Response is also provided below on this page, to his most recent page titled: Could a Lack of Vitamin D Lead to a Higher Risk of Autism?
Here we go again. First, how many times does alias no identity Costner, need to be shown again and again the error in what he claims to as to Dr. Andrew Wakefield? And as well as to what the major main stream media has claimed. I have extensively addressed this Wakefield issue before in this very blog, and also on my website. He just continues again and again with the lies; as if he has seen and read nothing.
Here are again some brief examples below in italics, of the Wakefield misinformation from his said and referenced to blog page. Funny thing how he has from day one refused to reference to my counter blog page. He has refused as well to publish any replies from me that show the error in any of the claims on his blog pages. Either he refuses to, or he distorts and lies about what those replies contained.
Granted Wakefield's "study" was originally published in a reputable medical journal (the Lancet) so people assumed it was at least factual. With time however, people soon discovered that Wakefield acted unethically when he performed his research. He manipulated and fabricated patient records. He paid children to give him blood samples. He left out key information that would have countered his claims, and he failed to mention that he had collected hundreds of thousands of dollars from trial lawyers for testifying against vaccine manufacturers (a blatant conflict of interest that he never disclosed).
As Brian Deer from the UK's The Sunday Times reported: However, our investigation, confirmed by evidence presented to the General Medical Council (GMC), reveals that: In most of the 12 cases, the children’s ailments as described in The Lancet were different from their hospital and GP records. Although the research paper claimed that problems came on within days of the jab, in only one case did medical records suggest this was true, and in many of the cases medical concerns had been raised before the children were vaccinated. Hospital pathologists, looking for inflammatory bowel disease, reported in the majority of cases that the gut was normal. This was then reviewed and the Lancet paper showed them as abnormal.
Eventually Wakefield's dishonesty and unethical behavior did in fact catch up with him, and ten of the original thirteen co-authors of the original study formally retracted their names from it. Eventually the General Medical Council in the U.K. recommended that his license to practice medicine be revoked, which it subsequently was. His original study was retracted from the very journal that had originally published it, he was forced out of the organization he was working for here in the US, and his follow-up study where he attempted to blame autism in animals on vaccines was also withdrawn.
Really? Is that a fact? I sent this information in a reply to his blog page, but of course he refused to publish it much less address any of it. Maybe he needs it all excerpted to him, or in some way be forced to actually read the truth, from the truth sources?
And you could ask, just how did the GMC get away with this kind of misconduct, and with their own massive conflict of interest going on like that. And the national and world media are so controlled by the power and the money, that they have not a clue! If they do, they are clearly never going to reveal it.
Murdoch and Vaccines: Exposure of Crimes Reveals a Much Larger Story, the real story on how and why Wakefield was taken down. Look at the conflict of interest that has NEVER been revealed? How do they get away with that?
LOOK at the massive conflict of interest! And yet they claim it was Wakefield that had the conflict of interest and that he was a fraud?
Excerpt: Brian Deer is the reporter who savaged Dr Wakefield from the pages of the Sunday Times, a paper managed by Rupert Murdoch’s son James Murdoch who is on the board of GlaxoSmithKline which makes the MMR. Deer researched his case with the help of Medico-Legal Investigations, a private enquiry company whose only source of funding is the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry. Deer was both the journalist writing on Wakefield and the person who brought a case of fitness to practice medicine to the General Medical Council, and then wrote about the proceedings as well.[Oh and that is JUST the beginning, read more!!!! I outlined that before on the blog and on the site, but this revelation goes allot deeper than that did.]
Rupert Murdoch, the devil incarnate. Actually read the detailed information in the article below!
BREAKING NEWS: In the midst of Rupert Murdoch scandal, newly surfaced evidence points to a widespread Vaccine Industry-Media-Gov’t “hand-in-glove team effort” strategy to discredit Dr. Andrew Wakefield & vilify his findings.
Why Medical Authorities Went to Such Extremes to Silence Dr. Andrew Wakefield, (with a list of 28 studies from around the world that support Dr. Wakefield’s controversial findings).
Does Ms. Dyer truly believe that "measles cases are on the rise around the world" because Dr. Wakefield said during a 1998 press conference, that if he had a choice, he would give his own children monovalent measles, mumps and rubella vaccines, still a NHS parental option at the time?
Is Ms. Dyer aware that according to the Health Protection Agency, the number of reported measles cases in the UK kept dropping after 1998 and only exceeded the 1998 figures ten years later, when there were several measles outbreaks worldwide? (1)
Does she realize that in fact, there were strikingly fewer reported measles cases in England in the 10 years that followed Wakefield's 1998 paper (28,289 cases) than in the 10 years that preceded its publication (188,483 cases)? (1)
Does she know that there were 43,010 reported cases of measles in the UK from 1993 through 1997 compared to 13,981 reported cases from 1998 though 2002, an equal five year span? (1)
Is she aware that there were 14 (fourteen) reports to the US Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System describing symptoms of autism appearing after MMR vaccinations before October 5, 1997 - when just about no one in the United States had ever heard of Andrew Wakefield? (2)
Then Costner goes on further in the said blog page to claim to and make this erroneous claim, backed by a study done in Japan.
Interestingly enough, I stumbled across a study published in The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry entitled "No effect of MMR withdrawal on the incidence of autism: a total population study". This study (an actual peer-reviewed study published in a reputable journal mind you) examined the incidence of autism spectrum disorders (ASD) in Japanese children who were born between 1988 and 1996 to determine if the incidence of ASD would rise after the MMR vaccine was no longer being administered (Japan stopped using the MMR vaccine in 1992).
Now read a well done analysis on that study; showing the real truth about the validity that study! The MMR was simply replaced with the single shot regime; the same vaccine essentially was still there. Read as well about the conflict if interest in that study, and the tie back directly again to one Rupert Murdoch! You see Costner hasn't a clue; he believes anything he is told by the mainstream and the CDC!
No effect of MMR withdrawal on the incidence of autism: a total population study
Excerpt: 5. "No effect of MMR withdrawal on the incidence of autism: a total population study"
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, Hideo Honda, Michael Rutter
Conflicts statement from the study:
None noted, an egregious omission given what is known about Dr. Michael Rutter of the UK: Not only is Dr. Rutter a paid expert witness for vaccine makers facing litigation regarding the MMR vaccine, he was also a board member of the Wellcome Foundation, a front foundation for Glaxo Smithkline, a vaccine maker. Dr. Rutter is also a primary witness in the case against Dr. Andrew Wakefiled, a British doctor who published a paper implicating MMR vaccine in autism.
Part 2: Vaccines and Autism - What Do Epidemiological Studies Really Tell Us?
■ The study tells us little about ASD incidence of ASD prior to 1988, when MMR was introduced. But we do know that the published prevalence of ASD did not exceed 25-per-10,000 at any time in Japan prior to 1988.
■ Annual incidence of ASDs for children born in 1987 was 20-per-10,000, but after MMR was introduced, in 1988, annual incidence more than quadrupled, to 85.9-per-10,000 for children born in 1990.
■ But then, MMR coverage began to decline dramatically, as concerns over the mumps viral component grew. ASD incidence likewise declined during this period, to 55.8 for children born in 1991 – representing a drop of 35%.
■ Following complete discontinuation of MMR in 1993, ASD incidence rose again, this time quite dramatically, to 161-per-10,000 for children born in 1994. However, during this time the recommended schedule was changed to include three single vaccines (M-M-R, given four weeks apart), which gained widespread acceptance, causing coverage to increase significantly.
■ For all practical purposes, children vaccinated according to the new schedule were still receiving 'M-M-R' at around age one. Giving the three separate vaccines in such close proximity amounts to overlapping exposure, in biological terms.
