Friday, April 26, 2013

Reply to: The Risk of Autism Is Not Increased by "Too Many Vaccines Too Soon"

The Risk of Autism Is Not Increased by "Too Many Vaccines Too Soon"

Reply sent to the editor of the above blog, but ass always again will likely never be published. To much truth.

That Pediatrics based study is nothing but extreme junk science. Are antigens the only thing in vaccines, to be concerned about. That study has nothing to do with human physiological science; nor does it have anything to do do with actual vaccine safety. The entire field of so called modern medicine should be ashamed of such a repeat attempt to mislead the public.

I created this website page, long before you created this blog page Mr Editor. I suggest that you review it. If you have no fear of opposing information, and if you really believe that you can stand on that study, you will publish this comment and the link to the said page. Knowing you all to well, all you will do is again refuse and censor the information, as you always do.

You are accepting of any bogus and clearly junk science that you can latch onto to support your obvious agenda; but yet go on to repeatedly claim that no scientific studies prove any of the claims that the vaccine truth people put forward. I have put in front of you multiple times the long list of studies that prove in any honest and rational mind, that the claims of vaccine doing more harm than good, are indeed true. Nothing is enough, you just keep on in your repeat and persistent state of denial, ignoring any evidence and actual unbiased science that shows your claims to be entirely lies and more lies. I will say it again, if you can not debate this subject matter in honesty; then you have no business blogging, nor creating repeat blog pages while ignoring any and all evidence that shows your claims to be false. Nothing would ever be enough, you must deny it. Now, publish it!

New Junk Science Study - No link between 'too many vaccines' and autism risk

And here is a reply comment directed to your previous blog page, Anti-Vaccination Groups: What's In a Name?

Being you didn't actually publish my previous complete reply, and as always; if you ever do; you were sent this corresponding reply, which again without doubt will not ever be published as well.

The reply:

Again your comprehension skills are majorly lacking. What I was referring to quite obviously was the removal of the anonymous posting option, right after the last post by Anonymous, above. I have as you know a blog as well, and is also on Blogger. My settings have always allowed for Anonymous replies, and still do. I am not getting any such said spam bot comments, so I guess you must be special, or possibly just making it up.

Your false claims of being all knowing and of proclaiming my using Anonymous to reply are clearly all washed up as bogus, as you have even accused the person reply posting above being me, when that is all to obviously not the case. You have in the past accused anyone at all that does not support your agenda, of being me. Nothing would be enough, and you still proclaim to always be right. What a false and self inflated image you have. Here is a question for you? Do you NOT find it a bit hypocritical be be blogging yourself without any identity at all, yet you require an identity for anyone else that replies on this blog. You have also allowed multiple and slanderous attacks to be published on this blog, personally attacking me directly; and those replies were as well allowed to be made without any identity left behind whatsoever. Every option you have left available for reply commenting here, can potentially reveal the persons identity.

In fact, this blog page alone, loses every shred of credibility you could have ever hoped to have had left standing; even with the shills and sheeple. Obviously all that took was to allow opposing commenting without censoring, just once. Nice job. I told you that was the case; and it always was and will be.

That Pediatrics based study is nothing but extreme junk science. Are antigens the only thing in vaccines, to be concerned about. That study has nothing to do with human physiological science; nor does it have anything to do do with actual vaccine safety. The entire field of so called modern medicine should be ashamed of such a repeat attempt to mislead the public.


Of course just like I said, this said blog editor never published my above reply; and it shows directly that he is and was knowingly lying about about it all.

Follow up reply sent:

What, numerous studies published as well and also in Pubmed, are not good enough for you? What would be? You simply did not publish the reply, because that was the only way you could keep twisting and lying about it all and deceiving the public as to the facts, and as to the solid information that reply contained, and with more than enough supporting science to blow your misinformation in the dirt, and you know it. If you had published the whole reply as you received it you wouldn't be able to take anything out of contest, nor remove any information that proves your statements to be lies. How twisted and sick do you have to be to keep on entirely lying about the information in front of you like you do. It was no different 3 years ago on the Argus, same thing. How sick do you have to be to keep on fabricating the twisted and false claims and statements that you do. I have as well never quoted blog posts nor articles and claimed them as science. I would have no need to because there is plenty of science in my listings that are obviously studies published right in as well Pubmed.

Why don't you and cant you just compare the science and data I have collected to what you have available? That in itself would shut this blog down, because you could never end up looking to be anything but a fool, and you know it. You can not and never could debate these subject matters in any honesty, not ever. Nothing could be more obvious. Face it. That reply is posted on blog just as it was sent to you, and anyone that goes there can see how twisted, fraudulent, and blatantly lying your statements are here.

What a very sick, sick, sick, and extremely twisted man. How do you even live with yourself. You need some serious, serious psychological help, which obviously you will never get. All you have ever been and continue to be is a huge detriment to society and anything good happening or being done whatsoever. You are a danger to the public well being and common good, as a fact. As a fact you are nothing but a complete liar and a deceiver, and representation of as well nothing but purely sick evil.  What an in denial, extremely SICK, and very twisted man you are, Mr.Editor!  


