Monday, January 16, 2012

Response to: The "Vax vs. Unvax" Study Myth

The "Vax vs. Unvax" Study Myth

Here AGAIN we have another page of personally attacking; full of intentionally delusional, twisted, and in denial of all-rants. A person could only wonder what he protects that requires that much and apparently necessary in his warped mind, denial. He knows he is wrong, and far to much as been shown to this said editor, to not know that. All it is is a very sick and repeat personal attack, and on any person or people that put forth the truth.

This reply was sent to the editor, but of course as always, will never be published. To much truth.


I actually don't think you should be posting another blog page until you can respond to the inaccuracies I pointed out in the previous one, and which you refused to publish. If you can not allow honest debate of the information; you have no business blogging; nor under this subject matter.

Here again you go on and on about that no science nor proof of anything has ever been put before you. That is a lie and you know it is a lie; and you know very well that you have never been able to respond to that information. You never have, except to deny that information is there and to control the information and the science that is here, and as to what you will allow the public to see and consider.

As to this current blog page; is there any information you can ever provide without going to Gorki, or the AAP?

The Proton in the Darkness article has some rebuttal that is and should be equally of interest to any possible readers, and you failed of course to consider that. In fact the entire focus of the article is a reply by a commentor on Gorksi's blog. So why are not such well written opposing views not to be of equal interest? The reply poster is passionlessDrone. 

The said Gorski commentor's reply contains nothing but a spin and a spin again and again of the numbers and a very biased rant attempting to make denial of the fact that any vaxed verses unvaxed study is worth while doing. And the said commentor would do that, while having an autistic child? Something smells a little rotten in Denmark? And posted on Gorki's blog of all places.

You can research it yourself the information concerning over 30,000 files belonging to the un-vaccinated at Homefirst Medical Community in Skokie, IL. The claim is that there is no autism, nor other degenerative and common disorders known of in today's children that go to public schools and received the full schedule of vaccines. In fact Dr. Mayer Eisenstein states there are only three cases of autism, and all three mothers received the mercury containing Rhogam shots. If you know Dr. Eisenstein at all; his credibility seems to me to be unquestionable. 

Being that the Amish have known a negative side as to genetic traits, attributable to the closeness in linage; that would suggest they likely should be more susceptible to autism, not less. If they really believe the Amish are genetically less prone to autism, then find out why; but they are not doing that. Why would that not be forth any investigation? 

To claim that a significantly large vaxed verses unvaxed study would be unethical; simply does not hold up because the sufficient existing numbers of un-vaccinated already exist in our population. If you also exist at all in our communities you should have seen or met some un-vaccinated children that are amazingly healthy. Instead the CDC would rather fear monger and send letters to suspected non-vaccinating parents, thus actually threatening and intimidating them by asking for their vaccination records. Pharma and CDC would rather throw their money at pushing legislation to eliminate any existing vaccine exemptions and parental rights anywhere.

Its interesting as well how they focus only on the Dan Olmstead information, and while there are other Amish communities they entirely disregard which are representative of large entirely un-vaccinated groups.

To claim that the entire country would need to be studied as to this investigation is clearly making denial of the need, by very selective and disingenuous me

End of reply:

Here is an article I think applies to you quite well, blogging editor, alias no identity Costner! Nothing would be ever be enough for your sick and demented ass to admit to anything. You clearly protect, something.


And of the vaccines and the vaccine ingredients they have studied, it amounts to how many? One vaccine, the MMR, and one ingredient, thimerosal! And you are going to claim, we have all the proof and the science we need; no vaccines have ever caused autism? And what about neurological and brain damage damage, and as well dysfunction and depletion of the immune system function itself. How about over activation of the brains microglia and chronic inflammation of the brain? Not possible? Safe and effective, right? 

Here are the vaccines and their ingredients.

Judging by the various methods as to the known success of bio-medical treatment in autism; it not just one vaccine nor one ingredient in vaccines that trigger autism. Diet, heavy metal detox, and antiviral detox have all worked in and as to that success. What works for one, or many; may need an added protocol for another. The fact that mainstream medicine and the CDC, refuse to look at that and.or investigate that said success in the reversal of autism, tells us they are more interesting in denying the truth. Of course, they obviously have far to much to lose. Everything and anything that doesn't support his, Costner's and/ or the CDC and mainstreams claims or views; is all only conspiracy theory? How selectively ignorant, intellectually dishonest, and flat out dumb is all that?  

Aluminum Adjuvant in Vaccines: A Smoking Gun Autism Link?

The study’s focus is on the adjuvant aluminum. It’s a known neurotoxin that’s commonly used in vaccines. Of the 32 currently recommended vaccines for preschool children in the US, 18 contain aluminum. 

Although the etiology of 90% of ASD is still largely unknown, a growing body of scientific literature shows that neuroimmune abnormalities (i.e., abnormal cytokine profiles, neuroinflammation and presence of autoantibodies against brain proteins) occur in ASD patients and may contribute to the diversity of ASD phenotypes.

Al [aluminum] is an experimentally demonstrated neurotoxin whose ability to impact the human nervous system has been known for decades.

Read more:

Do aluminum vaccine adjuvants contribute to the rising prevalence of autism?

