Mr. Blogging (no identity) Editor; you should have this (above linked to) article, analyzed by
a qualified psychiatrist; regarding a determination of if it was written based
on your total ignorance of immunology science; or if there is something other
going on here. It appears that you were actually having another major psychotic
episode; as it would be impossible for a thinking normal person to write
something that unrealistic and twisted.
What do you not understand about that a flu virus, and that
flu viruses are continually changing and that they mutate to forms that the
next years vaccine would be ineffective for? That would be to presume as well
that the currents years selection based on their all knowing wisdom was correct
as to the prevailing strain of flu virus in our communities.
What do you not understand about the fact that in regard to
flu and colds that the human body has never developed anything but relatively
short term temporary immunity, to either one. Therefore due to the fact that
the human body is incapable of producing long term immunity to such as the flu;
in turn it would be impossible to create a long term and or life time vaccines.
And in your world, this said long term flu vaccine should have been possible?
Your whole argument is preposterous and falls flat on its face.
Current and unbiased studies show just how ineffective flu
vaccines actually are, and in all age groups. Some studies have as well shown a
more harm than good effect in children, and increased hospitalization after a
flu vaccine. Why as well would the benefits outweigh the risks in injecting a
thimerosal containing vaccine in a pregnant women, when the unbiased studies
show no actual benefit? Several neonatal studies exist as well showing the
harmful effect of thimerosal on the brain of a fetus. They are listed right in
Pubmed.
The Cochrane data base as well shows in overall analysis
just how biased pharmaceutical company studies actually are, comparatively to
unconnected studies, regarding flu shot effectiveness.
When we read the fear mongering studies such as the one you
referenced to, why are we not as well getting the data on how many of those
deaths were in people that did receive the flu shot? Are you going to tell me
that there is no reason to record that data, nor to provide it to the public?
How about the fact as well that no state departments nor the CDC are ever
providing any information mid flu season as to if or not the flu vaccine is a
match with the predominantly encountered strain of flu virus? Any public
authority neglect in the failure to provide that information shows clearly that
they do not want to know, nor the public to know the real story on flu
vaccines. It would be pretty hard in a rational mind to disagree with that.
I could provide you many studies and a lot of further data,
but as always you have since day one here, refused to ever once publish any of
it in the past that was ever provided to you, and would be useless to attempt
it again, now. You can go to my site and see a full page of it, regarding flu
vaccines. You know as well, that is there.
You can go on living in your land of delusions, but you have
no right to tell anyone else to keep following you there. Vaccine decisions
deserve to be made by the public, with all information on the table, not with
just what and the incomplete you select for them to consider.
Ok, again alias no identity Costner was sent this below reply to the above referenced to blog page of his, already now days ago; and it still remains unpublished. Again, it all amounts to again and again, to much truth, and again exposes his endless sick game and as well amounts to - to much truth, and which is to damaging to his in denial, lying and full of intentional deception...agenda. This puke of a man, then sits on a continued claim that, oh, YOU posted on my blog under sock puppet accounts, and thus you are not allowed to reply post in any form of your defense personally, nor as to the false information he publishes on his blog. Each and every published blog page he publishes as well of course designed to be a personal attack on one person, me. It really is near to impossible to get nor be any more screwed up in the head, than is one alias, Costner Matthews; which was the previous name he blogged under in 2007. That prior to my finding his profile and his later immediate removal of it that profile when he realized I was aware of it. The man; this jerk, was already blogging with a fake name profile, before he even ever knew who I was was? How entirely sick and obviously having a less than honest and forthright agenda, is this guy? Amazing.
Here is the reply that was as said sent regarding that and the blog page referenced to above.
The problem with this blog page, is that it only exemplifies
your own selective ignorance. The reason for that is found in the fact that
generalized google searches under a specific title such as vaccine safety, and
vaccine effectiveness, simply and obviously do not provide any actual evidence
of the same being in existence there. That alone obviously does not prove that
what is in that generalized list of links, in any way proves vaccine safety and
effectiveness; and is actually showing in many cases to be just the opposite,
and/or with conclusions in those studies that are far less then adequate to
prove any such point
All you did was prove that when you say there is scientific
evidence, in reality there may be only little to none in the actual data. But
nice job in your attempts to mislead and to keep misleading the sheeple. I have
shown this as well in my previous analysis of your studies, the very few time
that you put anything forward to claimed to be proof of your claims. Such was
again not actually the case.
When you are so non observant that you even put forth the
claim that Gardasil has been shown to be safe and effective, when actually what
is there shows no such thing; that in itself shows clearly the height of your
desperation as to regarding your own denial of all.Increased antibodies do not
necessarily equate to vaccine efficacy; and they certainly as well do not
equate to efficacy in preventing even one single case of cervical caner. This
page clearly contains nothing much but actually false and misleading
information nothing but. But what else is actually new here, for you. Not much.
You even went so far as to claim there were studies done comparing vaccinated
verses non vaccinated; just because typing in a google search resulted in those
studies. What an idiot you are Costner. Nothing in reality could be further
from the truth. Scam, smoke screen, and smoke and mirrors strongly comes to
mind here. You lose, again.
This is NOT even debatable, as it is all an obvious fact.
What a clearly very twisted man you are.
This is the reply that was sent to the above linked to, and opposing blog. However, as always editor no identity Costner, will never publish; as it again contains to much truth.
Your claim that pharmaceutical companies can be sued; is
entirely false, Mr. Editor. In most any court you can file a lawsuit for almost
anything; however that does not mean that the plaintiff can actually be
successfully sued. If you know anything about the courts legal system; you
would realize that a precedence was set by the Bruesewitz case. Meaning that
any such cases that follow it if they are filed, will strongly be influenced by
and determined by any previous precedence in a similar case that has been set.
So, quite obviously if with the clearly good merits that the Bruesewitz case
had, they were not successful; then there is little to no chance that any other
such case filed will have any better luck. Those types of cases against the
vaccine manufacturer, are clearly preempted by the existence of the NCVIA. So,
in reality and at this point, no parent of a vaccine damaged child is going to
ever again pursue the avenue that the Bruesewitz family did against such as
Wyeth. Common sense should tell you that Mr. Editor. That family spent over a
decade chasing that claim and came up with no compensation. If you call that
justice, then something is way wrong with you.
In reality here you are being flat out intellectually
dishonest, to yet claim that a vaccine maker can be sued for anything, ever.
They are quite obviously. immune to any lawsuits of any kind from a parent of a
vaccine damaged child.
BRUESEWITZ ET AL. v. WYETH FKA WYETH, INC.,ET AL.
Excerpt:
Held: The NCVIA preempts all design-defect claims
against vaccine manufacturers brought by plaintiffs seeking compensation for
injury
or death caused by a vaccine’s side effects. Pp. 7–19.
NVIC Cites "Betrayal" of Consumers by U.S. Supreme
Court Decision Giving Total Liability Shield to Big Pharma
Excerpt: Hannah Bruesewitz was brain injured by DPT vaccine
as a child but she was denied compensation by the U.S. Court of Claims, which administers
the federal vaccine injury compensation program created by the 1986 Act that
has turned away two out of three plaintiffs. Her attorneys then sued in civil
court, providing evidence that Wyeth-Lederle had the technology to produce a
less reactive, purified pertussis vaccine but declined to do so.
“The U.S. Supreme Court has removed all financial incentive
for multi-national pharmaceutical corporations, which enjoy a $20 billion
dollar business, to make vaccines as safe as they can be,” said Fisher. “This
is a sad day for all Americans forced by law to use dozens of doses of vaccines
or be barred from school or health insurance or employment. The only leverage
left to American consumers to ensure that vaccines with the fewest health risks
are produced is to oppose vaccine mandates and work to defend vaccine
exemptions in all public health laws.”
Vaccination Profiteers Gang Up on Hannah Bruesewitz - In
Supreme Court
Excerpt: The Court took the Bruesewitz case to determine
whether 18-year-old Hannah, disabled by injuries she received from Wyeth’s
diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis (DPT) vaccine at 6-months-old in 1992, has
the right to bring a lawsuit against Wyeth after the Vaccine Court, set up by
the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, refused compensation even
though she will require life-long care and her vaccine was traced to a lot that
had 65 adverse reactions including two deaths, 39 emergency room visits, and 6
hospitalizations.
I wish to address one other matter as well, and will be directly.
This involves some replies by character name on that blog, Dakota James, and is on again this mindless and dimwitted blog page right here. One mans obsession with me for now since the summer of 2010, and some now over 80 blog pages of personal attack, on me.
This is the reply I made and as well quite obviously will never be published, in my defense, and nor in the defense of myself personally.
Your claim that pharmaceutical companies can be sued; is
entirely false, Mr. Editor. In most any court you can file a lawsuit for almost
anything; however that does not mean that the plaintiff can actually be
successfully sued. If you know anything about the courts legal system; you
would realize that a precedence was set by the Bruesewitz case. Meaning that
any such cases that follow it if they are filed, will strongly be influenced by
and determined by any previous precedence in a similar case that has been set.
So, quite obviously if with the clearly good merits that the Bruesewitz case
had, they were not successful; then there is little to no chance that any other
such case filed will have any better luck. Those types of cases against the
vaccine manufacturer, are clearly preempted by the existence of the NCVIA. So,
in reality and at this point, no parent of a vaccine damaged child is going to
ever again pursue the avenue that the Bruesewitz family did against such as
Wyeth. Common sense should tell you that Mr. Editor. That family spent over a
decade chasing that claim and came up with no compensation. If you call that
justice, then something is way wrong with you.
In reality here you are being flat out intellectually
dishonest, to yet claim that a vaccine maker can be sued for anything, ever.
They are quite obviously. immune to any lawsuits of any kind from a parent of a
vaccine damaged child.