Well, here we go again, another reply was needed to be sent to this blog page, even though it should not have been unnecessary, had this said blogging editor actually published my first and original reply (seen above). Here is is, and exactly the way it was sent.

I am getting more than a little tired of that kind of persistent hypocrisy in your claims, in regard to your own personal attack on me throughout the pages of this blog, and as well in your allowing all the as a fact, slanderous reply comments to be published, that you have. Your continual and false self elevation to some sort of expert here and on these issues, is beyond laughable. A self proclaimed blogging expert with as well absolutely and intentionally, no personal identity. As far as statements of opinion; why is it that you claim to and believe that yours are the only ones that correct; no matter what the subject matter, and no matter how well founded your oppositions claims are.

Look at what you are doing here. All you had to do was publish my original and first reply, and be done with it. But oh no, you refused to do that, and here you are weeks later still avoiding the content of that reply and its reference material. Here you are still making pathetic and repeat false excuses, one after another, for why you could not publish that reply as it was. Here you are as well making reply posting rule after rule, that actually has and had nothing to do with the dis-allowance of that said reply. You simply refuse to allow the truth information and all that unbiased science to be promoted; it is to much truth. Your agenda is NOT truth' and it all to clearly never has been nor ever will be. Your agenda is one of self selective denial.

And don't even go there in any attempt to claim you have not been to my website, as you know exactly what is there, and that is why you refuse to link to any of its pages. You quite clearly used to as well scour the original site in an attempt to find some dirt, and you were never successful. You as well simply refuse to allow any readers know that I have a counter blog to this one, and/or to ever reference to it. What should that tell the readers, when you go on blogging and creating more and more titled blog pages, having never answered to the truth information that exists on that blog? A blog that contains many repeat copies of the rebuttal and correct information replies, you refused to publish on this blog.  

You see what you are avoiding here again is any realization as well of the fact that it is not just one study that is the total of the evidence. It is multiple studies and data all showing the same or similar findings. It is when you put that all together, that you have the total package of realization and understanding. So, what are you doing? You are again censoring the reply information you have been given. I do not find it acceptable, nor do I have any desire whatsoever to play along with your twisted censorship games, Editor.

However, even though I have explained to you the situation, and I could give you dozens of good vaccine harm and ASD related studies, I am going to give you a single study, to see what you come up with. Actually I am going to give you two studies, because they are somewhat interlinked as a basic info package.

The spectrum of ASIA: ‘Autoimmune (Auto-inflammatory) Syndrome induced by Adjuvants

PLoS One. 2009; 4(12): e8382. Published online 2009 December 31.
Self-Organized Criticality Theory of Autoimmunity


Systemic autoimmunity appears to be the inevitable consequence of over-stimulating the host's immune ‘system’ by repeated immunization with antigen, to the levels that surpass system's self-organized criticality.

By the way; when we get done with this, we can move on to the issue of aluminum vaccine adjuvants, combined with vaccine contamination. Be sure that you as well provide any counter studies in any arguments you make, and just your opinions, are of course, not acceptable. Claims as well from Paul Offit and the CDC, that dietary consumption of mercury and/or aluminum is the same thing as injected forms of it, and claimed to be handled by the human body and detoxed the same way, are as well and of course not acceptable, as it is not backed by any real physiological data nor science.

(end of that reply)


Start actually educating yourself to the facts, Editor!

The False Theory of Vaccine Derived - Herd Immunity

Children Worldwide Are Contracting The Very Diseases They Are Being Vaccinated Against

Vaccine failure admitted: Whooping cough outbreaks higher among children already vaccinated

Vaccinated kids account for 90 percent of child whooping cough cases in Vermont

Study: Whooping cough outbreak linked to vaccinated children

Post Vaccination - Vaccine Targeted Strain - Viral and Bacterial Pathogen - Shedding

Vaccine Contamination

Scientific proof that the known cancer causing SV40 virus, a previous contaminant in the polio vaccine, is obviously either contagious; or the virus is still in the vaccine/s.


Aluminum Adjuvants - Lack of Safety Data - Lack of Aluminum Adjuvant Safety Studies

The Vaccine Damage - Science, (the existing and available science right in Pubmed that the CDC continues to ignore)

Current Status of Aluminum Adjuvant Research

Vaccines’ Alum Adjuvant Path to Brain Found: Study

Newly published research by Keele Conference scientists shows that aluminum adjuvant in vaccines transfers to the brain. They have documented the path from injection site to the brain, and that once in the brain, it persists. Newborns, the elderly, and people with a certain genetic variation are particularly at risk.

