Saturday, October 29, 2011

Response to: Louis Pasteur: Driven By Purpose Rather Than Profit

Louis Pasteur: Driven By Purpose Rather Than Profit

Here again is a copy of the reply sent to this blog with my name in the url. Something as always and again he likely will never publish.


Your mindless and knowing use of such selective ignorance, amazes me Costner! You KNOW the truth as to this issue; as it has been put in front of you repeatedly before. You know very well that is there, right on my site. Yet you deny you know anything about that. Haaaa haaaa haa haa ha...LOL. What is YOUR head made of ....SWISS CHEESE?

Noone ever said alias no identity Costner, that Pasteur was ever after profit nor even necessarily great fame. He was just a mislead stooge that the Rockefellers could use for gain. Oh course they (allopathic medicine and vaccines) are going to tout his mislead works.

Here is your outline of the actually very basic question put to you! Please go ahead and answer it completely!

Are you going to tell me that in the time era of Pasteur, that there were NO other physiologically based human health care scientists?

Are you telling me in that time era that there were NO other such scientists that had an opposite view point in their studies as to health care? You have heard of the soil and the seed, correct? What are the opposing view points in science regarding the concepts of the soil and the seed?

Are you aware that Pasteur knew that there was indeed such a controversy as to the human health care science of that time? Pasteur knew in that time who the equally as educated (if not more so) opposing viewpoint scientists were, such as Becamp, Tilden and Koch. Tell me why a typical medical text book never mentions those people; and only Pasteur? Thats right, just as if no one else anywhere ever existed. How would that be possible? Rockefeller oil money have anything to do with it?

You need to wake up, as until you have that basic ground work firmly understood in your mind, you can continue to deny all. Once you see that said revelation for what it really shows humanity; nothing will ever be the same. It ALL comes together. It shows you exactly why the alternative means actually work, and as well why the pharmaceutical drugs and vaccines have not been the answer. It shows you why there can never be any real cures, and as well why there never will be as long as pharma and the FDA have the control of all. It was ALL based on a false premise! Why? Because it was the only thing that could make millions and billions; and they knew it.

Once you establish the kind of financial backing that the Rockefellers have had. Once you establish as well the total control that the pharmaceutical industry has had on all medical schools, there is little that can stop it. The only thing that can stop it is the existence of people who are willing to and can actually think for themselves! People are endlessly and falsely brainwashed into thinking that anything but drugs and vaccines is unproven, if not outright quackery. They have been entirely mislead for generations and repeatedly flock to their believed savior all knowing doctors for any perceived need.

One factor that allopathic medicine clearly has realized, is that you can hold 1000's of people back that eventually jump ship after finding that they ended up clearly experiencing more harm than good.
When people realize their health and the publics health in general is often only getting worse with the pharmaceuticals and endless vaccines route; they start to wake up to the fact that they must start to educate themselves and take their health care into their own hands. They realize the clear need to do some non-biased and independent research. Then they see and read the success stories and learn the truth never to return to what they formerly lived; and lived with. You can NOT deny the studies as to modern medicine being the 3rd leading cause of death, behind cancer and heart disease Costner, unless you distort and lie about the math, and as you did.

I have to laugh at your futile effort here, losing more ground with every blog page. As if what I have put forth - never existed. I have to laugh at what a fool you are and always and repeatedly were. And you actually think people looking for the real answers will buy into such falsely attacking bullshit as this? The people in the medical field possibly like it; knowing they have to much to lose. Whats all that actually worth Costner? Not one damn thing! Who's the real fool Costner? Who is the REAL nut job? "Conspiracy theorist". You can NOT get dumber that THAT!

End of that reply:

If you now go to the said blog replies you can now see that he again only published half of this above reply. Would anyone question just why as editor of that blog he would do that? As well then as editor he just continued to put forth even more deperate and angry lies and deception, about and concerning the said information. Here below is additonally my additional reply and response to that.

The link.


Again, and as always, why did you Not publish BOTH sections of that reply? To much truth? Yup, as always quite obviously again YOU can not could not handle it.

Again you have falsely believed in your obviously twisted smoke and mirrors filled mind, that you control the information, and again that thus it is yet all good for you, correct?

In your mind no one seen this belwo information in my blog counter reply, correct? The reply where I show your basic math to be incorrect as to the 3rd Leading Cause studies. There is as you should know, more than one study; and by the way alias no identity Costner, none of those studies have ever been refuted, by anyone nor within the medical community, and you know they clearly would know they are there. The original study was never refuted even when it still appeared in the AMA Journal. You see, as always you can get nowhere unless you lie again and again. What is that actually worth - in the real world? You know the answer. Nothing. 

Response to: Lowell Hubbs Quote of the Day
Monday, October 25, 2010

Those studies put in front of you as well clearly show that modern medicine is NOT the savior nor cause of any increased mortality. And really, how do you prove that anyway, with a world that has steadily increased for population for decades. Epidemiological studies can clearly be skewed in any direction you want them to go; it is common knowledge. This below and recent AMA based vitamin study was epidemiologically based. In this below article analysis-realize the many ways that an epidemiological study can be skewed as to the reults, and as outlined in that article. You can deny all that; well then get started?? You have seen me reference to that sort of thing and the sources of analysis many times as to the issue of vaccines and those epidemiological studies as well. Nothing would ever be enough for an obviously sick and persistent denialist that is hell bent on denial of all truth.

This response as well will be added to the below page. That, is viewable by the public, dude! How dumb do you look!

End of reply:

More information:
Response to: Louis Pasteur: Driven By Purpose Rather Than Profit

3rd Leading Cause

History of Medicine, (the real history)

"Oh, hes only a vaccine and modern medicine conspiracy theorist" "No proof, no proof; (repeatedly lying), he has no no peer reviewed studies". "Oh, he's crazy and mislead, taken in by and bought the misinformation, the lies and a scam".

Who's obviously mislead? Who's crazy..Costner? You or me? You Costner, are truly as refuse to be educated as it gets and as foolish as a monkey chasing his tail.

The origins of western medicine exposed


The Smart Guy - Becamp

The Dumb Guy And Fraud! - Pasteur

I then presented as well presented this below information and video to editor Costner and asked him for his repsonse and analysis of that video? Do you think we will ever see that? What will it contain? More lies and angry personal attacks; oh, you know it will.

Worse than Bad Advice - This Can Lead to Seizures, Paralysis, Blindness, and Death

Story at-a-glance - Gardasil

Award winning documentary offers a fresh look at what’s behind the sharply polarized vaccine debate in the U.S., and offers the opportunity for a new, more rational discussion about how to create safer and more effective public health policies to help our children stay healthy.

Health officials insist vaccines are the best way to protect the health of individuals and the public.. As a result, the number of doses of vaccines included in the childhood vaccination schedule has tripled over the past 30 years, increasing from 23 doses of seven different vaccines to 69 doses of 16 different vaccines. At the same time there has been a rise in the numbers of vaccinations given to children, we’ve also seen a significant rise in the numbers of children suffering with chronic disease and disabilities.

According to Judicial Watch, 26 children died after receiving the HPV vaccine between September 1, 2010 and September 15, 2011. Other serious side effects reported during that time frame included paralysis, speech problems, memory loss, blindness, pancreatitis, ovarian cysts, and Guillain-Barre syndrome.

According to one of the world’s top experts on HPV, the HPV vaccine is associated with enough serious side effects that it could prove riskier than the cancer it is supposed to prevent in women, as cervical cancer is usually entirely curable when detected early enough through normal PAP screenings
Rigidly maintaining the assumption that an ever increasing number of vaccines must be mandated “for the greater good” is a dangerous assumption that fails to take into account the possibility that one-size-fits-all mass vaccination policies may be contributing to the rise in chronic disease and disablility among children.

