidence of meningitis in the undrugged, unvaccinated population. Miniscule, compared with the prodigious amount of actual immune system detriment which continues to be wrought by the excessive and inappropriate use of antibiotics.

Leave those kids alone, (continued)!

What's wrong with killing all my body's bacteria a few times a year when it's not particularly necessary?
Probiotics, that's what. Huh? Probiotics. Good bacteria. There are some 300 types of good bacteria at work in the colon which are necessary for many life functions, including complete digestion, absorption of vitamins and nutrients, and keeping the numbers of potentially pathological bacteria in check. Antibiotics kill all of them. It may take weeks or months for the body to rebuild its normal bacteria, which are called flora. This makes for incomplete digestion, also known as putrefaction, rancidity, or rotting of intestinal contents. Like John Wayne. Autopsy showed 44 pounds of undigested food in his intestines when he died! Think how heavy that would feel all those years. Guess nobody ever told The Duke about probiotics, because he sure didn't have any.

Another problem with killing all the body's bacteria is that it is no longer possible. The pervasiveness of antibiotics through the human race by pills, food, and the animals we eat has promoted the survival of mutant (resistant) bacteria. Scientists have now made the amazing discovery of finding antibiotic-resistant bacteria in the bodies of African tribesmen who live in total isolation from 'civilization,' with no access to drugs whatsoever! (Garrett) The point is, in 50 years, virtually everyone has developed some degree of immunity to antibiotics, directly or indirectly. The mutant strains are now normal flora. So the more we now take "broad spectrum" antibiotics, the more we destroy the old non-resistant strains. What's left? The mutants.

Most medical authorities in the National Institutes of Health, the Centers for Disease Control, and the World Health Organization agree on one idea: antibiotic resistance will be the #1 health challenge of the 21st century. That will be the area in which we will see the greatest increase in the death rate: infections with no cure.

One hidden source of antibiotics is FOOD. Half the antibiotics produced in this country, which totals 50 million pounds per annum, according to federal statistics, are given to animals like poultry and cattle. 80% of animal antibiotics are given to promote growth, not health. (Levy, p140) Antibiotics are also used extensively on fruit trees and other plants, and even in fish hatcheries. Food processing does not destroy the antibiotics. When we take them in with the food, many of these animal antibiotics are still strong enough to have an effect on our body's bacteria. This further complicates the problem of resistance. Today people may be resistant to antibiotics they never even got from the doctor.

The animal antibiotics are getting stronger all the time. According to the Journal of the South American Veterinary Association, 1996, a recent antibiotic called salinomycin was given to a herd of cattle. The drug killed 10% of the cattle from heart failure!

Even the FDA has known about the spillover of antibiotics from animals to humans for a long time. As far back as 1976, FDA Commissioner Donald Kennedy was publicly campaigning to ban antibiotics from animal feed. (New Eng J Med, 9 Sep 1976) Lobbying from the drug companies won out, and high dosages in livestock continue to the present time.

The Big Boys

Antibiotics is a $23 billion/year industry in the U.S. Its overall purpose is not, nor ever was, health. Its purpose is market growth. As an industry, it is a victim of its own success. Stuart Levy, MD writes that having taken antibiotics as though they were M&Ms for so many years has "caused a destruction of the armor of antibiotic, what I call destroying the miracle."

Now maybe you're saying, oh don't worry about drug resistance - they'll come up with something new. Think again.

Nothing responds to change like a market growth industry. The drug companies know better than anyone about the advent of the Post-Antibiotic Era. An article in the journal Clinical Infectious Disease, 1997 Supplement, stated that :

"...few new antibiotics are in the development pipeline, and indeed no novel class of antibiotics has been introduced into medical practice in more than 20 years. All recently introduced antibiotic compounds are permutations (improved versions) of pre-existing compounds."

Two of the major limitations ... are the high cost - about $300 million per new chemical entity - and the observation that many of the larger multinational companies have actually decreased their activities or even ceased to invest in the discovery of new antibiotics."

