Here below are two reply message posts made to alias-Costners said blog page; both of them he REFUSED to post on the blog!!!! Judge for yourself. I could have, based on my study of the real facts, shown the clear design error in this study, all on my own; but I found it had already been done for me. Note as well the responses he made to my reply submission of this information. An amazing level of denial! Nothing is ever enough.
The person, [publisher] has no known actual identity, as you can see.
Reply message 1.
[As always, facts and science cannot be disputed nor debated]. Those are your said words; right here!
Well Costner, indeed your study has been disputed in depth and very well. Why have you failed to address that, and those issues? In fact the study was disputed as to its information, right at the bottom of the page link you provided. Did you fail to read that? I will include two of the concluding comments made in the two analysis articles. [This is disingenuous at best]. [And] [The most important question which must be asked, is why have the authors chosen to demonize the parents of the minority 11%, and why did they not just focus on the well known flaws of the pertussis vaccine, and its inability to produce "herd immunity"?]
This said study does not support the concept of herd immunity, Costner. Plain and simple.
Why would you knowingly ignore that and yet be making the said claim you have above? Should I need excerpt all the highlights of that for you? You can find it under the titles: Obfuscation and misinterpretation? [And] Flawed Foundational Premise.
Go READ it ...Costner!
The said analysis.
If you can not address that, perhaps you should pull your page down! Or at least correct some of your misleading and arrogant statements. The public can read it right HERE!
What about the issue as well that B. parapertussis can look exactly like B pertussis, and they are NOT testing for it. There is no vaccine for that.
So given that PCR by itself is generally considered insufficient for diagnosing pertussis, what basis then do they have in this study for the ground work of and for even the basics of their findings? Shot down again, Costner!
And Joseph Albietz MD is clearly nothing more than a Gorski, Orac, Quackwatch associate and writer. No bias... there???
Reply 1 message end]
So here we have it, a copy of the two analysis noted.
Jason M. Glanz, David L. McClure, David J. Magid, Matthew F. Daley, Eric K. France, Daniel A. Salmon, and Simon J. Hambidge
Parental Refusal of Pertussis Vaccination Is Associated With an Increased Risk of Pertussis Infection in Children
Pediatrics 2009; 123: 1446-1451 [Abstract] [Full text] [PDF]
Obfuscation and misinterpretation?
David S Foster (30 May 2009)
Flawed Foundational Premise
Hilary Butler (2 June 2009)
Obfuscation and misinterpretation? 30 May 2009
David S Foster,
Send letter to journal:
Re: Obfuscation and misinterpretation?
E-mail David S Foster
This paper clearly states that "Patients were classified as confirmed [pertussis] cases if they had a medical chart-verified positive PCR test OR a positive culture for B pertussis" (emphasis mine).
The authors note that both PCR and laboratory culture results were recorded for each subject, so given that PCR by itself is generally considered insufficient for diagnosing pertussis , one has to wonder why the authors did not state what proportion of "patients" were classified solely on the basis of a positive PCR test. I also must ask, why did Pediatrics not require this data before publishing this study? Without this information, it is impossible to evaluate this study.
Furthermore, note that when the authors hypothesize that "parents who refuse vaccinations may be less likely to bring their children to medical attention for acute illness", they include a reference to lend credibility to their assertion. However, the referenced study itself does nothing more than pose the same hypothesis :
"Moreover, this tendency on the clinicians’ part may have been offset by the POSSIBILITY that parents of exemptors might have been less likely than those of vaccinated children to seek traditional medical care that involved laboratory testing." (emphasis mine)
This is disingenuous at best.
Some additional issues with this study:
* No differences in pertussis symptoms, duration of symptoms, or sequelae were found between vaccinated and unvaccinated children. This is highly significant, in that it goes against claims by the CDC that vaccines, even when they fail, provide some degree of protection. This finding should be highlighted in the abstract.
* If 11% of pertussis cases are associated with vaccine refusal, then 89% of cases are by definition associated with vaccine FAILURE, correct?
