Sunday, March 13, 2011

Response to: ThinkTwice and Polio: An Idiot's Guide to Critical Thinking

ThinkTwice and Polio: An Idiot's Guide to Critical Thinking

This is a response to the above blog page link.

Oh yes, alias no identity Costner, I might have known. You would and could not honestly address that article for anything, and you created nothing but of course an outrightly laughably and twisted analysis on that said article. Really, no honest and fortright person should ever even need respond to such hogwash. But being I did send you the article and the link, I will address some of your deliberate and again intellectually dishonest and misleading bullshit!

The first thing you did of course was again as always, attempt to by any twisted means possible, discredit the source and author. Well, that said attempt did not work very well for you, and is only a further testiment to the ways and means you repeatedly have accessed within your small, narrow, and clearly irrational and twisted mind!

Here is example of the twisted attempt at false discreditation.

For that reason I examined the thinktwice website and tried to determine who was associated with it. Unfortunately the "about us" page doesn't list any names or any doctors who are affiliated with the website, so I have no way to know who runs or manages the website nor do I know their qualifications. They do however list a nice disclaimer that includes such phrases as:

And he goes on to reference to 4 paragraphs of and in the disclaimer notice that he of course claims puts them in their place as to their lack of credibility. Those are listed here.

Are you actually so ignorant Costner, that you do not realize that such vaccine truth websites legally must protect themselves with a such disclaimer? They are forced to do that, to avoid people like you going after them and attempting to shut them down for providing non CDC/FDA accepted information, and as well without a medical license. Any way you look at it the with or without that license, any non FDA accepted information is subject to scrutiny by the FDA, and as well by the federal gov't; and actually by force requires that disclaimer. It has absolutely nothing to do with their credibility. In fact although worded differently, I have a disclaimer on my website as well, which I am sure you have noticed. In fact I read the copy of the investigation that was done on my site, and that is exactly how and one reason they (those chicken shits) previously submitted a complaint tip on me as well. Trying to shut the site down. It failed, as the disclaimer was deemed sufficient. In fact go to the blog below this one and read in detail what has been happening to this site right here.

Death Threats and Suppression of Vaccine Truth in Australia

If anyone would be familiar with that it would be you, Mr. no real name nor identity blogger; and here you are falsley attempting to be and appear ignornant of the facts. Any means at all to provide false and even slanderous discreditation will clearly work for you!

And here below is another example of that, as always, false attempt at dicreditation. This is your statement made.

 Let me stop right here and ask if you went to the CDC or FDA website and they had a store where they would sell you books and pro-vaccine pamphlets and slideshows... would you believe for a second that those websites were as reputable and other websites which offer their information for free in an effort to simply educate the public?  If you visited the website of a major pharmaceutical manufacturer and they were selling books for $19.95 that show how their pills can solve all of your ailments and that there are no known side effects... would you actually believe that book is in any way unbiased?  Could you trust the information shown to you was impartial and fair if you knew their goal was to have you pack your online shopping cart with various remedies and books and emergency supplies?  No you wouldn't - because real unbiased science doesn't rely upon pushing the reader towards an online store.  Real science and real unbiased information is only interested in sharing that information, which is why you will never see a reputable website or medical journal offer to sell you some random supplement as a promotional tie-in to the information being disseminated.

Costner, are you actually so blind to reality and fact that you do not even realize that those viewed by the sheeple, as high impact pharma journals, that they are selling something? That would be billions of dollars worth of drugs and vaccines? They advertise to the public nonstop, and spend millions on that advertizing, both to doctors and directly to the public. Your apparent lack of awareness of that aspect to it leads a person needing not go any further than that to show right from the starting line, that there is absolutely nothing you can be honest about, ever! So much for your own credibility!

A person really needs not and would not even need make any further analysis of your said blog page content, as you are clearly lying, or entirely delusional, and thus obviously unfit to make an evaluation of anything whatsoever as to the facts of the article you were given. And you now actually think I should now need go through that refuse to face the facts expose, and be expected to go through every twisted and baseless comment you made there; clearly lacking any unbiased honesty. Your claims are lacking even the basics of common sense and rationality? You make a mockery of fact, and you clearly do so intentionally. And why? Because you never have had any other basis to stand on but to distort, deny, and twist the actual facts, period. Yes, and no matter how many times you are shown and provided those facts. And studies.

You can continue to quote your false CDC and WHO numbers, and false 50's polio years numbers; that clearly have been proven in any honest mind to have no basis, and in fact by the true historical sources of access to real record that exists, those said numbers clearly are and have been falsified. You were given the exact sources to review and determine that information comparison for yourself, and against the CDC and WHO bullshit they put forth. And they are NOT non-reputable sources, they are from specific historical reference data, and sources to date you have never been able to refute nor show any error in that. You were given the sources as well, to show you that it was reclassification of the diagnosis of polio that allowed the US Public Health Service to manipulate the data on and cover-up the increased cases of polio after introduction of polio vaccine. We are still ass well seeing today, a resurgence of vaccine strain polio in the underdeveloped countries that have been so NOT helped by the WHO push to eradicate polio with the actually for all practical purposes live vaccine. It in fact is impossible to not create vaccine strain polio from the vaccines they are using, as it sheds, and it not only sheds to unvaccinated persons, but vaccinated persons, and can create a worse form of paralytic polio than if nothing had been done at all. The fully polio vaccinated (3 times) in those countries as well clearly have acquired the VDPV strain and experienced paralysis. In fact in the US as well, paralytic polio was fairly uncommon in comparison, prior to the polio vaccine.