Slow CCL2-dependent translocation of biopersistent particles from muscle to brain


Dr Andrew Wakefield Not Guilty Says BBC – General Medical Council Wrong

Dr Andrew Wakefield - MMR Vaccine - Truth and Reality

Callous Disregard

Callous Disregard-Supporting Research Studies

Biomedical Treatment in Autism (ASD)

New Junk Science Study - No link between 'too many vaccines' and autism risk

Vaccine Production With - Human Diploid Cells (aborted fetal cell tissue)

Proof that Big Pharma Doesn’t Care About Vaccine Harm, (SIDS deaths and hot lots)

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program - Payout Data

Now since 1989, and as of Jan. 2013; over 2 trillion dollars have been paid out from this vaccine caused injury and death compensation fund.  $2,550,640,666.73 is the current total figure paid out from this federal court system; which  includes attorney fees, (paid out, win or lose the case). Since the first Vaccine Injury Compensation claims were made in 1989, 3,110 compensation payments have been made, $2,389,329,250.45 disbursed to petitioners and $94,604,103.72 paid to cover attorney’s fees and other legal costs.

To date, 9,785 claims have been dismissed. Of those, 3,982 claimants were paid $52,680,057.05 to cover attorney’s fees and other legal costs

Failure Of The Continued Polio Vaccine Campaign

Paul Offit - Falsely Defends Thimerosal

Vaccine Quackery and Harm - Proven - Plain and Simple

Gardasil-The Real Truth

FDA Reply Letter - and Further Questions Raised on Gardasil

Informed Consent / Vaccine Risks Disclosure Form

Response to - The AAP Revises Their Vaccine Refusal Form - 2013
My responding comments will be found in [....] To shorten this expose, only the main highlighted and pertinent excerpts from these documents, will be put forth here. Read the full documents at the linked to urls below.

A Basic Understanding of Naturopathic Health Care


Chiropractic - Correcting Physiological Function and Strengthening Immunity

The False Foundations of Modern Medicine

The Real History of Medicine

Death By Medicine, (two well done studies show the truth; modern medicine and the whole system itself is now proven as a leading cause of death in the US). 

Cures, editor? What cures? Real cures? You call what pharma does, cures? What have they found the real cure to? To how many things? How can that be when they actually understand the real root causation, to nothing; and refuse to because there is no money in real cures nor real understanding? Are we all short of pharma chemicals and toxic and contaminated vaccines? Multiple vaccines will produce good health and resistance to disease? The truth is actually quite the opposite. But for you editor, NOTHING would be enough, you MUST deny it. The best you can come up with for an argument comes from the as well lying mis-informer, Gorski at nothing is actually science based, and certainly not real science? Wow, and that was the best you could do. 
doi:  10.1177/0960327112440111
PMCID: PMC3547435
Relative trends in hospitalizations and mortality among infants by the number of vaccine doses and age, based on the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 1990–2010
GS Goldman1 and NZ Miller2

VAERS is one of the largest databases containing adverse reactions reported in temporal association with vaccination. While some adverse events that are reported to VAERS may be unrelated to the recent vaccination, the VAERS database is an important postmarketing safety surveillance tool that is periodically analyzed by the CDC, FDA, and other vaccine researchers to discover potentially adverse vaccination trends. Using linear regression, several statistically significant trends were derived from the VAERS database: (a) a positive correlation between hospitalization rates and the number of vaccine doses (r 2 = 0.91); (b) a negative correlation between hospitalization rates and age (r 2 = 0.95); (c) an increased mortality rate associated with 5–8 vaccines relative to 1–4 vaccines; (d) a decreased mortality rate associated with children aged 0.5 to <1 year relative to those aged <0.5 year; and (e) a 1.4 male-to-female infant mortality ratio. These trends not only have a biological plausibility but are supported by evidence from case reports, case series, and other studies using entirely different methodologies and specific population cohorts.

Studies have not been conducted to determine the safety (or efficacy) of administering multiple vaccine doses in a variety of combinations as recommended by CDC guidelines. Our findings show a positive correlation between the number of vaccine doses administered and the percentage of hospitalizations and deaths reported to VAERS. In addition, younger infants were significantly more likely than older infants to be hospitalized or die after receiving vaccines. Since vaccines are administered to millions of infants every year, it is imperative that health authorities have scientific data from synergistic toxicity studies on all combinations of vaccines that infants are likely to receive; universal vaccine recommendations must be supported by such studies.

Adverse reaction trends detected in VAERS have important implications for vaccine recipients and health care providers. Finding ways to increase vaccine safety should be the highest priority. Further inspection of potential correlations between increasing vaccine doses, hospitalizations, and death is essential. Health care policy makers have an obligation to determine whether immunization schedules are achieving their desired goals.

                                                 Autism: 'Absolutely Vaccine Induced'

Vaccination: The Hidden Truth

With so much government and medical promotion of vaccination for prevention of disease, ironically, the important facts presented here come from the orthodox medicine's own peer-reviewed research. The result is a damning account of the ineffectiveness of vaccines and their often harmful effects.

It shows that parents are not being told the truth by the media, the Health Department and the medical establishment, with a medical doctor, Dr. Mark Donohoe, confessing that "It is a problem for me that I am part of a profession that is systematically lying to people."

Find out how vaccines are proven to be both useless and have harmful effects to your
health and how it is often erroneously believed to be compulsory.

Many people simply refuse to believe the truth regardless of how clear it is, but the impeccable documentation presented in this amazing video has changed the minds of many who have seen it.

No comments:

Post a Comment