Thursday, January 31, 2013
The Profit of Medicine
http://vaccineconspiracytheorist.blogspot.com/2013/01/the-profit-of-medicine.html
The Profit of Medicine
http://vaccineconspiracytheorist.blogspot.com/2013/01/the-profit-of-medicine.html
First of all, it is only of or in a figment of your twisted
imagination, that you are coming to the conclusion of and claiming that the
whole field of allopathic (chemicalized) so called medicine, would have to be
involved in some conspiracy plot to keep out all kinds of cures and
understanding, for allopathic medicine to be in an intentional situation where
that has been or would be the outcome.
Such is not the case and such has never been implied nor
claimed. You don't get it because you obviously refuse to get it. First you
must learn and understand the real history of modern so called medicine. You
MUST understand that actual history that has been hidden from the public and as
well the medical profession itself. You will never find a word on it in any
medical text book. It in fact has all been covered up; and that is not only
some mislead and paranoid conspiracy theory, it is all provable fact and would
be common sense, to the average thinking and honest person who is open minded
enough to review the yet existing information. If you are not willing to do
that in honesty, then you have no business writing a blog page about something
that you do not even as much of a basic comprehension of.
These pages right here tell the story quite well, if you had
the willingness and took the time to actually educate yourself. You are
unwilling to, and you never have been; so what and who does that serve? It
serves no one because all you are doing is promoting more of the mentality that
people never look outside that allopathic box for the real answers. Real
answers to the understanding of how and why mainstream became so failed, and
remains so failed. But in your mind editor, you refuse to see any of that
failure. You keep trying to find some way to get one up; but each time you have
failed and in reality each time I write another counter blog page, you look
more misguided and ridiculously twisted than the previous time and page. When
are you going to get it. It is a failed and in error system, and it has been
since its origins and founding now approximately 100 years ago. That is a long
time to be the only game in town that is allowed, to get and keep people
brainwashed. They claimed from day one that it was all based on real science,
but nothing has been further from the truth. You do not heal with chemically
toxic to the human body poison, it is impossible when that is exclusively all
you are promoting.
The insanity of vaccination is just near to mind boggling to
me anymore, and as to how that many people can remain so brainwashed and
mislead. Vaccine shave never worked, and from day one have as a fact caused far
more harm than good, and increasingly so, with all the steadily added vaccines
over the years up until now the year 2013. Common sense should tell people as
well that there is no way the human body was designed as compatible with
endless toxic and biologically contaminated junk vaccines injected into it
repeatedly into it, especially that of a child. And the thinking that it must
be some other reason kids are sicker and with more chronic illness and
disorders, than they have ever been? As if they all can't see and realize what
it really is? You don't heal with poison, you heal with detox and not putting
more junk in. You heal with and by giving the human body the necessary
nutrients and cellular nutrition it needs to repair. How simple is that? No
peer review needed.
Now take a look at a bit of what I am talking about and
referring to. If you are not willing to review that information and to educate
yourself to what the facts and the real history over the past one hundred years
really amounts to; then like I said, then you are not even near to being on the
same page nor the right page in discussion nor debate of this matter. The lack
of that surely doesn't provide you anything to write the blog page that you
did. That as well is why your page is filled with nothing but rambling,
twisted, and largely ignorant claims.
The Real History of Modern Medicine
The False Foundations of Modern Medicine
Death By Medicine
You editor, as well keep right on knowingly making the false
claim that I do not have any science to back up my claims on vaccines; while
what exists there is a literal bulwark of existing science with the majority of
it also published in Pubmed. You are so hateful of fact, that obviously you
must just keep on lying like that. But then since day one now over 3 years ago,
you denied the existence of anything that was put in front of you. And you have
the audacity to claim that I am the liar and the hypocrite. All I can say is
you better hope God has some mercy on your twisted and wretched soul, editor
alias Costner.
Now lets move on to some more of your ridiculous blog
article claims.