* The finding that unvaccinated children presenting to a clinic with URI were > 3 times more likely to be tested for pertussis than vaccinated children is extremely important, and in my opinion very understated in this paper as a potential source of bias. It also calls into question the validity of all passive surveillance of disease incidence relative to vaccination status, does it not?
* This study found that vaccinated children were twice as likely to visit the clinic for an URI than unvaccinated children. The authors' interpretation is very telling, in that they simply assume that this finding must be a reflection on the behavior of vaccine refusing parents. Did it ever occur to them, or to those reviewing this manuscript, that the relevant variable here might very well be vaccination status? Just recently a study found that children given the influenza vaccine were more likely to require hospital visits. 
So there are many issues with this study, but the lack of data on how many pertussis cases were identified based on PCR test alone makes this study difficult to interpret. If a majority of these case classifications were based on PCR alone then in my opinion the results of this study become invalid.
Conflict of Interest:
Flawed Foundational Premise 2 June 2009
Send letter to journal:
Re: Flawed Foundational Premise
E-mail Hilary Butler
Rewording the conclusion slightly it would seem that, "Herd immunity does not seem to completely protect (the 11% of) unvaccinated children from pertussis (which were given to them by the 89% of cases who were vaccinated)."
The body of the article talked about "ongoing endemic circulation" and "frequent asymptomatic infections" with the hope that adolescent and adult boosters might do something about both. If "herd immunity" exists, as the authors insist..., how can there also be " frequent asymptomatic infections" and "ongoing endemic circulation"?
The authors pin their hopes of improving this situation by repeatedly vaccinated all adolescents and adults.
However, the medical literature shows us:
1) That pertussis boosters do not improve any bactericidal activity in the vaccinated individuals: "we found no evidence that acellular vaccines promoted antibody-dependent killing by complement of enhanced phagocytosis by neutrophils" (1) which is a polite way of saying that the vaccines don't work.
As to why pertussis vaccine is not immunogenic, one must look at Dr James Cherry’s work:
2) "Of particular interest is the lack of a significant ACT antibody response in children for whom the DTP or DTaP vaccine failed.." (which is 89% of Kaiser cases)... "This induced tolerance is intriguing and may be due to the phenomenon called original antigenic sin. In this phenomenon, a child responds at initial exposure to all presented epitopes of the infecting agent or vaccine. With repeated exposure when older, the child responds preferentially to those epitopes shared with the original infecting agent or vaccine and can be expected to have responses to new epitopes of the infecting agent that are less marked than normal."
(2) There is a large body of medical literature that has been similarly ignored that clearly shows that individuals who gain their cellular and humoral immunity through the pertussis disease process, develop immune responses to ACT (adenylate cyclase toxin). When these individuals are reinfected, they are readily able to clear the bacteria and infection from their bronchials.
Conversely, as Dr Cherry stated, the immune systems of the vaccinated, because of their "original antigenic sin", ignore the ACT on rechallenge, because ACT is ONLY secreted as a product of natural infection, and is not an "ingredient" in the artificial vaccine manufacture process.
Therefore, in other words, the vaccinated adolescents and adults are unable to clear the bacteria, because their bodies learned the antibody immunity the wrong way, and therefore they also have no cellular immunity. The result is that they do spread frequent asymptomatic infections far and wide.
Is it a fluke, that when pertussis was primarily a childhood illness, rates of pertussis in adolescents and adults were rare?
The article finished with: "Future research should focus on the community impact of vaccine refusal and the risks to other vulnerable populations...."
A more scientific approach would be to swab Kaiser Permanente staff and patients regularly over the next 10 years, to find out just how far and wide “frequent asymptomatic infections” as a result of “original (vaccine) antigenic sin”, extends in the community at large.
The most important question which must be asked, is why have the authors chosen to demonize the parents of the minority 11%, and why did they not just focus on the well known flaws of the pertussis vaccine, and its inability to produce "herd immunity"?
(1) Weingart, C.L. et al 2000. “characterization of bactericidal immune responses following vaccination with acellular pertussis vaccine in adults.” Infect Immun, 68(12):7175-9. PMID: 11088351. (2) Cherry J.D. et al. 2004. “Determination of serum antibody to Bordetalla pertussis adenylate cyclase toxin in vaccinated and unvaccinated children and in children and adults with pertussis.” Clin Infect Dis 38(4):502-7. PMID: 14765342.