Again, alias no real identity Costner, it is all about what sources of information you are willing to accept. For you and far to many brainwashed others, including and unfortunately most of the entire medical establishment, that encircles nothing but the CDC based information. So, therefore there will never has been and never will be any agreement on any grounds whatsoever, between the provax and pro vax truth / anti vax movement. Call it what you whatever you want.  We also have a segment of a group out there that nothing would be enough, because the ramifications of admitting the truth, or being forced to would just be to likely to end their careers. As well as their belief in that they did not actually do more harm than good. Their allopathic training will not allow them to even begin to think for themselves.

There are major claims out there always claiming how effective the polio vaccine campaign has been.
Yet there seems to be some major problems out there that they seem to care not to try and get explained away! Their answer as well to elimination of "vacine-derived polioviruses (cVDPVs)",  is always hinged on shooting for that illusive herd immunity as the answer for everything. In realtity, in view of it all; how realistic is that? The only thing for certain, is pharma filling their pockets.
Polio eradication campaign uncovers 89,999 cases of acute flaccid paralysis worldwide.

Excerpted: There were 1,606 cases of polio caused by wild poliovirus in 2009, according to the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report issued yesterday by the CDC. This number is down from the 1988 estimate of 350,000 polio cases. This reduction is indeed a remarkable accomplishment in the global health arena.

According to the same report, there were also 175 cases of "vacine-derived polioviruses (cVDPVs)" detected in people with AVP (acute flaccid paralysis) in six countries. The countries with cases of  "vaccine-derived polioviruses included Nigeria, Guinea, Ethiopia, Somalia, Democratic Republic of Congo and India.

These vaccine-derived poliovirus infections were detected through the Acute Flaccid Paralysis Surveillance system, monitored by the World Health Organization (WHO). This system is in place to measure the progress of the war to erradicate polio from the planet. It tracks all AFP cases in children under the age of 15, and any cases of AFP in older people where polio is suspected.

Accute flaccid paralysis is often used to describe sudden onset flaccid paralysis, as might be associated with polio. It is characterized by weakness or paralysis and reduced muscle tone without other obvious causes (such as injury). Causes, other than polio, include Guillian-Barre syndrome, enteroviral encephalopathy, traumatic neuritis, and Reye's syndrome.

According to WHO records, there were 89,999 cases of AFP reported worldwide in 2009. The report indicates surveillance quality "varied substantially," so not all cases were reported. Even so, there were 89,999 cases of AFP reported worldwide.

1606 of these cases were attributed to wild polio virus; 115 cases attributed to vaccine-derived polio virus. No mention was made regarding what caused the other 88,278 cases. It should be noted that 14% of the AFP cases did not have adequate specimens provided for testing the cause of transmission.

So therfore, WHY has not the World Health Organization looked into the cause/s of that large number of sudden onset flaccid paralysis, further? Good question. They do not want to know, and you know they could know if they wanted to know! So, something seems to be rotten in Denmark. This is clearly so, as to the complete knowledge and definitive analysis of the true potential for and of the possible number of cases of polio vaccine strain virus out there that may be causing paralysis? No proof currently exists either way, as to how many cases of  VDPV worldwide there trully are!

Therefore, until the WHO can ascertain what the cause/s of the other 88,278 cases of sudden onset flaccid paralysis are, they best nor claim they know it is NOT the vaccines being used! Ask, why would they ignore that?

Acute Flaccid Paralysis Associated With Circulating Vaccine-Derived Poliovirus—Philippines, 2001
MMWR. 2001;50874-5

Excerpts: Three cases of acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) associated with circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus (cVDPV) isolates were reported in the Philippines during March 15–July 26, 2001. The first case-patient, a child aged 8 years from northern Mindanao island (500 miles south of Manila) who had received 3 doses of oral polio vaccine (OPV), had onset of paralysis on March 15. A second child, aged 3 years from Laguna province on Luzon island (60 miles south of Manila) who had received 3 OPV doses, presented with signs of meningitis but no paralysis on July 23. A third child, aged 14 months from Cavite province (25 miles from Manila and 45 miles north of Laguna province) who had received 2 OPV doses, had onset of paralysis on July 26.

To interrupt cVDPV circulation, a large-scale mass vaccination campaign with OPV is planned.

Low routine vaccination coverage is one of the most important causes of VDPV. Because the location of the originating events is unknown, the contribution of other factors is difficult to assess; however, a combination of two concurrent events within the virus is necessary for cVDPV emergence: reversion of attenuating mutations to increase neurovirulence, and a presumed increase in transmission characteristics that might be related to recombination with a nonpolio enterovirus. The molecular basis for the second property is not understood.

Wild poliovirus was last reported in the Philippines in 1993,2 and national vaccination rounds were last conducted in the Philippines in 1997 followed by subnational immunization days in 1998 and 1999. Among the areas covered were Cebu, Davao, Manila, and parts of Mindanao; however, coverage did not extend to the three provinces now reporting cVDPV cases.

So clearly, there are cases of  VDPV caused acute flaccid paralysis, as well in the fully polio vaccinated!!! Why is that not being addressed globally? They clearly do not have a full understanding of how this VDPV is happening, yet they ALWAYS revert again to the unproven vaccine herd immunity mantra, and we have to vaccinate more and that is the cause of VDPV. While they know attempting to achieve the so called required percentage of herd immunity, is impossible in those countries. Enter, the sustained authoritive power and profit motives.

And the polio vaccine is safe for everyone? Even undernouished children.