You have made the statement that if allopathic medicine
really wanted to make a lot of money, they would simply treat the diseases
instead of vaccinating. That would be to assume that without vaccines the whole
world would be dying of massive illness due to lack of sanctity of those holy
water savior vaccines. Such is not the case, never was, nor ever will be. As
well your claim are entirely misguided and false, based on all the reasons and
understanding of the information in the site pages above. The reasons are there
that should make it all become self evident to you; but that is only if you
actually gave a damn about the truth, and you have clearly no desire for that.
Simply understanding the above linked history of medicine, and as to how and
why it actually was founded is the only means by which to get to what I
understand and as well 1000's of other people obviously understand. We don't
buy the allopathic bullshit anymore; because we know the truth, and have
educated ourselves to the unbiased truth.
What you seem to ignore editor time and again, is the fact
that there is no money in cures; there never was. That is why modern medicine
is founded on the failed principals that is to, to begin with. There was no big
money profits in doing it the right way. They knew that 100 years ago. To
actually cure an illness, chronic condition, and/or a so called disease; you
first need to be willing to look for the actual causation. To do that you need
to understand the biological and physiological functions of the human body. A
person would think with all the schooling a doctors gets that oh yes they
surely understand all that. They in fact do not. They were trained in a medical
school with the focus on 100% of it that ONLY a DRUG can cure or prevent
disease, just as the revolving door with the pharma industry FDA, states. If
you make claims as to any other substance than a patented for profit pharma
drug, that causes that substance to become a drug in their view, and must be
regulated accordingly and with the same clinical trials that Merck and GSK
would be required of.
You claim to editor, that people who promote an natural
health substances, supplements, or products; should have to and need to do peer
reviewed studies on them first. Peer reviewed with who; pharma? The level of
raving and misguided lunacy that comes out of claim that you made in itself
directs to your inability to see any reality to anything here, period! There
have been studies done on many natural substances and products, obviously far
more than you realize. Guess what, it is not good enough for the FDA. They
don't care, as it will not be allowed to compete, if they have their way. Did
you ever notice that the products the FDA really goes after are only those that
work well and have been proven to. Who do you expect to do and pays for some
millions of dollars in clinical trials, on a product that will never see a
5000% or a 20,000% mark up on the sale price; such as that which happens with
pharmaceutical drugs? If there were any real big money in it, pharma would be
doing those clinical said trials on those natural substances...dummy! Here is
the problem, you can not patent a natural substance nor a combination of
natural substances. You would first need to majorly alter that substance so it
would not even resemble structurally and or chemically what it originally was.
Pharma in fact has done that to natural substances through the years, now and
then, as a fact. Naturopath's do not alter natural substances, because they
work fine in the pure and natural form all by themselves. At best they may
create an extract from the natural substance, to improve the
potency.
No, lets go to the other incorrect and misguided, without
merit, and baseless claims you made editor, and about certain named people that
you claim are over charging for supplements and/or vitamins.
Claim one. [Dr. Tenpenny offers nutritional supplements that
can cost more than $117 for a two month supply or when she offers a $200
"anti-flu" wellness kit which is nothing more than a collection of
supplements and vitamins?]
First of all on her supplements page, I did not find any
anti-flu wellness kit for $200 on either of her sites. I search the site and
there was no such thing there, so being you did not even bother to provide a
link, perhaps you just made it up. If a person were going to take the
essentials for fighting the flu however and you were really serious about that
to include liposomal vitamin C, D, probiotics, and more; it could add up to
over well $100 or more. Still cheaper than spending two days in the hospital
with the flu, even after getting an ineffective and immune system dysregulating
flu shot, and paying for the dangerous and ineffective Tamiflu.
Danger and Ineffectiveness of Flu Vaccines
LIPOSOMAL ENCAPSULATED VITAMIN C
Tamiflu Deception
Now, you can lie about it to yourself Editor and half the
world if you could; but in this Dr. Sherri Tenpenny Interview, does it actually
sound to you like she doesn’t know what she is talking about, or that she is
somehow mislead and or providing somehow incorrect and false information?