■ Early MMR trials showed clear evidence of 'interference' between the viruses in the combined vaccine, mediated through an altered immune response. The safety consequences of this 'interference' are completely unknown.
■ Children who have natural measles (or single measles vaccine) and natural mumps infections within the same year are at significantly greater risk of later inflammatory bowel disease,[19] which is consistent with an 'interference' phenomenon that could increase the risk of long-term measles virus infection and delayed disease.
■ The authors are wrong to examine MMR as the single exposure of interest, when in biological terms, exposure to M-M-R through three consecutive monovalent vaccines actually increased after 1993 when MMR was discontinued.
■ The data, therefore, could be interpreted as indicating a major influence of the pattern of exposure to these vaccine viruses on ASD incidence in this Japanese population.
■ More importantly, the data suggest a possible re-challenge effect of close temporal exposure to these three vaccine viruses on ASD incidence at the population level, whereby the exposure (MMR) has been introduced, removed (voluntarily through lack of public confidence), and then re-introduced (as M, M, and R close together).
■ ASD numbers increased and decreased in direct proportion to the total number of children vaccinated with the three live viruses. There is evidence of an effect not only from de-challenges and re-challenges, but there is also a “dose-response” relationship on a population level.
■ Such a dose-response relationship on a population level is rare; and is evidence of a possible causal association.
■ The interpretation by Public Health officials that this is the “last word on the subject” and that these data prove that MMR is safe is misleading and suggests a very limited perspective of the issues and a misunderstanding of published concerns on viral interference in a trivalent live-virus vaccine.
Undisclosed Conflict of Interest: Co-author Michael Rutter has close associations with the drug industry, including GlaxoSmithKline. He was a paid expert witness on their behalf in the UK MMR vaccine damage litigation. That was not declared in the Honda/Rutter paper.
SUMMARY:
Despite the methodological problems in Honda et al., and quite apart from the fact that an ecological study of this kind cannot be used to make attributions about causality, the unrecognized challenge-rechallenge effect of vaccination on autism rates in Japan provide yet another piece of support for the MMR-autism link. Because this study failed to clearly interpret the true population risk in the exposure of interest--assuming the removal of an exposure that in reality had remained-- the conclusions drawn by the authors are based on erroneous reasoning. Although drawing overly strong conclusions about an association between MMR-type exposures and autism would be premature in light of the study’s ecological design constraints, the data clearly indicate that further scrutiny of the data is required.
Strong Evidence MMR, Thiomersal & Other Vaccines Cause Autism - A Population Level Rechallenge in Japan, (an in depth analysis of the study). Actually read it! Look, even whale.to can show you the clear flaws in that study! Your hated source.
MMR - Autism Epidemiological Studies: Just A Distraction
By: Dr. F. Edward Yazbak
Another well done analysis of that Japanese study!
Excerpt: In their Commentary on Red Flags (March 7, 2005) entitled "Japanese study is the strongest evidence yet for a link between MMR and autism" Drs. Wakefield and Stott, reviewing the epidemiological research of the Japanese study, showed that the conclusions of the authors were not justified and that in fact, an opposite conclusion was more viable.
Here is also my reply to Costner's most recent and current page created right after this one! Rather than wasting the time to create another page to present that. I sent this reply as well to alias no identity Costner at his blog, but likely as well, will never be published.
There is no doubt that vitamin D3 improves the functions of the immune system, and thus serves to help with detoxification and as well modulation and strengthening of the immune system. In other words when the immune system functions at its best it also is better at coping with viral components of vaccines, as well as natural viruses. Detoxification then becomes more well managed within the body as well. So it would stand to proper reason that vitamin D3 would help a child withstand the onslaught of multiple childhood vaccines.
Although glutathione is essential for detoxification, it may also be that vitamin D helps in regard to production of essential element as well.
But then you are also the person who denies that toxins in the body have an adverse effect on health, and that detox plays an essential and necessary role in health care! Wow, you really do refuse to get it don't you?
So, where are you getting so far, attempting to claim vaccines are not the cause of autism? Are you actually that incompetent in your ability to do research? How about use of common sense? You again call that science that discredits vaccines as a cause of autism? Wow. And you will NEVER publish it; just like all the rest of the replies that showed your error! Have you at all looked up or researched what else vitamin D can do for human health? Of course not.
----------------------
You know what Costner? I think YOU need to give it up! You should know far better by now! What a warped mind!
It seems to me Costner, that YOUR pro-vaccine world is crumbling before your very eyes. My goal is vaccine truth, and only that in regard to vaccines; and so that people have proper truth information to base these very important decisions on.
Another blog page full of endless crap as always, lets start with a couple claims alias no identity Costner, made.
I recently wrote a post about vaccines and infant mortality, and as you may expect, Mr. Hubbs didn't appreciate data and statistics that serve to destroy his misheld beliefs. As a result, Mr. Hubbs tried to direct me to an opinion piece to claim vaccines actually cause higher rates of infant mortality along with him rambling on about SIDS (as he has done so often in the past). Unfortunately, Mr. Hubbs once again displays the fact that he fails to understand correlation does not equal causation.
I see you again used your typical tactics of refusing to actually link to the information and the study that you claim is only an opinion piece. Refusing to actual link to the study so people can actually see what is there, is again representative of a quite high level of deception. Apparently your intellectual dishonesty has hit one of its high points here Costner, because anyone that actual can read the study, knows that what it contains is far from just opinion. The document is not an opinion based article, it is an actual study published in a peer reviewed journal, regardless of if or not you choose to face and accept what it found.
"There is no such thing as SIDS" ~Lowell Kevin Hubbs
However, if there really is no such thing as SIDS how do you explain SIDS deaths in non-vaccinated kids? Here are a few studies that have focused on SIDS - none of which have found a statistical difference between vaccinated and unvaccinated infants:
Jonville-Bera AP, Autret E, Laugier J. Sudden infant death syndrome and diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis-poliomyelitis vaccination status. Fundam Clin Pharmacol 1995;9(3):263-70.
Carvajal A, et al. [DTP vaccine and infant sudden death syndrome. Meta-analysis] Med Clin (Barc) 1996 May 4;106(17):649-52.
Mitchell EA, Stewart AW, Clements M. Immunisation and the sudden infant death syndrome. New Zealand Cot Death Study Group. Arch Dis Child 1995 Dec;73(6):498-501.
I really don't expect Mr. Hubbs to be able to explain these studies - in fact I'm quite sure they are far beyond his reading comprehension level. Even if he did take the time to actually review them he would soon find out they disagree with his viewpoints, which is why (as always) Mr. Hubbs will just simply choose to ignore the science and the data as he continues his quest to make the world a dumber place. He will then attempt to change the subject to some other topic such as random 'toxins' in vaccines or he will return to his pattern of accusing someone of hacking his computer or hiring a hitman to silence him.
In my parents and grandparents day, SIDS was unheard of, period! They can say what they want in their studies. Now you hear of it allot. Just read the obituaries as well. The problem is as well that coroners often make a SIDS diagnosis for anything and everything they can not conclusively determine, (such as an adverse vaccine reaction). No matter what just vaccinated time line circumstances were known; and no matter what the parents seen and knew; it matters not.
And really Costner? I clearly suspect you did not even read those studies yourself, other than the conclusions. How many times have you seen me do it, and seen me show you how dumb these (your) studies are, with multiple holes every time - all the way through them, Costner! No analysis nor link to an accurate analysis has ever been enough for you.
The first one of course the Clinical Pharmcology study; they aren't ever biased in their predetermined outcome studies, are they ...Costner?
Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 1995;9(3):263-70.
It is hard to tell from only the abstract and exactly from this study, if they only tested DTCP, the Europes version of DPT, or if other vaccines were used?