Conflict of Interest:
Thats pretty damning, if you ask me!!! Remember the statement Costner made? [As always, facts and science cannot be disputed nor debated]. Costner is a flat out liar!
Pretty well educated and smart woman, she is! Hilary Butler.
Why Costner hates Whale.to. He can't refute it; and it's to damaging as to the vaccine and medical fields, specifically as to historical facts that have been hidden from us. It is the only way modern medicine could and did pull it off. Most doctors are not aware of that real 100 year history that is there on whale.to and other sites as well.
Any man who denies the truth about any of this information, is not a man at all but a creep that crawls on the earth, not walks. He has no moral responsibility for the truth, nor the decency to care for ANYONE, much less children.
But you know what? He can not refute it, and he knows that! It is historical fact. Actually it is to much damming information he nor anyone else can refute..
Alias Costner needs to face the facts, but endlessly refuses. Then if all else fails he will come back with another personal attack, on me. If they can not address the information they will falsely try to discredit the messenger, in fact any and all messengers. But we can see then that his partner in crime SDealer, even tries to go one step further, and discredit what a messenger is. Splitting the meaning of words and terms is always a clear sign of defeat.
Let's take a look at what 'Herd Immunities' so called science really looks like and where it was coined from. It was coined from veterinary science and natural immunity, not vaccine so called and derived immunity; there is a difference! Like I said, Costner, show me the herd immunity science; and to date, again you could not do it.
The pertussis vaccine and herd immunity failures have been endless, as a fact Costner. I have linked to that over and over.
The same thing exists as to measles; numerous herd immunity and vaccine failures! I had measles as kid, it is a typically a relatively mild thing to have, and something that can actually make your immune system stronger. If you get measles vaccinated; you can clearly get a worse case of it, if you acquire the measles after that. That then becomes a worse situation than if you did nothing.
And really, can you actually trust a Pediatrics (AAP) publication that has also even produced studies that attempt to claim thimersosal, [a neuro-toxin] actually improved the functioning test scores in children, verses children not injected with thimerosal containing vaccines? No conflict of interest ...there, is there???
This is the second reply message post to Costner's blog, which he references to in his reply section, but refused to publish the information; making only less than truthful and slanderous attacks on the content.
These articles are fully referenced as well, take a look!
Whooping Cough Outbreaks & Vaccine Failures
By Barbara Loe Fisher
Here is as well a video documentary as to those said vaccine failures.
Whooping Cough Kills 5 in California -- State Declares an Epidemic. Learn the real truth!
How many times do you have to be shown that Wakefields study has been duplicated on a larger scale. There are two well done studies, and many many more that support that study! But as long as you can cherry pick the so called science, and ignore any other; then its still all good for you.
Here is as well a good video interview with JB Handley. That is the basic arguement we have! Can you honestly address that arguement?
As far as varicella vaccine. What happens when a pregnant women, vaccinated when younger, loses that claimed immunity? The first thing that happened when the vaccine was available was that the incidence of shingles increased, then they created a shingles vaccine. There is some very interesting data on that. So then the option is to give life long boosters? And the ingredients of the vaccine, can you list them? Proven safe, right?
[End of second reply to the said blog]
Just like all vaccines, they can cause the virus to mutate to a new form. Pertussis had likely not changed much in decades until now. In nature, pathogens can contently change in an attempt to beat what is beating it. As well even in weeds that have been sprayed with Roundup, in use of roundup ready corn and beans, farmers are now beginning to see fields full of resistant super weeds. No matter what it is, that is and can be natures course.
Many whooping cough victims have been immunized; Experts spar over prospects of new disease strain
Why didn't he post the actual ingredients for both DTaP and Varicella vaccine??? That should be important, wouldn't you think?
Boy, doesn't look safe to me, DTaP, 5 shots??? And what about the so called drift of the vaccine virus changing, mutating into a form more deadly than what was existent? There is plenty of reference to that as well."Vaccines are the best thing since sliced bread"????