What a surprise. So much for selfless dedication to humanity. Thanks a lot, guys.

Want to talk about money? Here is a chart of U.S. hospital purchases of antibiotics, published in Jeffrey Fisher's book The Plague Maker.

1962 - $94,000,000
1971 - $218,000,000
1991 - $3,000,000,000
1997 - $8,000,000,000
Any questions?

Whose Fault Is It?

In 1981, when James Curran of the CDC was being ignored by his superiors about the coming AIDS epidemic, Mark Lappe wrote a book called Germs That Won't Die, in which he explained antibiotic resistance. A classic paragraph on antibiotics from Lappe's book, quoted by Laurie Garrett, is this one:

"Unfortunately, we played a trick on the natural world by seizing control of these chemicals, making them more perfect in a way that has changed the whole microbial constitution of the developing countries. We have organisms now proliferating that never existed before in nature. We have selected them. We have organisms that probably caused a tenth of a percent of human diseases in the past that now cause twenty, thirty percent of the disease that we're seeing. We have changed the whole face of the earth by the use of antibiotics."

A Great Gift: Misuse, Overuse, Abuse

You can make all sorts of excuses, but here's the way it looks to many researchers: Mankind took this incredibly fortuitous gift - antibiotics - and let it be egregiously overprescribed and misused, for profit. And now we're down this road we can't come back from. Antibiotics have always had, and still have, only one proper application: the life-threatening situation. Not colds, not sniffles, not just-in-case anything. A life-threatening situation. Period. We screwed up.

The Party's Almost Over

Antibiotics really were a miracle drug and they really did save thousands of lives. But that time is coming to an end. The 1990s have brought a resurgence of bacterial and viral diseases, after almost 50 years of complete control over infectious diseases, according to the Apr 94 New England Journal of Medicine. If dissemination of antibiotics had been controlled by scientists instead of by drug reps and doctors and HMO execs, perhaps the epidemic of resistance which has now befallen us would not exist. At least not so soon. I'm talking about the scientists who have known all along what Fleming knew, what Bechamp knew, and what Pasteur himself finally admitted: that bugs don't cause disease and that drugs don't cure them. Antibiotics were and are for one thing only: life-threatening infections. Not minor colds. Not minor ear infections. Children need to be sick sometimes. That's how they build their own immune defenses. It's OK to get a cold once in awhile; it gives the body a chance to use its powers of defense, like fever, inflammation, coughing, and swelling. These symptoms are not the illness. They are just signs that the body is successfully attempting to restore its own balance. To attack the symptoms is to fight the body itself and make it that much more difficult to return to a state of normal health. A body allowed to heal itself will be far more resilient, more RESISTANT in the future. That's the kind of resistance we want.

What we call disease is very often simply Nature's method for ridding the body of poisons.

For example, take FEVER. Fevers are generally good. The brain raises the temperature of the body for a reason - something has triggered an inflammation and the body is trying to make an inhospitable environment for the irritant and throw it off. Basic detox. Tylenol, ice baths, and drugs may interfere with the body's most instinctive first line of defense. Think how arrogant that is. Who knows better than your body when to turn up the thermostat? Now in that rare one in 5 million event where there's a danger of meningitis or the patient is delirious and remains in a very high fever for days on end - that may be the time to consider drugs. Like I said, life-threatening situations. But how often does that happen? When do we take antibiotics? Usually the first sign of a cold or fever. When we're young, they work. But most people use up all their ammunition early. Remember - average is 17 runs of antibiotics by the age of nine. Then when something serious happens, drugs fail. Not only are the bacteria now resistant; the body has never been given the opportunity to develop its own defenses, its own immune system. The result is just what the market growth drug industry wanted: a nation of people who are always sick, get colds a few times a year, have frequent headaches and digestive disorders and every few years get a "major" illness. Oh yes, and two thirds of whom will die either of heart disease or cancer.