(This section)
There was a statistical difference between vaccination status of SIDS cases and controls aged less than three months. Nine percent of SIDS cases under 3 months had been vaccinated whereas the matched controls had not. In our study DTCP vaccination was not a risk factor for SIDS; although more of the SIDS infants less than 3 months of age had been vaccinated. This result however, concerns only one subgroup of the population studied and needs to be confirmed with another study of only SIDS infants less than 3 months of age, because DTCP vaccination was not a risk factor for SIDS when considering the total sample of the study.
Analysis: Does that actually sound conclusive to you Costner? It sure doesn't sound so to me; and what about if you included 2000 children or more, or 10,000; instead of just the 118 SIDS and 332 control children?
---------------------
Med Clin (Barc). 1996 May 4;106(17):649-52.
[DTP vaccine and infant sudden death syndrome. Meta-analysis].
Analysis: Just another epidemiological study like all the rest that can be twisted the numbers any way they want, depending on what they want to find, and the abstract does not even state how many children were in the study. Check out what it states about those studies below!
---------------------
Med Clin (Barc). 1996 May 4;106(17):649-52.
[DTP vaccine and infant sudden death syndrome. Meta-analysis].
Mitchell EA, Stewart AW, Clements M. Immunisation and the sudden infant death syndrome. New Zealand Cot Death Study Group. Arch Dis Child 1995 Dec;73(6):498-501.
British Medical Association.
Results: Infants were at increased risk of SIDS if they had not received the 6 week, 3 month, and 5 month immunisations. After controlling for potential confounding variables, including those which measured health care use and infant illness, the relative risk of SIDS for infants not being immunised at 6 weeks was 2.1 (95% confidence interval = 1.2, 3.5). Four percent of cases died within four days of immunisation and 7.6% of control infants had been immunised within four days of the nominated date. There was a reduced chance of SIDS in the four days immediately following immunisation (OR = 0.5; 95% CI = 0.2 to 0.9).
Analysis: Are you kidding me, what a bunch of crap! And just exactly how would vaccinations protect for SIDS? Did any of the children live in an know area were so called infection was proven prevented to a so called vaccine preventable disease? That's just like when the American Academy of Pediatrics did a study claiming that mercury, thimerosal, (a neuro-toxin) improved the the functioning scores of children.
And here Costner, you linked to a CDC article on SIDS; who would have guessed? And then an AAP study; I am sure their honesty and trust worthy claims are absolutely impeccable? Auugh!
-----------------------------
Ok now, pay attention here Costner! Read carefully and pay attention!!!!
Here is your statement below: Yet you couldn't even actually link to that study.
I should also mention that the Immunization Safety Review Committee was established by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) to evaluate the evidence of possible causal associations between immunizations and certain adverse outcomes. The Committee concluded that there is no evidence of a causal relationship between these vaccines and sudden infant death syndrome, sudden unexpected death in infancy, or neonatal death. I suppose the IOM is in on some vast conspiracy too though... so I suppose they aren't a trustworthy source when compared to a bastion of knowledge such as whale.to (sarcasm intended).
Now see if you can follow some of this science, Costner!
Why case-control studies showed no association between Sudden Infant Death Syndrome and vaccinations
Valentina A. Soldatenkova, MSc
3. Conclusion
Systematic inclusion of higher proportions of vaccinated living controls in case-control studies which investigated asso-ciation between SIDS and vaccines as well as unusually low vaccination coverage among study infants younger than 3 months in all but one reviewed study constitutes potential selec-tion bias.
Thus, the finding: “The evidence is inadequate to accept or reject a causal relation between SIDS and vaccines” is more scientifically sound and appropriate than the conclusion the Institute of Medicine committee published in their 2003 report:
“The evidence does not support a causal link between sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) and either the diphtheria, tetanus, and whole-cell pertussis (DTwP) vaccine or exposure to multiple childhood vaccines.” [17]
[Based on this review, the committee concluded that the evidence favors rejection of a causal relationship between some vaccines and SIDS; and that the evidence is inadequate to accept or reject a causal relationship between other vaccines and SIDS, SUDI, or neonatal death.
The committee found no basis for a review of current immunization policies, but saw a clear need for continued research on adverse event following vaccination and on the biological basis for sudden unexpected infant deaths.]
Pretty conclusive huh, Costner! Is that why you didn't actually link to the study? Meaning, you obviously did not even read it. They don't have a clue!
Here is your other falsely believed noteworthy study!
Sudden Unexpected Infant Deaths, CDC
EXcerpt: For a medical examiner or coroner to determine the cause of the death, a thorough case investigation including examination of the death scene and a review of the infant’s clinical history must be conducted. A complete autopsy needs to be performed, ideally using information gathered from the scene investigation. Even when a thorough investigation is conducted, it may be difficult to separate SIDS from other types of sudden unexpected infant deaths, especially accidental suffocation in bed.
After a thorough case investigation, many of these sudden unexpected infant deaths may be explained. Poisoning, metabolic disorders, hyper or hypothermia, neglect and homicide, and suffocation are all explainable causes of SUID.
So, in other words the CDC intentionally attempted to explain away the diagnosis of SIDS by any other means they could. Just like the FDA and the CDC did with Gardasil; when the obvious was right in front of them. No link found, ever. If they admitted it they would be screwed in every way!
International Trends in Sudden Infant Death Syndrome: Stabilization of Rates Requires Further Action
Excerpts: [SUDDEN INFANT DEATH syndrome (SIDS) is the leading cause of death among infants between 1 month and 1 year of age in the developed world. In the United States, SIDS accounts for 22% of all postneonatal deaths.1 Many countries have launched educational campaigns in an effort to prevent SIDS, focusing on the modifiable factors that had been shown previously to be associated with SIDS.2 Although campaigns vary in the content of their other messages, the leading message of every campaign has been avoidance of the prone position for sleeping infants. Dramatic declines in SIDS have been attributed to these campaigns, which were found to be primarily a result of decreases in prone-sleeping rates.3–9
Finally, in addition to infant sleep positioning, other well-established risk factors should receive attention,
such as maternal smoking in pregnancy, infant overheating, and soft bedding.15,53,54 These are especially important in countries that have achieved high supine sleeping rates and which have seen increases in other
risk factors such as smoking among women.55,56.
In addition, research that investigates the underlying pathophysiological etiology (or etiologies) of SIDS should be ongoing, because it is likely that reaching the goal of eliminating SIDS will occur only when we fully identify its causes.]
Do in other words all they did was advocate change in the sleeping position of the infant/child to the side or face up. And in years past and before vaccines and all the vaccines being added, SIDS was comparitvely rare and literally unheard of and babies sleep any way and in any position at all. And no I do not trust the numbers, and right here as stated is a good reason why epidemiological and case control studies can not be trusted to give accurate results, and there is much more information on it all, below. Read the studies. They do not have accurate numbers, it sounds more like it is all over the place, as uncertain.
Why case-control studies showed no association between Sudden Infant Death Syndrome and vaccinations
Here's a better pubmed study for YOU Costner! Something better than the junk science the IOM put forth! Imagine that; but I expect you will not be able to understand science like that, nor explain that study - in fact I'm quite sure it is far beyond your reading comprehension level. Why? Because you only choose to see what you want to and what fits into your safe and effective .... B.S. agenda!
Pediatr Infect Dis. 1983 Jan-Feb;2(1):7-11.
Possible temporal association between diphtheria-tetanus toxoid-pertussis vaccination and sudden infant death syndrome
Baraff LJ, Ablon WJ, Weiss RC.