Dr. Andrew Moulden (Interview): What You Were Never Told About Vaccines

End of what was sent in the reply:

Outline of reply number 3

Editor Costner makes a claim that my life efforts at putting the truth out there are wasted. He would really like to believe and hope that to be true, but such is not the case. My website receives thousands of views per day worldwide. My site pages have been referenced to and actually as well his idiotic blog itself have been mentioned recently on a Natural News article, the second largest read alternative health information site, next to Mercola, in the world.

Thats all a failure? Huh? Really?

Check out the bottom of the page references in the below article. My site is referenced to however the blog is clearly referenced to only in the article, of course without a link.

How the medical monopoly hides inconvenient vaccine truths
Learn more:

Worse than Bad Advice - This Can Lead to Seizures, Paralysis, Blindness, and Death

Story at-a-glance - Gardasil

Award winning documentary offers a fresh look at what’s behind the sharply polarized vaccine debate in the U.S., and offers the opportunity for a new, more rational discussion about how to create safer and more effective public health policies to help our children stay healthy.

Health officials insist vaccines are the best way to protect the health of individuals and the public.. As a result, the number of doses of vaccines included in the childhood vaccination schedule has tripled over the past 30 years, increasing from 23 doses of seven different vaccines to 69 doses of 16 different vaccines. At the same time there has been a rise in the numbers of vaccinations given to children, we’ve also seen a significant rise in the numbers of children suffering with chronic disease and disabilities.

According to Judicial Watch, 26 children died after receiving the HPV vaccine between September 1, 2010 and September 15, 2011. Other serious side effects reported during that time frame included paralysis, speech problems, memory loss, blindness, pancreatitis, ovarian cysts, and Guillain-Barre syndrome.

According to one of the world’s top experts on HPV, the HPV vaccine is associated with enough serious side effects that it could prove riskier than the cancer it is supposed to prevent in women, as cervical cancer is usually entirely curable when detected early enough through normal PAP screenings
Rigidly maintaining the assumption that an ever increasing number of vaccines must be mandated “for the greater good” is a dangerous assumption that fails to take into account the possibility that one-size-fits-all mass vaccination policies may be contributing to the rise in chronic disease and disablility among children.

Dr. Andrew Moulden (Interview): What You Were Never Told About Vaccines


THIS below is the vaccine profits insane and presumed credible CDC - YOU TRUST - alias Costner!!!

CDC warns Americans to prepare for zombie apocalypse (really).

CDC Director Arrested for Child Molestation and Bestiality

Dr. Kimberly Quinlan Lindsey has been with the Centers for Disease Control for 12 years.

CDC official accused of child molestation, bestiality

Official, Kimberly Lindsey, Charged With Bestiality, Child Molestation

Central Figure in CDC Vaccine Cover-Up Absconds With $2M

Emails released in response to FOIA filings by parents also show that Kreesten Madsen, one of Dr. Thorsen's research partners, had acquiesced to the wishes of CDC officials who wanted to cherry pick facts in order to prove vaccine safety. Furthermore, according to an April 28 report by Natural News: Read the evidence in the below article.

CDC vaccine scientist who downplayed links to autism indicted by DOJ in alleged fraud scheme

Chapter V: 2003
It's Rotten in Denmark

The CDC finances, writes and helps publish Danish research
Another useless CDC-supported autism study

Pediatrics. 2003 Sep;112(3 Pt 1):604-6.
Thimerosal and the occurrence of autism: negative ecological evidence from Danish population-based data.

The discontinuation of thimerosal-containing vaccines in Denmark in 1992 was followed by an increase in the incidence of autism. Our ecological data do not support a correlation between thimerosal-containing vaccines and the incidence of autism.

Anyone with even half a brain would know that was impossible!!!

How the CDC really spends your tax dollars

CDC Accused Of Misusing Funds

A congressional report charges that the CDC squandered millions of dollars on its new headquarters while the agency's disease fighting initiatives languished. Sharyl Attkisson has more.

CBS Video:

... or just watch the short video report yourself at:

Neurotoxicology Conference

Vaccination “Trivia” Facts

The big vitamin scare: American Medical Association claims vitamins may kill you
Learn more:

Media hoax exposed: Recent attack on vitamins a fabricated scare campaign
Learn more:

NaturalNews readers demand retractions from major media outlets over erroneous reporting of antioxidant study
Learn more:

JAMA Anti-Vitamins Studies Flawed

The great direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertising con: how patients and doctors alike are easily influenced to demand dangerous drugs

How the American Medical Association Got Rich

What the American Medical Association hopes you never learn about its true history


Gardasil and Cervarix: Are strains targeted by the vaccines replaced by other HPV viruses?
Thursday, March 31, 2011 by: Rosemary Mathis, Director of SANE VAX, INC.
Learn more:

More info:

Mike Adams: Natural News: Also today: I demolish the silly claim based on a new Lancet study which says that flu shots are "60% effective." I read the study and it says that for every 100 adults vaccinated, only 1.5 of them will avoid influenza as a result.

Mike Adams: Seriously, when will mainstream media journalists ever learn how to understand math? Here's my breakdown of this latest vaccine quackery:

Seriously now? The U.S. government wants to use innocent children as medical experiment guinea pigs by injecting them with experimental anthrax vaccines! Yeah, as if we didn't already commit enough crimes with the dead children in Nigeria, or the dead prisoners in Guatemala, right? Now we gotta poison our own American children with experimental medicines, too?


What possible benefit could 25 mcg. of mercury, "thimerosal" in a flu shot have on improving your immune system function? Wouldn't it be much smarter to take adequate amounts of vitamin D and C? The immune system benefits of vitamin D studies are numerous.

Dr. John Cannell on vitamin D

Vitamin D kills the flu virus

Vitamin D is better than ANY vaccine and increases the immune system by 3-5 times

Some more flu vaccine reality

Vitamin D - More information


The MedAlerts Blog, Analysis of trends in VAERS data, (NVIC)

By Steven Rubin


It has been suggested that the H1N1 Flu vaccine causes miscarriages (see, for example, here, here, and here). This month, I want to see if the claim is supported by VAERS data.

The results are shocking. First of all, the H1N1 Flu vaccine has appeared in miscarriage events more often than almost any other vaccine. Of the 1115 VAERS events that mention the abortion/stillbirth symptom, 203 are cases where the H1N1 Flu vaccine was given (200 with the FLU(H1N1) vaccine code and 3 with the FLUN(H1N1) vaccine code). This ignores the current Flu vaccine being given which has the H1N1 strain in it (the FLU(10-11) vaccine code). By contrast, there are only 63 abortion/stillbirth events associated with the Seasonal Flu Vaccine (vaccine codes FLU and FLUN) and this vaccine has been administered to millions of people over 21 years of data collection!
If you consider that the H1N1 Flu vaccine has been associated with 3 times as many abortion/stillbirth events, and that it has been given for just 5 percent of the time that Seasonal Flu vaccines have been given, then it appears that the H1N1 Flu vaccine is 60 times more likely to cause a miscarriage than the Seasonal Flu vaccine.

H1N1 Miscarriages: Hundreds of women claim miscarriage after taking vaccine

H1N1 vaccine linked to 700 percent increase in miscarriages

Randomized Trials to Study the Nonspecific Effects of Vaccines in Children in Low-Income Countries

More evidence against multiple vaccines.

DTP with or after measles vaccination is associated with increased in-hospital mortality in Guinea-Bissau
The case fatality was increased for children who had received DTP with or after measles vaccine compared with children who had received measles vaccine as the most recent vaccine, the ratio being 2.53 (1.37–4.67) and 1.77 (0.92–3.41) in the two periods, respectively. The combined estimate was 2.10 (1.34–3.28). These results were not explained by differences in nutritional status, number of doses of DTP or discharge policy.