BRUESEWITZ ET AL. v. WYETH FKA WYETH, INC.,ET AL.
Excerpt:
Held: The NCVIA preempts all design-defect claims
against vaccine manufacturers brought by plaintiffs seeking compensation for
injury
or death caused by a vaccine’s side effects. Pp. 7–19.
NVIC Cites "Betrayal" of Consumers by U.S. Supreme
Court Decision Giving Total Liability Shield to Big Pharma
Excerpt: Hannah Bruesewitz was brain injured by DPT vaccine
as a child but she was denied compensation by the U.S. Court of Claims, which administers
the federal vaccine injury compensation program created by the 1986 Act that
has turned away two out of three plaintiffs. Her attorneys then sued in civil
court, providing evidence that Wyeth-Lederle had the technology to produce a
less reactive, purified pertussis vaccine but declined to do so.
“The U.S. Supreme Court has removed all financial incentive
for multi-national pharmaceutical corporations, which enjoy a $20 billion
dollar business, to make vaccines as safe as they can be,” said Fisher. “This
is a sad day for all Americans forced by law to use dozens of doses of vaccines
or be barred from school or health insurance or employment. The only leverage
left to American consumers to ensure that vaccines with the fewest health risks
are produced is to oppose vaccine mandates and work to defend vaccine
exemptions in all public health laws.”
Vaccination Profiteers Gang Up on Hannah Bruesewitz - In
Supreme Court
Excerpt: The Court took the Bruesewitz case to determine
whether 18-year-old Hannah, disabled by injuries she received from Wyeth’s
diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis (DPT) vaccine at 6-months-old in 1992, has
the right to bring a lawsuit against Wyeth after the Vaccine Court, set up by
the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, refused compensation even
though she will require life-long care and her vaccine was traced to a lot that
had 65 adverse reactions including two deaths, 39 emergency room visits, and 6
hospitalizations.
Is there some reason that you could not even link to as much
as the abstract of the study you are referencing, Mr. Editor, Costner? So that
tells me as well that likely you did not even read the study, yourself. You
just based what you claimed to off the two articles in itself. Would I be
correct? That’s right; you never even as much as read the study you are
promoting.
What is actually hilarious is the fact that you obviously do
not even realize it, that in fact that your said study actually in fact
directly supports the ASD/ vaccine connection. The reason you do are oblivious
to that fact and do not realize that, is based in the fact that you have failed
to study any of the unbiased non CDC connected scientific studies, to begin
with. Your pathetic presentation of this Molecular Psychiatry study, with the
additional claim that it debunks the vaccine connection, amounts to just
another expose of your own misunderstanding of the science. In the
further promotion of such said incorrect and unjustified claims on your
part; you are thus in that effort only promoting further baseless
conclusions. Conclusions that not only show a large amount of lack of critical
thinking on your part, but as well a major degree of intellectual
dishonesty. And you want to accuse others of promoting, “Quackery”?
That is more than a bit hypocritical, coming from the obvious head Quack, such
as yourself.
What I am as well referring to of course are all the studies
on this page right here, that of course as said; you conveniently
ignored.
See if you can actually follow the science, Costner; and
make the obvious connections??? Clueless yet?
J Neurodev Disord. 2011 Jun;3(2):132-43. Epub 2011 Mar 5.
Glutathione pathway gene variation and risk of autism
spectrum disorders.
Bowers K, Li Q, Bressler J, Avramopoulos D, Newschaffer C,
Fallin MD.
Source: Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg
School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe St. room W6509, Baltimore, MD, 21205,
USA.
Abstract
Despite evidence that autism is highly heritable with
estimates of 15 or more genes involved, few studies have directly examined
associations of multiple gene interactions. Since inability to effectively
combat oxidative stress has been suggested as a mechanism of autism, we
examined genetic variation 42 genes (308 single-nucleotide polymorphisms
(SNPs)) related to glutathione, the most important antioxidant in the brain,
for both marginal association and multi-gene interaction among 318 case-parent
trios from The Autism Genetic Resource Exchange. Models of multi-SNP
interactions were estimated using the trio Logic Regression method. A three-SNP
joint effect was observed for genotype combinations of SNPs in glutaredoxin,
glutaredoxin 3 (GLRX3), and cystathione gamma lyase (CTH); OR?=?3.78, 95% CI:
2.36, 6.04. Marginal associations were observed for four genes including two
involved in the three-way interaction: CTH, alcohol dehydrogenase 5,
gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase, catalytic subunit and GLRX3. These results
suggest that variation in genes involved in counterbalancing oxidative stress
may contribute to autism, though replication is necessary.
Recent research indicates that Autism is related to immune,
neurologic, and inflammation issues that are triggered by a genetic disposition
to be sensitive to certain pollutants, toxins, food additives and so on. Strong
evidence relates the lack of cellular glutathione (the major anti-inflammatory
agent) and Autism.
Excerpts:
Originally it was thought that autism was mainly from the
brain, we now find that there are three components of autism. They are the
brain, immune system, the intestinal track. It's not uncommon that these
children have intestinal disorders—maybe they are constipated or have certain
food sensitivities that irritate their stomachs. Autism is now being related as
a immune, neurological, and inflammatory disorder. Being that glutathione is
the major anti inflammatory agent, inflammation very well can be the component
associated with low glutathione in Autism.
It has been discovered that there are vulnerable genes that
in combination with the right environmental triggers do not allow the child to
stay healthy. Is this an outgrowth of increased pollution and toxins in our
food and air? If the child has a genetic disposition, then under the right
environmental factors (or shall we say unhealthy factors) autism appears. These
genetic variants are called Polymorphisms. When theses genes are affected they
disturb fundamental pathways in the body and the end result of autism is
chronic inflammation through out the brain, digestive and the immune system.
The good news is that inflammation is treatable. In the studies that have been
done the correlation between low glutathione levels and autism is staggering.
Dr. Daria suggests that you simply google “autism and low glutathione” and
you'll find many references to attest to this fact.
Jill James PhD. at the Arkansas Children’s Hospital
Research Institute where she is the director of the Metabolic Genomics Austin
Lab and also she is the professor for pediatrics at the same institute.
In an article published in New Science of Health Sept of 09
page 75, she states that “children with Autism do not make as much of a
compound called glutathione as nero-typical children do. Glutathione is the
cells most abundant antioxidant and is critical for removing toxins. If cells
lack sufficient antioxidants they experience oxidative stress which is often
found with chronic inflammation.”
The mitochondria use oxygen to help make ATP, but if the
cell is deficient in glutathione the cell senses this and diminishes the
production of ATP which will diminish the functioning of that cell—whatever its
purpose.
In American Journal of Medical Genetics in 2006 Jill James
found that common genes variants that support glutathione pathways may be
associated with Autism risks. Jill James says “We also plan to look at
mitochondria dysfunctions. Since mitochondria are the powerhouses of the cells,
this is also the place where the most free radicals are that play a role in
oxidative stress are produced. If the electron transport chain in a
mitochondria is faulty and you are not effectively making ATP. You’ll
produce more free radicals to deplete your glutathione.”
For children with Autism we have to help them control their
diet, the environmental toxins and do what we can to boost glutathione.
Diet generally means gluten and or casein free. It's based
on the theory that children with autism are more likely to have allergies to
gluten (the protein in wheat, oats, barley and rye) and casein (the protein in
milk). Unfortunately most children with these allergies are drawn to foods with
gluten—especially junk foods-- and foods with casein in them, making a change
challenging for some families. If you google “King Diet,” you'll find a diet
for parasite sufferers. Ironically it's an anti-inflammatory diet and will work
wonders with inflammation. It's a three stage diet with Stage I being devoid of
any milk or casein products. For the most part Stage II can be employed for
Autism minus the casein products. Later on, one can be advanced to Stage
III (again minus the casein unless casein is not a problem.) The other
advantage is that this diet is rich in foods that contribute to the cellular
production of glutathione.
Whereas most children under age 20 have enough glutathione,
those with Autism have a problem with the mitochondria that uses up too much
glutathione and they simply don't have enough glutathione.
In summary, inflammation plays an important role in Autism
and glutathione is the major anti inflammatory agent and anti toxin agent in
the cellular mechanism. Genetically there is a predisposition for certain
children to be subject to certain environmental/food toxins which cause the
mitochondria to produce more free radicals than normal which in turn uses up
the cellular glutathione resulting in insufficient production of ATP.
There is a strong correlation between children with Autism and the lack of
glutathione. It makes sense to do whatever can be done to boost cellular levels
of glutathione.
Despite increasing evidence of oxidative stress in the
pathophysiology of autism, most studies have not evaluated biomarkers within
specific brain regions, and the functional consequences of oxidative stress
remain relatively understudied. We examined frozen samples from the cerebellum
and temporal cortex (Brodmann area 22 (BA22)) from individuals with autism and
unaffected controls (n=15 and n=12 per group, respectively). Biomarkers of
oxidative stress, including reduced glutathione (GSH), oxidized glutathione
(GSSG) and glutathione redox/antioxidant capacity (GSH/GSSG), were measured.
Biomarkers of oxidative protein damage (3-nitrotyrosine; 3-NT) and oxidative
DNA damage (8-oxo-deoxyguanosine; 8-oxo-dG) were also assessed. Functional
indicators of oxidative stress included relative levels of 3-chlorotyrosine
(3-CT), an established biomarker of a chronic inflammatory response, and
aconitase activity, a biomarker of mitochondrial superoxide production.
Consistent with previous studies on plasma and immune cells, GSH and GSH/GSSG
were significantly decreased in both autism cerebellum (P<0.01) and BA22 (P<0.01).
