Friday, July 22, 2011

Response to: Destroying the "MMR Vaccine Causes Autism" Myth

Destroying the "MMR Vaccine Causes Autism" Myth

Response is also provided below on this page, to his most recent page titled: Could a Lack of Vitamin D Lead to a Higher Risk of Autism?

Here we go again. First, how many times does alias no identity Costner, need to be shown again and again the error in what he claims to as to Dr. Andrew Wakefield? And as well as to what the major main stream media has claimed. I have extensively addressed this Wakefield issue before in this very blog, and also on my website. He just continues again and again with the lies; as if he has seen and read nothing.

Here are again some brief examples below in italics, of the Wakefield misinformation from his said and referenced to blog page. Funny thing how he has from day one refused to reference to my counter blog page. He has refused as well to publish any replies from me that show the error in any of the claims on his blog pages. Either he refuses to, or he distorts and lies about what those replies contained.

Granted Wakefield's "study" was originally published in a reputable medical journal (the Lancet) so people assumed it was at least factual.  With time however, people soon discovered that Wakefield acted unethically when he performed his research.  He manipulated and fabricated patient records.  He paid children to give him blood samples.  He left out key information that would have countered his claims, and he failed to mention that he had collected hundreds of thousands of dollars from trial lawyers for testifying against vaccine manufacturers (a blatant conflict of interest that he never disclosed).

As Brian Deer from the UK's The Sunday Times reported:
However, our investigation, confirmed by evidence presented to the General Medical Council (GMC), reveals that: In most of the 12 cases, the children’s ailments as described in The Lancet were different from their hospital and GP records. Although the research paper claimed that problems came on within days of the jab, in only one case did medical records suggest this was true, and in many of the cases medical concerns had been raised before the children were vaccinated. Hospital pathologists, looking for inflammatory bowel disease, reported in the majority of cases that the gut was normal. This was then reviewed and the Lancet paper showed them as abnormal.

Eventually Wakefield's dishonesty and unethical behavior did in fact catch up with him, and ten of the original thirteen co-authors of the original study formally retracted their names from it.  Eventually the General Medical Council in the U.K. recommended that his license to practice medicine be revoked, which it subsequently was.  His original study was retracted from the very journal that had originally published it, he was forced out of the organization he was working for here in the US, and his follow-up study where he attempted to blame autism in animals on vaccines was also withdrawn.

Really? Is that a fact? I sent this information in a reply to his blog page, but of course he refused to publish it much less address any of it. Maybe he needs it all excerpted to him, or in some way be forced to actually read the truth, from the truth sources?

And you could ask, just how did the GMC get away with this kind of misconduct, and with their own massive conflict of interest going on like that. And the national and world media are so controlled by the power and the money, that they have not a clue! If they do, they are clearly never going to reveal it.

Murdoch and Vaccines: Exposure of Crimes Reveals a Much Larger Story, the real story on how and why Wakefield was taken down. Look at the conflict of interest that has NEVER been revealed? How do they get away with that?

LOOK at the massive conflict of interest! And yet they claim it was Wakefield that had the conflict of interest and that he was a fraud?

Excerpt: Brian Deer is the reporter who savaged Dr Wakefield from the pages of the Sunday Times, a paper managed by Rupert Murdoch’s son James Murdoch who is on the board of GlaxoSmithKline which makes the MMR.  Deer researched his case with the help of Medico-Legal Investigations, a private enquiry company whose only source of funding is the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry.  Deer was both the journalist writing on Wakefield and the person who brought a case of fitness to practice medicine to the General Medical Council, and then wrote about the proceedings as well.[Oh and that is JUST the beginning, read more!!!! I outlined that before on the blog and on the site, but this revelation goes allot deeper than that did.]



Rupert Murdoch, the devil incarnate. Actually read the detailed information in the article below!

BREAKING NEWS: In the midst of Rupert Murdoch scandal, newly surfaced evidence points to a widespread Vaccine Industry-Media-Gov’t “hand-in-glove team effort” strategy to discredit Dr. Andrew Wakefield & vilify his findings.