The credentials, experience, and training the woman has had; does it and that
sound like she is unqualified, and or that you are or would likely be more
educated than she is? You editor, are smarter and more knowledgeable than her,
right? That real answer to that question, is of course all to obvious.
Interview with Sherri Tenpenny about dangers of vaccines,
with Mike Adams
Dr. Sherri Tenpenny
Then you go on to claim to. [To make matters worse, why is
the selective outrage non-existent when they find someone like Dr. Tenpenny
offering vitamin D supplements for $14.99 when you can get a larger quantity of
vitamin D elsewhere on the Internet for less than $5? Shouldn't these
people be outraged that a "doctor" would intentionally gouge people
by marking up her products over 300%?]
How entirely stupid are you blog pages getting editor? have
you never been in a natural supplements store? Your blatant ignorance is
amazing. There are all different price ranges of products depending on the
quality. It depends on what quality level the product is. Are there fillers and
additives, and what kind. Natural products are an widely expanded market, and
it is not like going to get a prescription Editor, where there is only name
brand and generic. You can not honestly nor even possibly be ignorant, or are
you? So, what you are saying is that by your authority editor, you hereby
proclaim that Dr Tenpenny should only sell cheap products of inferior quality
to her customers or otherwise she greedy and cheating the customers? Wow. An
the product that sells for 10% likely has the same mark up that the $30 product
does, and the overhead is the same. Wow, what greedy corruption. In that case
and by those dumb standards, almost every merchant in town would thus be
classified as a greedy fraud. I would really at least attempt to improve a bit
on the image of your mentality, editor. How much does the dangerous and
ineffective Tamiflu cost, editor? Talk about mindless hypocrisy.
Lets go to the next claim you made in your fantastic blog
article.
[Why do they not seem to care when someone like Dr. Mercola
offers a bottle 60 vitamin C capsules for $14.97 while you can head over to
Walmart and get 100 tablets for under $7 or 70 vitamin C gummies for under $5?]
Really, here we go again. Do you not even know the difference
between standard vitamin C, and Liposomal vitamin C? Go to my LIPOSOMAL
ENCAPSULATED VITAMIN C page linked to above, and learn the significant
difference.
The product is also known as Lypo-SphericTM Vitamin C, (same
thing), and normally sells for a minimum of $29.99. So, Mercola's product is
actually and comparatively cheap, for price! There is no information on how the
Mercola product is made but does state that it has lecithin in it which is the
key ingredient that is used by a process to encapsulate the vitamin C, making
it more bioavailable to the intestine and thus as proven in studies equal to
the efficacy of IV vitamin C. IV vitamin C has by the way brought people back
from the near death from H1N1 and other flu. That after the medical arena said
they were likely to die and did nothing but force more toxic Tamiflu.
So editor, go on with your fantasy land of knowledge about
comparable gummie vitamins for $5, but you are obviously and entirely clueless
to even be attempting to evaluate this subject matter.
As far as your claims again and about and against Burzynski,
and his proven in cancer antineoplastons therapy treatments. Here again you are
only angry that someone would have the audacity to claim they have done
something far better than mainstream ever has or will. When the man can cure
children and adults of brain stem and other cancers that mains stream had no
hope to ever do, the guy is clearly doing something way right. If he were not,
they would have had the grounds to shut him down long ago. But they know they
can not because to many people would be outraged, and the false attack would be
way to obvious. he has by the way won all of his legal and medical board
battles, no matter where they ever were. How do you explain that? The charges were
fraudulent, and the evil bastards lost their ground that they never had to
stand on in the first place. One question. Does he cure said terminal cancers
that mainstream as a fact have not been able to cure, yes or no? If so why in
the hell is he still waiting to have his protocal approved 20 years after he
started that endeavor? Because they are doing everything they can to prevent
it, that is why. Review all the information existing and the videos, no one is
that stupid that they can not see the reality of that, if they have the ability
to be honest.