Abstract
Because diphtheria and tetanus toxoids pertussis (DTP) vaccine is routinely given during the period of highest incidence of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), this study was undertaken to determine if there is a temporal association between DTP immunization and SIDS. Parents of 145 SIDS victims who died in Los Angeles County between January 1, 1979, and August 23, 1980, were contacted and interviewed regarding their child's recent immunization history. Fifty-three had received a DTP immunization. Of these 53, 27 had received a DTP immunization within 28 days of death. Six SIDS deaths occurred within 24 hours and 17 occurred within 1 week of DTP immunization. These SIDS deaths were significantly more than expected were there no association between DTP immunization and SIDS. An additional 46 infants had a physician/clinic visit without DTP immunization prior to death. Forty of these infants died within 28 days of this visit, seven on the third day and 22 within the first week following the visit. These deaths were also significantly more than expected. These data suggest a temporal association between DTP immunization, physician visits without DTP immunization and SIDS.
Refuse This Routine Procedure - Or Expose Your Baby's Brain to Severe Danger...Hepatis B Vaccine.
Excerpt: Routine use of the hepatitis B vaccine for all newborns began in 1992, and according to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), operated jointly by the CDC and FDA, there were 36,788 officially reported adverse reactions to hepatitis B vaccines between 1992 and 2005. Of these, 14,800 were serious enough to cause hospitalization, life-threatening health events or permanent disabilities.
And 781 people were reported to have DIED following hepatitis B vaccination -- and this is likely an underestimate because only a fraction of the serious health problems, including deaths, following vaccination are ever acknowledged due to a lack of public awareness about how to recognize signs and symptoms of vaccine reactions.
Excerpts: Hepatitis B vaccine as a cause of sudden infant death (SIDS) has not been ruled out.
The mere observation that the incidence of SIDS has decreased while hepatitis B immunisation rates have increased proves nothing whatsoever. In other contexts, the Back to Sleep campaign is credited with a dramatic fall in SIDS; the fall might have been much greater without hepatitis B immunisations. The presence of findings such as brain edema in healthy infants who die very soon after receiving hepatitis B vaccine is profoundly disturbing, especially in view of the frequency of neurologic symptoms in the VAERS.
The fact that vaccine just happens to be given during the time period that babies are most likely to die of SIDS complicates the analysis. Also, there are a number of other confounding variables (sleep position, socioeconomic status, and possibly smoking behavior). The data in VAERS are probably too incomplete to answer the questions. A very detailed statistical analysis and an aggressive attempt to obtain more complete information are urgently needed. Glib reassurance, based on the secular trends shown to this Committee, is dangerous.
And don't forget VAERS has a known only 1 to 10% reporting factor, due to doctors and pediatricians indoctrinated reluctance to report a severe vaccine reaction or death; although required to. They simply think it is not possible, and will look for anything else but. Then they turn around even despite the VAERS data and claims severe and damaging reactions are rare. It is not rare within the NVCA either, when you know of the endless many cases wrongfully turned away as well. Unreasonable time lines or due to only what they unreasonably again, say qualifies. Then more yet lose, in actual federal court.
STATEMENT of the ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN PHYSICIANS & SURGEONS to the Subcommittee on Criminal Justice, Drug Policy, and Human Resources of the Committee on Government Reform U.S. House of Representatives RE: Submitted by Jane Orient, M.D.
June 14, 1999 Mr. Chairman and Members of the Subcommittee:
The Dangers of Excessive Childhood Vaccinations
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2008/04/01/the-dangers-of-excessive-childhood-vaccinations.aspx
Why a Shingles Epidemic is Bolting Straight at the U.S.
Posted on: November 2, 2010
The incidence of adult shingles has increased by a stunning 90% -- just from 1998 to 2003. Discover the facts about the ONLY way to establish lifelong robust immunity, and how that immunity is now being systematically destroyed…
Aren't vaccines great? Its all about the.... MONEY!
------------------------
See if you can comprehend the significance of THIS study Costner. Explain that study - in fact I'm quite sure it is far beyond your reading comprehension level. Hint: it has to do with the differences between vaccine derived antibody claims to immunity, and difference between that and the immunity derived from natural immunity.
The Suppression of Immune System Disorders by Passive Attrition
The Possible Role of Vaccines in Causing Retrogressive Changes: Reminiscences of America’s Children in the 1930s, and the Profound Changes That Have Taken Place Since Then.
Advisory Commission on Childhood Vaccines Meeting
Vaccine Safety Advocate Harold E Buttram, MD, Presentation
Primary Immunization of Premature Infants with Gestational Age <35 Weeks: Cardiorespiratory Complications and C-Reactive Protein Responses Associated with Administration of Single and Multiple Separate Vaccines Simultaneously.
Current childhood vaccine programs: An overview with emphasis on the Measles-Mumps-Rubella (MMR) vaccine and of its compromising of the mucosal immune system
Vaccine Scene 2001: Update and Overview, (101 references).
Harold E Buttram, MD
How unnatural vaccine derived antibody immunity differs greatly natural immunity. Man can NOT even come close to duplicating what we have created within... naturally. Realize the differences, and this along with all the vaccine toxins in vaccines, is exactly why children with the large increase in vaccines are only becoming more and more unhealthy!
Excerpt: However, vaccine proponents would have us believe that vaccines have been largely responsible for controlling virtually all of the former epidemics of killer diseases in the U.S.A. With the exceptions cited above, the facts do not bear this out.
According to the records of the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, from 1911 to 1935 the four leading causes of childhood deaths from infectious diseases in the U.S.A. were
However, by 1945 the combined death rates from these causes had declined by 95% before the implementation of mass vaccine programs.(l) Other statistical information provided much the same pattern.(2)
According to a report in Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, July 30, 1999, improvements in
* sanitation
* water quality
* hygiene
and the introduction of antibiotics have been the most important factors in control of infectious diseases in the past century. Although vaccines were mentioned, they were not included among the major factors.(3)
Another factor, which is commonly overlooked, is that the virulence of micro-organisms tends to be weakened or attenuated with the passage of time and with the serial passages through human hosts.(4)
Also, populations develop immunity with continued or repeated exposure.
One example of this is whooping cough (pertussis) which is clearly a milder disease in Western nations than it was 100 or so years ago.
The MMR Vaccine (Measles - Mumps - Rubella) and Autism:
In our own practice we have carried out a partial sampling of the charts of autistic children seen here in the year 2000. Among 32 charts that were reviewed, it was found that in 16 cases (50%) the onset of autistic features in a previously normal child took place in a time-related fashion following the MMR vaccine.
It is important to point out that an uncombined measles vaccine had been in use in the U.S.A. since 1961, with only a slight rise in autism from 1961 to 1975 when the combined MMR vaccine came into use, bringing with it the sharp increases in autism. As a result of this, some are coming to believe that the 3 vaccines should be given separately, about which more will be said later.
In our opinion, one of the prime researchers in the field of autism is Vijendra Singh, Ph.D., Department of Biology, Utah State University, who published the report of a study in which he found that a large majority of autistic children tested had antibodies to brain tissue in the form of antibodies to myelin basic protein. He also found a strong correlation between myelin basic protein antibodies and antibodies to measles (almost all of the children had been immunized with the MMR vaccine, and none had had these diseases).(54)
Childhood Immunizations and the Increasing Incidence of Atopy (Allergies):
Excerpts:The increasing incidence of allergic disorders in Western nations is now universally recognized, with every third child in industrialized societies having an allergic disorder.(66) In some areas the incidence of asthma has increased 200% in the past 20 years.(67) Another survey showed a 46% increase in death rate nationwide from asthma between 1977 and 1991.(68)
There is a school of thought that the so-called minor childhood illnesses of former times, including measles, mumps, rubella (German measles), and chicken pox, which entered the body through the mucous membranes, served a necessary and positive purpose in challenging and strengthening the immune system of these membranes.(69)
In contrast, the respective vaccines of these diseases are injected by needle directly into the system of the child, thereby bypassing the mucosal immune system. As a result, mucosal immunity remains relatively weak and stunted in many children, complications of which may be the rapid increase in asthma, eczema, nasal allergies, food allergies, and a general pattern of sickness in today's children.