There was a significant increase in 3-NT in the autism cerebellum and BA22
(P<0.01). Similarly, 8-oxo-dG was significantly increased in autism
cerebellum and BA22 (P<0.01 and P=0.01, respectively), and was inversely
correlated with GSH/GSSG in the cerebellum (P<0.01). There was a significant
increase in 3-CT levels in both brain regions (P<0.01), whereas aconitase
activity was significantly decreased in autism cerebellum (P<0.01), and was
negatively correlated with GSH/GSSG (P=0.01). Together, these results indicate
that decreased GSH/GSSG redox/antioxidant capacity and increased oxidative
stress in the autism brain may have functional consequence in terms of a
chronic inflammatory response, increased mitochondrial superoxide production,
and oxidative protein and DNA damage.
Another recent study, to be published later this year, was
conducted by Dr. Jill James of the Autism Speaks' Autism Treatment
Network. It relates to the mother’s inability to produce sufficient
levels of a chemical called Glutathione. The chemical is essential in fighting
toxic metals in the body. Several studies have already established that high
levels of toxic metals in children are strongly correlated with the severity of
Autism, Adams said. According to Adams, the glutathione study shows that low
levels of Glutathione, coupled with high production levels of another chemical,
homocysteine, greatly increase the chances of a woman having a child with
Autism. Among ? Autism moms? in the study, 41 percent of them carried this
chemical abnormality.
Clinical findings in autism and relevance of dysfunctional
calcium signaling in
Abnormal Biomedical Findings in Autism – SUMMARY
Reduced cerebral blood flow and cerebral edema in autism
Results of several studies have shown abnormal platelet
reactivity and altered blood flow in children with autism. Following these
findings it has been suggested that platelet and vascular endothelium
activation could be one of the contributing factors to the development and
clinical manifestations of the disorder (16908745). Relative to this the
following case reports are of particular interest, both describing cases of
inflammation of brain blood vessels resulting in loss of language and emergence
of symptoms of autism. In both cases administration of nicardipine lead to
recovery of language and behaviour (1373338, 11008286).
PET and SPECT scans in autistic children show a decreased
cerebral blood floow in some regions of the brain (12077922, 10960047, 7790938)
and cerebral water content was found to be raised in brain grey matter in
children with autism (16924017). A model has been suggested in which the
observed gray matter abnormality could be inflammatory (see
Immunity-Inflammation section below). This finding of cerebral edema at the
same time offered an alternative explanation for enlarged brain size in autism,
which up to then had been hypothesized to be due to lack ‘pruning’ of neurons
during development.
Abnormality of the immune function and chronic inflammation
in autism
Results of numerous studies point to an abnormality of the
immune function in autism, as well as active, ongoing inflammation in the GI
tract, the brain and the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF).
A recent study by Vargas et al (15546155) investigated the
presence of immune activation in postmortem brain specimens and CFS from
subjects with autism. The authors found active neuroinflammation in multiple
areas of the brain, for example in the cerebral cortex and white matter, and in
the cerebellum. A marked migroglial and astroglial activation was also found,
as well as the presence of an altered cytokine pattern, with macrophage
chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1 and tumor growth factor-beta1 (TGF-beta1) being
the most prevalent cytokines. There was also an accumulation of macrophages and
monocytes, and a marked absence of lymphocytes and antibodies, pointing toward
an innate neuroimmune activation with the absence of adaptive immune system/T
cell activation in the brain. In addition, an enhanced proinflammatory cytokine
profile was observed in the CSF, including once more a marked increase in
MCP-1. These observations resemble findings in other neurological disorders in
which elevations in cytokine levels is associated with the pathogenesis of
neuroinflammation, neurotoxicity and neuronal injury and subsequent behavioural
and cognitive impairments, for example HIV-associated dementia and multiple
sclerosis (15288500, 11282546, 16875710, 9852582). Animal experiments
illustrate that, during early pre and postnatal development, inflammatory
cytokine challenge can induce various psychological, behavioral and cognitive impairments
(17804539, 16147952, 9852582). At the same time the expression of many
cytokines, including MCP-1, in neurons and glial cells seems to be upregulated
by increased intracellular calcium triggered by membrane depolarisation
(11102468, 10943723).
Another investigation into inflammatory markers in the brain
tissue of patients with autisms revealed significantly increased levels of
several proinflammatory cytokines (TNF-alpha, IL-6 and GM-CSF, IFN-gamma,
IL-8). The Th1/Th2 ratio was also significantly increased in ASD patients,
suggesting that localized brain inflammation and autoimmune disorder may be
involved in the pathogenesis of ASD (19157572).
Various serological findings further confirm the presence of
immune system dysregulation and active inflammation in autism - raised levels
of proinflammatory cytokines have often been observed in blood of patients with
autism, with significant increases of IFN-gamma, IL-6 and TNF-alpha. These
results are followed by findings of decreased peripheral lymphocyte numbers,
incomplete or partial T cell activation following stimulation, decreased NK
cells activity, dysregulated apoptosis mechanisms, imbalances of serum
immunoglobulin levels, increased numbers of monocytes and abnormal T helper
cell (Th1/Th2) ratio, with a Th2 predominance, and without the compensatory
increase in the regulatory cytokine IL-10 (16698940, 16360218). It is of
interest to note that, following increased levels of TGF-beta1 in brain
specimen as observed by Vargas et al, this cytokine was found to be
significantly lower in the blood of adult patients with autism compared to
controls (17030376).
Another relevant observation is the elevation of
cerebrospinal fluid levels of TNF-alpha compared to its serum levels in
subjects with autism. The observed ratio of 53.7:1 is significantly higher than
the elevations reported for other pathological states for which cerebrospinal
fluid and serum tumor necrosis factor-alpha levels have been simultaneously
measured (17560496).
[Although this below study again looks at a lot of variable
aspects to ASD, and in that as well they seem to not ever address the potential
vaccine connection; one thing is clear, the information actually does not
exonerate vaccines, but indirectly again points right to that likely
possibility].
part 2:
Dysregulating Factors:
Genetic Factors – page 2
In addition, autism has been link to some genetic mutations
and polymorphisms that raise
suceptibility to oxidative stress (see Oxidative_Stress).
Toxic Agents
Of special interest might be the findings of a series of
murine studies pointing to links
between viral infections and absorbtion and tissue/organ
distribution of
environmental toxins, in the light of reports indicating
impaired detoxification and
accumulation in the body of environmental toxins in ASD
individuals (see Infectious
_Agents)
In addition to effects of mercury on neuronal cells, of
equal interest are the findings of its negative effects in immune responses.
Dysturbances of calcium homeostasis induced by lowlevel chronic exposure to
mercury is suggested to be one of the mechanisms behind immune dysfunction and
tendency towards development of chronic disease following viral infection
[9653674, 8952707]. Both organic and inorganic mercury have been observed to
screw immune responses and induce autoimmunity in mice, with mouse strains that
are genetically suceptible to autoimmunity showing most pronuonced
developmental disturbances following exposure to ethylmercury [17084957,
15184908] (see also Viruses/Bacteria).
Dendritic cells, crucial for the first-line response of the
immune system towards external pathogens, have recently demonstrated particular
sensitivity to changes in calcium levels as induced by ethylmercury-containing
perservative thimerosal [16835063] (see Immunity/Inflammation). The tendency of
increased persistence of virus with methylmercury exposure may turn out to be
of particular relevance in autism, as this toxin has been observed in a murine
model to change viral myocarditis in a direction compatible with the
development of chronic
inflammatory disease. Amongst other markers significantly
raised levels of calcium and decreased levels of zinc were recorded in the
inflamed heart [11314973, 8682094].
The continuous application of heavy metals lead and mercury
in vivo resulted in their accumulation in brain cells and the occurrence of
delayed toxic effects in rat fetuses. It was shown that when methylmercury is
applied at non-toxic concentrations it becomes neurotoxic under pro-oxidative
conditions. Lead and mercury induce glial cell reactivity, a hallmark of brain
inflammation and increase the expression of the amyloid precursor protein.
Mercury also
stimulates the formation of insoluble beta-amyloid, which
plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of AD and causes oxidative stress and
neurotoxicity in vitro. Based on their results and reviews of previous findings
authors suggest that those heavy metals may contribute to the etiology of
neurodegenerative diseases [16898674] (see Related Disorders)
Genetic variants in AVPR1A linked to autism predict amygdala
activation and personality traits in healthy humansAVPR1A genetic variation,
amygdala reactivity and personality.
Abstract
In mammals, the neuropeptide vasopressin is a key molecule
for complex emotional and social behaviors. Two microsatellite polymorphisms,
RS1 and RS3, near the promoter of AVPR1A, encoding the receptor subtype most
heavily implicated in behavior regulation, have been linked to autism and
behavioral traits. However, the impact of these variants on human brain
function is unknown. Here we show that human amygdala function is strongly
associated with genetic variation in AVPR1A. Using an imaging genetics approach
in a sample of 121 volunteers studied with an emotional face-matching paradigm,
we found that differential activation of amygdala is observed in carriers of
risk alleles for RS3 and RS1. Alleles in RS1 previously reported to be
significantly over- and under transmitted to autistic probands showed opposing
effects on amygdala activation. Furthermore, we show functional difference in
human brain between short and long repeat lengths that mirror findings recently
obtained in a corresponding variant in voles. Our results indicate a neural
mechanism mediating genetic risk for autism through an impact on amygdala
signaling and provide a rationale for exploring therapeutic strategies aimed at
abnormal amygdala function in this disorder.
Again do not forget about THIS science, that you should have included in the combined information assessment, as to the proper conclusion regarding that said Molecular Psychiatry so called genetics study!