Monday, October 10, 2011

Response to: Lowell Hubbs: Quote of the Day

 Lowell Hubbs: Quote of the Day

Just when I thought you could not out do yourself as to your selective lying about the facts and science, here comes ONE MORE blog page that topped that last one. In fact you are doing yourself more harm than good in your further efforts to deny all. There is not even the most died in the wool sheeple that wouldn't question the validity of your statements here. It is just that bad.

Lets take a look!

Quoting you. Every now and then, one of the comments Mr. Hubbs sends in is actually entertaining.  Most are filled with nonsense and chalk full of ramblings of a madman, but every now and then he says something which really makes you stop and think.  This is one of those times... Unquote

Who is the in REAL major, lying and in denial madman... Costner??? Are you THAT delusional?

Here we go again ...more.

Attempting to quote me.

"Whats the problem Costner, you can't read English. Do you not understand the most basic of common sense?"  ~Lowell Hubbs

What... Costner, you can't read a sentence if the "t" in a word is missing? I have no idea if it was actually missing, as you as always never referenced where you quoted it from. How pathetic is that?

Again quoting you.  I honestly don't even know what to say to this.  I guess I could just admit that yes... I can actually read English, but apparently Mr. Hubbs isn't much good with writing it.

Common sense?  Yea... not one of Mr. Hubbs' strong suits.  Yet he is the type of person who considers himself an expert on vaccines and science.  I guess that's one way to go.  Granted even if I overlook the errors in grammar to get down to the point which I believe Mr. Hubbs is trying to make, it still doesn't change anything. Unquote.

You have not much to brag about Costner with the number of misspellings in your own original blog page and in the fact that you could not even spell the word ...infant, so later you changed it to child. I guess you could spell that! Who actually writes your blog pages... anyway?

Quoting you. They don't care they science doesn't support their viewpoint. They don't care about the mounting evidence that reflects a strong genetic component to autism. Unquote.

But Costner you have seen me prove to you that the science does support their viewpoint. You have seen me show you and you know yourself that the genetic component as to autism and the large increases in autism running directly parallel to the increase in vaccines since 1987, is NOT supported by the science. If it was supported, the CDC and Paul Offit would be all over that; but they know as for conclusively, it does not and never will. Do you really believe after 1000's of years of human existence, that the human gene pool has suddenly for some unknown reason become defective enough to cause autism cases to go from 1 in 10,000, to now 1 in 100? In how any generations, two? Wow, that's your science? Start putting it up there!

Quoting you Costner. The problem is, there is no science to support these viewpoints.  Not only are cases of autism or other medical conditions nearly identical in unvaccinated populations, but there is not a single piece of peer-reviewed science published anywhere nor is there a single study which has ever reached the conclusion that vaccines cause autism. Unquote

Do you recall Costner, when you made this false claim before? Do you recall when I showed you that the study you referenced to, that the was not at all an unvaccinated versed vaccinated study. What is it was-was simply a MMR vaccine receiving group, verses a non-MMR reciving group. That was NOT an unvaccinated population study; they did receive the other recommended vaccines. So here again you are lying! You have no such study. What amazes me is that you claim to have all the science; yet you have not produced any to support your claims in this article. Do you see what I do when I make a blog page Costner? I back all my claims up with the proof and also allot of science.

It appears that you as well intentionally failed  to review and respond to this information. Of course obviously real life information is of no significance to you. Anyone that neglects to and or refuses to acknowledge
information like that, clearly does NOT care about the truth. They clearly have a different agenda.

Unvaxed vs Vaxed Health

Quoting you ...Costner. They don't care that they can't prove their theory or that unvaccinated children can still get autism.  They don't care about any of these things because they will tell you "they just know" vaccines are responsible, and no amount of science or research is going to be enough to convince them otherwise because their conclusions are based upon (you guessed it) "common sense". Unquote.

Who is it that is not proving their theories Costner? How about as well concerning the safety and effectiveness of vaccines? You, or me? I guess you haven't been to my blog and website lately; which is all easily found by the public. My website gets more views worldwide in a week, than your blog has in the entire time it has been up; by the way. Just hating that, aren't you.

Quoting you. Perhaps even more telling is that there has never been any peer-reviewed or reputable science that even suggested vaccines cause autism.  Ever.  Mr. Hubbs knows this, his fellow anti-vaccination friends know this, and the legitimate medical community knows this, which is why antivaxxers continue to try to move the goal posts and shift the debate time and time again as they attempt to ignore the fact their opinions have never been verified, validated, or even found to have any merit whatsoever. Unquote.

There are more than enough peer reviewed studies to back everything I state Costner! No one here moved the goal posts, I  have it exactly right.

Supporting Studies

Vacfacts. info

Quoting you again, Smart Guy. So why are all of these parents so convinced that vaccines cause autism, and why are vaccine conspiracy theorists so sure that vaccines are harmful?  Well a lot of it boils down to them being ignorant to the scientific method, but much of it also happens to be due to them relying upon anecdotal evidence.  Since many cases of autism seem to be diagnosed during the ages of two and three, and because that time frame also seems to coincide with when parents are giving their children vaccines they (for whatever reason) feel vaccines are to blame. Unquote.

The only people ignorant of the actual scientific method here is you and pharma itself, Costner. If you think they follow the scientific method and all peer reviewed science is based on fact and truth, you are beyond  selectively ignorant and there is no hope for you ever. Sheeple!!!! 

And really, all that is actually Quite clearly I have demonstrated over and over that I understand the science and that scientific method far better than you. Your repeated acceptance of proven junk science is only a further testament to that fact. I have demonstrated as well that I can repeatedly produce far more proof of the claims science than you, peer reviewed as well by the way.

Want to argue what proper peer review actually is Costner; maybe we should start with that? It isn't a bunch pharma for profit fools sitting spinning the multiple end point numbers. Nor is it people from Merck doing a clinical trial on Gardasil, using no real placebo.

Here is an example of that pharma scientific method your vaccine science Costner. Would you not think drug and vaccine clinical trial should be done using a true placebo? The FDA allowed an aluminum containing placebo, and as well a carrier solution containing placebo to skew the results of the damage and new medical conditions known of even in the clinical trials themselves? The only thing they actually replicated at all in those clinical trials was the damage Gardasil and now Cervarix have done. New now well known new medical conditions were clearly known of even in those clinical trials. For how many other vaccines is has similar situations of using no true placebo been allowed for? Quite clearly no real nor long term safety studies are done on vaccines. It is thus largely irresponsible to allow bogus vaccine clinical trials like that. Add to it the known 44% increased chance of believed precancerous indicators found in those receiving Gardasil while having an existing vaccine targeted strain of HPV. All of it was in the FDA VRPAC preapproval document. And now we have the HPV DNA that Merck stated was not in the vaccine, actually in the vaccine, locked to the aluminum. The FDA doing nothing. Ohhh, scream it loudly Costner, no proof no proof; always no proof. Vaccines saved the world; again I would say; clearly there is no proof. How about what the true historical account of the polio and small pox vaccine experience really shows? Does that matter; obviously to you it does not. The CDC ignores it, so you can ignore it, correct? You have all the science. Bullshit.

You are being hypocritical Costner. On one hand you claim that anecdotal evidence is not good enough for you nor anyone; touting science you don't actually even have, and never did. Vaccines wiping polio, small pox or anything else, is clearly only anecdotal evidence. Actually it does not even qualify as being, that good. WHO numbers they can not back up with real evidence; does as well not even add up to qualifying as anecdotal evidence, much less being science nor scientific. Are undernourished and underdeveloped countries at the same risk for viral infections as the US? No differentiation for risk is ever made by the WHO. That is being blatantly dishonest.

