Oh ya here we go again more bullshit from Costner, like he hasn't been shown the real truth as to Gardasil here on this blog before. Nothing is enough. Are you getting the idea yet that this guy is severally deranged and psychotic yet? He is in some very great fear of the truth being known. And what is it that he seems so infuriated and majorly obsessed with me and the truth I put forth? Wow, how sick is this ongoing garbage, it doesn't even deserve a response actually. Not to someone obviously that obviously sick. How MANY time do you need to throw all this information in front of Costner, and it ends up refusal to acknowledge it and more denial, denial, denial? Nothing would EVER be enough. There is to much to lose for someone.
And LOOK at this source he used. There is no origination source listed. They even bashed VAERS as being non credible as to anything at all. Amazing. They even termed it as a shonky system. Someone as always had to much to lose, in creation of THAT blog! http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/2011/is-the-hpv-vaccine-safe-v-2-0/
And by the way VAERS lists 69 Gardasil deaths in the US and 98 worldwide. 1 to 10% reporting factor, do the math! http://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html
Girls having seizures and crashing their cars happened in the clinical trials as well; thus the issue of why would anyone report a car accident as a Gardasil death, is answered? They knew.
Costner states: Quote: Therefore when I came across a visual image of the safety of the HPV vaccine I only thought it appropriate that I link to it from this blog. The image can be found on the Information is Beautiful website, and in case you are curious... they include all of their sources, data, and even their calculations to support the graphic itself. There are numerous scientific studies referenced, and you won't find a single part of the graphic which isn't supported be evidence nor will you find a piece of it based upon the opinion of a lone parent who "just knows" what the real truth is. Unquote
Well, lets look at what the American Medical Association had to say about the HPV vaccine; it looks quite obviously that it is bad, as even they are in doubt about the risks being worth any benefit.
Except: Whether a risk is worth taking depends not only on the absolute risk, but on the relationship between the potential risk and the potential benefit. If the potential benefits are substantial, most individuals would be willing to accept the risks. But the net benefit of the HPV vaccine to a woman is uncertain. Even if persistently infected with HPV, a woman most likely will not develop cancer if she is regularly screened.15 So rationally she should be willing to accept only a small risk of harmful effects from the vaccine.
When weighing evidence about risks and benefits, it is also appropriate to ask who takes the risk, and who gets the benefit. Patients and the public logically expect that only medical and scientific evidence is put on the balance. If other matters weigh in, such as profit for a company or financial or professional gains for physicians or groups of physicians, the balance is easily skewed. The balance will also tilt if the adverse events are not calculated correctly.
Now lets go to what these Gardasil victims had to say!
Wow, Costner, after All this you still believe that Gardasil and Cervarix are the best thing sick sliced bread? Like ALL vaccines nothing wrong with anything. The lying audacity of that claim earns your rightful spot in HELL dude. Nothing less would nor will be appropriate.
How about these girls here? They and their mothers, actually in many cases the parents, are all misguided and there is nothing wrong with Gardasil? You know it is approved for me and boys now, so I will be waiting for you on your blog to take the challenge of all three shots. You know with that over 600 mcg. of aluminum. You wouldn't understand real unbiased science if it hit you in the head Costner; nor care to! But how can you admit the horrors of anything when you refuse to accept anything but the to much to lose-biased information? I have and had studied this situation with Gardasil Costner a very long time, and yes it enrages me what they did and have done. If you can not comprehend and respect that, what is wrong with YOU? All you are doing is harassing and mocking the TRUTH, and you know it. Like I said, hell has allot of vacancies for people like you, I am quite sure!
The Truth About Gardasil, (an expose of the problem, and the girls adversely affected). Remember, Costner says there IS NO PROBLEM! He says the science the doctors have proves it. http://truthaboutgardasil.org/
Excerpted from his blog: Keep in mind Mr. Hubbs has never been too keen on supporting his viewpoints with hard science so rather than look at facts and figures he would much rather point you to random Internet testimonials about how some woman suffered some ill effects from the vaccine or how someone contracted a random condition soon after receiving the shots. He is also a big fan of sharing stories of parents who are "convinced" all of their daughter's medical problems are due to the Gardasil vaccine even if doctors, scientists, and evidence disagree. Apparently in the mind of a vaccine conspiracy theorist, the word of a parent is as good as a multi-year scientific study. Go figure.
So, WHERE is that science, alias no identity.... COSTNER??? You are a real and trusted scientific and academic scholar... aren't you? Wow.
How about these girls? All in their head? And in their parents head? And YOU said all the doctors have the science and the proof to know that Gardasil was never the cause of any of it! You LIED, again! Where is that scientific proof you repeatedly parade as fact? Those doctors are as brainwashed and lost as to fact as anything could ever be. The ones that do know are covering it up. They would rather bankrupt the parents looking for another answer unrelated to Gardasil than ever even file a report to VAERS, with is known only 1 to 10% reporting factor! Why? Because of physicians refusal to report any vaccine reaction or suspected death. Costner, your denial of all is flat out SICK! And YOU are quite - all to obviously ...sick! Any human being that puts saving face for the medical establishment, over the health and lives of these girls...is SICK! And for what; a vaccine with actually in all reality, no proven benefit?