This reply was again sent to the above linked to blog page. As with the blog page before, and the one before that; I wouldn't be expecting him to actually publish, and respond to these said replies. He simply can't. It is to much truth, and he only publishes replies where he can control the information, only partially publish the reply, or does not publish any reply at all, but yet twists it all and lies about what was there. Just like the CDC, he must control the information, and in this case what the public is actually allowed to see. He must as well completely ignore that there is any counter blog to his, and refuting repeatedly his said blog pages, right in and at the top of the google index listing, next to his. How sick and pathetic is that?
Here we go, a reprint of the said reply sent!
Costner, when are you going to get it through your head?
Gorski is as intellectually dishonest, mindlessly twisted, and as intentionally
in denial as you are. Why do you think he is there? To support real science,
and fact? No, he is there to represent a false illusion that has and that there
is real science to support his claims, and as well the vaccine safety and
effectiveness claims. No such thing exists. If it exists, then why when you
have been asked repeatedly for that, can you not produce it? After what, 80
personally attacking blog pages here, you have produced nothing. Creating one
blog page after another, while never having addressed the issues of the last
one, is in all truth just as worthless as if you admitted to having nothing.
Anyone can go to my site and counter blog page and read what you have ignored repeatedly.
By the way, as I told you before. I do NOT have any multiple
sites nor multiple blogs. There is ONE site, and ONE blog only. There have been
known spoofed sites in my name, and that is a whole separate and endless story.
Take an actual hard look at those, if any remain.
Your Gorski sourced article is nothing but the same old worn
out personal attacks on credibility, grind and spin. It is about as
worthless as used toilet paper; and actually about the most twisted and
rambling waste of time rant I have ever read. He sounds insane!
Where he as well in quoting it, claims to this said bit of
well worn out trash.
Quote:[Kata also correctly identifies most of the common
tropes and tactics of the antivaccine movement. First, the tactics:] unquote
Then he goes on to list four paragraphs of said accusations,
that he actually in all of his hypocrisy, is the most guilty of himself.
Exactly that. He is a complete hypocrite, and so are you Costner; because you
follow the same repeatedly failed and worn out outline of false claims and
accusations that he does. That's why he is there. But he is not smart enough to
realize he needs to come up with anything or something far better. Why? Because
like you, he is lying about it all. He has absolutely nothing to base those
claims on; and I will tell you, if he were debating me, he definitely would NOT
have any.
Right out of the gate, he shows his hypocrisy, and lack of
any tolerance for alternative information and the existing science any person
has and can put with it. And who is cherry picking? You can bring all the
pharma and CDC funded studies you want, (if you have any), and you know I can
and have (if you were paying any attention), shot down every one of them. Can
he or you do that with my studies? If you could, you would have already done
it. No, its better to refuse to acknowledge any existence of that.
Quote: [1.Skewing the science. This involves cherry picking
studies, denigrating science that doesn’t support an antivaccine viewpoint, and
endorsing bad science that supports antivaccine agendas.] unquote
Did you READ what he said there? He is not willing to accept
any science that does not support the pro vaccine agenda. There you have it,
just like you. No one even needs to denigrate the provaccine safety and
effectiveness science, because for the most part it does not even exist. What
said science that is claimed to be and exist, falls apart at the seams as not
even close to what it was said to be, by anyone that has actually read it, and
knows what is going on. As a fact.
He has and never will be able to come up with anything
better; than what he has in that article. It is truly pathetic. Where in that
article anywhere, does he actually refute the information that is out there, as
to vaccine truth? I am specifically talking about as to the information we or
any of us put forth. Where does he ever back any of his statements, with proof?
He is YOUR hero? Wow.
In any real debate, each person has a set of information,
and as well a set of reference material, and in this case must have the science
as well to back up their claims. Do you have that? No you don't, and you
clearly do not. All you can do is repeatedly deny the information, as if it
does not exist. You must ignore any information and the science that does not
fit with your intended and deceptive pro-vaccine safe and effective agenda.
So, what you have again here is just another page of foolish
nonsense, and personal ad hominem attack that you can not back up, and that
makes you look even worse than the page before that, and before that. Maybe you
can publish this and point out some spelling or grammar errors to make yourself
appear smarter; but all yet while you are failing and sliding further and
further down the informational and fact finding slope?
Here's some tin foil, Costner! Make yourself a HAT, you don't want any truth getting in there! And you know, any form of fact and truth that doesn't fit your pro-vax agenda, "is only a conspiracy theory". Just like an ostrich, head right back down the hole.
Check that out; the information in my linked to site page above; go ahead and review it, alias no identity Costner!
And you are still so mislead and in denial, that you call what has
been going on with the polio vaccine, and to date; a SUCCESS story??? Really?
It is clearly not a success story, and if you ever pulled your head out of the
WHO and CDC's rear end, you might figure that out. But it doesn't matter to
you what the truth is; your job clearly is to keep on with mindlessly denying it
all.
Do you know anything about vaccine caused polio paralysis,
and how many endless cases of that they are seeing in those said underdeveloped
countries? How about mutation of the polio virus, caused by the oral vaccine
itself?
Why is not Bill Gates instead, or as well, concerned with
providing clean water, improved sanitation, and nutrition? Other than digging
one single well, and then presenting water for vaccine bribes to get that clean
water; or they can continue to drink out of a pooed in ditch? The oral polio
vaccine keeps failing and even more-so largely because of the reasons described
They obviously don't care. They just keep mass vaccinating anyway, as
apparently the vaccine pharmaceutical companies are not wealthy enough yet.
They know very well, they can never eradicate polio; that having gone in the
directions they have. And that, even if the vaccine worked.
As to and for all the CDC, WHO, UNICEF, and the Global Polio
Eradication Initiative based said statistical data; how many times have I told
you, there is absolutely no data to back those claimed to and for those
numbers, and there never has been. As a fact. They simply get away with making
any claims they choose to, and no one is to supposed to be the wiser. They simply
get away with that because as supposed and self proclaimed authorities on the
issue; they know their data is assumed correct, no matter what it is. That has
been the way it has been throughout history, and for multiple levels of and for
those supposedly at a level of public health agency public trust. It has all
clearly been a fraud, since day one. The evidence of that clearly exists on
multiple levels.
Here, you are a big herd immunity buff, right? And you
proclaim for vaccines to work, there must be vaccine induced herd immunity,
right? There is no such thing, and the concept of herd immunity has been a
fraud as well, that, from day one. There is no physiological science based data
to to it; it is just another fraud. In fact you do not even need any science to
show that to be true. Common sense will show you the real truth, all by itself.
Here is why, and it is all on this site page below. See if you can find any
form of refute and/or denial you can make, to that information. Have fun.
Also sent in two parts, as a reply to the said and linked to above blog page.
Hey alias no identity, Costner!
I knew you couldn't do it. I knew you couldn't even attempt to
get past it, without using your typical and flat out lying and denial of the real evidence and vaccine science that is there. You can and never could deal with the real information, data nor the REAL and UNBIASED science, since day
one, nor make any claims whatsoever, without flat out lying. You must deny what is
actually there; or you have nothing; and you know that and have always known
that. What exists and goes on in your intentionally in denial and twisted mind,
is truly unmatched. You are truly pathetic
Unless the CDC admitted to it all and acknowledged the
studies, and the real data; nothing would allow you to admit to anything. Which
of course that the CDC refuses to do on any level, because they simply have to
much to lose.
You put forth the misleading informational garbage that you
have, refusing to acknowledge any information and studies regarding vaccines;
and then state "its a start", and that more of the same kind of
studies need to be done. Yet, you ignore the bulwark of very damning studies
already done on vaccines; that, in relation to aluminum and the MMR vaccine.
You ignore that the CDC should be funding more vaccine related studies like the
ones I have shown already are in existence; while you are at the same time of
course promoting any study that doesn't involve vaccines. That is in reality
entirely biased, and sick! Then YOU have the audacity to claim I have some
psychological problem? When are you going to get it that your old worn out and
repeatedly failed claims, and personal attacks, only make YOU look crazy? It
all repeatedly shows you to be incompetent and as well, far to biased and
dishonestly to evaluate the facts, on any level.
If there were any real validity and evidence to the
information you put forth, I would have no problem acknowledging that. But
there isn't; because it is near to worthless data, and as well as to the larger
picture.
The abbreviations for some of the journals I presented with;
do you actually in your small mind think those represent only "wild
theories unsupported by any studies or research". Like I said, and have
always said, you can reply to nothing, unless you lie! How’s that feel, pretty
good? You don't care; and you know you are lying, and that is all you have ever
done science day one. You must deny what is there. Do you actually think that
people reading your garbage, can not see clearly that you are repeatedly lying
and denying the facts in front of you?
You made this majorly delusional comment as well. Quote:
[Thankfully the glory days of anti-vaxxers seem to have passed as more and more
people realize the importance of vaccines.] Unquote.
The fact is that the vaccine truth movement is growing much
larger, not smaller. Why? Because increasing numbers of parents are realizing
what the vaccine have done to their children, and that is something that can
not be denied; no matter how you want to spin it.
Here is another one of your ridiculous statements.
Quote: [I have also shown you evidence and studies which
have examined vaccines and vaccine components but have never shown a link
between them and autism.]Unquote
I on the other hand have shown you overwhelmingly that the
scientific studies you and as well the CDC refuse to consider, clearly do show
the link to vaccines. You keep on lying about that and refusing acknowledge
that fact. So, what are your claims actually worth; nothing.
Next one
Quote.[You have also been shown data that shows vaccination rates
do not align with autism rates whether it be within a group of children, or
from different countries that don't follow the US vaccination schedule.]
Unquote.