Quoting you again, Costner! This is why the anti-vaccination crowd will never be successful and why they will never be taken seriously, because instead of them wishing to find the truth they would much rather dabble in what they perceive as "common sense".  The ironic part is that anti-vaxxers don't seem to have any common sense... yet they put an enourmous amount of faith in it while ignoring everything else. Unquote

No, you have that all wrong, Costner. It is YOU that has no common sense. I thought you said common sense had nothing to do with it? The vaccine truth movement has been very successful in many ways. Did you ever look up the word "denialist" in Wikipedia? The internet is a great tool for attaining truth knowledge, when used in the right way. The problem for you is that you want to believe all people are supposed to be as selectively dumb as you. Your self image of the real world is all wrong. You want to think that NO ONE can think for themselves, and YOU will prevent them from ever being able to if you have your way. Your concept that the average adult has no way to ascertain the truth other than to listen to their doctor or pediatrician, is beyond ...bogus. What you have in your blog is actually quite sick! Makes a person wonder what is actually wrong with a person like YOU, and actually what possess a person like you to do what you do??? It certainly does not involve any real nor honest concern for humanity.

And here we have it Costner!

Quote. The problem with Mr. Hubbs' logic is that "common sense" does not dictate fact nor does it influence scientific discovery.  Anecdotal evidence is just that... anecdotal.  For example if someone sees a child start developing symptoms of a learning disorder or sees them have a seizure, they may think it was because that child was given a vaccine a few weeks or months earlier because in their mind there were no other possible causes.  However that requires them to ignore million of other environmental and genetic causes. Unquote.

The problem for you Costner, is that thousands of parents have seen the same thing repeatedly. That's called in the real world, the ability to replicate or duplicate the study. There is plenty of science to back that so called theory, but every time it is put it in front of you, you repeatedly deny that it is there; you are lying. Or in the alternative you claim the actually peer reviewed source is not recognized nor reputable. The only thing that is reputable in your mind is what supports your twisted and intentionally in denial views.

The fact is that autism is only part of an even larger picture of neurological and immunological harm and damage resulting from now the multiple vaccines on the CDC schedule. Nothing ever would be enough for you Costner, nothing ever was. Therefore your credibility in evaluating any of this information is entirely down the shitter, period! Always was. You are doing your agenda here far more harm than good; no matter how delusional about that you remain

Vaccine Ingredients

Costner, there is little to nothing there that can not be proven, and as well with the available science; get over it.

"I gotta create another misinformation filled and lying blog page, this guy is kicking my butt all over the place"!  "Those damn vaccine conspiracy theorists have got to be stopped"! - alias no identity Costner


Costner! A monkey could write a better informed and more honest blog than yours!

Sunday, October 09, 2011

Response to: Vaccine Ingredients: What You Should Know

    Vaccine Ingredients: What You Should Know

     Your agenda is exactly this, editor no identity Costner! 


The shearing of the vaccines are good for me - brainwashed sheeple.  Lets take a look at some more of the mind-boggling misinformation they have been fed.


And this "Costner" fool continues to create blog page after blog page, personally attacking me with endless lying misrepresentations of what I represent and have shown him repeatedly. All of it remaining from a status of him having no identity and with me having full identity. How honorable and credible is all that! Biased to the corrupt core. After such attacks he then refuses to publish the replies from me, wow. He instead twists and lies about what was in them.

He starts out again making this comment: Most vaccination conspiracy theorists have a habit of tossing out random statements to try and paint vaccines as harmful, even when it is blatantly obvious they have no idea what they are talking about....

As for your your repeated references to vaccine truth promoters as being only, "Vaccine conspiracy theorists". Hey, editor Costner... here's a clue... its NOT all just a theory; and never was - it is all directly provable.

I could only laugh at how increasingly desperate and ridiculous he is and remains. Well, lets actually go see here who it is that blatantly and obviously has no idea what they are talking about!

My reply posted to his blog!

You have really out done yourself this time as to your stupidity, denial, and refusal to accept the facts and that of toxicology science, Costner. How many related studies have I shown you and linked you to alias Costner; they are many. Nothing would be enough. Your blog page makes me want to gag, it is again so completely full of misinformation. You know better, yet keep on lying; just like your recent very pathetic showing on the Argus.

And YOU as well see no difference whatsoever between the effect of ingesting a substance and it being handled by the natural and primary and then secondary defense mechanisms of the body; verses injecting that same substance and bypassing the primary defenses of the human body. It simply does not get any more ignorant than that.

Where is the actual peer reviewed science in your 2 articles. All those are for the most part again, are just conflict of interest filled claims being made, with nothing to back it up for proof.

Here is one of the significant problems. Childrens Hospitals, Paul Offit obviously does not have even a basic and proper understand of the immune system; nor the Th1 and Th2 immune system defense mechanisms. He does not understand toxicology, nor care: otherwise he wouldn't have claimed that children can safely tolerate 10,000 vaccines. If that were true then he should be able to start out with 100 vaccines and prove his claim. If he gets to sick to show up for work, we know he lied. And the parents will want pictures as proof that he is still healthy and functioning. A complete physical and a common full panel blood work up will also be proper proof of his post vaccinated health; done by an independent medical facility.

Let me know when you have contacted Paul Offit about putting his own body to that vaccine test. I await his response and your notification of what that was!. If he refuses to respond, then I will expect you Costner to prove Mr. Offits claims; which you easily could do if you chose to volunteer. It just may become world wide news as to the outcome. I will make sure the CDC is contacted about it. Otherwise if you refuse, everything Offit claims to remains clearly disputed and discredited; standing as well on an insane comment and claim like that.

End of that reply.

You want the truth, it's is there and easily found! Step outside the (that) box and learn. Think for yourself.

Vaccine Ingredients, far better information than Offit has ever had!

So how does a mother feel when her baby is dead from vaccines and all she hears from doctors, the government and media is that vaccines are safe and effective?

Doctors denying Vaccine Risks An American Tragedy, April 25, 2011

So, lets look at one of the two sources of claimed vaccine ingredients safety information linked to in Costner's said blog page.

And here: How much actual proof of his claims science do you see in those links? That is a pretty poor showing if you ask me. How much science do you see here of the opposite effect as to those issues and the toxicity of vaccines?

Here again is one of the false hero's!

Paul For Profit Offit, the CDC spokesman of Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Dr. Paul Offit of the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia earned millions of dollars as part of a $182-million sale by the hospital of its worldwide royalty interest in the Merck Rotateq vaccine. The amount of income distributed to Offit could be as high as $46 million. Offit has refused to say how much he made from the vaccine.

The high price placed on the patents raises concerns over Offit’s use of his former position on the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) to help create the market for rotavirus vaccine -- effectively, to vote himself rich.

Offit’s claim to a share of the profits from Rotateq revenues is based on his role as a listed inventor on the cluster of patents that protect Merck’s vaccine. Paul Offit had a great personal interest in Rotateq’s commercial success, and more than any other individual in the world he found himself in a position to directly influence that success.

Unlike most other patented products, the market for mandated childhood vaccines is created by the recommendation of an appointed body, ACIP. From 1998 to 2003, Offit served as a member of ACIP.

How Independent Are Vaccine Defenders? More information on on Mr. Paul Offit.


They're some of the most trusted voices in the defense of vaccine safety: the American Academy of Pediatrics, Every Child By Two, and pediatrician Dr. Paul Offit.

But CBS News has found these three have something more in common - strong financial ties to the industry whose products they promote and defend.

The vaccine industry gives millions to the Academy of Pediatrics for conferences, grants, medical education classes and even helped build their headquarters. The totals are kept secret, but public documents reveal bits and pieces.

A $342,000 payment from Wyeth, maker of the pneumococcal vaccine - which makes $2 billion a year in sales.

A $433,000 contribution from Merck, the same year the academy endorsed Merck's HPV vaccine - which made $1.5 billion a year in sales.