Same with infection. Infection follows inflammation. Some antigen has been identified and the body has mobilized its forces - the white cells - to wall off the area. The invader is attacked and many white cells are killed in the process. Pus is simply the accumulation of dead white cells that have done their job. Limited infection is not an emergency. It simply means that the body's defenses are working.

Again Dr. Tilden  nails it:

"... every so-called disease is a crisis of Toxemia; which means that toxin has accumulated in the blood above the toleration point, and the crisis, the so-called disease - call it cold, flu, pneumonia, headache, or typhoid fever - is a vicarious elimination. Nature is endeavoring to rid the body of toxin. Any treatment that obstructs this effort at elimination baffles nature in her effort of self-curing."

Read more:

John Tilden MD (1851-1940)
Natural Healers

Impaired Health: ITS CAUSE AND CURE
A Repudiation of the Conventional Treatment of Disease (VOLUME ONE )

Toxemia Explained

The Alleged Bad “Pathogens”

The False Target of Orthodox Medicine
[Germany] Dr.-lng Joachim-F. Grätz, Oberhausen i. Obb., Germany


The Immune System

Therefore, the imagination that sees the immune system as a fight between good and bad cannot be held up completely anymore. The immune system in the alleged sense does not exist.

Only the facts remain, but not the alleged system. That does not mean that such reactions are completely harmless! On the contrary, they can be very violent and a great strain under certain circumstances and may lead to death in single cases (dependent on the intensity and duration of the preceding sympatheticotonia)! But basically, the appearance of microbes is a sign of the second phase of disease, the vagotone healing phase.
In other words, the “Pathogens” only occur in a definite terrain and under definite innervation, but never do they appear in the state of perfect health in which the sympathetic and vagotone part of the autonomous nervous system are balanced – in eutonia. Only the change of the terrain, the milieu – via a central controlling error (a kind of emergency or special program of nature) – favor the growth of and increase in microbes.

The Microbes and the Terrain

This also became clear to Pasteur, in the course of time, when he recognized in his later years the validity of the research work of his contemporary and opponent Bêchamp and admitted that the organism at first gets ill and in succession, bacteria and viruses can proliferate. Finally, Pastuer admitted: “La bactérie n’est rien, le terrain c’est tout.” – “The microbe is nothing. The terrain is everything.” At the end of his life the father of microbiology was convinced that microbes are only the indicator of disease, not at all the originators. Moreover, he (even as a non-homeopath) became aware of the phenomena of suppression: “If you think to destroy disease by merely suppression and killing bacteria then you can experience horrible wonders”.

Also, Virchow, the founder of cellular pathology remarked “The disease is in the cells”, recognizing at the end of his life, the vital force, and thereby the central pillar of Homeopathy.

“However the established medicinal doctrine maintains unaffected to Virchows and Pasteurs ‘sins of youth’ until now.” states Dr. Otto Eichelberger, a famous homeopath of our time.

The Pathogens Which Aren’t that

According to these correlations, each disease has a biphasic process, provided the disease achieves the second phase at all, and is controlled primarily by our “control center”, the brain what can be made visible by means of modern technology (computer tomography of the brain, CCTs, without contrast medium), i.e. can be made visible and proven and is “scientifically” reproducible. The microbes cannot be real agents and triggers of disease because they only appear in the second phase of disease. Therefore, even the term “Pathogen” is held in error (and written in quotation marks here). In principle, these microbes are, at best, indicators of the second phase of disease, the actual healing phase! There always precedes a permanent stress stage of the ANS (see Fig. 1). They only appear within a certain terrain and with a definite innervation, in fact, the permanent vagotonia. This emergency or special program of nature favors the systematic growth and increase in the form of definite microbes, depending on the location, i.e. the organ or type of tissue. Thus they are conducted consciously, even volitionally, and have their physiological cleansing function in dependence of their belonging to the germ layer lineage, determined ontogenetically: either to replace tissue under discharge of mucous which was destroyed during the stress phase of the disease, or to ablate tissue which has proliferated before. And when there is no need for them anymore they are phased out (which, when one is unaware of the connections, looks to be an acute defense under the microscope).