That doesn’t look serious to you, Editor? And you think its
funny and you bastardize the guy as making to much money? And you say there is
no published data? Given the fact that the medical board system and the FDA
have attempted to shut him down in every way they could, and to even attempted
to send him to prison of years, I would say he has prevailed pretty well. You
are purely evil, and sick, editor. You always were, you always have been, and
you always will be. And I will say it again, you better hope God
has some mercy on your twisted and wretched soul, Mr Blogging “Editor”, alias
never have had any identity, Costner. When you have 200 pages of your
selectively ignorant blogging and attacking bullshit, will it ever be enough? I
have said it from day one, you are one sick man.
Antineoplastons-Bursynski
Human/Clinical Studies
Phase I Toxicity Studies for Specific Antineoplastons
Antineoplaston A
Antineoplaston
A10
Antineoplaston
AS2-1
Antineoplastons
A10 and AS2-1
Antineoplaston
AS2-5
Antineoplaston A2
Antineoplaston A3
Antineoplaston A5
Studies of Specific Malignancies Treated with
Antineoplastons
Brain tumors
Prostate cancer
Hepatocellular
(liver) cancer
Current Clinical Trials
To date, no phase III random
http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/cam/antineoplastons/healthprofessional/page5
Cancer is Serious Business, Burzynski Movie
http://www.burzynskimovie.com/
End of the reply:
--------------------
Next reply sent to the same said blog page.
Lowell Hubbs February 22, 2013 at 7:52 AM
Answer these questions, editor!
1. Does Burzynski cure cancer that main stream can not cure?
2. If so then why has in all this time, his Antineoplastons treatment not been approved by the FDA?
3. Explain exactly why you believe that a billion dollar cancer industry and the FDA, would NEVER intentionally block the efforts of Burzynski to get his treatment approved? Do not forget the reality of the fact regarding that use of antineoplastons, would have the potential to wipe out the current cancer industry, and standard protocols of surgery, chemo, pharma drugs, and radiation.
Editor, replied with again an endless bunch of delusional trash of course, and this was the return reply to that. Nothing is of course ever enough to stop his denial, and ignoring all the facts and information, nor his endless lying. Nor obviously ever will be.
You know what editor; I haven't looked at this blog in a while; simply because I have better things to do with my time that take far more priority than wasting the time to repeatedly address this, and your level of denial, and as well the continual level of delusional and dishonest insanity going on here.
You were asked three short questions, and you write a long expose like that with still the questions unanswered, but yet for a bunch of lies, misinformation and bought into falsely attacking garbage that you read somewhere, but never came from Burzynski's information itself.
You do not get through Phase 2 clinical trials without doing something right, and his studies published right in Pubmed and other reputable publications, are listed right on his site.
http://www.burzynskimovie.com/
http://www.burzynskiclinic.com/clinical-trials.html
Furthermore, you have a very poor understanding of how all the information is controlled. You repeatedly fail to understand and no matter what is put in front of you, that no one with any of those those medical degrees is ever allowed to think for themselves and outside the box and change anything whatsoever within their deemed politically correct arena. Non one is simply allowed to do their own thing, nor step out of line; or they end up with facing a literal career suicide every time. Wake up and face a little reality, for just once!
Further more, nowhere does it say he uses chemo and radiation in any of his current work, ever. Antineoplastons work, and they as well cure many cancers that mainstream has obviously no hope of ever curing; it is a simple as that. All your wasted time writing that deliberately lying, misinformation, and ignorance filled expose, was exactly that; a waste of time. How does that feel? Just who is it out there that you think is that dumb, and dumb enough to buy into all that garbage? That, when to read the real information, is so easily available? You can ignore and lie about the facts all you want; it does not and never will change reality, nor the truth.
----------------------
Cancer is Serious Business, Burzynski Movie
http://www.burzynskimovie.com/
End of the reply:
--------------------
Next reply sent to the same said blog page.
Lowell Hubbs February 22, 2013 at 7:52 AM
Answer these questions, editor!