Murdoch’s Vaccine World

Murdoch and Vaccines - Exposure of Murdoch's Crimes Open Up A Much Larger Story

An Elaborate Fraud, Part 2: In Which a Murdoch Newspaper’s Deceptive Tactics Infect the British Medical Journal

Murdoch Tabloids Strike Dr. Wakefield - To Market Deadly Vaccinations.
By Dr. Leonard Horowitz, 1-31-10

Murdoch's media malpractice and the genetic altering of human beings through DNA vaccines 

Excerpt: News Corp. systematically destroyed the reputation of Dr. Wakefield, lied about his work

VRM: Dr. Wakefield’s Imminent Vindication – Turning Of The TideVRM: Dr. Wakefield's Imminent Vindication - Turning Of The Tide

VRM: Dr. Andrew Wakefield Being Crucified By Big Pharma, [another earlier expose on the conflict of interest at the GMC!]

Why Medical Authorities Went to Such Extremes to Silence Dr. Andrew Wakefield, (with a list of 28 studies from around the world that support Dr. Wakefield’s controversial findings).

Just LOOK at THIS scandalous picture, and how it unfolds in it all, as to all that is involved!

Rupert Murdoch's Fox News ran 'black ops' department, former executive claim. Rupert Murdoch’s Fox News television channel had a “black ops” department that may have illegally hacked private telephone records, a former executive for the station has alleged.

"Who is Rupert Murdoch?"

Video list:

Who is Rupert Murdoch? - Gordon Duff on Press TV

Police say 'no-one else involved' in death of phone-hacking whistleblower who 'feared someone was out to get him

Whistleblower's Death: James Corbett on Murdoch scandal turning bloody

The truth about the number of measles cases

F. Edward Yazbak, Pediatrician

TL Autism Research


Does Ms. Dyer truly believe that "measles cases are on the rise around the world" because Dr. Wakefield said during a 1998 press conference, that if he had a choice, he would give his own children monovalent measles, mumps and rubella vaccines, still a NHS parental option at the time?

Is Ms. Dyer aware that according to the Health Protection Agency, the number of reported measles cases in the UK kept dropping after 1998 and only exceeded the 1998 figures ten years later, when there were several measles outbreaks worldwide? (1)

Does she realize that in fact, there were strikingly fewer reported measles cases in England in the 10 years that followed Wakefield's 1998 paper (28,289 cases) than in the 10 years that preceded its publication (188,483 cases)? (1)

Does she know that there were 43,010 reported cases of measles in the UK from 1993 through 1997 compared to 13,981 reported cases from 1998 though 2002, an equal five year span? (1)

Is she aware that there were 14 (fourteen) reports to the US Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System describing symptoms of autism appearing after MMR vaccinations before October 5, 1997 - when just about no one in the United States had ever heard of Andrew Wakefield? (2)



Competing interests: Grandfather of a young man with regressive autism


Then Costner goes on further in the said blog page to claim to and make this erroneous claim, backed by a study done in Japan.

Interestingly enough, I stumbled across a study published in The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry entitled "No effect of MMR withdrawal on the incidence of autism: a total population study".  This study (an actual peer-reviewed study published in a reputable journal mind you) examined the incidence of autism spectrum disorders (ASD) in Japanese children who were born between 1988 and 1996 to determine if the incidence of ASD would rise after the MMR vaccine was no longer being administered (Japan stopped using the MMR vaccine in 1992).

Now read a well done analysis on that study; showing the real truth about the validity that study! The MMR was simply replaced with the single shot regime; the same vaccine essentially was still there. Read as well  about the conflict if interest in that study, and the tie back directly again to one 
Rupert Murdoch! You see Costner hasn't a clue; he believes anything he is told by the mainstream and the CDC!

No effect of MMR withdrawal on the incidence of autism: a total population study

Full text:


7) “No effect of MMR withdrawal on the incidence of autism: a total
population study”17  [Actually read the analysis .... Costner!!!]