That is a bunch of bull crap Costner, and you know it. No
such data, much more being valid data exists. There are as well no vaccinated
verses entirely unvaccinated studies that have been done, which the gov't nor
the CDC have done, nor have been accepted by them. Those studies when we look
at the large groups of unvaccinated Amish that exist, (and they in fact do),
and they have no autism nor any of the other typical disorders known of now
running rampant in the vaccinated children. We as well know that in the
families with vaccine exemptions and/or home school without vaccines, that the
same thing exists there; no autism, and the children are amazingly healthy,
compared over-all to those vaccinated. It is simply a fact, deny it all you
want.
I think that all your angry hatred toward those who put
forth the vaccine truth, has actually and clearly done you more harm than good.
You are just to stubborn to admit it. And that is your reality; like it or
not.
And everything and what you put forth, alias no identity
Costner; you honestly feel carries more evidentiary weight, than do journals
and sources like these below?
Numerous Pubmed references
Over 100 references from various scientific journals, in one
link.
And none of these studies you have ever been willing to
acknowledge either, regarding Wakefield. Studies that replicate with the same
findings what that 1998 study found, and many more studies that clearly support
that study.
Oh yes, alias no identity Costner, I might have known. You would and could not honestly address that article for anything, and you created nothing but of course an outrightly laughably and twisted analysis on that said article. Really, no honest and fortright person should ever even need respond to such hogwash. But being I did send you the article and the link, I will address some of your deliberate and again intellectually dishonest and misleading bullshit!
The first thing you did of course was again as always, attempt to by any twisted means possible, discredit the source and author. Well, that said attempt did not work very well for you, and is only a further testiment to the ways and means you repeatedly have accessed within your small, narrow, and clearly irrational and twisted mind!
Here is example of the twisted attempt at false discreditation.
For that reason I examined the thinktwice website and tried to determine who was associated with it. Unfortunately the "about us" page doesn't list any names or any doctors who are affiliated with the website, so I have no way to know who runs or manages the website nor do I know their qualifications. They do however list a nice disclaimer that includes such phrases as:
And he goes on to reference to 4 paragraphs of and in the disclaimer notice that he of course claims puts them in their place as to their lack of credibility. Those are listed here. http://www.thinktwice.com/disclaim.htm
Are you actually so ignorant Costner, that you do not realize that such vaccine truth websites legally must protect themselves with a such disclaimer? They are forced to do that, to avoid people like you going after them and attempting to shut them down for providing non CDC/FDA accepted information, and as well without a medical license. Any way you look at it the with or without that license, any non FDA accepted information is subject to scrutiny by the FDA, and as well by the federal gov't; and actually by force requires that disclaimer. It has absolutely nothing to do with their credibility. In fact although worded differently, I have a disclaimer on my website as well, which I am sure you have noticed. In fact I read the copy of the investigation that was done on my site, and that is exactly how and one reason they (those chicken shits) previously submitted a complaint tip on me as well. Trying to shut the site down. It failed, as the disclaimer was deemed sufficient. In fact go to the blog below this one and read in detail what has been happening to this site right here.
If anyone would be familiar with that it would be you, Mr. no real name nor identity blogger; and here you are falsley attempting to be and appear ignornant of the facts. Any means at all to provide false and even slanderous discreditation will clearly work for you!
And here below is another example of that, as always, false attempt at dicreditation. This is your statement made.
Let me stop right here and ask if you went to the CDC or FDA website and they had a store where they would sell you books and pro-vaccine pamphlets and slideshows... would you believe for a second that those websites were as reputable and other websites which offer their information for free in an effort to simply educate the public? If you visited the website of a major pharmaceutical manufacturer and they were selling books for $19.95 that show how their pills can solve all of your ailments and that there are no known side effects... would you actually believe that book is in any way unbiased? Could you trust the information shown to you was impartial and fair if you knew their goal was to have you pack your online shopping cart with various remedies and books and emergency supplies? No you wouldn't - because real unbiased science doesn't rely upon pushing the reader towards an online store. Real science and real unbiased information is only interested in sharing that information, which is why you will never see a reputable website or medical journal offer to sell you some random supplement as a promotional tie-in to the information being disseminated.
Costner, are you actually so blind to reality and fact that you do not even realize that those viewed by the sheeple, as high impact pharma journals, that they are selling something? That would be billions of dollars worth of drugs and vaccines? They advertise to the public nonstop, and spend millions on that advertizing, both to doctors and directly to the public. Your apparent lack of awareness of that aspect to it leads a person needing not go any further than that to show right from the starting line, that there is absolutely nothing you can be honest about, ever! So much for your own credibility!
A person really needs not and would not even need make any further analysis of your said blog page content, as you are clearly lying, or entirely delusional, and thus obviously unfit to make an evaluation of anything whatsoever as to the facts of the article you were given. And you now actually think I should now need go through that refuse to face the facts expose, and be expected to go through every twisted and baseless comment you made there; clearly lacking any unbiased honesty. Your claims are lacking even the basics of common sense and rationality? You make a mockery of fact, and you clearly do so intentionally. And why? Because you never have had any other basis to stand on but to distort, deny, and twist the actual facts, period. Yes, and no matter how many times you are shown and provided those facts. And studies.
You can continue to quote your false CDC and WHO numbers, and false 50's polio years numbers; that clearly have been proven in any honest mind to have no basis, and in fact by the true historical sources of access to real record that exists, those said numbers clearly are and have been falsified. You were given the exact sources to review and determine that information comparison for yourself, and against the CDC and WHO bullshit they put forth. And they are NOT non-reputable sources, they are from specific historical reference data, and sources to date you have never been able to refute nor show any error in that. You were given the sources as well, to show you that it was reclassification of the diagnosis of polio that allowed the US Public Health Service to manipulate the data on and cover-up the increased cases of polio after introduction of polio vaccine. We are still ass well seeing today, a resurgence of vaccine strain polio in the underdeveloped countries that have been so NOT helped by the WHO push to eradicate polio with the actually for all practical purposes live vaccine. It in fact is impossible to not create vaccine strain polio from the vaccines they are using, as it sheds, and it not only sheds to unvaccinated persons, but vaccinated persons, and can create a worse form of paralytic polio than if nothing had been done at all. The fully polio vaccinated (3 times) in those countries as well clearly have acquired the VDPV strain and experienced paralysis. In fact in the US as well, paralytic polio was fairly uncommon in comparison, prior to the polio vaccine.
Again, alias no real identity Costner, it is all about what sources of information you are willing to accept. For you and far to many brainwashed others, including and unfortunately most of the entire medical establishment, that encircles nothing but the CDC based information. So, therefore there will never has been and never will be any agreement on any grounds whatsoever, between the provax and pro vax truth / anti vax movement. Call it what you whatever you want. We also have a segment of a group out there that nothing would be enough, because the ramifications of admitting the truth, or being forced to would just be to likely to end their careers. As well as their belief in that they did not actually do more harm than good. Their allopathic training will not allow them to even begin to think for themselves.
There are major claims out there always claiming how effective the polio vaccine campaign has been.
Yet there seems to be some major problems out there that they seem to care not to try and get explained away! Their answer as well to elimination of "vacine-derived polioviruses (cVDPVs)", is always hinged on shooting for that illusive herd immunity as the answer for everything. In realtity, in view of it all; how realistic is that? The only thing for certain, is pharma filling their pockets. Polio eradication campaign uncovers 89,999 cases of acute flaccid paralysis worldwide.
Excerpted: There were 1,606 cases of polio caused by wild poliovirus in 2009, according to the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report issued yesterday by the CDC. This number is down from the 1988 estimate of 350,000 polio cases. This reduction is indeed a remarkable accomplishment in the global health arena.
According to the same report, there were also 175 cases of "vacine-derived polioviruses (cVDPVs)" detected in people with AVP (acute flaccid paralysis) in six countries. The countries with cases of "vaccine-derived polioviruses included Nigeria, Guinea, Ethiopia, Somalia, Democratic Republic of Congo and India.
These vaccine-derived poliovirus infections were detected through the Acute Flaccid Paralysis Surveillance system, monitored by the World Health Organization (WHO). This system is in place to measure the progress of the war to erradicate polio from the planet. It tracks all AFP cases in children under the age of 15, and any cases of AFP in older people where polio is suspected.
Accute flaccid paralysis is often used to describe sudden onset flaccid paralysis, as might be associated with polio. It is characterized by weakness or paralysis and reduced muscle tone without other obvious causes (such as injury). Causes, other than polio, include Guillian-Barre syndrome, enteroviral encephalopathy, traumatic neuritis, and Reye's syndrome.
According to WHO records, there were 89,999 cases of AFP reported worldwide in 2009. The report indicates surveillance quality "varied substantially," so not all cases were reported. Even so, there were 89,999 cases of AFP reported worldwide.
1606 of these cases were attributed to wild polio virus; 115 cases attributed to vaccine-derived polio virus. No mention was made regarding what caused the other 88,278 cases. It should be noted that 14% of the AFP cases did not have adequate specimens provided for testing the cause of transmission.
So therfore, WHY has not the World Health Organization looked into the cause/s of that large number of sudden onset flaccid paralysis, further? Good question. They do not want to know, and you know they could know if they wanted to know! So, something seems to be rotten in Denmark. This is clearly so, as to the complete knowledge and definitive analysis of the true potential for and of the possible number of cases of polio vaccine strain virus out there that may be causing paralysis? No proof currently exists either way, as to how many cases of VDPV worldwide there trully are!
Therefore, until the WHO can ascertain what the cause/s of the other 88,278 cases of sudden onset flaccid paralysis are, they best nor claim they know it is NOT the vaccines being used! Ask, why would they ignore that?
Excerpts: Three cases of acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) associated with circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus (cVDPV) isolates were reported in the Philippines during March 15–July 26, 2001. The first case-patient, a child aged 8 years from northern Mindanao island (500 miles south of Manila) who had received 3 doses of oral polio vaccine (OPV), had onset of paralysis on March 15. A second child, aged 3 years from Laguna province on Luzon island (60 miles south of Manila) who had received 3 OPV doses, presented with signs of meningitis but no paralysis on July 23. A third child, aged 14 months from Cavite province (25 miles from Manila and 45 miles north of Laguna province) who had received 2 OPV doses, had onset of paralysis on July 26.
