Monday, December 03, 2012

Reply to: Move the Goalposts... It's Time to Talk Aluminum

Friday, November 16, 2012
Move the Goalposts... It's Time to Talk Aluminum


Reply to:

Your again intentional denial of the facts, surely does not even deserve a response as to this ridiculous and again in denial blog page, editor. You do know better; and you have no excuses left to continue in that kind of repeat denial of all. However, I will respond with this.

This reply was as well sent to the said editors blog page.

I assure you as well editor, that you can not lump all vaccine truth people into one stereotyped category, nor as to any of your and those mentioned as put forth claims in this again and again in denial article.

You made again the following below statement in the comments section of your previous blog page. Just as you always do and claim to, and the same as of course the false pretender Gorski, always falsely claiming that his keep on claiming to that vaccine safety and effectiveness science. The truth is that such science nor any sufficient any sufficient amount of science, simply does not exist to make any such stand as to your claims, and as you have been shown again and again long ago. How many mechanisms of aluminum adjuvant harm studies did and have I put in front of you in the past. Studies you refused to publish. You falsely claimed that none of the were from any reputable journals; yet about 95% are published right in Pubmed. There are numerous studies in Pubmed and other actually quite reputable sources that show the direct mechanisms of harm of and regarding both thimerosal and aluminum, and as well vaccine aluminum adjuvants. You simply and refuse to face it; and obviously must continue to ignore the facts.

Here below as said, is your said claim.

 (Quoting you, editor) You see Mr. Hubbs, I trust the science behind vaccines because I know the research has been done by people with scientific backgrounds and with credentials that prove to me the vaccines are not only effective, but that they are safe as well. I don't rely upon theory, but rather upon proven science. The benefits of vaccines far outweigh the risks, and as such I would have no problem taking a vaccine which would benefit me. (unquote)

When we look at the what they would call the main line believed hard line studies; what are they? Are they physiological studies as to toxicology and blood work performed on an actual infant, or a child; or anyone else? No, what they have is only so called epidemiological studies. Who funded those studies. Answer, the CDC What were those studies done in regard to? Answer, the only epidemiological studies ever done were on one single vaccine ingredient, thimerosal, and as well of course the Danish study on the MMR vaccine. In your mind do you think there is were any clear flaws in the study design and or any predetermined outcome present? Of course there were, and I have pointed that out to you long ago. You ignored it.

And when we look at vaccine clinical trials and any proof of efficacy, or that the vaccines actually work, they look at what? A certian level of antibody increases after a vaccine correct? So, in the year 2012 and as to the CDC and big pharma; that is all they know about the immune system. There is nothing there more complex than that? And how do they ever actually show or prove how many people the vaccines actually worked for or in? They don't, period. They never have. Better yet how long are the recipients of the vaccines ever followed for any significant time as for their health and record of ever getting those communicable illnesses? They aren't and they don't follow much of any of it. It then goes to VAERS as an after market reporting; which of course they all together ignore and deny that data and the outcome as well, and the only 1 to 10% known reporting. Never finding a common link to anything ever, no matter what. Gardasil, being the most prime example of that denial of all.

Both aluminum and mercury are neurotoxins, by the way; something else you ignore and likely as well deny. That fact has been known for decades. You are injecting a neurotoxin. A neurtoxin that can as well produce overactivation of the brains microglia and resulting chronic levels of brain inflammation. Is that good thing? Many studies have now shown this to be a finding in those with both ASD and those with ADHD. Other studies have shown the direct mechanism of harm and action regarding those said and often repeatedly injected aluminum adjuvants. Both aluminum and mercury injected cause an adjuvant effect, which clearly results in inflammation and non specific increased targeting of no onlya  killed/attentuated antigen; but as well can result in allergic and autoimmune reactions and conditions. Is that an important consideration? It should be?And the CDC remains silent. That science is all clearly there; why is the CDC and FDA not acting on it and demanding and doing further studies?  Answer, they have to much to lose, if the truth be known and admitted to, and they already as a fact know the truth.

So, where are the safety studies on aluminum adjuvants? I noticed that you did not have one single study provided for the public in this blog article. Didn’t you say you were about trusting the science? So, what science is acceptable to you; only that which is accepted by the CDC, the FDA, and the IOM? And if you think that the IOM is not directly influenced by big pharma and the whole of so called organized chemical based medicine, you are again entirely delusional.

Should it be of concern to a parent who is allowing all the vaccines on the current CDC schedule, that despite the number of references to aluminum toxicity, the FDA has always exempted it from testing from testing by putting it on their "Generally Regarded as Safe"  (GRAS ) list. Aluminum can be added to foods, medicines or water without restriction from the FDA.

Aluminum toxicity is a widespread problem in all forms of life, including humans, animals, fish, plants and trees, and causes widespread degradation of the environment and health. Over 7000 reference articles on aluminum toxicity exist in various data bases; ( as of 1996 ) all recognizing the toxicity but concluding the mechanism of action is unknown. — [ Search results - ]

From: History of crime against the Food Laws (1929) by Dr. Riley, the prime mover behind the original Pure Food Law and Director of the FDA. He resigned in disgust in 1912 over exceptions granted to the law and lack of enforcement.