Look what Dr. Archie Kalokerinos has stated about that in his work with Aboriginal children.

The Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) or Crib Death, has been shown by the Australian workers, A. Kalokerinos and G. Dettman, to be a manifestation of infantile scurvy, due to the fact that all infants, born of mothers who depended solely on their diet as their only source of ascorbate, are born with the CSS Syndrome after nine months of intrauterine scurvy (Stone. 1978). SIDS can be prevented by increasing the infant’s intake of ascorbate (Cook, 1978). This has been known and published since 1974 (Kalokerinos, 1974). (Irwin Stone, Eight Decades of Scurvy - The Case History of a Misleading Dietary Hypothesis, 1978).

Many of these infants were dying after receiving government-mandated vaccinations. Dr. Thomas Levy writes:

Vaccinations also generally present some degree of toxin insult to the body. Kalokerinos (1981) observed that vitamin C-deficient Aboriginal infants were often placed into an acute state of scurvy because of the additional vitamin C demands placed on their bodies by the vaccination injections, resulting in sudden death. (Thomas E. Levy, MD, JD, Vitamin C, Infectious Diseases, & Toxins – Curing The Incurable, 2002).

But then what would any average doctor or pediatrician know about that, nutritian?

Today the average medical doctor receives 3 hours or less training on nutrition despite the fact that our bodies are constructed entirely of what we eat and drink. Todays doctor receives much of his ongoing education from detail men. The detail man is the drug company salesman whose job it is to teach the doctor how to use the latest drugs. [For a more detailed expose on the truth and why that is, go to the sources below].


Polio Index:

Causes and Differential Diagnosis of Acute Flaccid Paralysis

Infectious causes of acute flaccid paralysis

If you believe the current world wide push to vaccinate for polio has been and will be successful, I suggest the following reference article.

Mutated Live Vaccine Polioviruses Pollute Water, Paralyze. by Barbara Loe Fisher

WHO hides the continuing polio epidemic. How a Continuing Polio Epidemic is being Hidden.

And here we have the continued stated and claimed numbers of occurance of the worlds (wild polio strain).


Excerpts: Polio cases have decreased by over 99% since 1988, from an estimated 350,000 cases then, to 1604 reported cases in 2009. The reduction is the result of the global effort to eradicate the disease.
In 2010, only four countries in the world remain polio-endemic, down from more than 125 in 1988. The remaining countries are Afghanistan, India, Nigeria and Pakistan.

Global polio eradication initiative launches 2010-2012 strategic plan for interrupting polio worldwide
New polio strategy builds on 99% drop in Nigeria cases but faces 50% funding shortfall

News release
17 June 2010 | Geneva -In Geneva this Friday, a broad range of stakeholders will formally launch the new Strategic Plan 2010-2012 for eradicating wild poliovirus.

“Polio eradication remains an urgent priority for our foundation,” said Tachi Yamada, president of global health at the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. “We call on donor governments to also prioritize polio as we seek to eliminate these last, most difficult cases.”

“The complete eradication of polio is an absolute goal and it requires absolute commitment from us all,” said UNICEF Executive Director Tony Lake.

Really? It seems they have some unfinished business to take care of before they can EVER make claim to that! It is a lie and they clearly should know that eradication of polio with a vaccine, especially with what they are using is unattainable!

Ol Costner can howl all he wants about what is on that page, but there is more truth there than he can, and/or ever will explain away. Ask him where his science is, that hasn't been shot down! Maybe he can tell me again about that old Gorski delusional myth that none of us understand the science and the scientific method. From the looks of it, the definition of a conspiracy theorist these days, is actually someone who proved a conspiracy existed. Otherswise, I think they need to find a new term. The only person here that should be wearing a tin foil hat is Costner; to add an extra layer so the truth can't penetrate his thick head. No matter how many times he is shown it and sees it.

I mean just look as well at how many times he has no matter what, maintained that Wakefield was a fraud, with complete evidence in front of him that he was not. Just like the CDC and FDA; they know the truth about what they have done, that is why nothing is ever enough.

Polio this week - As of Wednesday 09 March 2011

Polio situation worldwide in 2008 - update on the progress towards global eradication

Nigeria Sees Polio Outbreak from Mutated Vaccine Virus.

Excerpts: The new figure is double the 62 vaccine-derived cases reported in the country last year, and marks the continuation of the longest vaccine-derived polio outbreak ever seen, beginning in 2006, according to Oliver Rosenbauer, spokesman for World Health Organization's Polio Eradication Initiative.

The oral vaccine contains weakened live polio virus to build immunity in the patient, but can spread from a vaccinated person to the unvaccinated public and grow more virulent. If it is not contained and is allowed to mutate for months, it can grow strong enough to cause paralysis.

The oral vaccine containing the live virus is used in Nigeria because it is the only vaccine that can eradicate the active disease, WHO's Rosenbauer explained.

Many countries, including the United States and Canada, used the oral vaccine containing live virus to eradicate the disease, then were able to switch to an injected vaccine containing dead virus once polio was largely eliminated among the population.

And where is their science to back that bullshit of passive immunity? There is none. The sugar cube was in fact discontinued for the injected form in the US, not for those reasons but that they knew it was causing vaccine strain polio! So how could you ever claim you can and will eradicate anything, using something that causes vaccine strain polio which can be much more virulent? Knowing as well that a large number of people do not get vaccinated in those countries. Large enough to never eradicate polio, even if the vaccines in the vaccinated worked.