Excerpt form the conclusion:

We have thus provided a hypothesis which we hope will encourage future research into this area in order to resolve the issue of whether or not vaccines might be responsible in some part for the growing prevalence of autism in the developed world. Such future research should consider the following: (i) the postnatal period represents a very sensitive phase in development during which the physiology of the nervous as well as the immune system can be influenced and sometimes permanently changed [8,9,118,119,152–154]; (ii) Al is neurotoxin and a strong immune adjuvant (Table 1), hence Al has all the necessary biochemical properties to induce neurological and immune disorders; and (iii) autism is a multisystem disorder characterized by dysfunctional immunity and impaired brain function [17,20,22]. Because the current safety data for Al exposure in infants and children is unsatisfactory and because this demographic represents those who may be most at risk for complications following vaccination, a more rigorous evaluation of Al adjuvant safety than what has been provided to date seems warranted

Federal Vaccine Court Orders U.S. Government Pay an Estimated $20 Million for Lifetime Care to Child With Autism Just as New Book Exploring the Link Between Mercury-Containing Vaccines and Autism Is Released

The Unanswered Question Study
83 Cases of Autism Associated with Childhood Vaccine Injury Compensated in Federal Vaccine Court

A government program (NVCA) has been quietly paying awards to vaccine-injured children with autism for two decades but continues to deny vaccine-autism link. SafeMinds calls for immediate Congressional investigations.

83 Cases of Autism Associated with Childhood Vaccine Injury Compensated in Federal Vaccine Court

Would it editor, cause you to feel betrayed by the CDC and the media, if the studies and the science that replicate Wakefield's study, work, and findings, actually did exist? You remember the CDC stated that study has never been replicated anywhere. THEY LIED! And they know they lied. Actually that 1998 published study was verified again by Dr. Singh and in as well other studies that have been done. Many more studies even though they are not of similar study design, as well clearly support that finding.

Dr. Andrew Wakefield defends himself on Fox & Friends

Dr. Andrew Wakefield sues BMJ, journalist Brian Deer for defamation

(Brian) Deer in the Headlights...

Tim Bolen...

BMJ had secret financial ties to Merck during publication of articles attacking Wakefield

Dr. Andrew Wakefield has filed a defamation lawsuit in Travis County, Texas district court against The British Medical Journal(BMJ), Fiona Godlee, the journal’s editor, and Brian Deer, a writer working for the BMJ.

The Dr Wakefield Justice: Honor, Truth, Integrity: Fund Deception, Lies, Defamation:

The Litigation:

Demand Letter: Re: False and defamatory statements published by the British Medical 
Journal, Mr. Brian Deer and Dr. Godlee

The Court Filing:

Here is a set of some well done analysis as to the validity and credibility of the epidemiological studies they claim show that vaccines do not cause autism.

In my study of it, it is not only the MMR that is contributing to the rise in autism but aluminum and mercury as well in utero. The benefits of biomedical treatment in autism has shown that it is not only the diet changes that are needed to heal the gut in autistic children, but as well many children have needed heavy metal detox and as some well antiviral treatment to bring about the complete package of major improvement that is seen. What does mainstream have to offer; more drugs! 

Mechanisms of Aluminum Adjuvant Revealed: Vaccine Risks to Children Clarified

Mechanisms of aluminum adjuvant toxicity and autoimmunity in pediatric populations

The spectrum of ASIA: ‘Autoimmune (Auto-inflammatory) Syndrome induced by Adjuvants

Self-Organized Criticality Theory of Autoimmunity

Systemic autoimmunity appears to be the inevitable consequence of over-stimulating the host's immune ‘system’ by repeated immunization with antigen, to the levels that surpass system's self-organized criticality.

Journal of Autoimmunity 36 (2011) 4e


Autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants
Yehuda Shoenfeld a,b,*, Nancy Agmon-Levin a

Current Medicinal Chemistry, 2011, 18, 2630-2637
© 2011 Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.

Aluminum Vaccine Adjuvants: Are they Safe?

Aluminum and Vaccine Ingredients: What Do We Know? What Don’t We Know?
Lawrence B. Palevsky, MD, FAAP

Aluminum hydroxide injections lead to motor deficits and motor
neuron degeneration

Published papers

Using "Zeta Potential" as a Healing Tool, (related and applicable to the information on the adverse effect of aluminum adjuvants)

Why Everyone Should Supplement with Vitamin D

Vaccines and Immunization Harm - References and Research Citations

Vaccines and the Scientific Studies

49 Doses of 14 Vaccines Before Age 6?

Alarming New Studies: 50% of U.S. Children Have Chronic Disease/Disorders, 21% Developmentally Disabled

Mercury, Autism & The Global Vaccine Agenda : Dr David Ayoub M.D. (Listen to the last half to two thirds of this video, as to vaccine cause of infertility and as well what is sated about population control.

Cancer & vaccination quotes

Another practitioner, Dr. W. B. Clarke of Indiana, finds that "Cancer was practically unknown until compulsory vaccination with cowpox vaccine began to be introduced. I have had to deal with at least two hundred cases of cancer, and I never saw a case of cancer in an unvaccinated person."

I will never stop putting forth the truths as to this issue. Far to much needless damage is being done. They have to much to lose, and you will NEVER get the truth from pharma, the CDC, FDA, nor mainstream medicine

No comments:

Post a Comment