Screw YOU Costner, and ALL your endless, endless LIES!What kind of a human being does that? Here below is something I posted on Ars Technica and I know you are familiar with that article. And I know you as well posted against me there. Just like you did on the Argus leader, and just as then and just like now, YOU lose! The truth is so obviously there. In fact that Argus insult to your ego prompted all of this, and your blog with the url falsely in my name. The problem is that you refuse to actually allow any rebuttal to your lies on that blog nor to publish anything as to a reply that goes against your lying agenda. In fact i was the person who suggested to you to do what you did and create another Gardasil blog page. I knew you would fall for it and look how stupid you look NOW! You see what I am talking about?
Every medical so called professional that as well put the truth out there unwilling to stand by and just watch the destruction, was branded as crazy and at times even corrupt as well. They must do that; they have to much to lose. I wear your insults like a badge of honor, and proudly shake them off at each turn in this road. And I will always and proudly remain ...unbowed. The number of people that have become the informed, is growing, and I will never stop attempting to get more people joined in those ranks; regardless of your liking that or not.
I want to MEET YOU face to face Costner! When are you going to be man enough to do that? Lets sit down and have a private conversation? I have some questions for you that I want you to answer, and that you may not want to answer. You can bring that nutty SugarDealer with you too; I want to see what actual complete, utter, and evil insanity looks like in a human being?
CERTIFIED LYING EVIL ....AND FOR PROFIT, CONTROLLING ALL THE INFORMATION, TO MUCH. ...Truth!
Alias no identity...Costner!
For profit! To much to lose! How can the truth ever be known, when they control ALL the information??? They have for the last 100 years. The money and the power.
"Come on Costner, we have ANOTHER blog page to create"! ("Oh, whats it gona be... THIS time"?) "Lets tell em AGAIN how good - all the pharma junk science is"!
As you get to know Mr. Hubbs you realize his medical and vaccine conspiracy theories are not only limited to autism or mercury or thimerosal, but rather to pretty much any vaccine ever developed. This includes the MMR vaccine, the polio vaccine (I'm working on a post related to his "sugar causes polio" nonsense), and of course the Gardisil vaccine.
In fact, for quite some time you could even say Gardisil was Mr. Hubbs' favorite topic, and he considers himself one of the world's foremost researchers on the subject. Granted 100% of what he knows has been obtained via Google searches and he has never set foot in an actual scientific research lab and has never taken a single college course on biochemistry (or any other college course for that matter) nor has he ever bothered to read the numerous medical studies which were performed on the vaccine prior to the FDA approval, but lets try to avoid those issues for now.
Maybe some of this information will clear up some your delusional thought processes as to their being no studies. It is pretty hard to refute when that information comes right from the FDA, and the VRBPAC preapproval meeting documents. Listen up!I could easily outline for you what is on that video and have before; however you can easily follow what is stated. Apparently you dont even know what is in those FDA statements and douments. Looks like the only one avoiding the issues, is you?
So although it doesn't surprise me that Mr. Hubbs would write about Gardisil, what does surprise me is that he makes claims which he himself has never been able to substantiate with science. Case in point is the following comment left on a Gardisil discussion by our very own Mr. Hubbs:
What is quite unbelievable for a person like you that claims to have knowledge of all that claimed to science as to vaccines and as well as to Gardasil, that you can never refer to any, nor post any of that?
I am sure you can and would have the ability to fill this implied consent [having informed the parent or patient of all the risks] form out for each and every vaccine as well? http://www.lowellsfacts.com/MD_Vaccine_Warranty.html
Here he finds a 2 year old posted article reply by me, somewhere on the internet.
"The fact is 90% of HPV infections clear on their own. This vaccination is unproven to how long immunity lasts, may be no more than 5 yrs at best. HPV is not proven to cause cervical cancer, only that HPV sometimes resides in precancerous cervical lesions. The theory that any virus causes cancer is also unproven and questioned by several medical reseachers. [sic]" ~
And goes on to respond:
So here we have Mr. Hubbs giving us facts about HPV as if he has first hand knowledge. Don't bother asking for a source to validate his statements however as Mr. Hubbs is likely to refer you to his own blog as evidence. The simple truth is HPV may clear on its own, but so can the mumps or measles or any number of other viruses. Meningitis could also clear on its own if you really want to get technical, but does that mean nobody should get vaccinated because the virus MIGHT clear on its own with no side effects?