Polio Outbreak Raises Questions About Vaccine

A small cluster of polio cases in the Dominican Republic and Haiti marks both the first polio outbreak in the Western Hemisphere in more than 9 years and the first reliable report that a vaccine-derived polio strain may have reverted to a virulent form and spread contagiously. Although a massive vaccination campaign already in the works is expected to contain the outbreak, the unusual incident raises troubling questions about a vaccine that has been in widespread use for nearly 40 years.

Here are some more of Costner in denial and insane ramblings, as to the said sugar and the increased in cases of polio, issue.

It is quite possible that other manufacturers shipped even more ice cream to North Carolina during this same period, but we aren't given that data.  We are only given the select pieces of data that Miller wishes us to read in order for him to make his scientifically unsupported position.  A true study would not have relied upon such assumption and rather would have examined numerous states, their rates of polio, the amount of sugar consumed per capita from all known sources, and any other underlying factors which could have been to blame for a reduction in the number of cases (such as a unusually wet or humid summer resulting in less human to human contact, improved sanitation resulting in less fecal-oral contamination, more awareness of the disease resulting in less human transmission, or countless other factors).

It is quite possible that other manufacturers shipped even more ice cream to North Carolina during this same period, but we aren't given that data.  We are only given the select pieces of data that Miller wishes us to read in order for him to make his scientifically unsupported position.  A true study would not have relied upon such assumption and rather would have examined numerous states, their rates of polio, the amount of sugar consumed per capita from all known sources, and any other underlying factors which could have been to blame for a reduction in the number of cases (such as a unusually wet or humid summer resulting in less human to human contact, improved sanitation resulting in less fecal-oral contamination, more awareness of the disease resulting in less human transmission, or countless other factors).

The fact is, across the entire US there were close to 58,000 cases of polio in 1952, whereas after a massive vaccination campaign we witnessed a massive decrease in cases to around 15,000 in 1956, to just over 3000 in 1960, and in 1965 there only 72.  A few years after that in 1969 there were less than 20 total across the entire US, and by by mid 70s there were only around 8 cases per year.  Does Miller believe this is all due to the US vastly decreasing the amount of sugar intake? 

If that is Miller's suggestion, then he is being incredibly dishonest because sugar consumption in the US has actually increased during that same period from 6,846,000 tons in 1948 to 9,884,000 tons in 1969.  Unlike Miller I would like to disclose that those figures are total across the US and are not broken down per capita nor did I cherry pick just a few select states to make a point.  However it should be noted that per capita sugar consumption rose during this same period.  I know this because I am capable of doing basic math, and according to the US Census Bureau the US population was 146,631,302 in 1948 and 202,676,946 in 1969.  That tells us that American consumption of sugar in 1948 was 93.4lbs of sugar per person, while it was 97.5lbs of sugar per person in 1969.

There are 2,000lbs of sugar in a ton, thus 6,846,000 tons of sugar equates to 13,692,000,000 pounds.  If you divide that figure by the total population of 146,631,302 your end result is 93.37706079, or roughly 93.4 pounds of sugar per capita. Math doesn't lie.

Reply: You are using those false CDC/WHO numbers... again! And why would you do a study in all 50 states, when only one state, N.C. had the issue going on of a certain person Dr. Sandler putting it forth in the local news, the warning that sugar consumption affected the immune system, and the public and providers adhered to it and polio cases went down. What would you have to compare to in other states? You know there was likely no sudden decline like that 2,498 cases of polio in 1948, and 229 cases in 1949, in any other state, in one year. The insanity of trying to claim that there was another cause for that, is purely beyond in denial of ALL... lunacy!  (data taken from North Carolina State Health Department figures) [26:146;29].

If YOU are so incapable of unbiased research that you can not figure out why sugar would have a deleterious effect on the immune system, then you are beyond being even close to rational; nor clearly are you even qualified to even waste my time.

Are you THAT desperate to deny any and all facts, Costner? Of course you clearly are, and always were! Above are your blog page excerpts, Einstein; trying to pass yourself off as a mathematical genius! And as well  you are quoting false CDC and WHO numbers that were clearly and falsely manipulated to change the evidence of the fact that polio cases increased right after the polio vaccine was in use, and was covered up by the U.S. Public Health Service. And how many cases of meningitis do we have in the US today? But nothing would be enough evidence of anything for you. As polio cases were already in major decline prior ot the vaccine, and not only the deaths, that would eventually continue to be the case. Something the CDC and WHO also have misrepresented as to the those original numbers. But there is of course ONLY one set of information you will consider. That of the people that have to much to lose.  

Here is what that article stated:
Nutritional deficiencies: A poor diet has also been shown to
increase susceptibility to polio [25]. In 1948, during the height of
the polio epidemics, Dr. Benjamin Sandler, a nutritional expert at
the Oteen Veterans’ Hospital, documented a relationship between
polio and an excessive use of sugars and starches. He compiled
records showing that countries with the highest per capita con-
sumption of sugar, such as the United States, Britain, Australia,
Canada, and Sweden (with over 100 pounds per person per year)
had the greatest incidence of polio [26]. In contrast, polio was
practically unheard of in China (with its sugar use of only 3
pounds per person per year) [26].

Dr. Sandler claimed that sugars and starches lower blood sugar
levels causing hypoglycemia, and that phosphoric acid in soft
drinks strips the nerves of proper nourishment. Such foods dehy-
drate the cells and leech calcium from the body. A serious calcium
deficiency precedes polio [26-29]. Weakened nerve trunks are then
more likely to malfunction and the victim loses the use of one or
more limbs [26:146].