Thus, the imagination that sees the immune system as a fight between good and bad with its related antigen-antibody theory, when looked at in terms of the central pillar of immunological response is to be seen as antiquated.

Vaccinations – Reason for a Confused Immune System

Therefore, it can not be a matter of habit which provides immunity and much less, that the forced inoculation with microbes, as in vaccination, which – if everything flows smoothly –causes the production of certain antibodies. The inoculation with microbes in a healthy organism for the purpose of “training” the immune system, which is not in the vagotone phase – for vaccinations are mostly done in eutonia [Fig. 1] – will have inevitable consequences. The organism is in no way prepared for the invasion of such microorganisms during eutonia, and least of all for such different microbes that do not occur in nature! There is no child who comes down with diphtheria, whooping cough, tetanus, meningitis and polio simultaneously!

Thus, vaccinations cannot be a systematically active training of the immune system but are the cause for a totally confused immune system!

Combating or Manipulating Microbes – a False Approach to Therapy

A doctrine of established medicine is to combat constantly the occurrence of microbes, without being aware that the healing phase of disease is thereby directly wiped out. The natural balance in the organism is confused by crude therapeutic measures, without actually touching the cause of disease. This is clearly evident when antibiotics and cortisone are given. Cortisone, a stress hormone, which affects the brain directly (mainly the cerebrum) by suppressing the healing stage (permanent vagatonia) of disease and brings the patient back to the permanent sympatheticotonia (stress stage) [Fig. 1]. This is clearly evident in case of neurodermatitis.
This seems to be cured by cortisone initially due to the disappearance of symptoms but is brought “back to the beginning” in reality, with regard to time, (to the permanent sympatheticotonia or stress stage of disease), which means that the skin eruption in a new effort to elicit cure has to appear again (passing through the vagotone healing phase again) and in most cases this reappearance is worse than before. But the absence of the reappearance of the skin eruption does not mean a “real“ cure because we normally can find other health disturbances afterwards, in terms of substitutive processes such as: Bronchial asthma, spastic bronchitis, epileptic seizures and much more, depending on the weak point of the organism and ones miasmatic predisposition. The phenomena – no rarity nowadays – is called suppression: a disease disappears only to be displaced by another disease which is often much worse (see above).

Energetically it is still the same disease, the only difference is that it has changed its place of events. Normally the superficial disease is driven to a deeper level and gets aggravated or complicated. The same – mutatis mutandis – is valid for many contagious diseases (so-called infectious diseases), which are treated by antibiotics or other immune suppressive medicines as is seen in today’s often occurring scarlatina relapse. I have known many children in my practice who have gotten ill of scarlatina 8-10 times! Scarlatina is basically a quite harmless children’s disease and only when it is constantly suppressed by heroic medicines, so that the curative skin eruption, in terms of a cleansing process does not appear, the disease can take a dangerous course and lead to later complications.

Fatal Outgrowth of Future Vaccination Schedules

The outgrowth, for which the doctrine of the germ theory has undertaken, can be read in an article in Focus, February 1998. Where we can read, according to the vaccine report of the WHO, there are vaccines for approximately 60 different diseases. Many are in their last testing phase, among them: diarrhea, otitis media, stomach ulcer, borreliosis and respiratory infections.