Another top donor: Sanofi Aventis, maker of 17 vaccines and a new five-in-one combo shot just added to the childhood vaccine schedule last month.

Every Child By Two, a group that promotes early immunization for all children, admits the group takes money from the vaccine industry, too - but wouldn't tell us how much.

A spokesman told CBS News: "There are simply no conflicts to be unearthed." But guess who's listed as the group's treasurers? Officials from Wyeth and a paid advisor to big pharmaceutical clients.

Then there's Paul Offit, perhaps the most widely-quoted defender of vaccine safety.

He's gone so far as to say babies can tolerate "10,000 vaccines at once."

This is how Offit described himself in a previous interview: "I'm the chief of infectious disease at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and a professor of pediatrics at Penn's medical school," he said.

Offit was not willing to be interviewed on this subject but like others in this CBS News investigation, he has strong industry ties. In fact, he's a vaccine industry insider.

Offit holds in a $1.5 million dollar research chair at Children's Hospital, funded by Merck.

Read more:

How Independent Are Vaccine Defenders?

Did you hear that? (55 vaccines given by age 6). Insanity!

Paul Offit – “Doctor of Vaccine Profit” Caught Lying – Again –

Paul A. Offit, MD
Chief, Division of Infectious Diseases
Director, Vaccine Education Center
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Here you can see how lying and selectively ignorant Costner again became on the Argus Leader, Sioux Falls SD. This is how he operates, total denial of all, in any way that can be made; no matter how actually uneducated and selectively in denial he is. His game is to try and keep people believing all the common and false propaganda filled misinformation. To much to lose. He attempted in his reply to post a link to his said blog on me with my name in the url. As it only amounted to a personal attack, The Argus deleted it; so he put it back in a reply with short link and that reply post was again removed. How desperate is all that, and all of it in a repeatedly failed attempt to shut down the truth and attack anyone that puts it forth.

Tiny shot in the arm poised to tame three strains of flu

Blogging editor, alias Costner's 3rd grade picture!

Do your next blog page on this below information, editor Costner! Or START revising the one you have.

Maybe you should have researched your information from some other source than Paul (to much to lose and LYING) Offit??? Pig DNA/virus found in Rotarix and again the FDA did nothing; did you review that information? No, not likely, your buddies Paul Offit and David (ilk) Gorski, didn't think it was important.

Aluminum in Vaccines: Where Are the Safety Studies?


Since the 1930s vaccine makers have been using aluminum as an adjuvant in vaccines. However, from what I’ve been able to gather over years of researching vaccines and vaccinations, there doesn’t seem to be studies determining aluminum safety issues. If such studies exist, I hereby request the U.S. CDC and FDA please publish them and supply me with a copy, as I’d love to ‘digest’ and dissect them.

As a matter of fact, when Congressman Dan Burton held his vaccine-autism link hearings from 1999-2004, the question that FDA was asked repeatedly was, Where are your [safety] studies? The FDA’s reply was that they would be very expensive to do.

One of the more compelling facts about aluminum is that it is a blood brain barrier neurotoxin as reported by W. Zheng in 2001 and Bioport Corp. in 2002. Additionally, there are many studies confirming its ability to activate brain microglia and increase inflammatory cytokines thereby contributing to brain excitotoxicity as reported by C. Garrel, et al., in 1994; M. Tsunoda in 1999; C. Struys-Ponsar, et al., in 2000; A. Campbell, in 2004; M.S. Petrik, et al., in 2007; Blaylock and Strunecka in 2009; C.A. Shaw, et al., in 2009; and X. Li, et al., in 2009.

Regarding the role of aluminum in vaccines and brain inflammation, I just co-authored a paper with Dr. Harold E. Buttram, MD, titled “Vaccines and Brain Inflammation,” which has been accepted for publication by an online journal. Dr. Buttram and I are hopeful our paper will bring more issues to the forefront regarding vaccines, brain inflammation, and the probable etiology that adjuvants, excipients, and neurotoxins have with regard to brain inflammation and encephalopathy.

Recently a post-doctoral fellow, L. Tomljenovic, and a professor, C.A. Shaw, both associated with the University of British Columbia, Canada, published the paper, “Aluminum Vaccine Adjuvants: Are they Safe?” that needs to be taken seriously by Big Pharma, vaccinologists, and the U.S. HHS, CDC, and FDA for the documentation of research regarding aluminum in vaccines and health-related problems associated with it.

According to Tomljenovic and Shaw, In spite of these above data [regarding parenteral exposure], infants and children up to 6 months of age in the U.S. and other developed countries receive 14.7 to 49 times more than the FDA safety limits for aluminum from parenteral sources from vaccines through mandatory immunization programs.

Table 2, which accompanies that statement, indicates that in the United States the “Estimated total aluminum body burden (pg/kg bw/day) per vaccination” is as follows:

At birth        73.5 pg/kg bw/day      [14.7 times FDA safety limit]
1 month      -0-
2 month      245                                [49 times FDA safety limit]
3 month      -0-
4 month      171.1                              [34.22 times FDA safety limit]
5 month      -0-
6 month      161.2                              [32.24 times FDA safety limit]

FDA Safety limit for aluminum from parenteral sources is 5 pg/kg bw/day. [Emphasis added]

The question everyone ought to be asking is this: What is the cumulative or total amount of aluminum storing as a toxic body burden in tiny infants’ bodies? From my math calculations, there is a total of 650.8 picograms/kilograms body weight injected over the first six months of infants’ lives. What kind of toxic burden does that body load place on a six-month-old infant whose immune system is developing? How does the liver detoxify such a heavy-duty load of aluminum? What does that amount of aluminum do to the kidneys? What effect is there on brain cells? After all, these infants aren’t fully-grown and don’t possess healthy adult body detoxifying capabilities.

Source: read more:

Do you think any parents, given the large number of vaccines on the CDC schedule, would want and need to know that information, editor Costner? Do you think their pediatrician is telling them all they need to know? Of course and quite obviously they are not. Do they deserve to know? Of course they do. Start asking and you are likely to get a known and often non-helpful and hostile response.

Lets look a bit more at the actual science.

Formaldehyde MSDS Sheet

Potential Chronic Health Effects: Formaldehyde.
Hazardous in case of skin contact (sensitizer). CARCINOGENIC EFFECTS: Classified A2 (Suspected for human.) by ACGIH, 2A (Probable for human.) by IARC [Formaldehyde]. MUTAGENIC EFFECTS: Mutagenic for mammalian somatic cells.

[Formaldehyde]. Mutagenic for bacteria and/or yeast. [Formaldehyde]. Mutagenic for mammalian somatic cells. [Methylp. 2 alcohol]. Mutagenic for bacteria and/or yeast. [Methyl alcohol]. TERATOGENIC EFFECTS: Classified POSSIBLE for human [Methyl alcohol]. DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICITY: Not available The substance may be toxic to kidneys, liver, skin, central nervous system (CNS). Repeated or prolonged exposure to the substance can produce target organs damage. Repeated exposure. Repeated exposure to a highly toxic material may produce general deterioration of health by an accumulation in one or many human organs

Exposures can also occur from various consumer products, including an estimated exposure of 0.1 mg from applying hand creams or suntan lotion. The amount of formaldehyde found in blood in humans from natural metabolic processes is about 2 to 3 μg/g, which would work out to about 150 to 200 mg in an average sized adult.

So, they assume they did not need to study it, and that that injecting a little more could never throw anything off balance or be harmful, correct? Yup, that's correct. Just like they never studied L. histidine a never before used vaccine ingredient in Gardasil. Looks like they should have first studied that issue!

Polysorbate 80 and Histidine, a marriage of disaster.




Excerpt: Formaldehyde  reacts with  macromolecules, including  DNA.  The genotoxic effects of formaldehyde have been reported in a wide range of mutagenicity tests  in vitro in the absence of a metabolizing system.