Researchers have always known that polio strikes with its
greatest intensity during the hot summer months. Dr. Sandler ob-
served that children consume greater amounts of ice cream, soft
drinks, and artificially sweetened products in hot weather. In 1949,
before the polio season began, he warned the residents of North
Carolina, through the newspapers and radio, to decrease their con-
sumption of these products. That summer, North Carolinians re-
duced their intake of sugar by 90 percentCand polio decreased by
the same amount! The North Carolina State Health Department
reported 2,498 cases of polio in 1948, and 229 cases in 1949 (data
taken from North Carolina State Health Department figures)

One manufacturer shipped one million less gallons of ice cream
during the first week alone following the publication of Dr.
Sandler’s anti-polio diet. Soft drink sales were down as well. But
the powerful Rockefeller Milk Trust, which sold frozen products
to North Carolinians, combined forces with soft drink business
leaders and convinced the people that Sandler’s findings were a
myth and the polio figures a fluke. By the summer of 1950 sales
were back to previous levels and polio cases returned to “normal”

Sugar Increases Polio Risk -- Lessons For Other Viral Infections, (an analysis of Dr. Sandlers work.)

The Origin of the 42-Year Stonewall of Vitamin C

The empirical, clinical basis for Klenner’s statement is found in his paper “The Treatment of Poliomyelitis and Other Virus Diseases with Vitamin C”, published in the July 1949 issue of the Journal of Southern Medicine and Surgery. On pages 211-212 he writes:

Read the article here:

Antiviral Vitamin C

And what did the FDA in 2011 just ban from use in any therapy?  The IV form of vitamin C. These SOB's clearly are into curing anything, if it can not be claimed to come from a drug or vaccine. Just like they banned the use of darkfield blood microscopy as well. Nothing can tell better the true health of a patient, cause and effect. They don't want to look at actual root causes, as that means something might get actually cured at it's real cause and source. That takes the profit from pharmaceutical companies, selling more sickness and disease.

And did YOU even check out any of the references to that article Costner? Of course you didn't, you never do; that would mean you might have to admit the validity of them, and nothing would be referenced well enough for you that didn't contain the CDC and pharma non-dissenting and false dogma! To discount the level of reference material in and to that article, is just flat out asinine!

Here are some more of your asinine and baseless comments:

Back to reality, the reason that fewer people (as a percentage of polio cases) were actually dying from polio from the 1920s to the 1950s was not because polio had magically transformed from a deadly disease to merely a harmful disease.  Instead, the decrease in deaths was due in no small part to advancements in treatment of polio such as massage for muscle relaxation, confining patients to bed, increased usage of iron lungs, and perhaps most importantly usage of antibiotics to prevent infections.

Reply: And you now believe that the reduction in those polio deaths 47 and 55 percent were due to what you stated above? Someone like you, that even denys the benefits to the immune system of chiropractic, in light of over 100 studies you were provided that show that effect. Whatever, works for you at the given time I guess,  you whaffling whap.

Excerpt from the article: From 1923 to 1953, before the Salk killed-virus vaccine was introduced,
the polio death rate in the United States and England had already declined on its own by 47 percent and 55 percent, respectively. Source: International Mortality Statistics (1981) by Michael Alderson.

[51] Alderson M. International Mortality Statistics, Washington, DC: Facts on
File, 1981:177–8.

1940 - Sister Elizabeth Kenny travels from her native Australia to California where she is virtually ignored by the medical community. She then travels to Minnesota where she gives the first presentation in the United States to members of the Mayo Clinic staff regarding her procedures for treating polio patients by means of hot-packing and stretching affected limbs.
1942 - The first Sister Kenny Institute opens in Minneapolis.
1943 - The Sister Kenny Foundation is formed, and Kenny's procedures become the standard treatment for polio patients in the United States, replacing the ineffective traditional approaches of " convalescent serum " and immobilization.

You got to love THIS ... crap below! The lengths these people will go to lie their way out of something. Take your own advise Costner, and apply that terminology to yourself. Read it and apply it!

As you can see, a little objective analysis of Miller's work easily shows gaping flaws in logic, blatant intellectual dishonestly, misleading conclusions, and even factual errors.  I could easily spend several days identifying the countless significant errors throughout the entire article, but at the end of the day no amount of facts or figures is about to sway a devoted antivaxer.  In their minds Miller is a hero for trying to suggest a vaccine causes more harm that good no matter how much evidence exists to the contrary.

Reply: Buy the way, it is only your claims and comments that have gaps and flaws in the logic with a hole big enough to drive a truck through. And that is right, he is a hero, and his work is well referenced; like it or not. If there is anyone here with a blatant case of intellectual dishonesty, it is you, Mr. No Identity Blogger! Unfortunately, for you - you can not seem to get that Gorski /CDC poison koolaid and mislead rhetoric out of your head!  The insanity of your twisted thought processes and with the level of in denial biased misinformation you persistently refuse to give up, rightfully earns you your title.

More stupidity:
Obviously antivaxers like Mr. Hubbs aren't intelligent enough to examine such a document and identify the gaping flaws and therefore they just accept it at face value.  The most comical aspect of this is the fact that Miller actually makes a reference to the concept of herd immunity (second page of the document under item 5) which is the total inverse of what Mr. Hubbs believes, but it is pretty clear that Mr. Hubbs never actually bothers to read the sources he cites and instead is lucky to make it beyond the title and the abstract.