The case against universal varicella vaccination.
Chickenpox Outbreak in a Highly Vaccinated School Population.
Conclusions. A chickenpox outbreak occurred in a school in which 97% of students without a prior history of chickenpox were vaccinated. Students vaccinated >5 years before the outbreak were at risk for breakthrough disease. Booster vaccination may deserve additional consideration.
WOW, that really supports the HERD immunity of vaccines science and concept???
Chickenpox Vaccine Linked with Shingles Epidemic
Excerpt: New research published in the International Journal of Toxicology (IJT) by Gary S. Goldman, Ph.D., reveals high rates of shingles (herpes zoster) in Americans since the government's 1995 recommendation that all children receive chicken pox vaccine. Goldman's research supports that shingles, which results in three times as many deaths and five times the number of hospitalizations as chicken pox, is suppressed naturally by occasional contact with chicken pox.
So then you now need another toxic vaccine for shingles? Where does it end?
And if you get chicken pox as an adult, and after any vaccine immunity has worn off, you risk complications of varicella pneumonia, or worse; nice trade off. There have been many varicella outbreaks in fully vaccinated
vaccinated groups of children. This as well, does not support the concept of herd immunity.
Universal varicella vaccination: efficacy trends and effect on herpes zoster.
Wow, so lets take measles vaccines, and get measles as an adult, too????
Measles Outbreak in a Fully Immunized Secondary-School Population
We conclude that outbreaks of measles can occur in secondary schools, even when more than 99 percent of the students have been vaccinated and more than 95 percent are immune. (N Engl J Med 1987; 316:771–4.)
Wow, that sure supports the concept of vaccine induced herd immunity, doesn't it Costner??? And those same outbreaks have been many. Maybe they didn't have enough boosters, and how often would they need those? Once or twice a year? And look at those safe and effective injected ingredients! I bet that wouldn't ever give anyone immune suppression nor dysregulation? And kids are sicker than they have ever been!
Why vaccines don't work as advertised!
Oh, but the polio and small pox vaccines, they worked just great? No, they did NOT! Nothing could be further from the truth, and nothing would be enough. The masses have been just to brainwashed. (Listen as well to the Viera Scheibner video below, under Global Research Hour).
GRAPHICAL EVIDENCE SHOWS VACCINES DIDN'T SAVE US
Vaccines and Immune Suppression
Vaccines and Immune Suppression
MMR (Measles, Mumps and Rubella)
(Scientific Citations and Articles)
General scientific citations on vaccines.
Was Smallpox Vaccine Really A Great Success? [Not there, not anywhere].
Now back to the blog page referenced to above: In the first part of the referenced to blog article, Costner makes this statement, but it is misleading, as no such thing as to any such article exists, nor is there in the links mentioned.
He is referring to: Help Re-establish the Herd Immunity of Nevada!
Costner states: [This is a really good article written by Dr. Joseph Albeitz which melds nicely with our last post on the concept of herd immunity. Embedded within the article are links to two studies which show "that the act of refusing to vaccinate against pertussis (whooping cough) placed children at a 23 times greater risk of contracting pertussis."]
Dr. Joseph Albeitz
Help Re-establish the Herd Immunity of Nevada!
Costner claims that Dr. Joseph Albeitz has claimed no conflict of interest, yet we see this statement at the bottom of Mr. Albeitz written article on the the page titled; Help Re-establish the Herd Immunity of Nevada!
Quote: [What more can be done? We can limit the collateral damage of Jenny McCarthy's destructive bile. We can help protect the innocent. We can lower the barriers to vaccination so that the only people unvaccinated are either those who cannot be vaccinated due to age or health, or those who for whatever misguided reason choose not to vaccinate. Herd immunity needs to be reinforced or in some cases re-established, and it must be done one child at a time.
That is where our current project comes in to play. The JREF is going to fully subsidize the cost of vaccination to families who go to the SNHD clinics for as long as our donations last. Not only will this remove any financial barriers to vaccination, but it will also serve to heighten the awareness of the services provided by the SNHD.