Formaldehyde mutagenesis and formation of DNA-protein crosslinks in human lymphoblasts in vitro

And how would they know what the minimum toxic formaldehyde dose is in a vaccine; when there are no actual studies on it in regard to vaccines?

Here in this next study they attempted to explain the potential DNA damage away by claiming that the body eliminates formaldehyde so quickly that it would and could not have the said any considerable nor concerning affect. They are absolutely sure as well that all people eliminate formaldehyde at the same rate? Junk science!

Formaldehyde-induced sister chromatid exchanges in vitro and the influence of the exogenous metabolizing systems S9 mix and primary rat hepatocytes

Excerpt from the abstract:
It could be demonstrated that the reduction was not due to an unspecific binding of formaldehyde to macromolecules of the added S9 mix. The decrease in genotoxic effects, due to rapid metabolisation of formaldehyde in vitro and in vivo, explains the differences between results obtained in the in vitro experiments — performed without metabolizing systems — and in vivo results.

Formaldehyde in Vaccines: Toxic Substance Poses Threat
WARNING: Toxic Chemical Unsafe for Human Consumption at Any Level


Considering that babies typically have weak lungs and no immune system, it really does not sound like a prudent action to inject a young baby with a HIB, DPT or DTaP vaccine that is stabilized in formaldehyde. A baby that may be genetically sensitive to begin with does not have the body or the immune system developed to handle such an assault, and as a result common sense should tell us a baby just might suffer any number of serious reactions or conditions.

Formadehyde has been indicated by some in connection with chemically induced asthma and Chronic exposure leads to many adverse side effects, including ADD and ADHD.

The Government Agency for Toxic Substances says children are more susceptible to formaldehyde than adults. Babies immune systems continue to develop well after birth, so a babies body is not ready to fight of such an assault on the system.

Classification of formaldehyde as a human carcinogen

Aluminum MSDS Sheet

Chronic ingestion of aluminum may cause Aluminum Related Bone Disease or aluminum-induced Osteomalacia with fracturing Osteodystrophy, microcytic anemia, weakness, fatigue, visual and auditory hallucinations, memory loss, speech and language impairment (dysarthria, stuttering, stammering, anomia, hypofluency, aphasia and eventually, mutism), epileptic seizures(focal or grand mal), motor disturbance(tremors, myoclonic jerks, ataxia, convulsions, asterixis, motor apraxia, muscle fatigue), and dementia (personality changes, altered mood, depression, diminished alertness, lethargy, 'clouding of the sensorium', intellectual deterioration, obtundation, coma), and altered EEG

So that ONLY happens with ingestion of excessive amounts of aluminum? We are sure of that?

No MSDS toxicology studies appear to exist here as to actually injecting aluminum in humans! So, where are those safety studies? I will claim and conclude in my study of the science right here and now, that obviously those studies do not exist. There are only simple comparisons that have no basis in actual human study nor toxicology. Just like there are as well no listed studies, nor long term studies for resultant potential chronic health problems

Potential Chronic Health Effects: Aluminum.

CARCINOGENIC EFFECTS: Not available. MUTAGENIC EFFECTS: Not available. TERATOGENIC EFFECTS: Not available. DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICITY: Not available. The substance is toxic to lungs. Repeated or prolonged exposure to the substance can produce target organs damage. Repeated exposure to a highly toxic material may produce general deterioration of health by an accumulation in one or many human organs.

Doesn't look all that safe to me!!! And these are only two of the total vaccine ingredients in the various and numerous vaccines! Only...TWO!

Then we have not even begun to address fluoride in the water, a byproduct of aluminum manufacture; see yet the careless insanity in and of all this? Its all assumed as ...good? Proven safe? Money, power, and control of information has no effect? Assumed responsible, but is actually a false directing and controlling authority? Do you think you need to actually educate yourself yet, if you want the real and unbiased facts?

Chemical Profile for ALUMINUM (CAS Number: 7429-90-5)

Health Hazard Reference(s)

Recognized: --
Cardiovascular or Blood Toxicant
Reproductive Toxicant
Respiratory Toxicant

HEALTH EFFECTS Lists of various toxicants including aluminum |Main Page

Real science! The typical attacking, delusional and outright lying comment: "oh, they don't understand the science and scientific method". Oh ...really???

Aluminum and autoimmunity
Journal of Autoimmunity 36 (2011) 4e Review

Autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants
Yehuda Shoenfeld a,b,*, Nancy Agmon-Levin a
The Zabludowicz Center for Autoimmune Diseases, Department of Medicine B’ Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel

51 references:

Lupus. 2009 Nov;18(13):1217-25.
Adjuvants and autoimmunity.
Israeli E, Agmon-Levin N, Blank M, Shoenfeld Y.
Source: Center for Autoimmune Diseases, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel.

J Autoimmun. 2000 Feb;14(1):1-10.
Vaccination and autoimmunity-'vaccinosis': a dangerous liaison?
Shoenfeld Y, Aron-Maor A.
Source:Department of Internal Medicine B, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.

Excerpt: The findings could also represent a polyclonal activation (adjuvant reaction). The mechanism (or mechanisms) of autoimmune reactions following immunization has not yet been elucidated. One of the possibilities is molecular mimicry; when a structural similarity exists between some viral antigen (or other component of the vaccine) and a self-antigen. This similarity may be the trigger to the autoimmune reaction. Other possible mechanisms are discussed.

Safe, and effective????

Aluminum hydroxide injections lead to motor deficits and motor neuron degeneration.


Scientific Data Gaps


The following data gaps represent areas of scientific interest to further understanding on the human health implications of aluminium exposure:

At present, there is no long-term animal bioassay focusing on the neurotoxic effects of aluminium. Although this represents a major scientific data gap, the Panel questioned whether the availability of such a study would greatly improve our ability to establish human exposure guidelines for aluminium, given the availability of direct epidemiological evidence in this regard. If such a study were to be conducted for the purpose of informing human health risk assessment, careful consideration should be given to the neurological endpoints that would be of most relevance to humans, the most appropriate animal species and route of exposure, and the detailed experimental design, including the number of animals tested, and number and selection of doses.

They actually don't have a clue! If aluminum is used in water treatment plants to get the unwanted junk to settle to the bottom, how is injecting it into the human body a healthy thing? Aluminum as well is used as a blog coagulant. Sounds like something is indeed wrong with using it in multiple vaccines, ya THINK???


Current Medicinal Chemistry, 2011, 18, 2630-2637
Aluminum Vaccine Adjuvants: Are they Safe?
 © 2011 Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.

Aluminum is an experimentally demonstrated neurotoxin and the most commonly used vaccine adjuvant. Despite almost 90 years of widespread use of aluminum adjuvants, medical science's understanding about their mechanisms of action is still remarkably poor. There is also a concerning scarcity of data on toxicology and pharmacokinetics of these compounds. In spite of this, the notion that aluminum in vaccines is safe appears to be widely accepted. Experimental research, however, clearly shows that aluminum adjuvants have a potential to induce serious immunological disorders in humans. In particular, aluminum in adjuvant form carries a risk for autoimmunity, long-term brain inflammation and associated neurological complications and may thus have profound and widespread adverse health consequences. In our opinion, the possibility that vaccine benefits may have been overrated and the risk of potential adverse effects underestimated, has not been rigorously evaluated in the medical and scientific community. We hope that the present paper will provide a framework for a much needed and long overdue assessment of this highly contentious medical issue.

Curr Med Chem. 2011;18(17):2630-7. University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC,
Aluminum Vaccine Adjuvants: Are they Safe?