1. Does Burzynski cure cancer that main stream can not cure?
2. If so then why has in all this time, his Antineoplastons treatment not been approved by the FDA?
3. Explain exactly why you believe that a billion dollar cancer industry and the FDA, would NEVER intentionally block the efforts of Burzynski to get his treatment approved? Do not forget the reality of the fact regarding that use of antineoplastons, would have the potential to wipe out the current cancer industry, and standard protocols of surgery, chemo, pharma drugs, and radiation.
Editor, replied with again an endless bunch of delusional trash of course, and this was the return reply to that. Nothing is of course ever enough to stop his denial, and ignoring all the facts and information, nor his endless lying. Nor obviously ever will be.
You know what editor; I haven't looked at this blog in a while; simply because I have better things to do with my time that take far more priority than wasting the time to repeatedly address this, and your level of denial, and as well the continual level of delusional and dishonest insanity going on here.
You were asked three short questions, and you write a long expose like that with still the questions unanswered, but yet for a bunch of lies, misinformation and bought into falsely attacking garbage that you read somewhere, but never came from Burzynski's information itself.
You do not get through Phase 2 clinical trials without doing something right, and his studies published right in Pubmed and other reputable publications, are listed right on his site.
http://www.burzynskimovie.com/
http://www.burzynskiclinic.com/clinical-trials.html
Furthermore, you have a very poor understanding of how all the information is controlled. You repeatedly fail to understand and no matter what is put in front of you, that no one with any of those those medical degrees is ever allowed to think for themselves and outside the box and change anything whatsoever within their deemed politically correct arena. Non one is simply allowed to do their own thing, nor step out of line; or they end up with facing a literal career suicide every time. Wake up and face a little reality, for just once!
Further more, nowhere does it say he uses chemo and radiation in any of his current work, ever. Antineoplastons work, and they as well cure many cancers that mainstream has obviously no hope of ever curing; it is a simple as that. All your wasted time writing that deliberately lying, misinformation, and ignorance filled expose, was exactly that; a waste of time. How does that feel? Just who is it out there that you think is that dumb, and dumb enough to buy into all that garbage? That, when to read the real information, is so easily available? You can ignore and lie about the facts all you want; it does not and never will change reality, nor the truth.
----------------------
How about this editor? THIS is a real cure for cancer! You said that if the cure for cancer was ever known that it couldn't be hidden. Oh, they would get the Nobel prize you said. Do they give them a Nobel Prize? No, they send them to jail, if they can. Its now happening repeatedly with the people making the hemp oil, and those growing medical marijuana. They are in compliance with the new and existing state laws, but still the feds over-ride it and send them to prison.
You, Mr.(said) Editor, should know better, and I think you do know better; but your in denial nose is stuck so far up the pharma chemical's only-based allopathic saviors rear end, that you can see daylight, and you haven't seen any for years, simply because you choose not to see the truth and you deny every bit of evidence that is there. This cure for cancer, is just like all the rest of them that worked and were never acknowledged, nor seen used in the general public light. How long before we see proven cannabis oil clinical trials? It will never happen in the next 100 years, as a fact. They will not allow it, nor anything to compete with the over-all largely failed cutting, chemo, and radiation that the treatments end up often killing the patient, before the cancer does. There is no money in this cure and as well because the patents are already owned by the US gov't and health services. Yet they tell the public there is no benefit, and even thought they have the studies that go with the patents, that prove that it is. This is going on right here in a supposedly free country the US; and not N. Korea and not Russia.
SPAIN STUDY CONFIRMS CANNABIS OIL CURES CANCER WITHOUT SIDE EFFECTS
SPAIN STUDY CONFIRMS CANNABIS OIL CURES CANCER WITHOUT SIDE EFFECTS
Cannabis/Hemp Oil - Cancer Cure
http://www.vacfacts.info/cannabishemp-oil---cancer-cure.html
The said, existing patents on the use of medical cannabis, owned by the US gov't, complete with the studies acknowledging the successful use .