A lunacy beyond comparison, especially with regard to the miasms which are aggravated exorbitantly by these types of measures! “Quite soon we will be able to vaccine against each disease. And the number of possible combinations is almost unlimited”, states Dr. Klaus Gritz (former president of the “Berufsverband der Kinder- und Jugendärzte” and member of the “Ständige Impfkommission [STIKO]”). This is an undertaking that is doomed to failure, right from the beginning, because of the natural laws. On the other hand, the way seems to be paved and preassigned to cause much more chronic diseases – already we are seeing this in early childhood. Infants already suffer from Bronchial asthma, colitis ulcerosa (a chronic inflammatory intestinal disease), epilepsy and other diseases which are incurable according to orthodox medical practice, and the number is constantly increasing! If the above prescribed “program” becomes reality then the curve of chronic diseases in the early childhood will change progressively. Public health – good bye!

The Antigen-Antibody Theory – “Sugarcoated” Right from the Beginning

By equating immunity with the existence of specific antibodies in the blood as is done by orthodox medicine, the approach is reduced to a mere materialistic aspect, which implicates the specific artificial buildup of antibodies and constant combating of microbes in acute cases.

But our immune system is much more complex! It can never be reduced to a mere materialistic component like the existence of this or that concentration of antibodies. This proves to be too simple and moreover false! Let’s remember the homeopathic idea of the vital force in this connection, the immaterial, energetic controlling center of the organism, which facilitates all chemical and immunological reactions. Thus, the antigen-antibody-theory as the supporting pillar of immunity should be disproved definitely and belong to the past. Already Pasteur seems to have guessed this, because he “deceived” the public consciously at the time and committed scientific fraud several times by “sugarcoating” the, in reality, less convincing results of his studies. But this could only be discovered in 1993 – after more than 20 years of scientific triage and study of Pasteur’s private records of his laboratory work (approx. 10.000 pages) by Dr. Gerald L. Geison from the Institute of History of the University Princeton (USA). Also, charts and graphical illustrations about the course of plagues of the last 150 years take the same line and show consistently that vaccinated people get more often and more violently ill than non-vaccinated people. This is not astonishing, considering that their immune system was destroyed “systematically”.

Read more:

Why Louis Pasteur's Germ Theory Is A Curse
by Nancy Appleton, Ph.D.

Germ Theories

Disease arises from micro-organisms outside the body.
Microorganisms are generally to be guarded against.
The function of microorganisms is constant.
The shapes and colours of microorganisms are constant
Every disease is associated with a partciular microorganism
Microorganisms are primary causal agents.
Disease can "strike" anybody.
To prevent disease we have to "build defences".

1. Disease arises from micro-organisms within the cells of the body.
2.These intracellular microorganisms normally function to build and assist in the metabolic processes of the body.
3.The function of these organisms changes to assist in the catabolic (disintegration) processes of the host organism when that organism dies or is injured, which may be chemical as well as mechanical.
4.Microrganisms change their shapes and colours to reflect the medium
5. Every disease is associated with a particular condition.
6. Microorganisms become "pathogenic" as the health of the host organism deteriorates. Hence, the condition of the host organism is the primary causal agent.
7. Disease is built by unhealthy conditions.
8. To prevent disease we have to create health.


The Blood and its Third Anatomical Element

The Curse of Louis Pasteur [Paperback]
Ph.D Nancy Appleton

Rethinking Pasteur's Germ Theory: How to Maintain Your Optimal Health [Paperback]

Stopping Inflammation: Relieving the Cause of Degenerative Diseases

The following biography of Antoine Bechamp is by Montague R. Leverson, the translator of the 1912 edition of The Blood and its Third Element.

Health Care Truth

The Drug Story
Chapter One
What Nujol Started

Good luck getting this below book, but it should be on the shelves of every doctors office out there. And they are entirely oblivious to this information. They would likely tell it was all a tin hat conspiracy theory; whle they continue on their misguided travels to retirement in a profession that should be and should have been extinct 100 years ago, as to its understanding of physiological health.