How is mumps and measles even related to HPV? Measles and Mumps cause illness, and HPV is basically and essentially silent as well as mostly unknown for most women that have it. What kind of a refuse to comprehend anything and twisted rationalization is that? Why would you want to inject 225 mcg. of aluminum (amorphous aluminum hydroxyphosphate sulfate) totaling 675 mcg. in the three shots, as well as, sodium chloride, L-histidine, polysorbate 80, sodium borate, (roach killer), and water for injection.
However, if you can not understand how all those vaccine toxins can actually dysregulate and suppress immune function, then I can see you have absolutely no comprehension of physiological functions of the body, to begin with? Being that Gardasil is only known to produce titers for 2.5 to 5 years; a 9 year old girl may need up to 4 sets of 3 shots or 3 additional boosters by the time she is 25! If doing the series, (no-one knows), that is 12 Gardasil shots at 225 mcg. aluminum content each. That would end up being 2700 mcg. of aluminum - shot in the arm of a young woman! Then let's add all the other vaccines, and ingredients... they get? Few to no studies have been done combining vaccine ingredients, nor on the synergistic effect it may have.
Do Vaccines Disable The Immune System. (Good article).
Vaccines are destroying our immune systems. Amazingly, the medical profession ignores the incriminating evidence against vaccines, and continues to inflict more unnecessary and harmful vaccines on our nation's infants http://www.healthy.net/scr/article.aspx?Id=539
It probably doesn't matter to Mr. Hubbs that those with HPV could spread it to others just as those with measles or mumps could spread it to others. Mr. Hubbs doesn't seem to care about those who might contract a virus from another person however, he just wants to prevent anyone from ever being vaccinated. The fact that a virus could be passed from person to person and could eventually lead to one or more people being diagnosed with cancer, or in some cases that people could actually die as as direct result from a simple preventable virus just isn't that important to Mr. Hubbs.
I again refer you to the video by Mike Adams and also the information above, showing that real fact information about HPV and Gardasil. You have no proof that Gardasil will prevent anything. How can anyone trust an FDA that ignored the fact that Gardasil had a negetive, thats - 44.6% effect in reduction of precanerous indicators in those in the clinical trials vaccinated with Gardasil? The outcome of that should have been testing for existing HPV strains prior to use of the vaccine. Have they done that, the answer is no; even though one of the companies that makes that test equipment, clearly made issue with that to the FDA in 2006, while making application for specific approval of their equipment for that purpose. All of it went ignored.
How can you trust an FDA that ignored the fact that they seen in the trials an increase in Virulence of non targeted strains of HPV, due to use of Gardasil. Thats nature, always trying to beat what is attempting to beat it; and no differant with bacteria and antibiotics.
Of course his care for others doesn't stop there, and his comments continue:
Then he goes on to find another posted on by me article on the internet
"some Gardasil ingredients,[sic] polysorbate 80, (said to disperse the ingredients [sic] in the vaccine more uninformly [sic]), causes infertility [sic] in mice, and no research on that by Merck was done. The vaccine also contains L- histidine, also known to cause severe allergic reacions [sic], additionally the vaccine contains sodium borate, similar to Borax and has been used as roach killer, tell me why [sic] that is in the vaccine? Do the homework, stop first, research this on the net extensively like I have for weeks. The benefits [sic] do not outweigh the risks."
Do you think you have enough [sic's] in there ...bogus character name, no identity...Costner?
So, you went and googled my name and looked for anywhere I posted. Then you expected me in that post to also fill a full page with all the references OF proof. Do you mean, just like YOU, for the most part have failed to do, here? Ya, thats what I thought.
So according to Mr. Hubbs, the benefit of preventing a young girl or woman from contracting cervical cancer doesn't outweigh the risks of getting the vaccine. Granted he doesn't provide any facts or figures to show us why these risks are so significant, and he doesn't compare the number of doses given of the vaccine with no side effects versus the few claims of vaccine injury.
The figures of how many recieved the vaccine verses the number of significant adverse reactions, unrecovered from outcomes and death, have nothing to do with anything, when you are simply putting forth the potential risks in reference to those who have been harmed. To ignore that, is to essentialy claim that the collateral damage is at an acceptable level to ignore, and that is simply and clearly not the case. That is never an acceptable view, in regard to any vaccine nor pharmacuetical drug. You simply ignore the real risks and minimize it all based on falsified CDC and FDA claimed findings. To claim that there is no pattern found, and no connection is what they perpetually attempt to claim - for any vaccine or drug out there. The damage and death rates for pharmaceutical drugs sometimes have need to be in the 6 digit numbers before they will even consider doing anything. Vioxx for example. And as usual with the FDA, that has to be prompted by outside sources.
Be sure to review my response page 1 to that blog, as well.