Marijuana cures cancer – the US government has known since 1974
http://patients4medicalmarijuana.wordpress.com/2010/01/04/marijuana-cures-cancer-us-government-has-known-since-1974/
Cannabinoids as antioxidants and neuroprotectants
Inventors: Aidan J. Hampson, Julius Axelrod, Maurizio Grimaldi
Original Assignee: The United States of America as represented by the Department of Health and Human Services
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect2=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=/netahtml/PTO/search-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&d=PALL&RefSrch=yes&Query=PN/6630507
United States Patent 6,630,507
Hampson , et al. October 7, 2003
Cannabinoids as antioxidants and neuroprotectants
Abstract
Cannabinoids have been found to have antioxidant properties, unrelated to NMDA receptor antagonism. This new found property makes cannabinoids useful in the treatment and prophylaxis of wide variety of oxidation associated diseases, such as ischemic, age-related, inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. The cannabinoids are found to have particular application as neuroprotectants, for example in limiting neurological damage following ischemic insults, such as stroke and trauma, or in the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease and HIV dementia. Nonpsychoactive cannabinoids, such as cannabidoil, are particularly advantageous to use because they avoid toxicity that is encountered with psychoactive cannabinoids at high doses useful in the method of the present invention. A particular disclosed class of cannabinoids useful as neuroprotective antioxidants is formula (I) wherein the R group is independently selected from the group consisting of H, CH.sub.3, and COCH.sub.3. ##STR1##
Appl. No.: 09/674,028
Filed: February 2, 2001
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect2=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=/netahtml/PTO/search-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&d=PALL&RefSrch=yes&Query=PN/6630507
The said, existing patents on the use of medical cannabis, owned by the US gov't, complete with the studies acknowledging the successful use .
Marijuana cures cancer – the US government has known since 1974
http://patients4medicalmarijuana.wordpress.com/2010/01/04/marijuana-cures-cancer-us-government-has-known-since-1974/
Cannabinoids as antioxidants and neuroprotectants
Inventors: Aidan J. Hampson, Julius Axelrod, Maurizio Grimaldi
Original Assignee: The United States of America as represented by the Department of Health and Human Services
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect2=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=/netahtml/PTO/search-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&d=PALL&RefSrch=yes&Query=PN/6630507
United States Patent 6,630,507
Hampson , et al. October 7, 2003
Cannabinoids as antioxidants and neuroprotectants
Abstract
Cannabinoids have been found to have antioxidant properties, unrelated to NMDA receptor antagonism. This new found property makes cannabinoids useful in the treatment and prophylaxis of wide variety of oxidation associated diseases, such as ischemic, age-related, inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. The cannabinoids are found to have particular application as neuroprotectants, for example in limiting neurological damage following ischemic insults, such as stroke and trauma, or in the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease and HIV dementia. Nonpsychoactive cannabinoids, such as cannabidoil, are particularly advantageous to use because they avoid toxicity that is encountered with psychoactive cannabinoids at high doses useful in the method of the present invention. A particular disclosed class of cannabinoids useful as neuroprotective antioxidants is formula (I) wherein the R group is independently selected from the group consisting of H, CH.sub.3, and COCH.sub.3. ##STR1##
Inventors: Hampson; Aidan J. (Irvine, CA), Axelrod; Julius (Rockville, MD), Grimaldi; Maurizio (Bethesda, MD)
Assignee: The United States of America as represented by the Department of Health and Human Services (Washington, DC)Appl. No.: 09/674,028
Filed: February 2, 2001
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect2=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=/netahtml/PTO/search-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&d=PALL&RefSrch=yes&Query=PN/6630507
Natural Protocols Recovery From Cancer
http://www.vacfacts.info/natural-protocols-recovery-from-cancer.html
And THIS is the best the allopathic side can do when it comes to cancer!!! Wake up!
Cancer the Forbidden Cures - Full Documentary
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YsOPzBHPsqM
The Rockefellers, The FDA & The Cancer Industry
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8UOo0F7KFbQ
Here is another inconvenient fact and bit of information you overlooked, Editor. Below, the known high cost of traditional cancer treatment. Hows that for having a high level of hypocrisy, as to your twisted claims?