To interrupt cVDPV circulation, a large-scale mass vaccination campaign with OPV is planned.
Low routine vaccination coverage is one of the most important causes of VDPV. Because the location of the originating events is unknown, the contribution of other factors is difficult to assess; however, a combination of two concurrent events within the virus is necessary for cVDPV emergence: reversion of attenuating mutations to increase neurovirulence, and a presumed increase in transmission characteristics that might be related to recombination with a nonpolio enterovirus. The molecular basis for the second property is not understood.
Wild poliovirus was last reported in the Philippines in 1993,2 and national vaccination rounds were last conducted in the Philippines in 1997 followed by subnational immunization days in 1998 and 1999. Among the areas covered were Cebu, Davao, Manila, and parts of Mindanao; however, coverage did not extend to the three provinces now reporting cVDPV cases.
So clearly, there are cases of VDPV causedacute flaccid paralysis, as well in the fully polio vaccinated!!! Why is that not being addressed globally? They clearly do not have a full understanding of how this VDPV is happening, yet they ALWAYS revert again to the unproven vaccine herd immunity mantra, and we have to vaccinate more and that is the cause of VDPV. While they know attempting to achieve the so called required percentage of herd immunity, is impossible in those countries. Enter, the sustained authoritive power and profit motives.
And the polio vaccine is safe for everyone? Even undernouished children.
Look what Dr. Archie Kalokerinos has stated about that in his work with Aboriginal children.
The Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) or Crib Death, has been shown by the Australian workers, A. Kalokerinos and G. Dettman, to be a manifestation of infantile scurvy, due to the fact that all infants, born of mothers who depended solely on their diet as their only source of ascorbate, are born with the CSS Syndrome after nine months of intrauterine scurvy (Stone. 1978). SIDS can be prevented by increasing the infant’s intake of ascorbate (Cook, 1978). This has been known and published since 1974 (Kalokerinos, 1974). (Irwin Stone, Eight Decades of Scurvy - The Case History of a Misleading Dietary Hypothesis, 1978).
Many of these infants were dying after receiving government-mandated vaccinations. Dr. Thomas Levy writes:
Vaccinations also generally present some degree of toxin insult to the body. Kalokerinos (1981) observed that vitamin C-deficient Aboriginal infants were often placed into an acute state of scurvy because of the additional vitamin C demands placed on their bodies by the vaccination injections, resulting in sudden death. (Thomas E. Levy, MD, JD, Vitamin C, Infectious Diseases, & Toxins – Curing The Incurable, 2002).
But then what would any average doctor or pediatrician know about that, nutritian?
Today the average medical doctor receives 3 hours or less training on nutrition despite the fact that our bodies are constructed entirely of what we eat and drink. Todays doctor receives much of his ongoing education from detail men. The detail man is the drug company salesman whose job it is to teach the doctor how to use the latest drugs. [For a more detailed expose on the truth and why that is, go to the sources below].
And here we have the continued stated and claimed numbers of occurance of the worlds (wild polio strain).
Poliomyelitis
Excerpts: Polio cases have decreased by over 99% since 1988, from an estimated 350,000 cases then, to 1604 reported cases in 2009. The reduction is the result of the global effort to eradicate the disease.
In 2010, only four countries in the world remain polio-endemic, down from more than 125 in 1988. The remaining countries are Afghanistan, India, Nigeria and Pakistan.
Global polio eradication initiative launches 2010-2012 strategic plan for interrupting polio worldwide
New polio strategy builds on 99% drop in Nigeria cases but faces 50% funding shortfall
News release
17 June 2010 | Geneva -In Geneva this Friday, a broad range of stakeholders will formally launch the new Strategic Plan 2010-2012 for eradicating wild poliovirus.
“Polio eradication remains an urgent priority for our foundation,” said Tachi Yamada, president of global health at the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. “We call on donor governments to also prioritize polio as we seek to eliminate these last, most difficult cases.”
Really? It seems they have some unfinished business to take care of before they can EVER make claim to that! It is a lie and they clearly should know that eradication of polio with a vaccine, especially with what they are using is unattainable!
Ol Costner can howl all he wants about what is on that page, but there is more truth there than he can, and/or ever will explain away. Ask him where his science is, that hasn't been shot down! Maybe he can tell me again about that old Gorski delusional myth that none of us understand the science and the scientific method. From the looks of it, the definition of a conspiracy theorist these days, is actually someone who proved a conspiracy existed. Otherswise, I think they need to find a new term. The only person here that should be wearing a tin foil hat is Costner; to add an extra layer so the truth can't penetrate his thick head. No matter how many times he is shown it and sees it.
I mean just look as well at how many times he has no matter what, maintained that Wakefield was a fraud, with complete evidence in front of him that he was not. Just like the CDC and FDA; they know the truth about what they have done, that is why nothing is ever enough. http://www.lowellsfacts.com/Dr_E5TP.html http://www.lowellsfacts.com/Dr._A.html
Nigeria Sees Polio Outbreak from Mutated Vaccine Virus.
Excerpts: The new figure is double the 62 vaccine-derived cases reported in the country last year, and marks the continuation of the longest vaccine-derived polio outbreak ever seen, beginning in 2006, according to Oliver Rosenbauer, spokesman for World Health Organization's Polio Eradication Initiative.
The oral vaccine contains weakened live polio virus to build immunity in the patient, but can spread from a vaccinated person to the unvaccinated public and grow more virulent. If it is not contained and is allowed to mutate for months, it can grow strong enough to cause paralysis.
The oral vaccine containing the live virus is used in Nigeria because it is the only vaccine that can eradicate the active disease, WHO's Rosenbauer explained.
Many countries, including the United States and Canada, used the oral vaccine containing live virus to eradicate the disease, then were able to switch to an injected vaccine containing dead virus once polio was largely eliminated among the population. http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/health/july-dec09/polio_08-24.html
And where is their science to back that bullshit of passive immunity? There is none. The sugar cube was in fact discontinued for the injected form in the US, not for those reasons but that they knew it was causing vaccine strain polio! So how could you ever claim you can and will eradicate anything, using something that causes vaccine strain polio which can be much more virulent? Knowing as well that a large number of people do not get vaccinated in those countries. Large enough to never eradicate polio, even if the vaccines in the vaccinated worked.
Polio Outbreak Raises Questions About Vaccine
A small cluster of polio cases in the Dominican Republic and Haiti marks both the first polio outbreak in the Western Hemisphere in more than 9 years and the first reliable report that a vaccine-derived polio strain may have reverted to a virulent form and spread contagiously. Although a massive vaccination campaign already in the works is expected to contain the outbreak, the unusual incident raises troubling questions about a vaccine that has been in widespread use for nearly 40 years. http://www.sciencemag.org/content/290/5498/1867.2.summary
Here are some more of Costner in denial and insane ramblings, as to the said sugar and the increased in cases of polio, issue.
It is quite possible that other manufacturers shipped even more ice cream to North Carolina during this same period, but we aren't given that data. We are only given the select pieces of data that Miller wishes us to read in order for him to make his scientifically unsupported position. A true study would not have relied upon such assumption and rather would have examined numerous states, their rates of polio, the amount of sugar consumed per capita from all known sources, and any other underlying factors which could have been to blame for a reduction in the number of cases (such as a unusually wet or humid summer resulting in less human to human contact, improved sanitation resulting in less fecal-oral contamination, more awareness of the disease resulting in less human transmission, or countless other factors).
It is quite possible that other manufacturers shipped even more ice cream to North Carolina during this same period, but we aren't given that data. We are only given the select pieces of data that Miller wishes us to read in order for him to make his scientifically unsupported position. A true study would not have relied upon such assumption and rather would have examined numerous states, their rates of polio, the amount of sugar consumed per capita from all known sources, and any other underlying factors which could have been to blame for a reduction in the number of cases (such as a unusually wet or humid summer resulting in less human to human contact, improved sanitation resulting in less fecal-oral contamination, more awareness of the disease resulting in less human transmission, or countless other factors).
The fact is, across the entire US there were close to 58,000 cases of polio in 1952, whereas after a massive vaccination campaign we witnessed a massive decrease in cases to around 15,000 in 1956, to just over 3000 in 1960, and in 1965 there only 72. A few years after that in 1969 there were less than 20 total across the entire US, and by by mid 70s there were only around 8 cases per year. Does Miller believe this is all due to the US vastly decreasing the amount of sugar intake?
If that is Miller's suggestion, then he is being incredibly dishonest because sugar consumption in the US has actually increased during that same period from 6,846,000 tons in 1948 to 9,884,000 tons in 1969. Unlike Miller I would like to disclose that those figures are total across the US and are not broken down per capita nor did I cherry pick just a few select states to make a point. However it should be noted that per capita sugar consumption rose during this same period. I know this because I am capable of doing basic math, and according to the US Census Bureau the US population was 146,631,302 in 1948 and 202,676,946 in 1969. That tells us that American consumption of sugar in 1948 was 93.4lbs of sugar per person, while it was 97.5lbs of sugar per person in 1969.
There are 2,000lbs of sugar in a ton, thus 6,846,000 tons of sugar equates to 13,692,000,000 pounds. If you divide that figure by the total population of 146,631,302 your end result is 93.37706079, or roughly 93.4 pounds of sugar per capita. Math doesn't lie.