Aluminum in various forms can be toxic to the nervous system. The widespread presence in the human environment may underlie a number of CNS disorders. The continued use of aluminum adjuvants in various vaccines for children as well as the general public may be of significant concern. In particular, aluminum presented in this form carries a risk for autoimmunity, long-term brain inflammation and associated neurological complications and may thus have profound and widespread adverse health consequences. The widely accepted notion of aluminum adjuvant safety does not appear to be firmly established in the scientific literature and, as such, this absence may have lead to an erroneous conclusions regarding the significance of these compounds in the etiologies of many common neurological disorders. Furthermore, the continued use of aluminum-containing placebos in vaccine clinical trials may have lead to an underestimation of the true rate of adverse outcomes associated with aluminum-adjuvanted vaccines. In our opinion, a comprehensive evaluation of the overall impact of aluminum on human health is overdue. Such an evaluation should include studies designed to determine the short and long-term impacts of dietary aluminum as well as the potential impacts in different age groups of exposure to adjuvant aluminum alone and in combination with other potentially toxic vaccine constituents (e.g., formaldehyde, formalin, mercury, phenoxyethanol, phenol, sodium borate, polysorbate 80, glutaraldehyde). For the latter, until vaccine safety can be comprehensively demonstrated by controlled independent longterm studies that examine the impact on the nervous system in detail, many of those already vaccinated as well as those currently receiving injections may be at risk for health complications that exceed the potential benefits that vaccine prophylaxis may provide. The issue of aluminum adjuvanted vaccine safety is especially pertinent in light of the legislation which might mandate vaccination regimes for civilian populations (e.g., the Biodefense and Pandemic Vaccine and Drug Development Act of 2005). Whether the risk of protection from a dreaded disease outweighs the risk of toxicity from its presumed prophylactic agent is a question that demands far more rigorous scrutiny than has been provided to date.

Self-Organized Criticality Theory of Autoimmunity

Systemic autoimmunity appears to be the inevitable consequence of over-stimulating the host's immune ‘system’ by repeated immunization with antigen, to the levels that surpass system's self-organized criticality.

Vaccines and Autoimmune Diseases of the Adult

Dr Russel Blaylock, retired board certified neurosurgeon

Published papers: (Immunoexcitotoxicity).

Brief Assessment of Aluminum Exposure and Endocrine Disruption, (With 41 scientific references).

Aluminum phosphate:AlPO4 an Adjuvant, [more studies].

EDF Suspected - cardiovascular or blood toxicant, neurotoxicant, respiratory toxicant, respiratory  toxicant.  Implicated as a cause of brain damage;  suspected factor in Alzheimer's Disease, dementia, convulsions and comas.  More hazardous than most chemicals in 2 out  of 6 ranking systems.  On at least 2 federal regulatory lists. EDF Suspected - cardiovascular or blood  toxicant neurotoxicant, respiratory toxicant.  More hazardous than most chemicals in 3 out of 11 ranking systems.  On at least 3 federal regulatory lists.

Chronic RELs and toxicity summaries using the previous version of the Hot Spots Risk Assessment guidelines (OEHHA 2000)


The binding of formaldehyde to endogenous proteins creates haptens that can elicit an immune response. Chronic exposure to formaldehyde has been associated with immunological hypersensitivity as measured by elevated circulating IgG and IgE autoantibodies to human serum albumin (Thrasher et al., 1987). In addition, a decrease in the proportion of T-cells was observed, indicating altered immunity. Thrasher et al. (1990) later found that long-term exposure to formaldehyde was associated with autoantibodies, immune activation, and formaldehyde-albumin adducts in patients occupationally exposed, or residents of mobile homes or of homes containing particleboard sub-flooring. The authors suggest that the hypersensitivity induced by formaldehyde may account for a mechanism for asthma and other health complaints associated with formaldehyde exposure.

Oh, but the dose in vaccines is to small to matter? There is a total of over 600 mcg in the combined total for all 3 Gardasil shots, and they wonder why girls developed blood clots and died; the FDA falsely blamed it of course on risk factors like birth control pills and smoking. Then it should have been contraindicated to get the shots at all. To much to lose in taking any responsibility.

Wow, and aluminum adjuvants have been in vaccines a very long time. Just say, "hell ...NO, I am on my way to by some 1000 IU capsules of vitamin D3" and some C! 

Think the new non-aluminum adjuvants they are trying are any better? From the looks of what has since resulted after the approval of Cervarix with its APo4 adjuvant; the outcome is just as bad or worse. I would not be expecting nor waiting for the FDA and the CDC to inform you or your doctor of that.

HPV-Autoimmunity Science

100 Compiled Studies on Vaccine Dangers

Vaccines and Immunization References and Research Citations

Aluminum A Neurological Gamble

Vaccine Ingredients

Vaccine Immune Supression

Evidence-based vaccinations: A scientific look at the missing science behind flu season vaccines

Editor, alias no identity, "Costner"... you go..."Fool"!

These are America's and the worlds children, we are talking about!

"The WHO said, the CDC said, Paul Offit and Gorski said"

Holy ...buckets of bullshit!

Like I said blogging editor Costner, take just 100 of the 10,000 vaccines Paul Offit said children could safely get; then later write a blog page about your outcome?

Harold E Buttram, MD and Catherine J Frompovich

June 21, 2011

Basics of the Human Immune System Prior to Introduction of Vaccines: Are Vaccines Turning Our Children’s Immune Systems Inside Out?

Basics of the Human Immune System Prior to Introduction of Vaccines: Are Vaccines Turning Our Children’s Immune Systems Inside Out? Part 2

Vaccination: The Hidden Truth, Watch the full documentary now

Herd Immunity - [The real truth].

Polysorbate 80 (Tween 80) is present in Gardasil. It is a surfactant (lowers surface tension); it makes the blood-brain barrier more porous ("opens it up"). This facilitates the passage of aluminium and other substances through the barrier and into the brain tissue.

Polysorbate 80 bypassing the blood brain barrier, and the harm it does. Polysorbate 80 is in many vaccines and also causes sterility in rats. An Elsevier/ Science Direct Study

Food Chem Toxicol. 1993 Mar;31(3):183-90.

Delayed effects of neonatal exposure to Tween 80 on female reproductive organs in rats

No vaccine would ever be ineffective enough nor harmful enough for Costner, "no proof, no proof". What is this guys real problem? When you show him the proof he ignores it. He himself demands peer reviewed science from me, and when asked for his, he produces only a pitiful level of non-scientific low level of proof junk - that any reputable and honest scientist would and could blow a hole in a mile wide.

This guy Costner is as fake and bogus as anything can get, and always was. Fear mongering without proof, should be a criminal offense; that when we are talking needlessly injecting children as if they are a toxic waste dump. Huge, no liability profits have nothing to do with it of course?!

Ask him, to list all the toxicologists on the FDA and CDC approval and decisions boards! There are none. It doesn't matter??? Really?

You know what Costner? You should just give it up! You lose, again.

Our current healthcare system has failed to protect us; worse, it’s our leading cause of death! Take back the responsibility for your own health from a system that—through adverse reactions to prescription drugs, infections, medical errors, needless surgical procedures and more—claims nearly 800,000 lives a year, closely followed by heart disease (700,000) and cancer (approximately 600,000).

America's Healthcare System is the Third Leading Cause of Death
Barbara Starfield, M.D. (2000) [The AMA knew this then, and was published in THEIR journal, and nothing much has been done but to just let it get worse, and as well they simply removed that study from their abstracts].

Excerpt: Even more significantly, the medical system has played a large role in undermining the health of Americans.  According to several research studies in the last decade, a total of 225,000 Americans per year have died as a result of their medical treatments:  

 12,000 deaths per year due to unnecessary surgery

 7000 deaths per year due to medication errors in hospitals

 20,000 deaths per year due to other errors in hospitals

 80,000 deaths per year due to infections in hospitals

 106,000 deaths per year due to negative effects of drugs
Thus, America's healthcare-system-induced deaths are the third leading cause of the death in the U.S., after heart disease and cancer.