You don't need to attend TAM 7 (although you should) in order to help. Go to the TAM 7 registration page, and at the very bottom you will find the donation links. For $25 the Vaccine Fair Donation - One Series will cover the entire cost to a child regardless of the number of vaccines administered that day, and the Vaccine Fair Donation - One Vaccine covers the cost of a single vaccine for $16. Add as many as you like to your cart and check out.
A while back, a friend relayed a conversation he'd had with a group of skeptics who were bemoaning the way in which we as skeptics were publicly cast in a negative light, maligned, even hated. His response: "What have you done to be loved?" This is a chance to give him an answer.] Unquote.
So hear we have Dr. Joseph Albeitz clearly connected as a writer these said sites Gorski, Orac Quackwatch, that do nothing but bash any alternative information whatsoever. We have Mr. Albeitz even trashing Jenny McCarthy as being anti-vaccine, and she is not. We have Mr. Albeitz bashing McCarthy who has a vaccine injured son who had autism. That autism was reversed by biomedical treatment that main stream allopathic fields refuse to acknowledge as real. It has worked for now an endless number of children. Jenny McCarthy only promotes that proven healing protocol to other parents in need. The numbers of reversal of autism that is happening in are to large to ignore. McCarthy simply wants truth information put forward to parents. Mr Albeitz must discount it and attack it because all that threatens the very foundation of what he is so called educated in and promoting. His career is at stake if the vaccine truth is known on a large scale, and large numbers of parents reject vaccines.
Do you want to see a picture of her son, Evan McCarthy? [Watch the video, the picture of Evan is at 7:59; with a statement that may surprise you]. And this, is what Mr. Albeitz, like Costner, is making a mockery of. Clearly vaccine damaged children.
09 Andrew Moulden En 07 de 11
09 Andrew Moulden En 06 de 11
Generation Rescue, Jenny McCarthys site. How evil is it for Costner, and the known other sources that have, to bash this mother who clearly has it RIGHT? As well as helping other parents realize there is a treatment for autism that works. What has main stream medicine offered? Answer: more worthless and toxic drugs!
If you want to know the REAL truth about what goes on in the vaccine industry, and about the truth as to Dr. Andrew Moulden, this video below is the place!!! Where is he now? Near as I can tell, he has been effectively silenced. He will not say nor tell you much.
09 Andrew Moulden En 03 de 11
"All children and doctors betrayed. All damages/deaths from this day forward were preventable"!
Yes, they HAD to much to lose. Educate yourself as to vaccines, today!
Ischemia/Hypoxia, why it happens.
[As always, facts and science cannot be disputed nor debated] Really? There are 5000 images of that, WITH the EXACT physiological explanation that no brain science EXPERT has ever been able to refute! Period. And you know they would have tried.
[As always, facts and science cannot be disputed nor debated] You know what, Costner, I think you lose! The only thing you have on your side Costner, is that the CDC knows this, and they have covered it up, to MUCH to lose. Their science is nothing but a paid and funded cover-up. Top to bottom.
Doctors Reversing Autism, my letter write to the Argus Leader
Do you see now why I get attacked in the manner I do in this said opposing blog that was created? They have to much to lose. They are in deep denial of what they have done. They believe as long as the CDC continues to support all the lies and misinformation that nothing can take it all down. They yet believe there is always a continued need to silence any and all decent. They cherry pick the claimed to [mostly bogus] science, and refuse all else that is unbiased science.
If you want to get Costner into his full on lying denial mode, just ask him to explain this? I seen that again and again on the Argus reply posting to autism vaccine letters. He attacked me over and over and came up lying, and refusing to acknowledge what was there. As always, every time.
If everything you say about me is true Costner, why is it always YOU that ends up looking like the fool? That, if you had the capacity to be honest, but unfortunately you do NOT.
Let me ask you, if indeed modern medicine is the 3rd leading cause of death in the US, and it is; then how can it be that none of that science can be disputed nor debated? Those are your words. "As always, facts and science cannot be disputed nor debated". You are as delusional as it gets! In fact you are outrightly as to your misinformation .... dangerous. You have been shown the truth, yet you keep lying and making denial of what was there.
