Response to: The Difference Between a Scientific Study and a Survey

The Difference Between a Scientific Study and a Survey


More misleading garbage from alias no identity - Costner!


This was reply posted to his blog. Which he will likely as always - never publish.

Quoting from your page - (below): Lets see your actual math for that calculation and what numbers you used in regard to that statement? There is obviously a error in your math and your interpretation of the numbers!


[We are continually told that the rates of autism are roughly 1 in 110 American children and that this number has bloomed in the past decade, yet this graphic (if you average all children from 0-12 years of age) shows the rate to be 1.46%.  If you factor in all children through age 18 the rate averages to 1.25%.  So if the rate of autism in the general population is 1 in 110, that equates to 0.9%.  However this survey is suggesting that the rate of autism in unvaccinated children is anywhere from 1.25% to 1.46%... which is an increase over the general population of 38% to 62%!]


Does THIS interest you?

Questionnaire may help predict autism at 1 year

(Health.com) Excerpts:-- A quick and simple questionnaire given to parents during a regular checkup in a pediatrician's office may help detect autism in children as young as 1 year old, a new study suggests.

Some [are] on children, but very few people have the ability to study autism in babies, because we can't diagnose it until 3 or 4 years. How in the world are we going to discover the causes if we're studying brains that have had a lifetime of living with autism, and [have] a host of compensatory mechanisms?"

The average age of ASD diagnosis is around 5 years old, though most of those children show signs of developmental problems before age 3, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

http://www.cnn.com/2011/HEALTH/04/28/austism.predict.questionnaire/index.html


And when will you get honest enough to admit that there is no validity to your claims that the mainstream studies show no correlation between autism and vaccines? As well they are all CDC funded, and they clearly had a biased study design with as well a predetermined outcome. You know you were shown all of this before, and yet you continue to lie about it, and mislead the public.


An well done analysis of all the said most commonly known main stream studies.

The Fallacy of Thimerosal Removal & Autism Increase: A Failure of Science, A Bigger Failure to Children Worldwide

http://www.ageofautism.com/2010/03/the-fallacy-of-thimerosal-removal-autism-increase-a-failure-of-science-a-bigger-failure-to-children-.html


The next analysis:

http://www.putchildrenfirst.org/index2.html


The next analysis:

http://www.safeminds.org/research/commentary.html

http://www.safeminds.org/


The next analysis:

http://www.14studies.org/


AUGUST 25, 2011  New IOM Report on Vaccine Adverse Effects Shows Alarming Lack of Good Science.

http://www.safeminds.org/news/pressroom/iom-report-vaccine-adverse-effects.html


And WHY are they recommending flu shots for every pregnant woman on earth, with 25mcg. of mercury, potentially damaging the child before ever born? They are scared of the results in seeing entirely mercury, (thimerosal) free children, in regard to autism. Thimerosal containing vaccines by the way have never been approved by the FDA; what do they know? They have not been tested. They refuse to. They know the results would be damming. Any honest person with the comprehension level even barely above that of a drooling fool, realizes how insane it is to inject mercury into the arm of anyone!


The TRUTH About The Flu Shots, by Dr Sherri Tenpenny

http://drtenpenny.com/the_truth_about_the_flu_Shot.aspx


The Truth about Flu Shots in Pregnancy

by Dr Sherri Tenpenny

http://drtenpenny.com/FluShotsAndPregnancy.aspx


But then, all you ever do is refuse to look at the real facts and science. You lie about it and claim it doesn't exist.


What do you call THIS, you have seen it put in front of you time and time again? And there is much more out there and you know it.

Supporting Studies -Wakefield
http://www.vacfacts.info/Supporting_Studies.html


If vaccines do not cause autism, then how is it that vaccine caused autism is reversible with biomedical treatment, which you harass anyone that puts that forth and deny the reality of that biomedical treatment works. Why must you deny it? Because it shows the cause is vaccines, and not only one vaccines but most all vaccines contributing to autism and why. The MMR being the greatest offender. Anyone who denies this, is not concerned with children's well being, but only in denying the truth! Period!

Voluminous Research Proves Vaccines are Deadly 

http://www.infowars.com/voluminous-research-proves-vaccines-are-deadly/


Pharma Not in Business of Health, Healing, Cures, Wellness 

 http://youtu.be/AazObF_pHSU

 


Autism, Vaccines, Mercury and the Culpability of the American Academy of Pediatrics

http://youtu.be/36_qz2beMaE