In review, it is really worth all that... isn't it; when there is no proof that Gardasil even works! The CDc has touted high levels of near 100% protection, based on what; antibody titers? Antibody titers mean nothing, loosk at all the herd immunity and vaccine failures the CDc has failed to address when the largest problem was in the vaccinated. Fear mongering the parents that it was the unvaccinated that caused it. We all know most schools that had outbreaks actually had the numbers vaccinated to call it herd immunity; something as well that the term in itself has absolutely no basis in any actual vaccine science.
And when Merck attempted to mandate the vaccine for as young as all nine year old girls in every state, I bet there was allot of science backing that too? Working through women in gov't groups and falsely being told what a good deal it was, that was all false hooeey as well.
How as well can you do an honest clinical trial using as a placebo, one placebo containing the full amount of aluminum, and the other placebo contained the carrier solution?
So let's go ahead and do that for Mr. Hubbs since he seems incapable of doing so for himself. According to the CDC as of September 30, 2010, approximately 32 million doses of Gardasil have been distributed in the US. That is 32,000,000 doses and according to Mr. Hubbs, 32,000,000 chances that a risk would outweigh a benefit.
Incorrect: 32 million doses distributed does NOT mean there have been 32 million doses actually used by the public, that figure is seemingly quite unknown as to exact number, or as to even a guess. The actual doses used could be a fraction of that number, so really without the actual figure calculations are not going to be entirely accurate. As well we need to figure in the fact that VAERS is well known to have only a 1 to 10% reporting, due to doctos and other medical workers reluctance to ever report a suspected vaccine reaction, no matter how severe it is wrote off as another coincidence. Obviously your math here has as well entirely ignored that fact, and not figured that factor in!
So of these 32,000,000 doses, how many resulted in negative side effects or "risks"? Well, again according to the CDC as of September 30, 2010, there were 17,160 Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) reports of adverse events following Gardasil vaccination in the US. Of these reports, 92% were reports of events considered to be non-serious, and 8% were reports of events considered serious.
And if you believe any bullshit like that- claiming that only 8% of the total of adverse events were serious in nature, you clearly have not done enough research into the real life reality of Gardasil! It (that) is a complete whitewash of the truth, as always. Do you actually believe they would admit to anything, with any honesty? And as well if they were so in denial as to any common link to the death, they certainly would not be honest about the nature of the adverse events either.
There is as well a differant way of looking at it. Under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, over $2 billion has been awarded to children and adults for whom the risks of vaccine injury were 100%. We know as well that the NVCA is not a catch all and only a small percentage of total claims ever actually get settled. Actually, it an unfair system as to its limitations, just as well as it has an outright corrupt system of review.
As well, lets look at that 32 million figure again! The one you equate to doses actually used.
The United States 2000 Enumerated Census showed only 36,695,524 females in the age range of 10 to 29. It was offically reported as of Nov. 2008, that 10 to 20% have received at least one dose of Gardasil; averaging 15%. That number is 5,804,329, which based on that information at that time-recieved at least one dose of Gardasil.
October 23, 2008 Cervical Cancer Vaccine Called Safe
[In this information] The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Immunization Safety Office said a study of 370,000 doses given to girls and young women over the past two years found no evidence that the vaccine causes an increased risk of blood clots or other serious conditions, Bloomberg News reported.
So by that above article, here in 2008 the CDC number of estimated doses of Gardasil used, were 370,000, a long ways from 32 million!!! How's that figure, to you??? In other words they used up less than a million doses of Gardasil, from the first use in June 2006, to October 2008; but used 30 million additional doses between 2008 and 2010? Wow? Something smells a little rotten in Denmark as to your use of the CDC figures... there Costner? You better call the CDC and ask what the right number is, as to those actually vaccinated with Gardasil, and the total number of doses used??? Allot of young ladies never completed the shots, after getting sick from the first one or two
So, it doesn't seem that you could ever really get a precisely accurate count of just how many doses of Gardasil vaccine have actually been used. Unless there is a source, I haven't yet run across.
As to the numbers of adverse reactions; as said, you and the CDC have neglected to inform anyone that there is a well known only 1 to 10% reporting factor as to the VAERS system. So would that matter or make any differance to you? It should. 17160 adverse reactons then become with a 10% reporting factor x 10 and equal to over 171 thousand adverse reactions. 1373 serious reactions then become 13,730. 56 deaths then become 560 deaths. That is if the reporting is even as high as 10%. So what you have created here is just about flat out worthless as to the reality of Gardasil risk.
Gardasil Update: learn about the concerned womens group that took the Gardasil issue to the FDA. And what happened? It doesn't appear that much of anything resulted. The FDA can not admit to any major issue with any vaccine, as they know it will open the pandoras box questioning all vaccines. http://www.lowellsfacts.com/Gardasil_Update.html
The REAL truth!!! CDC Gardasil Risk Report Is A Cover-up
Excerpts:
This week the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) in association with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) issued a report on Gardasil vaccine safety that amounts to a cover-up of serious reactions, including paralysis and deaths, that have been reported to the government's Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS).