The drug story: A factological history of America's $10,000,000,000 drug cartel--its methods, operations, hidden ownership, profits and terrific impact on the health of the American people


The Blood and its Third Anatomical Element

Antoine Béchamp (1816-1908)

Louis Pasteur (1822-1895)

Louis Pasteur vs. Antoine Bechamp: Know the True Causes of Disease

The Dream & Lie of Louis Pasteur
by R. B. Pearson (originally Pasteur, Plagiarist, Imposter 1942)

The dream and lie of Louis Pasteur [Import] [Paperback]

Louis Pasteur's Germ Theory- Wrong

Pasteur, Plagiarist, Impostor or The Germ Theory Exploded
by: Pearson, R.B.

Bechamp Or Pasteur? A Lost Chapter In The History of Biology
by: Hume, E. Douglas

The Lost History of Medicine

Modern Medicine: The New World Religion

Sick and Tired?: Reclaim Your Inner Terrain [Paperback]

Alkalize or Die: Superior Health Through Proper Alkaline-Acid Balance [Paperback]

The Rockefellers, The Flexner Report, The AMA, and their Effect on Alternative Nutritional (botanical) Medicine

The AMA and Medical Education

It is a paradox that a group ostensibly so concerned as the AMA with the qualifications of doctors for the practice of medicine failed to be disturbed by Flexner's lack of qualifications for the task he undertook. Flexner was neither a phvsician nor a scientist, and had no qualifications as a medical educator. He had an undergraduate degree in arts from Johns Hopkins and had operated a small, private, and apparently profitable preparatory school in Louisville for fifteen years. It is unlikely, if not inconceivable, that he would have been accepted in a court of law as an expert witness in the field of medical education before he undertook his study.

Read more:

Flexner Report

Medical Control, Medical Corruption

(A complete history)
Who is unhappy with this increased knowledge? The American Medical Association, which for almost 150 years has sought to institutionalize a rip-off and to keep sick people and their families oblivious to it. Thanks to this central committee of the medical cartel, the number of medical schools and medical students is drastically restricted, state licensure further obstructs the supply of doctors, fees are largely secret and controlled across the industry, alternative treatments and practitioners are outlawed, pharmacists and nurses are hamstrung, and the mystique of the profession rivals the priesthood, although priests have a somewhat lower income. Meanwhile, the customer pays through the nose, even if he does not go to an otolaryngologist.

Read more:

The supression of the chiropractic practice.
Chiropractic in the United States:
Training, Practice, and Research
Chapter I: A Brief History of Chiropractic
Reed B. Phillips, DC, PhD

Medical Suppression of Symptoms and Its Homeopathic Cure

History of Homeopathy

Some history of the treatment of epidemics with Homeopathy

The History of the AMA 

Let’s put on our history caps and go all the way back to the year 1910 and learn about John D. Rockefeller and the Flexner Report. I’ll bet you’ve never heard of this report, have you? You see, Rockefeller’s goal was to dominate the oil, chemical, and pharmaceutical markets, so his company (Standard Oil of New Jersey) purchased a controlling interest in a huge German drug/chemical company called I.G. Farben.

On a side note, I.G. Farben was the single largest donor to the election campaign of Adolph Hitler. One year before Hitler seized power, I.G. Farben donated 400,000 marks to Hitler, his Nazi party, and his private army (the “SS”). Accordingly, after Hitler’s seizure of power, I.G. Farben was the single largest profiteer of the German conquest of the world during World War II. While millions of people were being imprisoned and murdered, I.G. Farben was profiting.

I.G. Auschwitz, a 100% subsidiary of I.G. Farben, was the largest industrial complex of the world for manufacturing synthetic gasoline and rubber for the conquest of Europe. Auschwitz used the concentration camp prisoners as “slave labor” in their factory. But there was no “retirement plan” for the prisoners of Auschwitz. Those who were too frail or too ill to work were selected at the main gate of the Auschwitz factory and sent to the gas chambers. Even the chemical gas Zyklon-B used for the annihilation of millions of innocent people resulted from I.G. Farben’s drawing boards and factories.