Aluminum has been exempted from testing for safety by the FDA under a convoluted logic wherein it is classified as GRAS. (Generally Regarded As Safe.) It has never been tested by the FDA on its safety and there are NO restrictions whatever on the amount or use of aluminum. Diseases Associated with Aluminium Intoxication. H. Tomlinson, M.B., Ch.B., MRCS., LRCP. Since that time thousands of studies have been published indicating aluminum is involved in neurological dysfunction, immunocompetence, as well as a host of other morbidities. I cannot begin to reference them all. Sepsis: a cause of aluminum release from tissue stores associated with acute neurological dysfunction and mortality. Davenport A. – Williams P.S. – Roberts N.B. – Bone J.M. From: Clin Nephrol (1988 Jul) 30(1):48-51.

You can find the references to this on this page of my site. No, don’t be backing out of publishing this reply because you falsely claim this is from a personal website. There is a collection of actual unbiased science here that you can even touch and explain it away, and you do know that is there, editor! So, let me ask you this editor, why is it that all of the unbiased non pharma connected science is all off limits to you, and swiped off the table, and all the while that you make denial of its existence? That amounts to intellectual dishonesty of actually the highest order, and we are talking about the health and well being of millions of people here, who were actually mislead as to the safety and as well the effectiveness of vaccines.

Aluminum Adjuvants - Lack of Safety Data - Lack of Aluminum Adjuvant Safety Studies

You simply can not explain away that level of real science, editor. And you definitely can not do it without scientific safety studies on such as aluminum adjuvants of your own, which of course you provided none of. It is the largest elephant in the room, that as well both the FDA and the CDC as well ignore. So, editor; it is all good as long as they ignore it all as well? You as well can not explain that way with the CHOP, Paul Offits claim that ingestion of aluminum and mercury is all the same thing as if you inject it. You can not make the claim that such substances are handled and detoxed in the same way, without adequate physiological toxicology studies done on an actual human being. And you are telling me that Paul Offit has proven that ingestion of aluminum in dietary form, is physiologically detoxed the same way as injected aluminum adjuvants? Simple common sense should tell that is an entirely without any merit and a flat out bogus claim. Where is Offits science; he has none to make that claim. The real studies themselves prove that he is clearly wrong, as clearly are you.

How much collected and real science do you see on this page of my site? Showing you exactly the mechanisms of harm regarding aluminum adjuvants, and as well thimerosal? Your going to continue as always to ignore that? Of course you are, you have to or you could not continue to lie to and misinform the public like you always do. How much real data and real science is on this site in general? It is an overwhelming and massive amount of factual data and real science. And you as said go on rejecting it. The purpose of your whole blog is to make a mockery of facts and anyone that puts them forth. Who, is the real fool? You or me? That answer is all to obvious, when the real information is not censored, denied access to; or refused to be published in its entirety. You know it, and I definitely know it as a fact.

The Vaccine Damage – Science

Recovering Caroline, The Journey (an example of biomedical treatment, where parents have taken the time to do the needed and completed homework. Helping as well other parents to recover their children). Does it matter; oh yes it does matter.

They are detoxing the vaccines and healing the damage. Heavy metals, viral overload, and the harm done by the MMR vaccine. This would, not be possible if it were not the vaccines, as a fact. But what can the average mainstream doctor or pediatricain offer? More pharma chemcial drugs that may drug away the childs behavior; more therapy that never gets to the real causation? What a picture of evil, destruction, cluelessness, and dishonesty within the so called medical profession. To much to lose, it is all a simply uinderstood as that. All of us were once trusting that vaccines were effective and that they worked as advertised, and we would have continued to believe that, had we not investigated the truth. There is little way to in any honesty claim there is any bias in that.

Vaccines Cause Autism and More - The Scientific Explanation

Vaccine Caused Ischemia/Hypoxia


Vaccine Production With - Human Diploid Cells (aborted fetal cell tissue)

The False Theory of Vaccine Derived - Herd Immunity

Chiropractic - Correcting Physiological Function and Strengthening Immunity

Failure Of The Continued Polio Vaccine Campaign

Post Vaccination - Vaccine Targeted Strain - Viral and Bacterial Pathogen - Shedding

Gardasil - The Real Truth

FDA Reply Letter - and Further Questions Raised on Gardasil, (nothing would ever be enough, as they have to much to lose to ever admit the truth and their liability; as they at the CDC and FDA would be finished, as would be the entire vaccine program then put under a forced and far more appropriate spotlight of investigation)

Scientific proof that the known cancer causing SV40 virus, a previous contaminant in the polio vaccine, is obviously either contagious; or the virus is still in the vaccine/s.

Danger And Ineffectiveness of Flu Vaccines

The False Foundations of Modern Medicine

Death By Medicine

No comments:

Post a Comment