Here's my picture alias no identity Costner, where's YOURS? This said chicken shit refuse to debate the actual facts blogging editor jackass, has never had any identity since day one. Controlling all information and denying all information from day one of creating that blog. I guess that some how gives him more credibility when he uses my pictures on his blog, while having no identity whatsoever of his own. Not even a name, nothing. How sick is that?
.jpg)
And THIS is the best the allopathic side can do when it comes to cancer!!! Wake up!
Cancer the Forbidden Cures - Full Documentary
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YsOPzBHPsqM
The Rockefellers, The FDA & The Cancer Industry
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8UOo0F7KFbQ
Here is another inconvenient fact and bit of information you overlooked, Editor. Below, the known high cost of traditional cancer treatment. Hows that for having a high level of hypocrisy, as to your twisted claims?
The Cost of Traditional Cancer Treatment
Prescription drugs
The average cost of a 30 day cancer drug prescription was more than $1,600 in 2006 and it’s even higher today. Many cancer drugs cost much more than drugs for other illnesses. Some of the newer cancer treatments can cost as much as $10,000 for a month’s supply. Also, co-pays are often higher for these prescriptions than those for other types of treatment. When your doctor prescribes medicines or outpatient care, here are some questions you can ask:
Read more:
http://www.cancer.org/treatment/findingandpayingfortreatment/managinginsuranceissues/the-cost-of-cancer-treatment
How Much does Cancer Treatment Cost?
There are five items that will require a great cost in treating cancer and they are the hospital stay, travel, chemotherapy and radiation, surgery, and the follow up exam. The average cost for hospital stay is about 7,500 dollars for a four day stay. The travel depends on how far away you are from the hospital that treats your condition and if you can't walk due to the cancer you also may need to buy a wheelchair. For therapy it can cost up to 52,000 dollars just for the medication and for surgery it can cost up to 40,000 dollars, and just for the follow up which usually only takes about 20 minutes can be quite costly in itself.
http://answers.reference.com/wellness/conditions/how_much_does_cancer_treatment_cost
Cancer Treatment Expenses
http://www.ehow.com/about_5534025_cancer-treatment-expenses.html
Cancer's growing burden: the high cost of care
http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/health/story/health/story/2012-02-27/Cancers-growing-burden-the-high-cost-of-care/53271430/1
How much does cancer treatment actually cost? Average Annual Costs
http://costofcancer.wordpress.com/2011/03/11/average-annual-costs/
As a fact more than 1 million people are diagnosed with cancer each year in the US. I bet the profit factor would never have anything to do with never finding a real cure, nor in having adequate understanding of the real cause. How about its effect in never allowing advancement of a alternative cure that pharma and the cancer industry could not profit from??? I bet those 1 million diagnosis have nothing to do with a cheaper route of treatment, never becoming available. How evil is that? All for profit, control, and saving their careers. Instead of promoting and supporting that long as waited cure, instead they attack the person or people that promoted it, the effectively silencing all knowledge of its true viability. You see the evidence of that again, right here.
Medicine’s Big Mystery, What Does Treatment Cost?
The next time I see my oncologist, my main complaint will be not the side effects of my cancer treatments, though I have plenty of those, but the impossibility of finding out how much those treatments will cost before I have them.
In 2006, I was diagnosed with breast cancer. I was 29. The cancer was small and, in terms of surgery and immediate recovery, things went well.
But my five-year follow-up treatment has been an endless loop of side effects that generate their own costs and -- often just as stressful -- a dizzying accumulation of medical debt.
Repeatedly I have been stunned by bills I didn’t expect because no one -- not doctors, hospitals or insurance companies -- could tell me in advance how much their services would cost.