Today (October 24, 2008), the National Vaccine Information Center issued a press release that calls on the CDC and FDA to release to the public the study design, data and names of principal investigators involved in the report maintaining that Gardasil vaccine is safe with no serious side effects. NVIC will also be calling on the newly elected President and members of Congress to remove the nation's vaccine safety monitoring system from DHHS and place it in a separate entity reporting directly to Congress.
Conflicts of interest are rampant in a mass vaccination infrastructure that has the same people, who are regulating and promoting vaccines, also evaluating vaccine safety. This kind of conflict of interest cannot be tolerated.
October 26, 2008 Gardasil safety questioned, CDC urged to back up statement with data. National Vaccine Information Center Says Government Denies Gardasil Risks.
Excerpts:
The CDC and FDA are alleging that the vast majority - if not all - of the approximately 9,000 HPV vaccine adverse events, including (at that time) 27 deaths, reported to the federal Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) are not causally related to the Gardasil vaccine based on internal analysis, including review of medical records of girls and women vaccinated in HMO's participating in the federal Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) Project and other closed government operated databases.
"Transparency in government is essential to trust in government and replication is the hallmark of good science," said NVIC co-founder and president Barbara Loe Fisher. "Parents of young girls and women cut down in their prime - some of them paralyzed or dead within hours or days of getting Gardasil vaccine - deserve better answers than a whitewashing of this vaccine's very serious side effects. Until there is an independent confirmation of these unverified findings by individuals and companies without financial ties to the government or industry, it is not credible." http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/126924.php http://www.news-medical.net/news/2008/10/26/42159.aspx
So out of 17,160 events, approximately 92% (or 15,787 events) are non-serious. This includes things like pain at the injection site (common for any shot), dizziness, headache, fever, or fainting. Since these events are not serious and typically clear up on their own, lets disregard them for the sake of this discussion.
Do you mean, just like they disregarded all the endless number of seizures these girls had a short time after the shots, and as well even days and weeks later. As for some of the reported as Gardasil deaths to VAERS, and I wondered too, how a car accident death could be attributed to Gardasil. They had a seizure and crashed their cars, and someone knew it! It was oddly enough listed the same way in the clinical trials as well. And what did the FDA do? They only placed a new warning to have the woman lying down when injected and watch for them 15 minutes. Again, a total disconnect from the reality of the situation that was and is going on.
This leaves us with the 8% (or approximately 1,373 events) which are classified as serious. Of this 8%, some of these events include girls being diagnosed with Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS), although once again if we refer to the CDC source material we find "there has been no indication that Gardasil increases the rate of GBS in girls and women above the rate expected in the general population, whether or not they were vaccinated.
And, how much consideration was given to Gardasil being combined with other vaccines?
If you actually think Guillian-Barre Syndrome is the issue and the only major issue with Gardasil, you have been drinking the CDC Koolaid for far to long!
Again, do not forget that as to that VAERS reporting, that it is clearly well known that VAERS contains only reporting of 1 to 10% of the total reactions that should and could have been reported. Why? Because the brainwashed doctors refuse to report the reactions, no matter how severe; to include even death it is attributed to something else or no cause found. Look at those VAERS reports! The assumption is always that it couldn't have been the vaccine, and that it is all again a coincidence. When you read the endless real life accounts of this as to all the Gardasil unrecovered outcomes; doctors have repeatedly nearly bankrupted families, looking and testing for any cause - but Gardasil. Oh ya, now they have Cervarix too, with its new Apo4 adjuvant, proven equally if not more dangerous in its now known results. It was first approved in Europe and was held up here over the adjuvant they had no existing way nor set guideline in regard to safety. Just let your daughter be a guinea pig for pharma.
So what does that mean? Well it simply means the incidence of girls being diagnosed with GBS occurs in the same rate whether they were or were not vaccinated with Gardisil. Therefore scientifically speaking we cannot link the rate of GBS with the vaccination and the only reason these types of events are reported to VAERS is because the system is intended to collect all events whether related or not. Since there is no proven increase in the rate of GBS, it doesn't appear this is a significant risk.
Ok, ya right, keep believing that. Whatever the CDC states is correct and absolutely right!
Another serious event reported included blood clots. This isn't so much of an issue with Gardisil as it is with an injection itself of course, but as it turns out those girls and women who experienced blood clots were in the "at risk" category which includes those who smoke, those who take oral contraceptives, and those who are considered obese. Thus in this case, a number of factors may have contributed to the blood clots including lifestyle choice... so is this something we can blame solely upon the Gardisil vaccine? Not very likely.
Here is what even JAMA had to say about those blood clots.
Conclusions Most of the AEFI rates were not greater than the background rates compared with other vaccines, but there was disproportional reporting of syncope and venous thromboembolic events. The significance of these findings must be tempered with the limitations (possible underreporting) of a passive reporting system.