Reply: You are using those false CDC/WHO numbers... again! And why would you do a study in all 50 states, when only one state, N.C. had the issue going on of a certain person Dr. Sandler putting it forth in the local news, the warning that sugar consumption affected the immune system, and the public and providers adhered to it and polio cases went down. What would you have to compare to in other states? You know there was likely no sudden decline like that 2,498 cases of polio in 1948, and 229 cases in 1949, in any other state, in one year. The insanity of trying to claim that there was another cause for that, is purely beyond in denial of ALL... lunacy! (data taken from North Carolina State Health Department figures) [26:146;29].
If YOU are so incapable of unbiased research that you can not figure out why sugar would have a deleterious effect on the immune system, then you are beyond being even close to rational; nor clearly are you even qualified to even waste my time.
Are you THAT desperate to deny any and all facts, Costner? Of course you clearly are, and always were! Above are your blog page excerpts, Einstein; trying to pass yourself off as a mathematical genius! And as well you are quoting false CDC and WHO numbers that were clearly and falsely manipulated to change the evidence of the fact that polio cases increased right after the polio vaccine was in use, and was covered up by the U.S. Public Health Service. And how many cases of meningitis do we have in the US today? But nothing would be enough evidence of anything for you. As polio cases were already in major decline prior ot the vaccine, and not only the deaths, that would eventually continue to be the case. Something the CDC and WHO also have misrepresented as to the those original numbers. But there is of course ONLY one set of information you will consider. That of the people that have to much to lose.
Here is what that article stated:
Nutritional deficiencies: A poor diet has also been shown to
increase susceptibility to polio [25]. In 1948, during the height of
the polio epidemics, Dr. Benjamin Sandler, a nutritional expert at
the Oteen Veterans’ Hospital, documented a relationship between
polio and an excessive use of sugars and starches. He compiled
records showing that countries with the highest per capita con-
sumption of sugar, such as the United States, Britain, Australia,
Canada, and Sweden (with over 100 pounds per person per year)
had the greatest incidence of polio [26]. In contrast, polio was
practically unheard of in China (with its sugar use of only 3
pounds per person per year) [26].
Dr. Sandler claimed that sugars and starches lower blood sugar
levels causing hypoglycemia, and that phosphoric acid in soft
drinks strips the nerves of proper nourishment. Such foods dehy-
drate the cells and leech calcium from the body. A serious calcium
deficiency precedes polio [26-29]. Weakened nerve trunks are then
more likely to malfunction and the victim loses the use of one or
more limbs [26:146].
Researchers have always known that polio strikes with its
greatest intensity during the hot summer months. Dr. Sandler ob-
served that children consume greater amounts of ice cream, soft
drinks, and artificially sweetened products in hot weather. In 1949,
before the polio season began, he warned the residents of North
Carolina, through the newspapers and radio, to decrease their con-
sumption of these products. That summer, North Carolinians re-
duced their intake of sugar by 90 percentCand polio decreased by
the same amount! The North Carolina State Health Department
reported 2,498 cases of polio in 1948, and 229 cases in 1949 (data
taken from North Carolina State Health Department figures)
[26:146;29].
One manufacturer shipped one million less gallons of ice cream
during the first week alone following the publication of Dr.
Sandler’s anti-polio diet. Soft drink sales were down as well. But
the powerful Rockefeller Milk Trust, which sold frozen products
to North Carolinians, combined forces with soft drink business
leaders and convinced the people that Sandler’s findings were a
myth and the polio figures a fluke. By the summer of 1950 sales
were back to previous levels and polio cases returned to “normal”
[26:146;29].
The empirical, clinical basis for Klenner’s statement is found in his paper “The Treatment of Poliomyelitis and Other Virus Diseases with Vitamin C”, published in the July 1949 issue of the Journal of Southern Medicine and Surgery. On pages 211-212 he writes:
And what did the FDA in 2011 just ban from use in any therapy? The IV form of vitamin C. These SOB's clearly are into curing anything, if it can not be claimed to come from a drug or vaccine. Just like they banned the use of darkfield blood microscopy as well. Nothing can tell better the true health of a patient, cause and effect. They don't want to look at actual root causes, as that means something might get actually cured at it's real cause and source. That takes the profit from pharmaceutical companies, selling more sickness and disease.
And did YOU even check out any of the references to that article Costner? Of course you didn't, you never do; that would mean you might have to admit the validity of them, and nothing would be referenced well enough for you that didn't contain the CDC and pharma non-dissenting and false dogma! To discount the level of reference material in and to that article, is just flat out asinine!
Here are some more of your asinine and baseless comments:
Back to reality, the reason that fewer people (as a percentage of polio cases) were actually dying from polio from the 1920s to the 1950s was not because polio had magically transformed from a deadly disease to merely a harmful disease. Instead, the decrease in deaths was due in no small part to advancements in treatment of polio such as massage for muscle relaxation, confining patients to bed, increased usage of iron lungs, and perhaps most importantly usage of antibiotics to prevent infections.
Reply: And you now believe that the reduction in those polio deaths 47 and 55 percent were due to what you stated above? Someone like you, that even denys the benefits to the immune system of chiropractic, in light of over 100 studies you were provided that show that effect. Whatever, works for you at the given time I guess, you whaffling whap.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deception
Excerpt from the article: From 1923 to 1953, before the Salk killed-virus vaccine was introduced,
the polio death rate in the United States and England had already declined on its own by 47 percent and 55 percent, respectively. Source: International Mortality Statistics (1981) by Michael Alderson.
[51] Alderson M. International Mortality Statistics, Washington, DC: Facts on
File, 1981:177–8.
1940 - Sister Elizabeth Kenny travels from her native Australia to California where she is virtually ignored by the medical community. She then travels to Minnesota where she gives the first presentation in the United States to members of the Mayo Clinic staff regarding her procedures for treating polio patients by means of hot-packing and stretching affected limbs.
1942 - The first Sister Kenny Institute opens in Minneapolis.
1943 - The Sister Kenny Foundation is formed, and Kenny's procedures become the standard treatment for polio patients in the United States, replacing the ineffective traditional approaches of " convalescent serum " and immobilization.
You got to love THIS ... crap below! The lengths these people will go to lie their way out of something. Take your own advise Costner, and apply that terminology to yourself. Read it and apply it! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intellectual_dishonesty
As you can see, a little objective analysis of Miller's work easily shows gaping flaws in logic, blatant intellectual dishonestly, misleading conclusions, and even factual errors. I could easily spend several days identifying the countless significant errors throughout the entire article, but at the end of the day no amount of facts or figures is about to sway a devoted antivaxer. In their minds Miller is a hero for trying to suggest a vaccine causes more harm that good no matter how much evidence exists to the contrary.
Reply: Buy the way, it is only your claims and comments that have gaps and flaws in the logic with a hole big enough to drive a truck through. And that is right, he is a hero, and his work is well referenced; like it or not. If there is anyone here with a blatant case of intellectual dishonesty, it is you, Mr. No Identity Blogger! Unfortunately, for you - you can not seem to get that Gorski /CDC poison koolaid and mislead rhetoric out of your head! The insanity of your twisted thought processes and with the level of in denial biased misinformation you persistently refuse to give up, rightfully earns you your title. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brainwashed
More stupidity: Obviously antivaxers like Mr. Hubbs aren't intelligent enough to examine such a document and identify the gaping flaws and therefore they just accept it at face value. The most comical aspect of this is the fact that Miller actually makes a reference to the concept of herd immunity (second page of the document under item 5) which is the total inverse of what Mr. Hubbs believes, but it is pretty clear that Mr. Hubbs never actually bothers to read the sources he cites and instead is lucky to make it beyond the title and the abstract.
Reply: And obviously you are not intelligent enough to examine and realize a document like that is proof of exactly what it states. And clearly the only way you could get around that was to lie about what was there. But that seems to be a very sick and bad habit you have mastered quite well. "Oh, he has no peer reviewed studies". Try getting honest and compare the level of peer reviewed studies that have been referenced here, compared to the number you have referenced? And what happened to each and every one of those? And you do, know that! And you as well lie straight up, claiming to accept any study from anywhere in the world, but when it comes down to it, that is never the case.
And now for the grand finale!
Is it any wonder why nobody will ever take the antivaxer movement seriously? I think not.
Reply: And for ANYONE to take your twisted and again in denial analysis in that blog and blog page expose seriously and as factually correct, they would have to be as mislead and drinking the same bogus Gorski and CDC Koolaid that you are, and just exactly like you! Thats ok, there are tons of people mislead and in denial; but not many are sick enough to produce what you have. Nor sick enough to falsely go after and personally attack one person, for over a year; to include deliberate and multiple occurrences of slander. You have as well a couple very sick people clearly connected to you that post from time to time on this blog, under anonymous or a bogus name. Am I supposed to take that seriously? At least you never see me posting any sick trash like that. And how about your no identity blog creation? Only a bonified and damage control sheeple with allot to lose if the truth be known, would take that trash and slanderous seriously! But keep on that delusional path, all you want. Your deception only increases awareness for those that would be actually looking for the truth.
And additonally, why was it Costner, that you conveniently ignored and did not address the SV-40 polio vaccine contamination issue in that article. That is a major issue, and it is undeniable. If 1 in 200 people actually acquired paralyitic polio, and being adequate amounts vitamin C and D boost the immune function and prevent polio, as well as elimination of sugar; I will surely in all good sense, refuse polio vaccines. I wish now that I had been able to do that in 1963! I got that contaminated sugar cube, and now I have a certain health related issue that was explained in that article, and now it all makes sense. In fact it wouldn't matter how many cases of polio I seen out there, it simply is not and never was worth the benefits verses risk - ratio. Not for that vaccine, nor any vaccine.