It has not gone unnoticed that the increasing incidence of atopic disorders has coincided in a time-related fashion with the childhood vaccine programs, and reports are now appearing from widely separated geographic areas in which vaccinated children were found to have significantly more allergic disorders than children with limited or no vaccines.(70-73)
The suspected role of the pertussis vaccine in potentiating allergic disorders tends to be confirmed in animal studies(74-76) as well as a human study.(77) Thimerosol, an organic mercurial compound widely used as a preservative in vaccines, also has been studied for its sensitizing properties.(78)
A second prime researcher in the field of autism, in our view, is Dr. Andrew Wakefield, Reader in experimental gastroenterology, Royal Free Hospital and University College Medical School, London. This researcher and coworkers were the first to suggest a possible link between the triple MMR vaccine and clinical combination of autism with bowel disorder, now referred to as the autistic enterocolitis syndrome.
As a result Dr. Wakefield has become the center of a storm of controversy in the United Kingdom, as well as a highly sought speaker at conferences in the U.S.A. Although coauthor of many peer-reviewed clinical and scientific papers, the course of Dr. Wakefield's pioneering work in this field can be found in a series of three articles,(58-60) as well as his presentation to the United States House of Representatives Committee on Government Reform, April 6, 2000.(61)
In summary, Dr. Wakefield and coworkers have studied over l50 developmentally delayed children with colitis, in which enlarged and inflamed intestinal nodes are a prime feature. Wakefield stressed that patterns in these children appear to be distinct from other forms of inflammatory bowel disease, such as Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis.
Working in collaboration with a state-of-the-art laboratory in Ireland, subsequent molecular studies from intestinal biopsies performed on these children detected measles virus genetic material in 24 out of 25 specimens (96%), in contrast with only 5% of detected measles virus in control specimens sent in a "blinded" fashion.
In explaining the ability of the MMR-derived measles virus to establish itself in the intestinal mucosa of affected children, Wakefield cited earlier reports warning of the potential of viral interference in the triple MMR vaccine, whereby one virus could interfere with another.(62,63)
Commenting on these early articles, Wakefield stated,
"The ability of mumps virus to interfere with the cellular immune response to certain strains of measles virus and thereby, in particular combinations potentially to reduce viral clearance and increase the risk of persistent (intestinal) infection, is an intriguing hypothesis to some of those involved in the current debate."(61)
Parenthetically, Dr. Wakefield is not opposed to the measles, mumps, and rubella vaccines, but he does believe that their administration should be widely separated.
In an article just released at time of this writing in the Adverse Drug Reaction & Toxicology Review,(64) Andrew Wakefield and coauthor Scott Montgomery carefully reviewed the inadequacies of the early pre-licensing trials of the MMR vaccine with a maximum follow up of 28 days and even shorter periods in some of the studies.
And they DESTROYED WAKEFIELD, falsely calling him a fraud, with a conflict of interest; well quess who really had the conflict of interest?
Read more in the article: VRM: Dr. Andrew Wakefield Being Crucified By Big Pharma, READ MORE, on the conficts of interest of the Reed Elsevier Group (which owns The Lancet) http://vaccineresistancemovement.org/?p=329
(58) Wakefield AJ et al, Persistent measles virus infection and immunodeficiency in children with autism, ileo-colonic lymphoid nodular hyperplasia and nonspecific colitis, Gut, 1998; 42(Suppl 1):A86.
(59) Wakefield AJ et al, Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children, Lancet, Feb. 28, 1998; 351:637-641.
(60) Wakefield AJ et al, Enterocolitis in children with developmental disorders, Amer J Gastroent, Sept., 2000; 95(9):2285-2295.
Excerpts: In brief summary, the immune system is divided into two major classes: Cellular immunity, in which the mucous membranes of the body play a prominent role, and humoral immunity, with the production of antigen-specific antibodies by plasma cells in the bone marrow.
Cellular immunity, which involves macrophage activation and the cytotoxic T lymphocyte as its major agents, is responsible for control of viruses, fungi, as well as bacteria. Humoral immunity, on the other hand, is predominantly involved in control of bacteria.
Both of these classes are governed by TH lymphocytes, the "T" referring to the thymus gland, from which they are derived, and the "H" referring to a helper or activating activity. Early in life these "naïve" or uncommitted TH lymphocytes are differentiated into either armed TH1 cells, which governs in cellular immunity or armed TH2 cells, which governs in humoral immunity.
This initial differentiation , at which naïve TH cells become either armed TH1 cells or armed TH2 cells has a critical impact on the outcome of adaptive immune response, depending on whether it is dominated by macrophage activation of the former or antibody production of the latter.(79)
It has been found that this differentiation is profoundly affected by cytokines, which are produced by lymphocytes and serve as chemical messengers. The two cytokines, Interleukin 12 and Interferon gamma, in vitro, tend to promote the development of TH1 cells. Interleukin 4, 5, 6, and 10, on the other hand, tend to promote the differentiation of TH2 cells.(80)
Once one subset becomes dominant, it is difficult to shift the response to the other subset, as the cytokines from one subset tend to dominate the other. The overall effect is that certain reponses are dominated either by humoral (TH2) or cell-mediated (TH1) responses.(81)
Among the different cytokines, some have been shown to have damaging effects: Interleukin I may cause increased blood brain barrier permeability and meningeal inflammation(82) and brain damage in experimental animals.(83) Interferon-gamma has been found to reduced the intestinal barrier and increase permeability,(84,85) and to bring about profound morphological, functional, and permeability changes in human brain blood-vessel endothelial cells.(86)
In both the New England Journal of Medicine(88) and the journal, Thorax,(89) articles have appeared stating that a healthy immune system has a "bias" towards the TH1 immune system, while people with allergies, asthma, and diseases of an autoimmune origin have what is known as the TH2-skewed immune response. However, either antibodies or T cells of the cellular immune system can cause tissue damage in autoimmune diseases.(90)
A study of cytokine levels in 20 autistic children by S Gupta and coworkers found that TH1 cytokines were consistently lowered and TH2 cytokines were consistently elevated as compared with controls.(91) Once again, does this tie in with immunizations? Are immunizations tilting the immune systems into TH2-skewed immune response? Considering that vaccines are administered by parenteral injection, designed primarily to stimulate antibody response, this would appear to be the case.
However, we cannot know the answers to this and other similar questions until definitive studies are done, testing both the immediate and long-term effects of vaccines on the human system. Among these, the testing of cytokines and related lymphocyte subpopulations before-and-after immunizations appear to be the most promising.
Vaccine Scene 2001: Update and Overview, (101 references).
Vaccination Citations and Death, (from above link).
Na, "DPT Vaccination and Sudden Infant Death - Tennessee, US Dept HEW, MMWR Report, Mar 23, 1979, vol 28(11): 132.
Arevalo, "Vaccinia Necrosum. Report on a Fatal Case", Bol Ofoc Sanit Panamer, Aug 1967, 63:106-110.
Connolly, J H, Dick, G W, Field, CM, "A Case of Fatal Progressive Vaccinia", Brit Med Jour, 12 May 1962; 5288:1315-1317.
Aragona, F, "Fatal Acute Adrenal Insufficiency Caused by Bilateral Apoplexy of the Adrenal Glands (WFS) following Anti-poliomyelitis Vaccination", Minerva Medicolegale, Aug 1960; 80:167-173.