If they were at risk in using birth control pills at the time they were given Gardasil, then why did the FDA not require Merck to study that prior to approval of the vaccine? There no warnings on that, any more than that Gardasil could cause a -44.6% increased chance of cervical cancer, if you already had an existing targeted strain. it is right in the FDA approval douments. As condition of approval Merck was to study it further and report back. Try and find anything in the FDA douments on that outcome? It doesn't exist.
An example of this would be building a home. The foundation is designed to support a single family home with one story above ground, and assuming the house is build as designed everything will be fine. However decades later, the new owner of the house decides he needs more room, so he adds another two stories to the house. He doesn't bother to reinforce the foundation, and assumes everything will be fine. He finishes the project and decides to put a new hot tub on the third floor which holds 1,000 gallons of water. A few weeks after living in the new expanded house it starts to settle. A few weeks after that the foundation develops a huge crack on one wall, and soon the foundation fails and the house falls down bringing the hot tub and the 1,000 gallons of water into the basement
Kind of like the house of Merck should have cracked and fallen, after the Vioxx and Gardasil scandles?
So is the hot tub to blame for the foundation failing? Obviously not - because there was a known weak point in the home. Had the foundation been strong enough to accept a larger structure, there wouldn't be a problem, but we don't blame the failure on the hot tub merely because we didn't know about the weak foundation.
The same is true with a case where a vaccine or medication might result in a condition which was underlying. Even if we didn't know about the condition, is it the fault of the vaccine if it comes to the surface? If we did know about the condition, but didn't think it would impact us, is it still fair to blame the vaccine if we are proven wrong? I dare say there is inherent risk in everything we do, but we can no more blame the vaccine for an underlying condition when we knew about the risk factors than we can blame the hot tub for the failing foundation when the builder knew about the weak foundation.
Translation: Even if it was the Gardasil, that way they can always blame it on something else, and claim there was never any common link found; no matter what. Must of been another coincidence.
All of this said, the one primary serious event that everyone is concerned with is the risk of death, so if it is determined that Gardisil results in girls dying simply by taking the vaccine, then surely it needs to be addressed. Looking at the CDC material, we can see that out of those 32,000,000 doses of Gardisil that have been given thus far, there have been 56 deaths reported among females who have received the Gardisil vaccination.
32 million doses given??? Again, read what I just put further up on this page for information! Are you that cognitively inept that you believe 32 million distributed doses just positively has to equal 32 million doses used? That when there were only slightly over 36 million women age 10 to 29, in the 2000 census? Like noone heard all the bad stuff about Gardasil and refused their daughter to take it. It is not like it is a huge secret.
Anything you can find as always, to distort and twist the truth.
Now if we assume every woman receives the full recommended three dose schedule of the vaccine, that tells us that 10,700,000 woman have received Gardisil thus far, and of those 10,700,000 woman 56 have died. I don't mean to trivialize 56 deaths. In fact I don't even mean to trivialize one single death, but the math tells us these 56 deaths account for approximately 0.0005% of the women who received the Gardisil vaccination. In other words the remaining 99.9995% of women are still alive and with us.
Oh, you are so feeling, what a nice guy?
It looks like you again clearly...ARE... trivializing allot of issues here! No proof..ever!
More importantly however, according to the CDC out of these 56 deaths (which of only 30 have been confirmed thus far), there was "no unusual pattern or clustering to the deaths that would suggest that they were caused by the vaccine". This means that if a woman died of a totally unrelated heart issue within days or perhaps even weeks of receiving the Gardisil vaccine, that event would be reported to VAERS. It doesn't mean Gardisil caused the issue, but to err on the side of caution, all such events are reported.
Confirmed? You mean they might not be dead?
However since the analysis of these deaths does not include any pattern or clustering when compared to non-vaccinated control groups, no reasonable researcher or scientist (or even anyone with an open mind) can claim that these deaths are all related to the Gardisil vaccine itself. In fact if you read about the actual deaths in greater detail, you will find in some cases the deaths were directly attributed to causes such as illicit drug use and heart failure. Can we really blame a death upon a vaccination when the women decides to inject herself with illegal drugs and dies of an overdose? I personally don't think so.
Now it is quite possible a woman out there has died or been seriously injured as a direct result of the vaccine. Each person is unique, we all have different genetic traits including dominant and recessive genes. We each have different risk factors, different traits such as allergies or reactions to chemical compounds, and we each have our own medical histories which may include other prescription drugs, over-the-counter medications, supplements, nutrient intakes etc, etc. Therefore no medication, supplement, or even food is compatible with all humans, and as such there will always be a risk when someone decides to eat a new food, take a new supplement, use a new brand of toothpaste, or yes even take a new medication or vaccination.
You can not possibly be that ignorant? Eating sandwiches is sure scarey stuff? Considering that, I think I will definately stay with my old brand of toothpaste? Holy buckets. Any harm that comes from pharma, is due to bad and faulty genetics? "We done nothin"!