Reply: And obviously you are not intelligent enough to examine and realize a document like that is proof of exactly what it states. And clearly the only way you could get around that was to lie about what was there. But that seems to be a very sick and bad habit you have mastered quite well. "Oh, he has no peer reviewed studies".  Try getting honest and compare the level of peer reviewed studies that have been referenced here, compared to the number you have referenced? And what happened to each and every one of those? And you do, know that! And you as well lie straight up, claiming to accept any study from anywhere in the world, but when it comes down to it, that is never the case.

And now for the grand finale!

Is it any wonder why nobody will ever take the antivaxer movement seriously?  I think not.

Reply: And for ANYONE to take your twisted and again in denial analysis in that blog and blog page expose seriously and as factually correct, they would have to be as mislead and drinking the same bogus Gorski and CDC Koolaid that you are, and just exactly like you! Thats ok, there are tons of people mislead and in denial; but not many are sick enough to produce what you have. Nor sick enough to falsely go after and personally attack one person, for over a year; to include deliberate and multiple occurrences of slander. You have as well a couple very sick people clearly connected to you that post from time to time on this blog, under anonymous or a bogus name. Am I supposed to take that seriously? At least you never see me posting any sick trash like that.  And how about your no identity blog creation? Only a bonified and damage control sheeple with allot to lose if the truth be known, would take that trash and slanderous seriously! But keep on that delusional path, all you want. Your deception only increases awareness for those that would be actually looking for the truth.

And additonally, why was it Costner, that you conveniently ignored and did not address the SV-40 polio vaccine contamination issue in that article. That is a major issue, and it is undeniable. If 1 in 200 people actually acquired paralyitic polio, and being adequate amounts vitamin C and D boost the immune function and prevent polio, as well as elimination of sugar; I will surely in all good sense, refuse polio vaccines. I wish now that I had been able to do that in 1963! I got that contaminated sugar cube, and now I have a certain health related issue that was explained in that article, and now it all makes sense. In fact it wouldn't matter how many cases of polio I seen out there, it simply is not and never was worth the benefits verses risk - ratio. Not for that vaccine, nor any vaccine.

Vaccines Dark Inferno, what is NOT on the insert labels.

60 Lab Studies Now Confirm Cancer Link to a Vaccine You Probably Had as a Child - SV 40

Reference studies on SV 40 in the polio vaccine.

60 Lab Studies Now Confirm Cancer Link to a Vaccine You Probably Had as a Child - SV 40

SV40, Polio Vaccine, and Cancer: Now Beyond Coincidence?

SV40 Cancer Foundation

SV 40

Simian Virus 40 (SV40): A Cancer Causing Monkey Virus from FDA-Approved Vaccines, Michael E. Horwin, M.A., J.D.

Hearing: SV40 in Polio Vaccine before the Subcommittee on Wellness and Human Rights, Committee on Government Reform, US House of Representatives

Simian Virus 40 and Human Cancer, National Cancer Institute, [As always they are LYING! This one hand washes the other racket, will never admit to anything, ever! And they continue to mislead the public as to the facts on SV40].

Cancer, Simian Virus 40 (SV40), and Polio Vaccine, (CDC claimed) Fact Sheet. [More "no proof", bullshit!]

The IOM on SV40

Excerpts: Studies of groups of people who received polio vaccine during 1955-1963 provide evidence of no increased cancer risk.

However, because these epidemiologic studies are sufficiently flawed, the committee concluded in this report that the evidence was inadequate to conclude whether or not the contaminated polio vaccine caused cancer. In light of the biological evidence supporting the theory that SV40-contamination of polio vaccines could contribute to human cancers, the committee recommends continued public health attention in the form of policy analysis, communication, and targeted biological research.

At least they are willing to admit, that much.

The Real SV-40 Truth.

The polio DDT and pesticide link.

Source: Polio in the United States, Graphic Timeline: U.S. 1870-1998,

Polio in the United States, Graphic Timeline: U.S. 1870-1998, including exposures to DDT.

Pesticide Introductions and Poliomyelitis

Images Of Poliomyelitis, A Critique Of Scientific Literature

Pesticides And Polio

DDT Dosage During The Epidemic Of 1942-62

The Environmental Aspects Of The Post Polio Syndrome

Salk Vaccine Timeline, U.S.

Because Pesticide symptoms and physiology are identical to poliomyelitis.
and pesticide dosage arguments alone suffice, and epidemiological proofs for pesticide causality correlate perfectly.

and in spite of an extremely biased scientific environment ranging from textbook warning statements regarding the mere consideration of pesticide causality, exclusively biased public health laws, exclusively biased funding, and dramatically charged global propaganda for the public and medical professional,

We are able to conclude with the most direct explanation: pesticide causality.

There is clearly enough evidence right there to affirmatively state that the use of DDT significantly effected the rates of polio in the public and even more-so in the military of that time. As well the banning of DDT also witnessed a sharp drop in polio cases, only to to post polio syndrome appear when DDT was back in limited use.

Polio Vaccine Linked to Lymphoma
Like I said, more harm than good.

Medical Miracle or Masterful Mirage
By Dr. Raymond Obomsawin

Of course Costner doesn't believe there is anything wrong with Gardasil either, no proof ever! Must deny it on all fronts! He wants to a see a high impact pharma peer reviewed study, before he will believe the needless harm and death Gardasil has caused. He thinks the collateral damage is worth it. Check that out in his blog as well, and the replies in this one. Yes, he is that much in denial, talk about intellectual dishonesty! He knows better, and he is lying as always.