Moblus, G et al, "Pathological-Anatomical Findings in Cases of Death Following Poliomyelitis and DPT Vaccination", Dtsch Gesundheitsw, Jul 20, 1972, 27:1382-1386.
NA, "Immunizations and Cot Deaths", Lancet, Sept 25, 1982, np.
Goetzeler, A, "Fatal Encephalitis after Poliomyelitis Vaccination", 22 Jun 1961, Muenchen Med Wschr, 102:1419-1422.
Fulginiti, V, "Sudden Infant Death Syndrome, Diphtheria-Tetanus Toxoid-Pertussis Vaccination and Visits to the Doctor: Chance Association or Cause and Effect?", Pediatr Infect Disorder, Jan-Feb 1983, 2(1): 7-11.
Baraff, LJ, et al, "Possible Temporal Association Between Diphtheria-tetanus toxoid-Pertussis Vaccination and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome", Pediatr Infect Disorder, Jan-Feb 1983, 2(1): 5-6.
Reynolds, E, "Fatal Outcome of a Case of Eczema Vaccinatum", Lancet, 24 Sept 1960, 2:684-686.
Apostolov. et al, "Death of an Infant in Hyperthermia After Vaccination", J Clin Path, Mar 1961, 14:196-197.
Bouvier-Colle, MH, "Sex-Specific Differences in Mortality After High-Titre Measles Vaccination", Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique, 1995; 43(1): 97.
Stewart GT, "Deaths of infants after triple vaccine.", Lancet 1979 Aug 18;2(8138):354-355.
Flahault A, "Sudden infant death syndrome and diphtheria/tetanus toxoid/pertussis/poliomyelitis immunisation.", Lancet 1988 Mar 12;1(8585):582-583.
Larbre, F et al, "Fatal Acute Myocarditis After Smallpox Vaccination", Pediatrie, Apr-May 1966, 21:345-350.
Mortimer EA Jr, "DTP and SIDS: when data differ", Am J Public Health 1987 Aug; 77(8):925-926.
{SHAKEN BABY SYNDROME OR VACCINE INDUCED ENCEPHALITIS - ARE PARENTS BEING FALSELY ACCUSED? BY Buttram M. D., Harold(Author)}Shaken Baby Syndrome or Vaccine Induced Encephalitis - Are Parents Being Falsely Accused?[paperback]
The Possible Role of Vaccines in Causing Retrogressive Changes: Reminiscences of America’s Children in the 1930s, and the Profound Changes That Have Taken Place Since Then.
Vaccinations and the Dynamics of Critical Days the Journal of the Australasian College of Nutritional & Environmental Medicine (J ACNEM) 23(3):1-5, December 2004.
Viera Scheibner, PhD, is a retired principal research scientist with a doctorate in natural sciences. During her distinguished career she has written three books and had over 90 papers published in refereed scientific journals. She has been researching vaccines and vaccinations since the early 1980s and is the author of Vaccination: 100 Years of Orthodox Research Shows that Vaccines Represent a Medical Assault on the System (1993; reviewed in NEXUS 2/16) and Behavioural Problems in Childhood (2000; reviewed in 7/05).
Dr Scheibner's article on the dynamics of critical days was first published in the Journal of the Australasian College of Nutritional & Environmental Medicine (J ACNEM) 23(3):1-5, December 2004.
Previous articles by Dr Scheibner on vaccines and vaccinations have been published in NEXUS: "Adverse Effects of Adjuvants in Vaccines" (NEXUS 8/01-02), "Shaken Baby Syndrome" (5/05); "Brain-eating Bugs" (3/03), and (with Leif Karlsson) "Cot Deaths Linked to Vaccinations" (2/05).
Dr Scheibner is often asked by lawyers to provide expert reports for vaccine-damage court cases, and she regularly conducts lectures. She was a speaker at the 2005 NEXUS Conference in Brisbane in September.
Dr Scheibner can be contacted by email using the form provided here: Contact Viera.
She is happy to provide additional references for this article as well as accompanying diagrams on request.
Attached is a superb article published today in Ohio, where the legislature is reconsidering its mandatory Hepatitis B vaccine. Note two important aspects of this article: (1) it discusses actual physicians opposed to the vaccine and (2) it discusses the financial ties of the AMA and AAP which taint their endorsement of the mandatory vaccine.
One of the Most Inexcusable Vaccine Revelations of All...
Excerpt: Ratajczak says human tissue (aborted fetal tissue) is currently used in 23 vaccines. She discusses the increase in autism incidences corresponding with the introduction of human DNA to MMR vaccine, and suggests the two could be linked.”
Pay close attention to what is said in these next three videos Costner!
Autism, Vaccines, Mercury and the Culpability of the American Academy of Pediatrics, (Video)
Excerpt: Kenneth Stoller, MD was trained as a pediatrician at UCLA and was a fellow of the American Academy of Pediatrics for two decades. In 2008 he resigned from the AAP after realizing that the AAP has known that mercury in vaccines can cause Autism and other neurological damage, yet the organization has refused to make a determined effort to have mercury (in thimerosal) removed from all vaccines. And in fact, has instead engaged in a cover-up to protect the interests of the vaccine makers and pharmaceutical empires.
Biomedical Treatment [And you want to deny this Costner, and deny these children a chance for a better life than what main stream medicine can offer them. Of course they refuse to acknowledge it because they caused it!] http://www.vacfacts.info/biomedicaltreatment.html
Crimes at the CDC
Excerpt: According to Kennedy, in a July 1999 letter, vaccine producer SmithKline Beecham tells CDC that it is ready to produce non-Thimerosal DTP (Diptheria/Tetanus/Pertussis) vaccines immediately and has sufficient inventories to supply the entire U.S. market during the remainder of 1999 and the first half of 2000, by which time other vaccine manufacturers would have their Thimerosal-free DTP vaccines on line. Thimerosal-laden DTP vaccines containing 25 micrograms of mercury apiece (75 thousand trillion atoms of mercury) were then being administered to American infants at two months, four months and six months — far exceeding EPA’s recommended safe level for mercury. Had CDC accepted SmithKline’s offer, it could have immediately reduced the mercury exposures to vaccinated six-month-old children by 40%.
Kennedy continued, “However, in November, CDC mysteriously sent a letter back rejecting SmithKline’s offer. Then, on July 14, 2000 CDC published a deceptive press release promising to require that all vaccines be Thimerosal-free as soon as “adequate supplies are available.” This was a full 12 months after the agency had denied SmithKline’s proposal.” http://imva.info/index.php/vaccines/crimes-at-the-cdc/
Vaccine Nation, and THIS is what they deny; claiming no peer reviewed study proves? A very informative video on vaccines!
YOUR CHILDS DEATH WILL BE A COINCIDENCE AND NO ONE IS LIABLE - Gardasil (The problem with non reporting of serious vaccine injuries and death, 1 to 10% reporting at best).
If this video does not make you mad; if it does not enrage you; if you are still that far into lying denial, then in my opinion people like you belong somewhere else than among us in society. This is the problem for ALL vaccines. Rotateg caused intussusception was to obvious and they had no way to deny that; do not beleive just based on that-that all vaccines are opennly and honestly safety monitored. (Video)
.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQZpm4-6YfM&feature=related
Vaccine-autism link: New investigation, check out this video which details the typical situation with vaccines causing autism; THIS is what they deny! Every study they have claims to find no link ever. Listen closely. Richard Deth, MD.
Make an Informed Vaccine Decision for the Health of Your Child A Parent's Guide to Childhood Shots
By Mayer Eisenstein, MD, JD, MPH
What on of several had to say.
"A comprehensive research-based review for parents wanting to hear
the untold story about vaccines. Thank you for this reputable resource;
I will continually recommend this book to parents and healthcare professionals alike."