He Who Pays the Piper - Creation of the Modern Medical (Drug) Establishment
by G. Edward Griffin

History of Osteopathy

Frederick Robert Klenner, (October 22, 1907 – May 20, 1984) was an American medical researcher and doctor in general practice in Reidsville, North Carolina. From the 1940s on he experimented with the use of vitamin C megadosage as a therapy for a wide range of illnesses, most notably polio. He authored 28 research papers during his career. He was one of the originators of orthomolecular medicine, but his work remains largely unaddressed by established medicine.[1] Klenner is the subject[2] or mentioned or referenced in a number of orthomolecular medicine related papers and articles. A recent book[3] broadly updating Klenner's cumulative vitamin C work is dedicated to him and he is profiled in Medical Mavericks.[4]

In 1949 Klenner published in and presented a paper to the American Medical Association detailing the complete cure of 60 out of 60 of his patients with polio using intravenous sodium ascorbate injection[7] Galloway and Seifert cited Klenner's presentation to the AMA in a paper of theirs.[8] Generally, he gave 350 to 700 mg per kilogram body weight per day.

He described giving up to 300,000 milligrams (mg) per day of neutral pH sodium ascorbate. Klenner published 27 medical papers, most about vitamin C applications for over 30 diseases, two about treatment of severe neuropathies including multiple sclerosis using aggressive supplementation].[9] He wrote a 28th paper ca 1980, an unpublished update about MS treatment. It was posthumously summarized by Lendon Smith in the Clinical Guide to the Use of Vitamin C.


Frederick R. Klenner, M.D., F.C.C.P

High-Dose Intravenous Vitamin C: A Tribute to Fred Klenner
Of course the FDA has  as well since banned the use of IV vitamin C from use in any practice.

Doctors and Healers using or promoting Diet & Nutrients

Orthomolecular & Nutritional Medicine
Healing systems  Natural Healing

Welcome To Orthomolecular.org


Vitamin D revealed to be miracle anti-cancer 'drug' with astonishing chemical properties
Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/036597_vitamin_D_anti-cancer_drug.html

Study Shines More Light On Benefit Of Vitamin D In Fighting Cancer

Vitamin D Backed For Cancer Prevention In Two New Studies

Breaking News - Cancer physician speaks out about cancer fraud
Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/036592_cancer_whistleblower_fraud.html

There IS scientific PROOF that natural (non-toxic) cancer treatments completely heal patients with stage 4 cancer. Meet Nicholas Gonzalez, MD as he talks about our healing potential.

 the perspective of contemporary molecular biology.
The Trophoblast and the Origins of Cancer: One solution to the medical enigma of our times

Books by Dr. Gonzalez

What Went Wrong: The Truth Behind the Clinical Trial of the Enzyme Treatment of Cancer

The Enzyme Treatment of Cancer and Its Scientific Basis

Dr. John Beard's study of the mammalian placenta led him to the conclusion that in its early incarnation, this tissue behaves much as a cancerous tumor. He then proposed that pancreatic enzymes regulate placental development, and in turn represent the body’s main defense against cancer. In 1911, he published The Enzyme Treatment of Cancer to favorable reviews. Though in his lifetime the scientific community never embraced his ideas about cancer – he died in relative obscurity in 1924 – in recent years, evidence from molecular biology and stem cell research increasingly confirms many of Dr. Beard’s fundamental precepts. This historic work is now available again, in a carefully recreated reproduction with a foreword by Dr. Gonzalez.

Dr Nicholas Gonzalez has a clinic in New York and treats cancer patients with a cancer diet therapy that includes pancreatic enzymes and a host of natural compounds and vitamins as part of a total cancer nutrition package. He completed a clinical trial on his therapy with patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer, supervised by the National Cancer Institute and funded by Nestle.  The results of that study were published in the peer reviewed journal Nutrition and Cancer and reported the best results ever in the treatment of the disease.


Pancreatic enzymes, the Trophoblast, a diet therapy and cancer cure

No comments:

Post a Comment