If you do not believe that real cures are suppressed, I suggest this information below! Not much can say it all better than that.

Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski

Burzynski, the Movie is the story of a medical doctor and Ph.D biochemist named Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski who won the largest, and possibly the most convoluted and intriguing legal battle against the Food & Drug Administration in American history.

His victorious battles with the United States government were centered around Dr. Burzynski's gene-targeted cancer medicines he discovered in the 1970's called Antineoplastons, which have currently completed Phase II FDA-supervised clinical trials in 2009 and could begin the final phase of FDA testing in 2011–barring the ability to raise the required $300 million to fund the final phase of FDA clinical trials.

When Antineoplastons are approved, it will mark the first time in history a single scientist, not a pharmaceutical company, will hold the exclusive patent and distribution rights on a paradigm-shifting medical breakthrough.

It’s time for a change!

Health Care Reform

Costner, watching TV

"Ok, that works - for me"!

"Just as long as I don't have to hear any more vaccine, and pharma..."conspiracy theories"

FDA censorship of nutritional science threatens health of all Americans

Learn more:

Ignorance Is Power - exposes FDA censorship of nutritional science, video.

FDA unleashes end game scheme to outlaw virtually all dietary supplements formulated after 1994

Learn more:

FDA's scheme to outlaw nearly all nutritional supplements created after 1994 would destroy millions of jobs and devastate economy

Learn more: 

And do they tell YOU about vitamin D3 at YOUR doctors clinic, or do they just push vaccines? Yup, they just push toxic vaccines, that's it. They can't even get the recommended dosage right, if they ever did tell you; 400 IU is nothing - for a deficient person. Many Americans are deficient. 400 IU is not near enough. A minimum of 5000 IU per day is what is needed. 

Next time they attempt to push vaccines on you at your clinic, ask for the ingredient lists and the MSDS sheets on the ingredients, and as well as the safety studies. If they only hand you a copy of the CDC sites safety and effectiveness of multiple vaccines, paltry for any information and/or science assurances page; you might as well conclude there and then that they have not a clue; and they don't. 

Vitamin D Council

Vitamin d better than flu vaccine, Dr. Eisenstein

Pro D (Vitamin D3 with Probiotics)

How Much Vitamin D Should You Take? Dr. Eisenstein

Dr. Eisenstein Discusses Vitamin D as an Immune Modulator of T cells

Vitamin D is better than ANY vaccine and increases the immune system by 3-5 times

Vitamin D not flu shots, Dr Mercola

Vitamin D$=activity

Proc Nutr Soc. 2011 Aug 18:1-12.

Vitamin D and immune function: an overview.

Pediatr Res. 2009 May;65(5 Pt 2):106R-113R.

The vitamin D connection to pediatric infections and immune function.

Mol Nutr Food Res. 2011 Jan;55(1):96-108. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201000174. Epub 2010 Sep 7.

A review of the critical role of vitamin D in the functioning of the immune system and the clinical implications of vitamin D deficiency.

Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2010 Dec;235(12):1395-6; discussion 1397.

Ample evidence exists from human studies that vitamin D reduces the risk of selected bacterial and viral infections.

Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2010 Oct;29(10):987.

Vitamin D supplementation could reduce the risk of type A influenza infection and subsequent pneumonia.

Arch Intern Med. 2009 Feb 23;169(4):384-90.

Association between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level and upper respiratory tract infection in the Third National  National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.$=activity

Epidemiol Infect. 2006 Dec;134(6):1129-40. Epub 2006 Sep 7.

Epidemic influenza and vitamin D.

Pediatr Res. 2009 May;65(5 Pt 2):106R-113R.

The vitamin D connection to pediatric infections and immune function.

J Am Board Fam Med. 2009 Nov-Dec;22(6):698-706.

Vitamin D: an evidence-based review.

Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2009 Jan;9(1):81-7.

Vitamin D, respiratory infections, and asthma.

J Clin Virol. 2011 Mar;50(3):194-200. Epub 2011 Jan 15.

Vitamin D and the anti-viral state.

Nutr Rev. 2006 May;64(5 Pt 1):226-33.

A potential role for vitamin D on HIV infection?


Eur J Clin Nutr. 2009 Apr;63(4):473-7. Epub 2007 Nov 21.

Association of subclinical vitamin D deficiency in newborns with acute lower respiratory infection and their mothers.

Vitamin D

Mayo Clinic Study Finds Vitamin D Associated with Survival in Lymphoma Patients

Anti-Viral vitamin C

Maximized Living

 Editor Costner, you need to give it up while you can still save some face at all, as if that would even possible? You lose, again. Any honest person can see that. You can stay in your world of denial, but you have no right to repeatedly attempt to take anyone and everyone with you. You have a mind, heart, and a soul that is all to clearly pure ilk~! You could actually care less about humanity, it is all about denial and to much to lose for someone! Why do you think I do what I do? What you are made of is not what I am made of. You are like a toxic - cancer that invades our lives and attempts to prevent the real answers from being found. This exists world wide; but you do not see actual doctors here nor anywhere debating this full on with those that know the truth, nor with me on anything; they wouldn't be that stupid. Why do you think that is? They can't CONTROL the information in those situations. The only way you can attempt to control that is to lie and as well refuse to publish what is actually sent to you on that blog. How sick is that? How twisted and sick as well does a mans soul need to be, to do that?


Alias Costner, creating a new blog page! "Lets see, 1. Pharma's vaccines saved the world. 2. The only way to true health and regaining health is at your doctors office and the pharmacy. 3. I have run out of misinformation and lies that I have not already told them 300 times, and has been refuted? 4. I better go see and read the latest garbage Gorski has written?

"Praise the allopathic gods for science based medicine, and pharma Gorski"! Between him and Paul Offit, without it I wouldn't have anything to write at all.


Here's your favorite guy again Costner! You denied all that too! Again, only claiming to that he has no peer reviewed studies. You deny 5000 picture images of the same thing; vaccine damage! You deny as well grounded in actual science physiological explanation of how that happened and happens. That's funny, no neurologist nor brain science expert ever did, nor could. How's your credibility doing?


09 Andrew Moulden En 07 de 11, (at  8 minutes running time, Evan McCarthy, and as well Gardasil. Look what vaccines are doing! There it is, it can not be denied.

Listen to the information in this below video, amazing. And this is what they deny! And 5000 images of the same thing, and the knowledge and tools to understand it..

Tolerance Lost - Dr. Andrew Moulden

Vaccine Health Truth Tolerance Lost by Dr. Andrew Moulden Part 1 of 3 

Vaccine Health Truth Tolerance Lost by Dr. Andrew Moulden Part 2 of 3

Vaccine Health Truth Tolerance Lost by Dr. Andrew Moulden Part 3 of 3

This man I believe in what I know of this, was silenced as to what he knew. His website was taken control of as well, it is no longer his. To think that this mans information has now been silenced, is just fuel to the fire for me! Period. They had to silence him, they had no choice - in the liability and loss of all, they were facing. Stand up and get information to anyone that will listen, one at a time, need be.

Index for other videos by Dr. Andrew Moulden


Not if you do not actually know what the risks are, or deny the risks!!!

 Some might want to believe I have some personal vendetta against the pharmaceutical industry and modern so called medicine, and a mission to destroy that. Why would I do that? Why would anyone. All I do is put it forth, just exactly like it is. It was obviously not my choices that did nor resulted in what the medical system has done; nor as to its outcome.

In America, endless wars have been fought for freedom; and that does and should include as well, freedom from medical dictatorship and tyranny. You can agree or disagree with any given war and our being there at all, but the point made here I believe, is clear. And that is the way I see it; all of it.