Obviously anything and everything we do has risk, and it is up to each individual to determine if they feel that risk is acceptable when compared to the benefits of eating the food, swallowing the supplement or vitamin, taking the medication, receiving the vaccine, or undergoing a medical procedure etc. I don't believe that is my place to tell someone else that they must get vaccinated, but at the same time I don't believe it is in Mr. Hubbs' place to tell them they can't. It is a personal decision best left up to the individual when they take all of the risk factors into mind.
Noone said they can't do... anything! Like I marched around to every clinic in town and told them all, no, don't get that Gardasil. Informed decisions is all it was and all it ever will be about. You know the kind you advocated as well but failed to give them the complete information? Decisions made with as well, the non biased information. According to you nothing is biased in the pharmaceutical world, and there is no control of any important information, so you falsely believe people such as me are not needed, nor anyone else out there but pharma the CDC and FDA. You have all the science...remember?
However it seems clear in this case, the risk of receiving a Gardisil vaccination is no greater than the risk of choosing to eat a sandwich for lunch or the decision to take aspirin to relieve a headache. For all of the screaming and yelling and arguments made against this vaccine really don't live up to scrutiny when you look at the facts and examine the real numbers.
Does a sandwich have any aluminum and/or sodium borate in it? Do you think there is any difference in eating polysorbate 80, and injecting it? How about L- histidine? They thought they didn't need to study it before they thought of injecting it in a vaccine, as it is an amino acid already found in the body. What they didn't realize was that injecting it can throw off the natural balance of histidine that exists. Mixed with polysorbate 80 that also causes infertility in mice, wellaa, you get the article published, Polysorbate 80 and histidine a marriage of disaster. But surely you have never read that.
Why then don't you just inject a sandwich, for lunch; to fit your logic? I think Sanfords doing a diabetes study on that? And just like the thimersol issue, you equate eating a substance like tuna, with injecting thimerosal, and as essentially the same thing. You are now as author of that blog, a genuine top notch physiological health scholar! We can all now clearly see that.
Oh, and you have someone else that feels the same way...congratulations!
I will debate you publicly any place you choose, and we will videotape it and upload it to youtube, that should be good for a laugh? What did you say your health care credentials... were? Oh thats right, you don't have any identity.
You should have known better than to screw with that!
This is what they have done, no presumed collaterol damage is enough, they falsely claim there is no link found; that when the link to the disabilites and the deaths is all to clear. Nothing is ever enough. And you have the audacity to have recreated the blog linked to above praising Gardasil as safe and effective. Yet you provided no real proof of that!
First, I would like to address this little gem of a quote from that blog.
As you get to know Mr. Hubbs you realize his medical and vaccine conspiracy theories are not only limited to autism or mercury or thimerosal, but rather to pretty much any vaccine ever developed. This includes the MMR vaccine, the polio vaccine (I'm working on a post related to his "sugar causes polio" nonsense), and of course the Gardisil vaccine.
Apparently Costner never noticed that his little said and expected expose of ignornace has already been blown out of the water and addressed for the real fact content it contains, no matter how he again as ususal intends to misrepresent the real facts. He will do that again - bordering along the lines of outright slander, just watch for it.
The real information and your reply to that said claim, already exists right here, enjoy ...fool!
It matters not what these people have been shown, they just come back time and again making the same false claims on it all. Why? Because they can not refute it in any way, they must attack it from a lying and in denial angle that only Lucifer himself could do a better job of that lying. Oh, they said Coke causes polio, and sugar causes polio, all the while ignoring their own complete ignornace as the facts, and even the historical facts that were put forth.
Here again, it fits directly or indirectly depending on how you see it, with this statement.
The pharmaceutical and organized medicine cartels – must deny it. The philosophy is “if they cannot deny the message, then they will discredit the messenger.”
As to this expose on Gardasil, Costner states that if you asked me for the evidence of the Gardasil harm, I would refer you to my website. As if he is so arrogant that he is the final judge and jury as to what is accpetable for any and all people to consider for information. You see he hates that website, because he knows what is there. He even endlesslly search it for any dirt he could find. He didn't find much, but steam rolled it into a big whoop..ty do of shit that even Quackwatch wouldn't have stooped to....
There is actually an endless amount of research and study I have done into Gardasil, and much but not all IS on that website he fears. http://www.lowellsfacts.com/ Gardasil
I will be adding more to this blog as I get time but let me start you out with this video.
This is one of the girls that he claims had a preexisting condition and that Gardasil was not to blame. Remember another aspect to VAERS he forgot to mention. It is well known that VAERS only covers about one to 10% of the reactions that are reported. Looks like Costner need to go back and redo his math.
As well, the number of doses distributed do not equal the number of doses used. Do you actually have that figure?