--Susan McCreadie, MD, Board Certified Pediatrician
DR. MAYER EISENSTEIN, MD, JD, MPH, is a graduate of the University of Illinois Medical School, the Medical College of Wisconsin School of Public Health, and the John Marshall Law School. In his 38 years in medicine, he and his practice have cared for over 75,000, children, parents, and grandparents. He is the founder and Medical Director of the Homefi rst® Health Services. He is Board Certifi ed by the American Board of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, and the American Board of Quality Assurance and Utilization Review Physicians. He is a member of the Illinois Bar. His latest book, Making An Informed Vaccine Decision goes along with his other books: Give Birth at Home With The Home Birth Advantage; Safer Medicine, Don’t Vaccinate Before You Educate, 2nd Edition; Unavoidably Dangerous - Medical Hazards of HRT and Unlocking Nature’s Pharmacy. Some of his many guest appearances include: “The Oprah Winfrey Show” and “Hannity and Colmes”. His weekly syndicated radio show “The Dr. Mayer Eisenstein Show”, airs in the Chicagoland area. One of his goals is to lower the use of pharmaceuticals in the American population.
Vaccine Safety Manual for Concerned Families and Health Practitioners, (also listen to the commentary by Neil Miller) By Neil Z. Miller.
What one of several had to say.
"This is the best book ever written on this subject. I cannot imagine how many hours were spent researching the information. The chapter on the HPV vaccine is one of the most incisive, data-packed and well-argued pieces of scientific journalism I have ever seen. This book will go a long way toward helping people make critical vaccine decisions."
--Russell Blaylock, MD, Neurosurgeon (retired)
VACCINES: Are They Really Safe and Effective?
By Neil Z. Miller
New, updated and revised edition! This is the best selling introductory vaccine book in the world.
What three of several had to say.
"Compelling evidence! This book deeply affected me. I strongly recommend it to all concerned parents."
--Rayna Siegler-Dineen, M.A., Early Childhood Educator
Many thanks to Neil Miller for the thoroughness of his research. The evidence compiled in this book will help people of every persuasion to clarify their views."
--Richard Moskowitz, M.D.
"There are grounds for questioning both the safety and efficacy of current childhood vaccination programs. These reasons are reviewed with clarity and thoroughness in the main body of this book."
--Harold E. Buttram, M.D.
The polio vaccine: a critical assessment of its arcane history, efficacy, and long-term health-related consequences
Neil Z. Miller, Thinktwice Global Vaccine Institute http://www.know-vaccines.org/PDF/PolioHistory.pdf
Oh ya Costner, its ALL... a ......"conspiracy THEORY"! No wonder you attack me like you do! I have it RIGHT!
THIS is why I do what I do, and always have Costner!
---------------------------------------
I see your latest page is on Pertussis vaccine! Didn't I already kick your butt on that subject... before? And YOU refused to publish any information on that in a reply to your page? Keep ....lying! And you expect me to waste my time creating ....another page?
In your page prior to that titled: More Evidence That Autism Caused by Genetic and Environmental Factors, you made this comment below.
The only question remaining is, how many more studies will it take before an antivaxxer like Mr. Hubbs admits that vaccines are not the root cause of autism? Put another way, how many more times will the scientific and medical community release a study which make Mr. Hubbs and his fellow antivaxxers look foolish?
Time will tell.
And, alias no identity Costner, you still think there is some genetic link that caused the autism rates to go from one in 10,000, in 97 to 1 in 100 or less in 2011? But NONE of their studies have ever concluded THAT; even Offit's study at Children's Hospital in PA! Anything to blame something other than vaccines, which by the way quadrupled after the 1997 no liability NCVA. Thats good, Paul (for profit) Offit still believes its all genetic too; the same guy that stated children can safely tolerate 10,000 vaccines! Did you hear what Barbara Loe Fisher, NVIC said about him in that video? Pretty much sums it up.
The ONLY person actually looking mocked and foolish here.... is YOU Costner! Deny it all you want. And YOU have all the science!? Holy smokes, can anyone get any more in denial and delusional than that? Wow!
You need to go back to your castle or where ever you exist and get back to work on some more bullshit, call the CDC, or maybe Gorski, Orac, and Quackwatch too, for some more updated counter... material? I don't know what you look like, but I figured that likely this guy at the bottom might come as close as it would get.
Anyone that does what you do Costner and goes to the lengths with no identity that you have, (for this long); in an attempt to destroy others (me), that put forth the truth, is actually just more than a bit ...SICK and... CREEPY! But you never could admit how badly you get your butt kicked, ever! Try it again.. Cowboy! You have ALL the answers and that great pharma/CDC science; which for the most part has made a quite poor showing for you here so far.
Nickelback- If everyone cared lyrics
Collection of a bit more of the selected information on vaccines and why the whole basis for modern medicine is wrong. Starting right here.
Bechamp or Pasteur: A Lost Chapter in the History of Biology [Paperback]
Disease arises from micro-organisms outside the body.
Microorganisms are generally to be guarded against.
The function of microorganisms is constant.
The shapes and colours of microorganisms are constant
Every disease is associated with a partciular microorganism
Microorganisms are primary causal agents.
Disease can "strike" anybody.
To prevent disease we have to "build defences".
CELLULAR THEORY (Bechamp).
1. Disease arises from micro-organisms within the cells of the body.
2.These intracellular microorganisms normally function to build and assist in the metabolic processes of the body.
3.The function of these organisms changes to assist in the catabolic (disintegration) processes of the host organism when that organism dies or is injured, which may be chemical as well as mechanical.
4.Microrganisms change their shapes and colours to reflect the medium
5. Every disease is associated with a particular condition.
6. Microorganisms become "pathogenic" as the health of the host organism deteriorates. Hence, the condition of the host organism is the primary causal agent.
7. Disease is built by unhealthy conditions.
8. To prevent disease we have to create health.
Why Louis Pasteur's Germ Theory Is A Curse. It is Pasteur (1822-1895) who remains the father of vaccination and it is with him that the long string of lies begins.
Vaccines Did Not Save Us – 2 Centuries of Official Statistics
Excerpt: The Measles mortality graphs are enlightening [more below] and contradict the claims of Government health officials that vaccines have saved millions of lives. It is an unscientific claim which the data show is untrue.
Clin Infect Dis. 2004 Aug 1;39(3):389-94. Epub 2004 Jul 9.
Fever after immunization: current concepts and improved future scientific understanding.(They don't have a damn clue, that fever is not necessarily bad in processes of the immune system).
Common Belief is that Vaccines are Safe...BUT Doctors & Scientists Speak Out
Excerpt: “Cancer was practically unknown until compulsory vaccination with complex vaccines began to be introduced? I never saw a case of cancer in an unvaccinated person.”
The research findings of Dr. Gary S. Goldman, published in the International Journal of Toxicology, support the theory that shingles, which is known to cause three times as many deaths and five times the number of hospitalizations as chickenpox, is naturally suppressed by occasional contact with chickenpox. Dr. Goldman's website presents numerous radio interviews on the chickenpox vaccine controversy. Hear them at http://www.drgoldmanonline.com/.
Vaccination: 100 Years of Orthodox Research Shows that Vaccines Represent a Medical Assault on the Immune System
by Viera Scheibner, Ph.D.
Excerpt: Following this finding, Dr Scheibner studied some 30,000 pages of medical papers dealing with vaccination. She found no evidence that vaccines are safe or effective. Vaccines are highly noxious. They contain formaldehyde, aluminium phosphate, thiomersal (mercury compound), foreign proteins (antigens) and contaminating animal proteins and viruses from the tissues used as growth medium to culture the viral and bacterial components of vaccines. None of these substances should ever be injected into human beings. They erode the immune system and alter the immunological response to diseases.