Global Backlash on HPV Vaccines.
Leslie Botha [USA] [Host: Mayer Eisenstein, MD, JD, MPH]

Truth About Gardasil

Gardasil Victim Speaks Out After 2 Years.

Gardasil Update:

GANGSTERS IN MEDICINE, the real history you will never be told of in any medical school or text book, it has all been hidden, as a fact!

Here's some for ya Costner! Your favorite site. When you going to actually address and refute any of that?

Six Reasons to Question Vaccinations--Ten Reasons to Just Say 'No' to Vaccinations

Germ Theories

Disease Theories.


DEATH BY ALLOPATHY, (and they can NOT deny it).

VACCINE DISEASE, (and they can NOT refute it, all they can do is falsely attack and attempt to discredit the source).

The Vaccine Disease Racket quotes

The Smearing of Dr Wakefield

Persecuted doctors, health professionals.

Rene Caisse & Essiac, in the cure of cancer. And the proof is in, that it works better than chemo and radiation, and has for decades.

Oh, none of the information is controlled Costner? They would be glad to have any of that in many of the peer reviewed journals; they wouldn't mind any dissenters or studies showing them they are full of crap and that what they were doing was wrong and flat out causing more harm than good?
Gee, talk about intellectual dishonesty! Go drink some more of that Gorski and Orac Pharma hit man Koolaid! You know they have bashed any and all alternative information, and they have never ben wrong. Modern medicine is the third leading cause of death, and they have never been wrong, nor about their claimed to and said science! Wow.

Two-thirds of local pertussis cases were vaccinated, data show

The Non-Disclosed and Hyper-Allergenic Vaccine Adjuvant

Excerpts: What peanuts have in common with vaccines is something that very few healthcare consumers and medical doctors may be aware of: Peanut oil is a hidden and non-stated ingredient in the manufacture of children’s vaccines.

During the 1970s and 1980s peanut oil became a common practice and ingredient in vaccines. Coincidentally, peanut allergies began rising exponentially in children as more vaccines were administered. Heather Fraser in her 2010 book, The History of the Peanut Allergy Epidemic, documents this.

The History of the Peanut Allergy Epidemic

They REALLY don't care what they do to those kids; remember, they are the authorities with ALL the science, and use that scientific method! There is NO better way, click your heals, repeat that three times and return to Kansas!

Vaccinate the World: Gates, Rockefeller Seek Global Population Reduction, (and he denys this too).

Sanford just hooked up with Gates, imagine THAT?

Bill Gates Funds Covert Vaccine Nanotechnology


Read the book online.

VACCINE WITCH HUNT-TRIAL SCANDAL: Parent’s of Andrew Wakefield’s research silenced!

Lancet, UK & USA government, media in a conspiracy to shut down any investigations as to the dangers of vaccines by targeting Andrew Wakefield as the lamb to be slaughtered. This is what will happen if anyone dares to touch the holy grail of vaccines, so that no one, in the future, will dare to take the chance to uncover the truth, that vaccines and in specific to this film, MMR, causes horrific injury to children. This is a film about the MMR Witchhunt Trial Scandal and Brian Deer’s (London Times Journalist) involvement in bringing the case to the medical court, GMC. It features the Lancet parents and Brian Deer outside the GMC Wakefield witch hunt. There was not one complaint by parents in bringing this case to court. It is said, Brian was brought in by his association to the American NY Times journals, whose boss, James Murdoch, senior executive of News International, which owns The Sunday Times (who Mr. Deer works for) is on the board of directors of GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceutical’s, a manufacturer of the MMR vaccinations.

Wakefield provides the facts, an explanation of the problem that confronted him and his colleagues 15 years ago. He does this in a detailed forensic analysis of the lies, obfuscation, cover ups, and dystopian science and medicine that panders to commercial interest at the expense of our children. Buy this book and send it to # 1 on the best seller list…

CDC is currently suppressing information that the H1N1 vaccines given to pregnant women increased VAERS miscarriage reports by 2,500%

The vaccine manufacturers in this case Glaxo Smith Kline in particular who has ultimately been able to send a powerful message to all future doctors and researchers who think about what they are doing and have second thoughts.The unavoidable lesson is don’t take on the vaccine industry or YOU too can be ruined. Physicians and scientists will be steered away from questioning what they see and drawing obvious conclusions or at least investigating them further. The only investigations to be done are those bought and paid for by the Drug companies and the government regulatory-grant making autorities. The ones who have to suffer with the results are the patients and the public. This film really uncovers the shallowness of the case presented by Deer and his sponsors.

MMR Vaccine. Selective Hearing, Brian Deer and the GMC, Dr Andrew Wakefield Autism Video
A film about the MMR Witchhunt Trail Scandal and Brian Deers involvement in bringing the case,
an autism documentary by Alan Golding features the Lancet parents and Brian Deer outside the GMC.

And Costner! Before whoever it is that you are supporting or working for gives any more vaccines; you should have them copy and fill out this document! It is only fair, and you should need to prove all that, because you are claiming all that!

Physician’s Warranty of Vaccine Safety.