Read more:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-07-12/medicine-s-big-mystery-what-does-treatment-cost-mimi-ferraro.html
Prescription drugs
The average cost of a 30 day cancer drug prescription was more than $1,600 in 2006 and it’s even higher today. Many cancer drugs cost much more than drugs for other illnesses. Some of the newer cancer treatments can cost as much as $10,000 for a month’s supply. Also, co-pays are often higher for these prescriptions than those for other types of treatment. When your doctor prescribes medicines or outpatient care, here are some questions you can ask:
Read more:
http://www.cancer.org/treatment/findingandpayingfortreatment/managinginsuranceissues/the-cost-of-cancer-treatment
How Much does Cancer Treatment Cost?
There are five items that will require a great cost in treating cancer and they are the hospital stay, travel, chemotherapy and radiation, surgery, and the follow up exam. The average cost for hospital stay is about 7,500 dollars for a four day stay. The travel depends on how far away you are from the hospital that treats your condition and if you can't walk due to the cancer you also may need to buy a wheelchair. For therapy it can cost up to 52,000 dollars just for the medication and for surgery it can cost up to 40,000 dollars, and just for the follow up which usually only takes about 20 minutes can be quite costly in itself.
http://answers.reference.com/wellness/conditions/how_much_does_cancer_treatment_cost
Cancer Treatment Expenses
http://www.ehow.com/about_5534025_cancer-treatment-expenses.html
Cancer's growing burden: the high cost of care
http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/health/story/health/story/2012-02-27/Cancers-growing-burden-the-high-cost-of-care/53271430/1
How much does cancer treatment actually cost? Average Annual Costs
http://costofcancer.wordpress.com/2011/03/11/average-annual-costs/
As a fact more than 1 million people are diagnosed with cancer each year in the US. I bet the profit factor would never have anything to do with never finding a real cure, nor in having adequate understanding of the real cause. How about its effect in never allowing advancement of a alternative cure that pharma and the cancer industry could not profit from??? I bet those 1 million diagnosis have nothing to do with a cheaper route of treatment, never becoming available. How evil is that? All for profit, control, and saving their careers. Instead of promoting and supporting that long as waited cure, instead they attack the person or people that promoted it, the effectively silencing all knowledge of its true viability. You see the evidence of that again, right here.
Medicine’s Big Mystery, What Does Treatment Cost?
The next time I see my oncologist, my main complaint will be not the side effects of my cancer treatments, though I have plenty of those, but the impossibility of finding out how much those treatments will cost before I have them.
In 2006, I was diagnosed with breast cancer. I was 29. The cancer was small and, in terms of surgery and immediate recovery, things went well.
But my five-year follow-up treatment has been an endless loop of side effects that generate their own costs and -- often just as stressful -- a dizzying accumulation of medical debt.
Repeatedly I have been stunned by bills I didn’t expect because no one -- not doctors, hospitals or insurance companies -- could tell me in advance how much their services would cost.
Read more:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-07-12/medicine-s-big-mystery-what-does-treatment-cost-mimi-ferraro.html
Here's my picture alias no identity Costner, where's YOURS? This said chicken shit refuse to debate the actual facts blogging editor jackass, has never had any identity since day one. Controlling all information and denying all information from day one of creating that blog. I guess that some how gives him more credibility when he uses my pictures on his blog, while having no identity whatsoever of his own. Not even a name, nothing. How sick is that?
.jpg)
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program - Payout Data
Now since 1989, and as of Jan. 2013; over 2 trillion dollars have been paid out from this vaccine caused injury and death compensation fund. $2,550,640,666.73 is the current total figure paid out from this federal court system; which includes attorney fees, (paid out, win or lose the case). Since the first Vaccine Injury Compensation claims were made in 1989, 3,110 compensation payments have been made, $2,389,329,250.45 disbursed to petitioners and $94,604,103.72 paid to cover attorney’s fees and other legal costs.
To date, 9,785 claims have been dismissed. Of those, 3,982 claimants were paid $52,680,057.05 to cover attorney’s fees and other legal costs
Read more:
Court Awards $969,474.91 for MMR Vaccine Causing Boy’s
Autism, with Dr. Andrew Wakefield and Award-Winning Author David Kirby
Biomedical Treatment in Autism (ASD)
.jpg)
.jpg)