Basic review of the book:
Vaccination: 100 Years of Orthodox Research Shows that Vaccines Represent a Medical Assault on the Immune System
by Viera Scheibner Ph.D.
This book (published 1993) is a concise summary of the results of orthodox medical research into vaccines and their effects. It aims to inform medical professionals, parents and the general public about short and long-term dangerous side-effects, including brain damage and death, of vaccines; of the ineffectiveness of vaccines in preventing infectious diseases, as shown by epidemics in fully vaccinated populations; and the causal link between DPT and polio vaccines and cot death.
Dr Viera Scheibner, retired Principal Research Scientist for the NSW Government with a doctorate in Natural Sciences, has published 3 books and some 90 scientific papers in refereed scientific journals in Australia and overseas during her distinguished career.
She and her husband, Leif Karlsson, an electronic engineer specialising in patient monitoring systems, developed Cotwatch, a true breathing monitor for babies. Vaccination proved to be the most prominent stressful event to sound the alarm. A microprocessor version of Cotwatch recording babies' breathing patterns presented the effect of vaccination clearly on the computer print-outs and the link between vaccine injections and cot death became painfully obvious.
Following this finding, Dr Scheibner studied some 30,000 pages of medical papers dealing with vaccination. She found no evidence that vaccines are safe or effective. Vaccines are highly noxious. They contain formaldehyde, aluminium phosphate, thiomersal (mercury compound), foreign proteins (antigens) and contaminating animal proteins and viruses from the tissues used as growth medium to culture the viral and bacterial components of vaccines. None of these substances should ever be injected into human beings. They erode the immune system and alter the immunological response to diseases.
The appearance of many new, autoimmune diseases like asthma, affecting alarming numbers of children, childhood leukaemia, and cancer, the enormous upsurge in the incidence of cerebral palsy and infantile convulsions seen in children of vaccination age and not before, should all be taken as serious warnings. Infectious diseases contracted at the appropriate age and allowed to run their course are beneficial because they serve to prime and mature the child's immune system.
The overwhelming evidence from the numerous human clinical and epidemiological studies cited by Dr Scheibner demonstrates beyond any doubt the dangers and ineffectiveness of vaccinations and her book is a most valuable contribution towards exposing the myth of vaccinations.
MMR Vaccine,Thimerosal and Regressive or Late Onset Autism (“Autistic Enterocolitis”) A Review of the Evidence for a Link Between Vaccination and Regressive Autism, March 2006
for which the decline in mortality appears substantial after the
point of intervention-and on the unlikely assumption that all of
this decline is attributable to the intervention-it is estimated that at
most 3.5 percent of the total decline in mortality since 1900 could be
ascribed to medical measures introduced for the diseases considered
here.
These conclusions, in support of the thesis introduced earlier,
suggest issues of the most strategic significance for researchers and
health care legislators. Profound policy implications follow from
either a confirmation or a rejection of the thesis. If one subscribes to
the view that we are slowly but surely eliminating one disease after
another because of medical interventions, then there may be little
commitment to social change and even resistance to some reordering
of priorities in medical expenditures. If a disease Xis disappearing
primarily because of the presence of a particular intervention or
service Y, then clearly Y should be left intact, or, more preferably,
be expanded. Its demonstrable contribution justifies its presence.
But, if it can be shown convincingly, and on commonly accepted
grounds, that the major part of the decline in mortality is unrelated
to medical care activities, then some commitment to social change
and a reordering of priorities may ensue. For, if the disappearance
of X is largely unrelated to the presence of Y, or even occurs in the
absence of Y, then clearly the expansion and even the continuance
of Y can be reasonably questioned. Its demonstrable ineffectiveness
justifies some reappraisal of its significance and the wisdom of
expanding it in its existing form.
In this paper we have attempted to dispel the myth that medical
measures and the presence of medical services were primarily responsible
for the modern decline in mortality. The question now
remains: if they were not primarily responsible for it, then how is it
to be explained? An adequate answer to this further question would
require a more substantial research effort than that reported here,
but is likely to be along the lines suggested by McKeown which were
referred to early in this paper. Hopefully, this paper will serve as a
catalyst for such research, incorporating adequate data and appropriate
methods of analysis, in an effort to arrive at a more viable
alternative explanation.
------------------------------------------
Referenced also in the article titled; The polio vaccine: a critical assessment of its arcane history, efficacy, and long-term health-related consequences.
Excerpt: Despite official denials of any correlation between polio vac-cines, SV-40, and increased cancer rates [91], by April 2001, 62 papers from 30 laboratories around the world had reported SV-40 in human tissues and tumors [84:10]. The virus was also discov-ered in pituitary and thyroid tumors, and in patients with kidney disease [84:10,13]. Even the National Cancer Institute issued a statement that SV-40 “may be associated with human cancer [84:11;92].”
Detection of polyomaviral DNA sequences in normal and adenomatous human pituitary tissues using the polymerase chain reaction
Conclusions. These findings, that polyomaviral DNA sequences are detectable at low levels in certain normal tissues, are in agreement with those of other groups and, to the authors' knowledge, serve as the first report of polyomaviral latency in human pituitary tissue. A role for polyomaviruses in pituitary tumorigenesis could not be established in this analysis. Cancer 1995; 76:490–6.
Mice Transgenic for a Vasopressin-SV4O Hybrid Oncogene Develop Tumors of the Endocrine Pancreas and the Anterior Pituitary A Possible Model for Human Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1
Targeted pituitary tumorigenesis using the human thyrotropin beta-subunit chain promoter in transgenic mice.
Abstract excerpt: These results indicated that the 1109 bp sequence of the human TSH beta 5'-flanking region is essential for pituitary-specific expression of SV40 large T antigen in transgenic mice, which exhibited a dwarf phenotype and developed pituitary tumors. The tumors were composed of undifferentiated cells and did not produce thyrotropin. These transgenic mice should provide a valuable animal model for studying the pathogenesis of anterior pituitary
Post-translational processing of proopiomelanocortin (POMC) in mouse pituitary melanotroph tumors induced by a POMC-simian virus 40 large T antigen transgene.
Conventional epidemiology and the link between SV40 and human cancers
Dr Regis A Vilchez a b , Claudia A Kozinetz c, Janet S Butel a
Summary
Simian virus 40 (SV40) is known to cause tumourigenesis. The main types of tumour induced by SV40 in laboratory animals mirror the human cancers that have been found to contain SV40 DNA or the viral oncoprotein. Increasing amounts of data support the notion that SV40 may be an aetiological factor in the development of human cancers. Retrospective birth cohort studies have been used in attempts to refute the alleged causal link between SV40 and human cancers. However, these observational studies are affected by several important confounding factors, which mean that firm conclusions cannot be drawn. In this essay, we consider the unique features of SV40 infection in humans and examine the limitations of conventional studies that seek to disprove the aetiological link with human cancer.
Increasing evidence for involvement of SV40 in human cancer
Department of Molecular Virology and Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
Abstract
SV40, a small DNA virus, is known to possess strong oncogenic potential. Millions of people were exposed to SV40 as an unknown contaminant of some early poliovaccines. This article briefly summarizes the increasing evidence of the association of SV40 with certain types of human cancer, including mesotheliomas and brain tumors. Unanswered questions pertaining to the pathogenesis of human infections by SV40 and the functional role of the virus in tumor development are noted. It is concluded that SV40 should be considered a candidate human tumor virus and that vigorous efforts to clarify the role of the virus in human disease should be supported.
Screw you and your lies alias Costner, and your further promotional agenda you have regarding your failure to recognize and admit the fraud from the beginning and the lies we are fed concerning all of modern medicine!