And do you remember, as you call yourself [Costner], when I asked you if you could answer these 9 questions, and asked how many vaccines could you answer them for? You couldn't do it; and you know it.
And how many doctors and pediatricians would be willing to fill out this vaccine safety warranty?
This is the National Vaccine Compensation Act Table that lists and explains injuries/conditions that are presumed to be caused by vaccines. It also lists time periods in which the first symptom of these injuries/conditions must occur after receiving the vaccine. Note how extremely limited it is, and for time frames as well, and it never even mentions autism.
Yet even with those restrictions the compensation pay out is quite significant, since its enactment in 1986.
$2,149,035,080.79 and nearly just as many cases have been dismissed. Many more that could have filed, were never filed.
When you go to VAERS, you can also see that vaccine reactions are clearly not rare. This is know to be 1 to 10% of what should and could have been reported? Why? Because parents are told it wasn't a vaccine reaction, and as well doctors and pediatricians refuse to acknowledge vaccine reactions no matter how severe. They are simply so brainwashed, they refuse to use even basic common sense. Yet they will bankrupt a family looking for and testing for any cause but the vaccine. Look what happened with Gardasil. Nothing is ever enough.
Leslie Carol Botha on the upcoming Gardasil Vaccine FDA presentation. [And GUESS WHAT? The FDA blew them off!] Safe and effective, the science can not be challenged! What science!
You a liar Costner!!! On all levels. As a fact, if you had a real identity, there isn't much doubt you would be pulling that blog down. But your game is mockery of the truth, and anyone that puts the truth forward. You and your must deny the truth ... cronies. Nothing is enough. How sick is that crap???? Well, when you get blind sided by your eventual well earned ticket to hell, maybe that will be enough.
You see unlike you I care about children having a fair shot at life, as God our creator made them. I care about doing something about all the people mislead by the selling sickness nightmare of the for profit pharmaceutical mafia. You know, the one with all that science and refuses to accept real understanding of the human body. That one.
Like I said, there is no real vaccine science behind the term herd immunity!
Here is a picture for you I feel is very fitting, Costner! Enjoy.
A little TRUTH EXPOSE, by a former long term pharmaceutical rep.!
Just another "conspiracy theory".... Costner??
Denial, look that term up ...and wake up!
Hey look Costner, its even on your despised whale.to, and you know everything I have comes from there, as you can see. Have you had your vision checked lately??? He must of been a pretty smart pig farmer, to bad all the pediatricians weren't pig farmers we would be allot better off! Nothing wrong with pigs.
Book above, written by Dr. Mayer Eisenstein
Autism and the Homefirst Practice,
Excerpt: The Age of Autism: 'A pretty big secret' By Dan Olmsted UPI Senior Editor
CHICAGO, Dec. 7, 2005 (UPI) -- It's a far piece from the horse-and-buggies of Lancaster County, Pa., to the cars and freeways of Cook County, Ill.
But thousands of children cared for by Homefirst Health Services in metropolitan Chicago have at least two things in common with thousands of Amish children in rural Lancaster: They have never been vaccinated. And they don't have autism.
"We have a fairly large practice. We have about 30,000 or 35,000 children that we've taken care of over the years, and I don't think we have a single case of autism in children delivered by us who never received vaccines," said Dr. Mayer Eisenstein, Homefirst's medical director who founded the practice in 1973. Homefirst doctors have delivered more than 15,000 babies at home, and thousands of them have never been vaccinated.
The few autistic children Homefirst sees were vaccinated before their families became patients, Eisenstein said. "I can think of two or three autistic children who we've delivered their mother's next baby, and we aren't really totally taking care of that child -- they have special care needs. But they bring the younger children to us. I don't have a single case that I can think of that wasn't vaccinated."
Vaccine Exemption Laws State by State.
Flu Shots are Silly. Dr. Mayer Eisenstein
Before he lost the weight, health care done the right way.
Autism, No Vaccines No Autism
And the CDC claims it would be unethical to do a vaxed versed non-vaxed large scales study. It is clearly unethical, not to do one, but they are scared to find out the results they clearly already know will be found. That study already exists.
Dr. John Cannell on vitamin D