These below video statements can be verified through the review of FDA VRBPAC pre-approval document. Listen closely. There is much more reference material that can verify that as well.
Truth About Gardasil. Look! (Do you want to risk that for your daughter, after what you just heard in the above video)? Over 600mcg. of aluminum in the 3 shots. http://truthaboutgardasil.org/
Ashley Ryburn's life ruined by HPV (Gardasil) vaccine.
Ashley-Gardasil Vaccine Injury; Ashley visits a chiropractor and finds real help. Neuro Cleanse is a Maximized Living Chiropractic product; "oh ya Costner, chiropractic is only for sore backs and is probably the placebo affect of touch, no better than physical therapy the main stream can provide"; you know, like you said.
Listen to this below video about the initial Merck attempt to mandate Gardasil for school attendance in every state; that for as youung as 9 year old girls. The only way that ended is when the FDA told them they should back off as the vaccine was not yet proven).
Gardasil Update: learn about the concerned womens group that took the Gardasil issue to the FDA. And what happened? As always, doesn't appear to be that anything resulted. The FDA can not admit to any major issue with any vaccine, as it will may open the pandoras box questioning all vaccines.
(Gardasil costs $360 for a three-shot series and often more than $500 when office visits are added in. Mercks Gardasil take has been estimated at 4 billion per year, no wonder they wanted to mandate it).
Don't forget that reporting factor of 1 to 10% and to do the math! If the reporting factor was at 10%, that is 197,000 adverse reaction. 81 deaths is equal to 810 actual deaths. Now try 5%, 1640. Do not even think nor attempt to claim they were all unrelated, and falsely reported. Does the public have the right to know this? Not, in Costners world. And he will find any other lame excuse he can find, even if he has to fabricate lies and half truths. Lying by omission is still lying.
All were athletic, indicating testosterone, just as in the higher increase of autism in boys,there is a connection. Gardasil is targeting high achieving females with high GPA scores, now is THAT a little unsettling? In fact this largely appears to be in fact true; when you review the cases of disability and as well the deaths. Listen to the below video.
Katy Perry - Teenage Dream (This is the dream they should and could be be living; not the shit that Gardasil gave them. And what about the fertility issues, and that polysorbate 80 and borax in the shot, like over 600 mcg of aluminium wasn't enough? Be sure to read all of Cynthia Janaks articles, the site listing is above. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98WtmW-lfeE
Aluminum in the human blood body and blood stream causes blood sludging. If they can use it in water treatment plants to get contaminats to settle to the bottom, what the hell are they using it in vaccines for? Even 3rd grade science teacher could get most of the students to understand, that much? Oh ya but they ARE working on other oil based adjuvants, etc., that they have no idea how that may change human DNA and the genetic code. The result ending up worse than the use of aluminum.
Iscehmia Hypoxia; Guess who else put that forward? Dr. Andrew Moulden. Oh and who knows what happened to him since? I think I have a pretty good idea of what happened. 5000 picture images.
1. When it is known that 80 to 90% of the HPV clears up on its own without causing any significant health problems. 2. That only happens when the immune system works right and is strong; why would you want to slam three toxic vaccines into the body causing immune sytem dysregualtion and suppression? 3. The only cases that are ongoing and that persist, are in a person with a compromised immune system.
Do Vaccines Disable The Immune System. (Good article).
Vaccines are destroying our immune systems. Amazingly, the medical profession ignores the incriminating evidence against vaccines, and continues to inflict more unnecessary and harmful vaccines on our nation's infants
And if birth control pills were contraindicated in use of Gardasil, why did no doctor know that? Because Merck didn't care, it might reduce their sales to have investigated the blood clot risk. It happened as well, without any birth control pills having been used. Just like they knew as evidenced in the VRBPAC document, that any subject with existing HPV of the targeted strain was at 44.6% increased risk of developing cervical cancer. What did they do? They approved it anyway, with the stipulation that Merck study it further and report back on a specific date. What was the result? Noone knows, it is all hidden. So why did they not test for existing strains of HPV, prior to injecting this poison 3 times? It would draw attention to the problem; you can not have that. Merck had to recoup its Vioxx loses! And the CDC claims they find no clustering of similar problems, which is what VAERS is designed to find? FDA, same garbage, we find no link, and they never will. The link is obvious.
And in the linked to blog, it was stated the need for parents to be allowed to make their own decisions, right? Well, how can they make proper decisions on vaccines unless they know the whole truth, when the CDC nor FDA have provided that? Why do you think I do what I do? Don't you just love his honesty (dishonesty, and trying to keep the sheeple mislead, on every level)?
One day you will get it and admit it, but the fires of hell will be all around you, and it will be to late then!
Keep messing with me, I have made a fool out of you every time; and only your lying delusions have kept you from admitting it. You want to mock me, like you stated? You mock every infant, child, teen, or adult that has been damaged or died by the hand of vaccines, right along with it.