Hearing: SV40 in Polio Vaccine before the Subcommittee on Wellness and Human Rights, Committee on Government Reform, US House of Representatives http://www.hhs.gov/asl/testify/t031113.html
Simian Virus 40 and Human Cancer, National Cancer Institute, [As always they are LYING! This one hand washes the other racket, will never admit to anything, ever! And they continue to mislead the public as to the facts on SV40]. http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/sv40
Excerpts: Studies of groups of people who received polio vaccine during 1955-1963 provide evidence of no increased cancer risk.
However, because these epidemiologic studies are sufficiently flawed, the committee concluded in this report that the evidence was inadequate to conclude whether or not the contaminated polio vaccine caused cancer. In light of the biological evidence supporting the theory that SV40-contamination of polio vaccines could contribute to human cancers, the committee recommends continued public health attention in the form of policy analysis, communication, and targeted biological research.
Conclusion
Because Pesticide symptoms and physiology are identical to poliomyelitis.
and pesticide dosage arguments alone suffice, and epidemiological proofs for pesticide causality correlate perfectly.
and in spite of an extremely biased scientific environment ranging from textbook warning statements regarding the mere consideration of pesticide causality, exclusively biased public health laws, exclusively biased funding, and dramatically charged global propaganda for the public and medical professional,
There is clearly enough evidence right there to affirmatively state that the use of DDT significantly effected the rates of polio in the public and even more-so in the military of that time. As well the banning of DDT also witnessed a sharp drop in polio cases, only to to post polio syndrome appear when DDT was back in limited use.
Of course Costner doesn't believe there is anything wrong with Gardasil either, no proof ever! Must deny it on all fronts! He wants to a see a high impact pharma peer reviewed study, before he will believe the needless harm and death Gardasil has caused. He thinks the collateral damage is worth it. Check that out in his blog as well, and the replies in this one.Yes, he is that much in denial, talk about intellectual dishonesty! He knows better, and he is lying as always.
Oh, none of the information is controlled Costner? They would be glad to have any of that in many of the peer reviewed journals; they wouldn't mind any dissenters or studies showing them they are full of crap and that what they were doing was wrong and flat out causing more harm than good? Gee, talk about intellectual dishonesty! Go drink some more of that Gorski and Orac Pharma hit man Koolaid! You know they have bashed any and all alternative information, and they have never ben wrong. Modern medicine is the third leading cause of death, and they have never been wrong, nor about their claimed to and said science! Wow.
The Non-Disclosed and Hyper-Allergenic Vaccine Adjuvant
Excerpts: What peanuts have in common with vaccines is something that very few healthcare consumers and medical doctors may be aware of: Peanut oil is a hidden and non-stated ingredient in the manufacture of children’s vaccines.
During the 1970s and 1980s peanut oil became a common practice and ingredient in vaccines. Coincidentally, peanut allergies began rising exponentially in children as more vaccines were administered. Heather Fraser in her 2010 book, The History of the Peanut Allergy Epidemic, documents this. http://www.garynull.com/home/the-non-disclosed-and-hyper-allergenic-vaccine-adjuvant.html
They REALLY don't care what they do to those kids; remember, they are the authorities with ALL the science, and use that scientific method! There is NO better way, click your heals, repeat that three times and return to Kansas!
Lancet, UK & USA government, media in a conspiracy to shut down any investigations as to the dangers of vaccines by targeting Andrew Wakefield as the lamb to be slaughtered. This is what will happen if anyone dares to touch the holy grail of vaccines, so that no one, in the future, will dare to take the chance to uncover the truth, that vaccines and in specific to this film, MMR, causes horrific injury to children. This is a film about the MMR Witchhunt Trial Scandal and Brian Deer’s (London Times Journalist) involvement in bringing the case to the medical court, GMC. It features the Lancet parents and Brian Deer outside the GMC Wakefield witch hunt. There was not one complaint by parents in bringing this case to court. It is said, Brian was brought in by his association to the American NY Times journals, whose boss, James Murdoch, senior executive of News International, which owns The Sunday Times (who Mr. Deer works for) is on the board of directors of GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceutical’s, a manufacturer of the MMR vaccinations.
Wakefield provides the facts, an explanation of the problem that confronted him and his colleagues 15 years ago. He does this in a detailed forensic analysis of the lies, obfuscation, cover ups, and dystopian science and medicine that panders to commercial interest at the expense of our children. Buy this book and send it to # 1 on the best seller list…
The vaccine manufacturers in this case Glaxo Smith Kline in particular who has ultimately been able to send a powerful message to all future doctors and researchers who think about what they are doing and have second thoughts.The unavoidable lesson is don’t take on the vaccine industry or YOU too can be ruined. Physicians and scientists will be steered away from questioning what they see and drawing obvious conclusions or at least investigating them further. The only investigations to be done are those bought and paid for by the Drug companies and the government regulatory-grant making autorities. The ones who have to suffer with the results are the patients and the public. This film really uncovers the shallowness of the case presented by Deer and his sponsors.
MMR Vaccine. Selective Hearing, Brian Deer and the GMC, Dr Andrew Wakefield Autism Video
A film about the MMR Witchhunt Trail Scandal and Brian Deers involvement in bringing the case,
an autism documentary by Alan Golding features the Lancet parents and Brian Deer outside the GMC. http://www.viddler.com/explore/ziggy/videos/1/ http://www.cryshame.com/
And Costner! Before whoever it is that you are supporting or working for gives any more vaccines; you should have them copy and fill out this document! It is only fair, and you should need to prove all that, because you are claiming all that!
Physician’s Warranty of Vaccine Safety.
I (Physician’s name, degree)_________________________, _____ am a physician licensed to practice medicine in the State of ________________ . My State license number is _______________ , and my DEA number is _______________. My medical specialty is ________________________
I have a thorough understanding of the risks and benefits of all the medications that I prescribe for or administer to my patients. In the case of (Patient’s name) ___________________________ ,
age _________ , whom I have examined, I find that certain risk factors exist that justify the recommended vaccinations. The following is a list of said risk factors and the vaccinations that will protect against them:
and, hereby, warrant that these ingredients are safe for injection into the body of my patient. I have researched reports to the contrary, such as reports that mercury thimerosal causes severe neurological and immunological damage, and find that they are not credible.
I am aware that some vaccines have been found to have been contaminated with Simian Virus 40 (SV 40) and that SV 40 is causally linked by some researchers to non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and mesotheliomas in humans as well as in experimental animals. I hereby warrant that the vaccines I employ in my practice do not contain SV 40 or any other live viruses. (Alternately, I hereby warrant that said SV-40 virus or other viruses pose no substantive risk to my patient.)
I hereby warrant that the vaccines I am recommending for the care of (Patient’s name) _______________ _______________________ do not contain any tissue from aborted human babies (also known as “fetuses” or Human Diploid Tissue).
In order to protect my patient’s well being, I have taken the following steps to guarantee that the vaccines I will use will contain no damaging contaminants.
I have personally investigated the reports made to the VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) and state that it is my professional opinion that the vaccines I am recommending are safe for administration to a child under the age of 5 years.
The bases for my opinion are itemized on Exhibit A , attached hereto, – “Physician’s Bases for Professional Opinion of Vaccine Safety.” (Please itemize each recommended vaccine separately along with the bases for arriving at the conclusion that the vaccine is safe for administration to a child under the age of 5 years.)
The professional journal articles I have relied upon in the issuance of this Physician’s Warranty of Vaccine Safety are itemized on Exhibit B , attached hereto, – “Scientific Articles in Support of Physician’s Warranty of Vaccine Safety.”
The professional journal articles that I have read which contain opinions adverse to my opinion are itemized on Exhibit C , attached hereto, – “Scientific Articles Contrary to Physician’s Opinion of Vaccine Safety.”
The reasons for my determining that the articles in Exhibit C were invalid are delineated in Attachment D , attached hereto, – “Physician’s Reasons for Determining the Invalidity of Adverse Scientific Opinions.”
Hepatitis B
I understand that 60% of patients who are vaccinated for Hepatitis B will lose detectable antibodies to Hepatitis B within 12 years.
I understand that in 1996 only 54 cases of Hepatitis B were reported to the CDC in the 0-1 year age group.
I understand that in the VAERS, there were 1,080 total reports of adverse reactions from Hepatitis B vaccine in 1996 in the 0-1 year age group, with 47 deaths reported.
I understand that 50% of patients who contract Hepatitis B develop no symptoms after exposure.
I understand that 30% will develop only flu-like symptoms and will have lifetime immunity.
I understand that 20% will develop the symptoms of the disease, but that 95% will fully recover and have lifetime immunity.
I understand that 5% of the patients who are exposed to Hepatitis B will become chronic carriers of the disease.
I understand that 75% of the chronic carriers will live with an asymptomatic infection and that only 25% of the chronic carriers will develop chronic liver disease or liver cancer, 10-30 years after the acute infection.
The following scientific studies have been performed to demonstrate the safety of the Hepatitis B vaccine in children under the age of 5 years.
In addition to the recommended vaccinations as protections against the above cited risk factors, I have recommended other non-vaccine measures to protect the health of my patient and have enumerated said non-vaccine measures on Exhibit D , attached hereto, “Non-vaccine Measures to Protect Against Risk Factors.”
I am issuing this Physician’s Warranty of Vaccine Safety in my professional capacity as the attending physician to (Patient’s name) ________________________________. Regardless of the legal entity under which I normally practice medicine, I am issuing this statement in both my business and individual capacities and hereby waive any statutory, Common Law, Constitutional, UCC, international treaty, and any other legal immunities from liability lawsuits in the instant case.
I issue this document of my own free will after consultation with competent legal counsel whose name is _____________________________, an attorney admitted to the Bar in the State of __________________
__________________________________ (Name of Attending Physician)
__________________________________ L.S. (Signature of Attending Physician)
Signed on this _______ day of ______________ A.D. ________
.jpg)