I (Physician’s name, degree)_________________________, _____ am a physician licensed to practice medicine in the State of ________________ . My State license number is _______________ , and my DEA number is _______________. My medical specialty is ________________________
I have a thorough understanding of the risks and benefits of all the medications that I prescribe for or administer to my patients. In the case of (Patient’s name) ___________________________ ,
age _________ , whom I have examined, I find that certain risk factors exist that justify the recommended vaccinations. The following is a list of said risk factors and the vaccinations that will protect against them:

Risk Factor Vaccination
_____________________________________________________ ____________________________________________
_____________________________________________________ ____________________________________________
_____________________________________________________ ____________________________________________
_____________________________________________________ ____________________________________________
_____________________________________________________ ____________________________________________
_____________________________________________________ ____________________________________________
_____________________________________________________ ____________________________________________
_____________________________________________________ ____________________________________________

I am aware that vaccines typically contain many of the following fillers:
• aluminum hydroxide
• aluminum phosphate
• ammonium sulfate
• amphotericin B
• animal tissues: pig blood, horse blood, rabbit brain,
• dog kidney, monkey kidney,
• chick embryo, chicken egg, duck egg
• calf (bovine) serum
• betapropiolactone
• fetal bovine serum
• formaldehyde
• formalin
• gelatin
• glycerol
• human diploid cells (originating from human aborted fetal tissue)
• hydrolized gelatin
• mercury thimerosol (thimerosal, Merthiolate®)
• monosodium glutamate (MSG)
• neomycin
• neomycin sulfate
• phenol red indicator
• phenoxyethanol (antifreeze)
• potassium diphosphate
• potassium monophosphate
• polymyxin B
• polysorbate 20
• polysorbate 80
• porcine (pig) pancreatic hydrolysate of casein
• residual MRC5 proteins
• sorbitol
• tri(n)butylphosphate,
• VERO cells, a continuous line of monkey kidney cells, and

• washed sheep red blood,,

and, hereby, warrant that these ingredients are safe for injection into the body of my patient. I have researched reports to the contrary, such as reports that mercury thimerosal causes severe neurological and immunological damage, and find that they are not credible.

I am aware that some vaccines have been found to have been contaminated with Simian Virus 40 (SV 40) and that SV 40 is causally linked by some researchers to non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and mesotheliomas in humans as well as in experimental animals. I hereby warrant that the vaccines I employ in my practice do not contain SV 40 or any other live viruses. (Alternately, I hereby warrant that said SV-40 virus or other viruses pose no substantive risk to my patient.)

I hereby warrant that the vaccines I am recommending for the care of (Patient’s name) _______________ _______________________ do not contain any tissue from aborted human babies (also known as “fetuses” or Human Diploid Tissue).

In order to protect my patient’s well being, I have taken the following steps to guarantee that the vaccines I will use will contain no damaging contaminants.

STEPS TAKEN: ____________________________________________________________________

I have personally investigated the reports made to the VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) and state that it is my professional opinion that the vaccines I am recommending are safe for administration to a child under the age of 5 years.

The bases for my opinion are itemized on Exhibit A , attached hereto, – “Physician’s Bases for Professional Opinion of Vaccine Safety.” (Please itemize each recommended vaccine separately along with the bases for arriving at the conclusion that the vaccine is safe for administration to a child under the age of 5 years.)

The professional journal articles I have relied upon in the issuance of this Physician’s Warranty of Vaccine Safety are itemized on Exhibit B , attached hereto, – “Scientific Articles in Support of Physician’s Warranty of Vaccine Safety.”

The professional journal articles that I have read which contain opinions adverse to my opinion are itemized on Exhibit C , attached hereto, – “Scientific Articles Contrary to Physician’s Opinion of Vaccine Safety.”

The reasons for my determining that the articles in Exhibit C were invalid are delineated in Attachment D , attached hereto, – “Physician’s Reasons for Determining the Invalidity of Adverse Scientific Opinions.”
Hepatitis B

I understand that 60% of patients who are vaccinated for Hepatitis B will lose detectable antibodies to Hepatitis B within 12 years.

I understand that in 1996 only 54 cases of Hepatitis B were reported to the CDC in the 0-1 year age group.

I understand that in the VAERS, there were 1,080 total reports of adverse reactions from Hepatitis B vaccine in 1996 in the 0-1 year age group, with 47 deaths reported.
I understand that 50% of patients who contract Hepatitis B develop no symptoms after exposure.

I understand that 30% will develop only flu-like symptoms and will have lifetime immunity.

I understand that 20% will develop the symptoms of the disease, but that 95% will fully recover and have lifetime immunity.
I understand that 5% of the patients who are exposed to Hepatitis B will become chronic carriers of the disease.

I understand that 75% of the chronic carriers will live with an asymptomatic infection and that only 25% of the chronic carriers will develop chronic liver disease or liver cancer, 10-30 years after the acute infection.

The following scientific studies have been performed to demonstrate the safety of the Hepatitis B vaccine in children under the age of 5 years.

In addition to the recommended vaccinations as protections against the above cited risk factors, I have recommended other non-vaccine measures to protect the health of my patient and have enumerated said non-vaccine measures on Exhibit D , attached hereto, “Non-vaccine Measures to Protect Against Risk Factors.”

I am issuing this Physician’s Warranty of Vaccine Safety in my professional capacity as the attending physician to (Patient’s name) ________________________________. Regardless of the legal entity under which I normally practice medicine, I am issuing this statement in both my business and individual capacities and hereby waive any statutory, Common Law, Constitutional, UCC, international treaty, and any other legal immunities from liability lawsuits in the instant case.

I issue this document of my own free will after consultation with competent legal counsel whose name is _____________________________, an attorney admitted to the Bar in the State of __________________

__________________________________ (Name of Attending Physician)
__________________________________ L.S. (Signature of Attending Physician)

Signed on this _______ day of ______________ A.D. ________
Witness: ___________________________________ Date: ________________________
Notary Public: ______________________________ Date: ________________________

No comments:

Post a Comment