The "14" Studies

Excerpt: 5. "No effect of MMR withdrawal on the incidence of autism: a total population study"
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, Hideo Honda, Michael Rutter

Conflicts statement from the study:

None noted, an egregious omission given what is known about Dr. Michael Rutter of the UK: Not only is Dr. Rutter a paid expert witness for vaccine makers facing litigation regarding the MMR vaccine, he was also a board member of the Wellcome Foundation, a front foundation for Glaxo Smithkline, a vaccine maker. Dr. Rutter is also a primary witness in the case against Dr. Andrew Wakefiled, a British doctor who published a paper implicating MMR vaccine in autism.

Part 2: Vaccines and Autism - What Do Epidemiological Studies Really Tell Us?


■ The study tells us little about ASD incidence of ASD prior to 1988, when MMR was introduced. But we do know that the published prevalence of ASD did not exceed 25-per-10,000 at any time in Japan prior to 1988.

■ Annual incidence of ASDs for children born in 1987 was 20-per-10,000, but after MMR was introduced, in 1988, annual incidence more than quadrupled, to 85.9-per-10,000 for children born in 1990.

■ But then, MMR coverage began to decline dramatically, as concerns over the mumps viral component grew. ASD incidence likewise declined during this period, to 55.8 for children born in 1991 – representing a drop of 35%.

■ Following complete discontinuation of MMR in 1993, ASD incidence rose again, this time quite dramatically, to 161-per-10,000 for children born in 1994. However, during this time the recommended schedule was changed to include three single vaccines (M-M-R, given four weeks apart), which gained widespread acceptance, causing coverage to increase significantly.

■ For all practical purposes, children vaccinated according to the new schedule were still receiving 'M-M-R' at around age one. Giving the three separate vaccines in such close proximity amounts to overlapping exposure, in biological terms.

■ Early MMR trials showed clear evidence of 'interference' between the viruses in the combined vaccine, mediated through an altered immune response. The safety consequences of this 'interference' are completely unknown.

■ Children who have natural measles (or single measles vaccine) and natural mumps infections within the same year are at significantly greater risk of later inflammatory bowel disease,[19] which is consistent with an 'interference' phenomenon that could increase the risk of long-term measles virus infection and delayed disease.

■ The authors are wrong to examine MMR as the single exposure of interest, when in biological terms, exposure to M-M-R through three consecutive monovalent vaccines actually increased after 1993 when MMR was discontinued.

■ The data, therefore, could be interpreted as indicating a major influence of the pattern of exposure to these vaccine viruses on ASD incidence in this Japanese population.

■ More importantly, the data suggest a possible re-challenge effect of close temporal exposure to these three vaccine viruses on ASD incidence at the population level, whereby the exposure (MMR) has been introduced, removed (voluntarily through lack of public confidence), and then re-introduced (as M, M, and R close together).

■ ASD numbers increased and decreased in direct proportion to the total number of children vaccinated with the three live viruses. There is evidence of an effect not only from de-challenges and re-challenges, but there is also a “dose-response” relationship on a population level.

■ Such a dose-response relationship on a population level is rare; and is evidence of a possible causal association.

■ The interpretation by Public Health officials that this is the “last word on the subject” and that these data prove that MMR is safe is misleading and suggests a very limited perspective of the issues and a misunderstanding of published concerns on viral interference in a trivalent live-virus vaccine.

Undisclosed Conflict of Interest: Co-author Michael Rutter has close associations with the drug industry, including GlaxoSmithKline.  He was a paid expert witness on their behalf in the UK MMR vaccine damage litigation.  That was not declared in the Honda/Rutter paper.


Despite the methodological problems in Honda et al., and quite apart from the fact that an ecological study of this kind cannot be used to make attributions about causality, the unrecognized challenge-rechallenge effect of vaccination on autism rates in Japan provide yet another piece of support for the MMR-autism link. Because this study failed to clearly interpret the true population risk in the exposure of interest--assuming the removal of an exposure that in reality had remained-- the conclusions drawn by the authors are based on erroneous reasoning. Although drawing overly strong conclusions about an association between MMR-type exposures and autism would be premature in light of the study’s ecological design constraints, the data clearly indicate that further scrutiny of the data is required.

Strong Evidence MMR, Thiomersal & Other Vaccines Cause Autism - A Population Level Rechallenge in Japan, (an in depth analysis of the study). Actually read it! Look, even can show you the clear flaws in that study! Your hated source.

The Honda/Rutter Japan Paper

Wakefield Responds To Japan Study

MMR - Autism Epidemiological Studies: Just A Distraction
By: Dr. F. Edward Yazbak

Another well done analysis of that Japanese study!

Excerpt: In their Commentary on Red Flags (March 7, 2005) entitled "Japanese study is the strongest evidence yet for a link between MMR and autism" Drs. Wakefield and Stott, reviewing the epidemiological research of the Japanese study, showed that the conclusions of the authors were not justified and that in fact, an opposite conclusion was more viable.

Japanese & British Data Show Vaccines Cause Autism

Wow Costner, AGAIN how GREAT YOUR said science is?????????

Unanswered Questions from the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program: A Review of Compensated Cases of Vaccine-Induced Brain Injury.

Past replies and references previously put directly in front of Costner, and nothing is enough.

Breaking News, Dr. Andrew Wakefield Cleared Of Fraud

Reply to: Journal: Study Linking Vaccine to Autism Was Fraud

Response to: Journal: Study Linking Vaccine to Autism Was Fraud, Part Two

Update: Dr Wakefield demands retraction from BMJ after documents prove innocence from allegations of vaccine autism data fraud.

Supporting Studies that replicate and or support Wakefields findings.

Dr wakefield Updates

Dr Wakefield Videos

Dr Wakefields New book - Callous Disregard

MMR Vaccine Truth 1 and 2

Dr Andrew Wakefield


Here is also my reply to Costner's most recent and current page created right after this one! Rather than wasting the time to create another page to present that. I sent this reply as well to alias no identity Costner at his blog, but likely as well, will never be published.

Could a Lack of Vitamin D Lead to a Higher Risk of Autism?

There is no doubt that vitamin D3 improves the functions of the immune system, and thus serves to help with detoxification and as well modulation and strengthening of the immune system. In other words when the immune system functions at its best it also is better at coping with viral components of vaccines, as well as natural viruses. Detoxification then becomes more well managed within the body as well. So it would stand to proper reason that vitamin D3 would help a child withstand the onslaught of multiple childhood vaccines.

Although glutathione is essential for detoxification, it may also be that vitamin D helps in regard to production of essential element as well.

Your Guide to Boost Glutathione Levels

But then you are also the person who denies that toxins in the body have an adverse effect on health, and that detox plays an essential and necessary role in health care! Wow, you really do refuse to get it don't you?

So, where are you getting so far, attempting to claim vaccines are not the cause of autism? Are you actually that incompetent in your ability to do research? How about use of common sense? You again call that science that discredits vaccines as a cause of autism? Wow. And you will NEVER publish it; just like all the rest of the replies that showed your error! Have you at all looked up or researched what else vitamin D can do for human health? Of course not.


You know what Costner? I think YOU need to give it up! You should know far better by now! What a warped mind!

It seems to me Costner, that YOUR pro-vaccine world is crumbling before your very eyes. My goal is vaccine truth, and only that in regard to vaccines; and so that people have proper truth information to base these very important decisions on.

Epidemic of vaccine suspensions worldwide, as adverse reactions flood in from around the world

FDA Requests Meeting With Activists Exposing Gardasil Adverse Reactions

How safe are HPV Vaccines, Gardasil and Cervarix? The conflicting evidence which does not add up

Gardasil Vaccine Researcher Drops Bombshell

An adverse reaction to Cervarix has caused a British parent to be falsely accused of child abuse

Medical Mafia Threatens Family After Adverse Reaction to Cervarix

Do we live in a blame the parent culture? Vaccines vs SBS.

World Health Organization Running Scared: WHO pandemic probe focuses on media, Internet role

Ghostwriting Is Called Rife in Medical Journals

No comments:

Post a Comment